Business
EPF Withdrawal Rule Changes 2025: Here’s What EPFO 3.0 Means For You, Know Key Updates
Last Updated:
EPFO 3.0 allows instant 75% withdrawal for unemployed, 12-month service for partial withdrawals, and more withdrawals for education and marriage.
PF Withdrawal Rules.
EPFO 3.0 Updates 2025 Latest News: The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) has introduced new partial withdrawal rules under the upgraded EPFO 3.0 system, bringing more uniformity and flexibility for subscribers. The decision to amend the scheme was taken by the apex decision-making body of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), the Central Board of Trustees headed by Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya, in a meeting held on October 13.
Here’s a detailed look at what’s new:
1. Continuous Unemployment
Under the previous rules, members could withdraw 75% of their EPF balance after one month of unemployment and the remaining 25% after two months.
Now, under EPFO 3.0, members can withdraw 75% of their balance immediately, while the full withdrawal can be made after 12 months of continuous unemployment.
2. Pension Withdrawal After Job Loss
Earlier, pension withdrawal was allowed after two months of unemployment. Under the new rules, the waiting period has been extended. Members can now withdraw their pension amount only after 36 months.
3. Lockout or Closure of Establishment
Previously, withdrawals in case of a lockout or closure were limited to not exceeding the employee’s share or up to 100% of the total share.
Now, 75% of the EPF corpus can be withdrawn, while 25% must be retained as a minimum balance.
4. Epidemic or Pandemic
Earlier, members could withdraw up to three months’ basic wages and dearness allowance (BW + DA) or 75% of their balance, whichever was lower. The new rules maintain similar conditions but align them with the new standardised service requirements.
5. Natural Calamity
Previously, withdrawals were capped at Rs 5,000 or 50% of the member’s own contribution with interest, whichever was less. Under the new framework, minimum service tenure for all partial withdrawals, including this category, is standardised to 12 months.
6. Medical Treatment (Self or Family)
Earlier, members could withdraw up to six months’ BW and DA or the employee’s share, whichever was less, and this could be done more than once. The new rules retain this structure but fall under the uniform 12-month service condition.
7. Education and Marriage
Under the old rules, EPF subscribers could withdraw up to 50% of their contribution after seven years of membership. Withdrawals were permitted three times (for education) and two times (for marriage) during their service.
Under EPFO 3.0, the frequency limit has been increased. Education withdrawals allowed up to 10 times, and marriage-related withdrawals up to 5 times during service.
8. Purchase or Construction of House / Purchase of Site
Earlier, this was allowed after 24-36 months of service, up to the total of BW + DA or the cost of construction, whichever was less, and only once.
Now, with the new standardised rule, a minimum of 12 months of service is required for all partial withdrawals.
9. Addition/ Alteration/ Improvement in House
Previously, members could withdraw up to 12 months’ BW and DA or their employee’s share, whichever was less. The same conditions continue under the new uniform system.
10. Housing Loan Repayment
Earlier, members could withdraw up to 36 months’ BW + DA or total balance or outstanding loan, whichever was less, once during their service. The new EPFO 3.0 system retains the same criteria but simplifies the process for digital requests.
11. Purchase of Dwelling House or Flat
Earlier, up to 90% of the total share with interest or cost of acquisition could be withdrawn once. The same conditions remain, with digital processing expected to make transactions smoother.
Key Highlights of EPFO 3.0 Withdrawal Framework
Uniform Service Tenure: The minimum service requirement for all partial withdrawals has now been standardised to 12 months, replacing the earlier range of 2–7 years, depending on the purpose.
Minimum Balance Rule: Members must now retain at least 25% of their EPF corpus after withdrawal.
Frequency Flexibility: The frequency for withdrawals related to education and marriage has been increased, giving members more flexibility during important life stages.
Instant Withdrawal Facility: Under the new system, members facing unemployment can access 75% of their balance immediately, providing crucial liquidity during job loss.

Haris is Deputy News Editor (Business) at news18.com. He writes on various issues related to personal finance, markets, economy and companies. Having over a decade of experience in financial journalism, Haris h…Read More
Haris is Deputy News Editor (Business) at news18.com. He writes on various issues related to personal finance, markets, economy and companies. Having over a decade of experience in financial journalism, Haris h… Read More
October 20, 2025, 12:44 IST
Read More
Business
EU–Mercosur trade pact: Parliament sends deal to EU court, farmers celebrate while exporters flag risks – The Times of India
The European Parliament has voted to refer the recently signed EU-Mercosur free trade agreement to the bloc’s top court, pushing the long-negotiated pact into legal uncertainty just days after it was sealed, according to an AFP report.Lawmakers in Strasbourg voted 334 to 324 in favour of asking the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to examine whether the agreement complies with EU rules. The move follows the signing of the deal on Saturday with Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, aimed at creating one of the world’s largest free trade areas.
The decision was greeted with celebration by farming groups, particularly from France, which has led opposition to the pact over concerns about agricultural imports. Hundreds of farmers gathered with tractors outside the European Parliament ahead of the vote and cheered as the result was announced.“We’ve been on this for months and months, for years,” Quentin Le Guillous, head of a French young farmers’ group, told AFP. “Tonight, I’m going home, I’m going to kiss everyone, and I’m going to tell my kids, ‘I got it, we got it, we can be proud.’”The court referral deals a setback to the European Commission, which negotiated and champions the agreement. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had earlier described the pact as a “historic deal,” especially at a time when countries are seeking new trade partners amid tariff threats from the US administration.The Commission said it “regrets” the parliament’s decision. Trade spokesman Olof Gill said the questions raised by lawmakers were “not justified,” arguing that the Commission had already addressed concerns in detail.At the heart of the legal challenge is whether the agreement can be partially applied before full ratification by all EU member states, and whether it improperly limits EU powers on environmental and food-safety standards.The decision also drew criticism from industry. Hildegard Mueller, head of Germany’s auto industry group VDA, said the vote sent a “devastating sign” and risked alienating Mercosur partners at a time of heightened geopolitical uncertainty.Germany, Spain and Nordic countries back the deal, viewing it as a way to boost exports amid competition from China. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said after the vote: “We are convinced of the legality of the agreement. No more delays. The agreement must now be provisionally applied.”However, France, Poland, Austria, Ireland and Hungary remain opposed, citing risks to domestic agriculture. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said, “The fight continues to protect our agriculture and guarantee our food sovereignty.”The EU-Mercosur deal would ease tariffs on more than 90 per cent of bilateral trade, favouring European exports such as cars, wine and cheese, while opening EU markets further to South American beef, poultry, sugar and soy.Together, the EU and Mercosur account for around 30 per cent of global GDP and more than 700 million consumers.
Business
Forget Budget Homes! Luxury Housing Sales Reach 4-Year High As Indians Opt For High-End Flats
Last Updated:
Luxury homes made up 27% of Indian residential sales in 2025, with high demand in Mumbai, Delhi-NCR, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad
The report noted that around 62,500 homes were sold during the October–December 2025 quarter
The residential real estate market is undergoing a decisive shift, with luxury housing emerging as the dominant growth driver and redefining buyer preferences across the country. Once led by demand for compact and affordable homes, the market has now firmly entered what industry observers describe as a “luxury era”, where larger homes, premium locations and lifestyle-driven amenities have become central to purchasing decisions.
The year 2025 has proved to be a watershed moment for this transformation. According to the India Market Monitor Q4 2025 report, luxury homes accounted for nearly 27% of total residential sales during the year, bringing the segment within striking distance of one-third of all housing transactions. For the first time, sales of premium and luxury homes outpaced those in the mid-income and affordable categories.
The scale of the shift is striking. In 2022, premium and luxury homes made up just about 12% of total residential sales. In a span of four years, that share has more than doubled, signalling a rapid change in the aspirations and spending power of Indian homebuyers.
Industry experts attribute this surge to a combination of economic and demographic factors. Sustained salary growth in the corporate sector, the expansion of the startup ecosystem, rising entrepreneurial incomes and strong participation from non-resident Indian (NRI) investors have significantly boosted purchasing capacity at the top end of the market.
“Today’s crore-plus homebuyers are looking well beyond basic shelter,” said Yash Miglani, Managing Director of Migson Group, “They want larger homes in prime locations, global-standard amenities and a sense of exclusivity. Features such as clubhouses, swimming pools, landscaped green spaces, smart home technology and sustainable design are no longer add-ons, they are expectations.”
Developers, too, are recalibrating their strategies in response. Many are increasingly prioritising high-end and super luxury projects, particularly in markets where demand has shown resilience even during periods of economic uncertainty.
The definition of luxury, however, continues to vary across cities. In Mumbai and the Delhi-NCR region, homes priced between Rs 1.5 crore-Rs 3 crore are typically classified as premium. In Bengaluru and Hyderabad, the range is narrower, between Rs 1.5 crore-Rs 2.5 crore. At the same time, cities such as Pune, Chennai and Kolkata are witnessing rising demand for homes priced above Rs 1.25 crore, underscoring that luxury housing is no longer confined to a handful of metros.
Harvinder, Chairman of Sikka Group, said strong demand in NCR, Mumbai and Bengaluru reflects the underlying strength of the housing market. “Infrastructure upgrades, improved connectivity and sustained corporate expansion have pushed high-end residential projects to a new level,” he said, adding that the premium and luxury segment is likely to maintain steady growth over the next five to seven years.
The momentum is even more pronounced at the very top of the market. The super luxury segment recorded a sharp rise in 2025, with demand increasing by nearly 70% over the year. Growth during the October–December quarter alone exceeded 60 per cent, pointing to heightened interest from ultra-high-net-worth individuals, who increasingly view real estate as a stable and secure asset class.
“Buyer attitudes have changed fundamentally,” said Amit Modi, Director of County Group, “There is a clear preference for larger, better-planned homes with superior amenities, especially in metro and tier-1 cities. Real estate is no longer seen merely as a necessity, it has become a status symbol and a long-term investment.”
The report noted that around 62,500 homes were sold during the October–December 2025 quarter, while approximately 60,000 new units were launched in the same period. Mumbai, Pune, Delhi-NCR and Hyderabad accounted for the bulk of the transactions, indicating a healthy equilibrium between demand and supply.
For developers, the shift marks a critical inflection point. Success today depends on far more than pricing, said Kushagra Ansal, Director of Ansal Housing, adding, “Design excellence, location, sustainability and reliability of delivery are now decisive factors. The growing appetite for luxury and super luxury homes shows that the market has matured and become quality-driven.”
January 21, 2026, 18:44 IST
Read More
Business
Next buys shoe brand Russell & Bromley but 400 jobs still at risk
High street fashion giant Next has bought shoe retailer Russell & Bromley which had collapsed in to administration.
Next paid £2.5m in a rescue deal for the upmarket British footwear and accessories seller — but the future for most of the chain’s current staff and shops remains uncertain
Next will own the brand and three of Russell & Bromley’s 36 stores, as well as some existing stock for which it is paying an additional £1.3m.
Administrators Interpath said it was considering the future of the remaining stores, which for the moment remain open, as well as nine concession stores which all employ around 400 people.
Russell & Bromley’s chief executive Andrew Bromley said it was a “difficult decision” but the sale of the brand was the best way to secure its future.
The company is around 150 years old but has become the latest to struggle in a tough retail environment.
It joins other brands in a familiar path to largely disappearing off the high street via a process of administration, which means companies are often broken up and the highest value assets sold off to the highest bidder.
The Original Factory Shop and accessories retailer Claire’s are both currently going through a process of administration, with site closures and jobs at risk. Around 1,000 people lost their jobs after Bodycare collapsed in September, while River Island will close some stores to avoid a total collapse. The woes all come after a tranche of high profile closures such as Debenhams and Wilko.
In a statement, Next said it secured “the future of a much loved British footwear brand.”
“Next intends to build on this legacy and provide the operational stability and expertise to support Russell & Bromley’s next chapter, allowing it to return to its core mission: the design and curation of world-class, premium footwear and accessories for many years to come.”
The three stores Next will acquire are in high-end shopping destinations in or around London: Chelsea, Mayfair and Kent.
Next has seen relatively solid performance in the current turbulent retail landscape – unlike Russell & Bromley which has been loss-making in recent years.
Its saviour has experience in failing circumstances: last year, Next bought out of administration fashion maternity label Seraphine, and began rolling out its FatFace concessions a few years after snapping it up.
-
Tech1 week agoNew Proposed Legislation Would Let Self-Driving Cars Operate in New York State
-
Entertainment1 week agoX (formerly Twitter) recovers after brief global outage affects thousands
-
Sports6 days agoPak-Australia T20 series tickets sale to begin tomorrow – SUCH TV
-
Politics4 days agoSaudi King Salman leaves hospital after medical tests
-
Business5 days agoTrump’s proposed ban on buying single-family homes introduces uncertainty for family offices
-
Tech6 days agoMeta’s Layoffs Leave Supernatural Fitness Users in Mourning
-
Fashion4 days agoBangladesh, Nepal agree to fast-track proposed PTA
-
Tech7 days agoTwo Thinking Machines Lab Cofounders Are Leaving to Rejoin OpenAI
