Connect with us

Business

Gatwick airport second runway approved by transport secretary

Published

on

Gatwick airport second runway approved by transport secretary


Katy AustinTransport correspondent and

Jamie WhiteheadBBC News

PA Media Four aeroplanes line up for take off at London Gatwick Airport. In the foreground, seven sheep stand around on a bank of grass. PA Media

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has approved plans for a second runway at London Gatwick Airport, as the government looks for economic growth opportunities.

The £2.2bn privately-financed project involves in effect moving the current Northern Runway 12 metres to bring it into regular use, as well as other developments, including extending the size of terminals.

The airport says its plans will bring jobs and boost the local economy. But there has long been opposition from campaigners and groups worried about the impact on the surrounding area.

Gatwick currently handles about 280,000 flights a year. It says the plan would enable that number to rise to around 389,000 by the late 2030s.

A government source has described the plans as a “no-brainer for growth,” adding that “it is possible that planes could be taking off from a new full runway at Gatwick before the next general election.”

London Gatwick, in West Sussex, is currently Europe’s busiest single-runway airport with more than 40 million passengers using it every year.

The plans approved by Ms Alexander would include adding 40,000 more flights before the second runway opens, and 70,000 more – almost 190 a day – once it is fully up and running.

The airport says that passenger numbers could rise to up to 80 million.

Currently, the Northern Runway is currently only used for taxiing or as a back up.

The second runway would be used for short haul flights, with capacity also freed up for more long-haul services from the main runway.

Map showing new position of northern runway and the new buildings proposed as part of the Gatwick development

The decision to approve the expansion plan had been expected in February, but at the time, the transport secretary only said she was “minded to grant consent” for the Northern Runway planning application.

It emerged planning inspectors had expressed concerns over the effect the proposals would have on several aspects on the area surrounding the airport, including traffic and noise.

In April, Gatwick Airport agreed to stricter noise controls, an enhanced insulation scheme for nearby residents, and having 54% of air passengers using public transport before the Northern Runway opened.

To achieve this target, the airport said, third parties – including the Department for Transport – would need to “support delivery of the necessary conditions and improvements required to meet this target,” giving the example of reinstating the full Gatwick Express rail service.

Before the Covid-19 pandemic, the Gatwick Express ran a service of four trains per hour non-stop between the airport and London Victoria, this was reduced to two trains per hour from 2022.

Gatwick Airport also proposed a cars-on-the-road limit if the 54% target could not be met before the first use of the Northern Runway to address possible road congestion concerns.

It added that if neither the target nor the cars-on-the road limit could be met, the runway plans would be delayed until the required £350m of road improvements had been completed.

“This would make sure any additional road traffic flows can be accommodated and any congestion avoided,” the airport said.

“This government has taken unprecedented steps to get this done, navigating a needlessly complex planning system, which our reforms will simplify in future,” the government source said.

“Any airport expansion must be delivered in line with our legally binding climate change commitments and meet strict environmental requirements.”

Chris Curtis, who chairs the Labour Party’s growth group, welcomed the approval but said “radical planning reform” was needed to enable future projects to be completed more swiftly.

Shadow transport secretary Richard Holden welcomed the decision as “a vital step towards driving economic growth”.

But he said approval should have been made months ago and accused Labour of creating “uncertainty for businesses and local communities”.

But there is strong opposition to any expansion, particularly from climate campaigners.

Green Party leader Zack Polanski said approval of the expansion plan was a “disaster for the climate crisis”.

Hannah Lawrence, spokesperson for Stay Grounded, said “We need an immediate end to airport expansion and money put into improving sustainable transport such as trains.”

In February, Greenpeace UK policy director Douglas Parr said the extension would not drive economic growth. “The only thing it’s set to boost is air pollution, noise, and climate emissions,” he added.

Alex Chapman, senior economist at left-of-centre think tank New Economics Foundation, also argued the move would not create new jobs, but would just shift them from other parts of the country.

“People are already perfectly able to catch cheap flights on holiday or travel for business,” he added.

Unite the Union general secretary Sharon Graham backed Gatwick having a second runway, but warned it would need “to come with guarantees of well paid, unionised jobs and proper facilities for workers”.

Sally Pavey standing at her back door with her garden in the background.

Sally Pavey, chair of Communities Against Gatwick Noise Emissions (CAGNE), said she was worried about “uncontrollable noise, ramifications on the roads, decline in air quality… and climate change”.

“We can’t keep ignoring climate change and it would be wrong to allow a new ‘bucket and spade’ runway, as we put it, at the expense of residents and the economy,” she said.

The group would take legal action through a judicial review if the expansion goes ahead, she added.

Gatwick’s is the latest in a string of airport expansion approvals, most recently Luton’s in June.

The government has also expressed support for a third runway at the country’s biggest airport, Heathrow, but that would be a much more complex, costly and controversial project.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

New GST Rates List Live Updates: GST 2.0 Comes Into Effect Today

Published

on

New GST Rates List Live Updates: GST 2.0 Comes Into Effect Today


New GST Rates List Live Updates: GST 2.0, a major overhaul in the indirect tax system of the country, has come into effect today, September 22, decreasing tax on essential items to boost consumption nationwide and rationalising rates on other products. Termed as GST Bachat Utsav (savings festival), coinciding with the first day of Navratri, products from groceries to electronics have become cheaper from today on account of lower GST. 

The 56th GST council, led by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, has merged the previous four slabs into two main categories with an additional “sin tax” bracket:

  • 5% slab — for essential goods.
  • 18% slab – for most other goods and services.
  • 40% slab – for luxury and sin goods such as tobacco, alcohol, betting, and online gaming.

This consolidation is expected to make tax compliance easier and also reduce prices on many items currently taxed at 12% or 28%.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while addressing the nation on Sunday ahead of the implementation of GST 2.0, said that people will save Rs 2.5 lakh crore, with the combined benefit of the goods and services tax (GST) cuts and the earlier Income Tax reduction.

PM Modi congratulated people on the GST Bachat Utsav (savings festival) kicking off on September 22 — the first day of Navratri. “GST Bachat Utsav would lead to savings and people will be able to purchase things easily,” he said.

PM Modi said that since 2014, GST has been a top priority, as reforms are continuous and need to adapt to the nation’s evolving needs. Before the rollout of GST 2.0, goods transported across states in India faced multiple hurdles, including a maze of documentation, numerous check posts, and differing tax systems at every location, said the PM in his address. He emphasised that these complexities often slowed business and increased costs.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gatwick second runway plan given go-ahead by Government

Published

on

Gatwick second runway plan given go-ahead by Government



Gatwick Airport’s £2.2 billion second runway plan has been given the go-ahead by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander.

In the privately-financed project, the West Sussex airport will move its emergency runway 12 metres north, enabling it to be used for departures of narrow-bodied planes such as Airbus A320s and Boeing 737s.

This will enable it to be used for about 100,000 more flights a year.

Ms Alexander backed the scheme as a “no-brainer” for economic growth, a Government source said, suggesting flights could take off from the new full runway before 2029.

The Cabinet minister is satisfied with adjustments made, covering issues such as noise mitigation and the proportion of passengers who would travel to and from the airport by public transport.

It comes after the Planning Inspectorate initially rejected the airport’s application and earlier this year recommended Ms Alexander should approve the project if the changes were made.

New commitments include Gatwick’s management setting its own targets for the proportion of passengers who travel to the airport by public transport, rather than a legally binding target.

Residents affected by more noise will be able to ask Gatwick to cover the costs for triple-glazed windows.

Homeowners living directly beneath the new flight routes who choose to sell could have their stamp duty and reasonable moving costs paid, as well as estate agent fees of up to 1% of the purchase price.

Gatwick says its plans will create £1 billion per year in economic benefits, and generate an additional 14,000 jobs.

A Government source told the PA news agency: “The Transport Secretary has cleared Gatwick expansion for take-off.

“With capacity constraints holding back business, trade and tourism, this is a no-brainer for growth.

“This Government has taken unprecedented steps to get this done, navigating a needlessly complex planning system, which our reforms will simplify in future.

“It is possible that planes could be taking off from a new full runway at Gatwick before the next general election.

“Any airport expansion must be delivered in line with our legally binding climate change commitments and meet strict environmental requirements.”

Local campaigners opposed to expansion are concerned about the impact on surface transport, noise, housing provision and wastewater treatment, but the airport insists it has conducted “full and thorough assessments” of those issues.

CAGNE, an umbrella aviation community and environment group for Sussex, Surrey and Kent, said it stands ready to serve a judicial review funded by residents and environmental bodies.

The group said: “We know this Government cares little for the environmental impact aviation is having on our planet and Gatwick’s neighbours, but not to demand that Gatwick pays for the infrastructure, the onsite wastewater treatment plant, and noise impact is unlawful in our book.”

The Labour Government’s backing of a third runway at Heathrow Airport in its bid to grow the economy has also drawn criticism from environmental groups and opposition politicians.

Green Party leader Zack Polanski described ministers’ support of a second Gatwick runway as a “disaster”.

He said in a statement: “It ignores basic climate science and risks undermining efforts to tackle the climate crisis.

“Labour keeps wheeling out the same nonsense about growth, but at what cost? What this really means is more pollution, more noise for local communities, and no real economic benefit.”

Stewart Wingate, Vinci Airports managing director for the UK and former Gatwick chief executive, said: “After a lengthy and rigorous planning process, we welcome the Government’s approval of plans to bring our Northern Runway into routine use, ahead of the expected deadline.

“This is another important gateway in the planning process for this £2.2bn investment, which is fully funded by our shareholders and will unlock significant growth, tourism and trade benefits for London Gatwick and the UK and create thousands of jobs.

“As we’ve said previously, it is essential that any planning conditions enable us to realise the full benefits of the project and do not impose unnecessary constraints that make it uneconomic to invest in.

“We now need to carefully examine the details of the planning consent. Once we have done that, we will be able to comment further.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

What is Gatwick’s expansion plan and who will pay for it?

Published

on

What is Gatwick’s expansion plan and who will pay for it?



Gatwick Airport’s expansion plan involves bringing its emergency runway into routine use.

Here the PA news agency answers 14 key questions about the project.

– How many runways does Gatwick have?

It has one conventional runway, and one standby runway.

– What is the standby runway used for?

It is mostly used for aircraft to taxi to and from terminals, but is also used when the main runway is closed for emergencies or maintenance.

– Why does Gatwick want to expand?

It is the UK’s second busiest airport and one of the busiest single-runway airports in the world.

Spare slots at peak periods are scarce and the runway is heavily utilised, meaning disruption can have a severe knock-on effect.

– What must happen to the standby runway for it to be brought into routine use?

It must be moved 12 metres to the north – away from the main runway – to meet strict aviation safety rules.

– What else does the plan involve?

Remodelling and replacing existing taxiways, which connect runways to terminals, hangars and other facilities, extending both terminals, and installing new aircraft gates.

– How about transport?

Gatwick says it would pay for road connections to both terminals to be enhanced, creating fly-overs which separate local traffic from vehicles travelling to or from the airport.

A £250 million upgrade of the airport’s railway station was completed in November 2023.

– What would the standby runway be used for?

Departures of narrow-bodied planes such as Airbus A320s and Boeing 737s.

– What impact would that have on Gatwick’s capacity for flights?

It would enable the airport to be used for about 386,000 flights per year, about 100,000 more than current levels.

– How about annual passenger numbers?

They could rise from about 45 million to 75 million by the late 2030s.

– How much will the project cost?

Gatwick says the plan will cost £2.2 billion.

– Who will pay for it?

The airport says the project will be privately financed. It has pledged to meet the cost without hiking charges to airlines.

– When could the new runway open?

A Government source suggested flights could take off from the new full runway before 2029.

– Who owns Gatwick Airport?

French company Vinci and investment fund Global Infrastructure Partners.

– Does Heathrow’s third runway proposal affect Gatwick?

The Government has indicated its support for Heathrow’s expansion plan.

But it is likely to be many years before construction on a third runway at the west London airport begins, and Gatwick is determined to boost its own capacity.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending