Connect with us

Business

GSK boss says US is the best country to invest in

Published

on

GSK boss says US is the best country to invest in


Simon Jack,Business editorand

Archie Mitchell

Watch: GSK boss Dame Emma Walmsley lays out competitions facing the UK

While successive governments have stressed that the UK is a superpower in life sciences, in the eyes of one of the country’s biggest pharmaceutical companies, the US is the best place to invest.

The boss of the vaccines and medicines giant GSK, Dame Emma Walmsley, has told the BBC the company will invest $30bn (£23bn) in the US by the end of this decade.

The cash injection across the pond comes as other major drug makers have pulled UK projects worth billions after years of frustration over NHS drug budgets and pressure from President Donald Trump to set up production in the states.

And despite a new deal which will see the NHS pay more as part of a zero tariffs deal on shipping UK pharmaceuticals to America, Dame Emma is not going to “shy away” from GSK’s US investment plans.

The US is where the pharma giant makes more than half its turnover and is “still the leading market in the world in terms of the launches of new drugs and vaccines,” she says.

Alongside China, it is “the best market in the world to do business development”.

GSK’s latest stateside investment drive followed US pharmaceutical company Merck – which is called MSD in Europe – scrapping a planned £1bn expansion of its UK operations.

UK drug maker AstraZeneca has also announced it is pausing a planned £200m investment in a Cambridge research facility while ploughing tens of billions of dollars into the US.

Other drug companies have also said there is little appetite to invest in the UK, which successive governments have insisted is a life sciences superpower.

Dame Emma, who will leave GSK in January after eight years at the helm, stressed that GSK remains committed to the UK, noting that the interview was being carried out in its new global headquarters in London.

“No one should be deluded that the UK is going to be a massive scale market, a domestic market, but it can be an exporter of innovation in life sciences,” she says.

“For GSK, it’s 2% of our sales are here. More than 50% are in the US. But we’re very heavily invested, and remain committed to being invested in terms of manufacturing and research and development.”

Despite challenges facing Britain’s pharmaceuticals industry, Dame Emma welcomes the deal to scrap tariffs on UK drug shipments to the US as “a step in the right direction” for Britain.

The deal means the UK will pay more for medicines through the NHS – in return for a guarantee that US import taxes on pharmaceuticals made in the UK will remain at zero for three years.

Dame Emma says it is a welcome reversal of a long term decline in the portion of the NHS budget spent on medicines compared to other countries’ health systems.

The move, she suggests, will encourage the kind of innovation that supports ground-breaking new medicines, such as GSK’s new asthma drug which can be taken twice a year and could slash hospital admissions by 70% for serious asthma sufferers.

GSK hopes the new treatment will be approved for use by the NHS within weeks.

Asked about the health of the UK, Dame Emma says there are “social demographic root causes” for its decline.

She says health outcomes vary widely depending on where you live: “You can probably get a 10 or 15-year difference in lifespan prospects depending on which postcode you’re in.”

Dame Emma pointed to British diets and a lack of education around nutrition as part of the problem.

“I think there’s no question that the food system is fundamentally something we need to look at harder.”

Dame Emma also opened up about the differences she has experienced between the NHS and the private healthcare system in the US, having given birth in London, Paris and twice in New York.

“Both the experience of childbirth and all the follow up that happens afterwards are very, very different,” she says. “Anything from the advice you’re given.. .the frequency with which you are expected to be visited, how long you are in hospital and what kind of follow-up advice.”

Dame Emma added what matters is the balance of price, access and outcomes, and that the NHS still has “work to do” on getting the balance right.

Dame Emma, who also sits on the board of Microsoft, says the world is on the cusp of major advances in health science thanks in part to advances in AI which promise to accelerate innovation

“90% of the projects in our industry don’t work, they take a decade and cost billions. Getting to a place where you just double that to you know, instead of 10% working, 20% working will completely change the trajectory of innovation.”

In the end, she adds, few things are more important than health. “It is one of the few things that every single person on the planet ends up caring about.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Iran oil attacks trigger 35% gas price spike – and fears of interest rate rises

Published

on

Iran oil attacks trigger 35% gas price spike – and fears of interest rate rises



Britain is to “step up” defensive support for Gulf states after Iran attacked energy sites across the region in a “serious escalation” of the war that could push up inflation and interest rates.

The price of Brent crude climbed as high as $119 a barrel and European gas prices briefly surged by 35 per cent after Iran pounded Qatar’s Ras Laffan energy hub and other Middle Eastern oil and gas infrastructure with missiles.

Interest rates were held at 3.75 per cent instead of the previously expected cut, as the Bank of England warned that the war could push inflation as high as 3.5 per cent by July on the back of rising energy bills, and that rates could rise – creating misery for homeowners.

It came as:

  • US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said “ungrateful” European allies should be thanking Donald Trump for the war
  • Trump claimed he was unaware of Israel’s strike on Iran’s South Pars gas field
  • Oman called the US/Israel attacks a “grave miscalculation”
  • Europe’s biggest airlines warned of higher fares

Iran’s attacks were in retaliation to an Israeli strike on the vital South Pars gas field, which drew condemnation from the Gulf states as well as Tehran. It was the first attack of the war so far on an energy production facility. Tehran fired missiles at multiple energy sites across the Gulf, including a Saudi oil refinery, Qatari gas facilities and two more oil refineries in Kuwait.

While Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron called for de-escalation, President Trump threatened to “massively blow up” the South Pars facility if Iran did not halt its retaliatory attacks, repeating his claim that US forces had “obliterated” Iran’s navy and military, adding that the war was “substantially ahead of schedule”. He denied that plans were being made to send more American troops to the region.

John Healey, the UK defence secretary, said Tehran’s tit-for-tat responses threatened to further destabilise the region and Europe’s economies. He called them a “serious escalation”, adding: “They further destabilise the region and we will step up the defensive support that we can offer to those Gulf states.”

British forces are already deployed to the Middle East, with RAF jets flying defensive sorties against Iranian drones across the Gulf and British air defence systems protecting critical infrastructure in Saudi Arabia. UK military planners have also joined US Central Command to help formulate proposals for opening the Strait of Hormuz, a critical trade route for the world’s oil and gas.But there were signs of growing frustration towards Washington’s war aims in the Gulf states, with Oman’s foreign minister claiming that the conflict was President Trump’s “greatest miscalculation”.

In the most scathing attack on Washington’s foreign policy yet by a Gulf state, Badr Albusaidi said “this is not America’s war” and criticised Mr Trump for supporting Israel. Writing in The Economist, he called on American allies to help extricate it from the conflict, which has continued for a third week despite failing to achieve the US and Israel’s stated aim of instigating regime change in Tehran or stopping its nuclear programme.

Meanwhile, the Bank of England has warned that it may have to put up interest rates if the war continues to drive up inflation and unemployment. Its governor, Andrew Bailey, said the impact was already being felt by consumers as petrol prices surge and that he is “ready to act as necessary to ensure inflation remains on track to meet the 2 per cent target”. That would pave the way for a rate hike as early as the end of April.

Bets on the financial markets suggest a 50/50 chance that Britain will face higher interest rates from next month – and the possibility of two more rises by the end of the year.

Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, said: “Markets are now pricing in an almost 50 per cent chance that April’s meeting will see rates rise to 4 per cent with the potential for two additional rate hikes by the end of the year. But no one has a crystal ball. No one knows how long the conflict will last or the amount of damage that could be inflicted on crucial energy infrastructure by the time it ends.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Watch: How oil and gas prices are pushing up the cost of living

Published

on

Watch: How oil and gas prices are pushing up the cost of living



From fuel to mortgages, the BBC looks at how oil and gas prices could push up the cost of living.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

US considers lifting sanctions on some Iranian oil

Published

on

US considers lifting sanctions on some Iranian oil


“To put it mildly, this is bananas,” said David Tannenbaum, director of Blackstone Compliance Services, a consultancy specialising in maritime sanctions. “Essentially we’re allowing Iran to sell oil, which could then be used to fund the war effort.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending