Connect with us

Tech

In 2026, collaboration, honesty and humility in cyber are key | Computer Weekly

Published

on

In 2026, collaboration, honesty and humility in cyber are key | Computer Weekly


If 2024 was the year AI crashed into cyber security, 2025 was the year interdependence became impossible to ignore.

Looking back over the past 12 months, the most important lesson I’ve learned is an uncomfortable one for security people: you are not really “in control” of your risk, you are sharing it. You are sharing it with suppliers, with operators, with cloud and AI platforms, and with the people on your own teams whose resilience is being stretched.

In our research at Forescout we’ve watched attacks continue to climb sharply. Across multiple reports, we’ve seen total attack volumes more than double compared with last year, and incidents in critical infrastructure grow several-fold. In the first half of 2025 alone, we tracked thousands of ransomware events worldwide, with services, manufacturing, technology, retail and healthcare consistently among the most-targeted sectors. This is no longer an IT hygiene problem; it has become a continuity problem for the real economy.

Operational technology has moved from the footnotes to the main story. Our threat intelligence work on critical infrastructure and state-aligned hacktivism has documented repeated attempts to disrupt water utilities, healthcare providers, energy companies and manufacturers by going after the industrial systems that run them. In parallel, our Riskiest Connected Devices research shows routers and other network equipment overtaking traditional endpoints as the riskiest assets in many environments, and risk concentrated in sectors that blend IT, operational tech (OT), the Internet of Things (IoT) and sometimes medical devices. The systems that keep things moving, and the devices that quietly connect them, are now prime targets.

The same interdependence is obvious when you look at the devices and components everyone depends on. In that same Riskiest Connected Devices report, we saw average device risk rise by 15% year-on-year, with routers alone accounting for more than half of the devices carrying the most dangerous vulnerabilities, and risk clustered in retail, financial services, government, healthcare and manufacturing. At the same time, our router and OT/IoT vulnerability research has shown how a single family of widely deployed network or industrial devices with remotely exploitable flaws can simultaneously expose hospitals, factories, power generators and government offices. That is not a theoretical ecosystem risk; it is a design feature of how we now build technology and deliver services. When one link is weak, the consequences propagate.

Working with organisations through real incidents this year, one pattern keeps emerging: resilience has become an ecosystem property. You can have well-managed endpoints, a competent SOC and a decent incident-response playbook and still be taken down because a third-party supplier gets hit, a “non-critical” OT asset becomes a bridge into IT (or vice-versa), or the humans running your programme are simply exhausted. Burnout is increasingly recognised as a security risk, not just an HR issue.

So, what does that mean for 2026?

One trend I expect to crystallise is what I have called “reverse ransom”. Traditionally, extortion follows the organisation that has been breached. We think attackers will increasingly flip that logic: compromise a smaller upstream manufacturer, logistics firm or service provider where defences are weaker, then apply pressure to the larger downstream brands and operators who depend on them to keep the whole chain moving. The party that can pay will no longer always be the party that was breached. For defenders, that means treating supplier visibility, shared detection and joint exercising as a core competency, rather than paperwork for procurement.

The second shift is around AI and social engineering. The novelty of AI-written phishing and voice cloning will wear off; it will just be how social engineering is done. In our 2026 predictions, we talk about “social engineering-as-a-service”: turnkey infrastructure, scripts, cloned voices, convincing pretexts and even real human operators available to anyone with a bitcoin wallet. At the same time, I expect to see more serious, less hype-driven adoption of AI on the defensive side: correlating weak signals across IT, OT, cloud and identity, mapping and prioritising assets and exposures continuously, and reducing the cognitive load on analysts by automating triage. Done properly, that is not about replacing people; it is about giving them back the headspace to think and to delve into the more rewarding stuff.

The third trend is regulatory. Between NIS2 in Europe, evolving resilience requirements in the UK and similar moves elsewhere, boards are going to discover that ecosystem security is becoming a legal duty as much as an operational one. Regulators are increasingly interested in how you manage third-party risk, how you protect critical processes, and how you evidence that your controls actually work under stress.

If 2025 taught me that complete control is largely an illusion, my hope for 2026 is that we respond with humility and collaboration rather than fear. That means investing in continuous visibility across IT, OT, IoT and cloud, building genuine partnerships with suppliers and peers rather than throwing questionnaires over the fence, and better considering the wellbeing of the people we rely on to make good decisions under pressure.

We’re never going back to a simpler threat landscape. But we can build a more honest one that acknowledges interdependence, designs for it and shares the load more intelligently.

Rik Ferguson is vice president of security intelligence at Forescout, as well as a special advisor to Europol and co-founder of the Respect in Security initiative. A seasoned cyber pro and well-known industry commentator, this is Ferguson’s first contribution to the CW Security Think Tank.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

BMW Is Betting Big on the New iX3. The Good News Is It’s Superb

Published

on

BMW Is Betting Big on the New iX3. The Good News Is It’s Superb



BMW’s first car on its new EV platform has finally arrived. But will a big range, thumping charging tech, and a new driving brain that aims to deliver the ultimate ride be enough to beat China?



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

MIT engineers design an aerial microrobot that can fly as fast as a bumblebee

Published

on

MIT engineers design an aerial microrobot that can fly as fast as a bumblebee


In the future, tiny flying robots could be deployed to aid in the search for survivors trapped beneath the rubble after a devastating earthquake. Like real insects, these robots could flit through tight spaces larger robots can’t reach, while simultaneously dodging stationary obstacles and pieces of falling rubble.

So far, aerial microrobots have only been able to fly slowly along smooth trajectories, far from the swift, agile flight of real insects — until now.

MIT researchers have demonstrated aerial microrobots that can fly with speed and agility that is comparable to their biological counterparts. A collaborative team designed a new AI-based controller for the robotic bug that enabled it to follow gymnastic flight paths, such as executing continuous body flips.

With a two-part control scheme that combines high performance with computational efficiency, the robot’s speed and acceleration increased by about 450 percent and 250 percent, respectively, compared to the researchers’ best previous demonstrations.

The speedy robot was agile enough to complete 10 consecutive somersaults in 11 seconds, even when wind disturbances threatened to push it off course.

A microrobot flips 10 times in 11 seconds.

Credit: Courtesy of the Soft and Micro Robotics Laboratory

“We want to be able to use these robots in scenarios that more traditional quad copter robots would have trouble flying into, but that insects could navigate. Now, with our bioinspired control framework, the flight performance of our robot is comparable to insects in terms of speed, acceleration, and the pitching angle. This is quite an exciting step toward that future goal,” says Kevin Chen, an associate professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), head of the Soft and Micro Robotics Laboratory within the Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE), and co-senior author of a paper on the robot.

Chen is joined on the paper by co-lead authors Yi-Hsuan Hsiao, an EECS MIT graduate student; Andrea Tagliabue PhD ’24; and Owen Matteson, a graduate student in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AeroAstro); as well as EECS graduate student Suhan Kim; Tong Zhao MEng ’23; and co-senior author Jonathan P. How, the Ford Professor of Engineering in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and a principal investigator in the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS). The research appears today in Science Advances.

An AI controller

Chen’s group has been building robotic insects for more than five years.

They recently developed a more durable version of their tiny robot, a microcassette-sized device that weighs less than a paperclip. The new version utilizes larger, flapping wings that enable more agile movements. They are powered by a set of squishy artificial muscles that flap the wings at an extremely fast rate.

But the controller — the “brain” of the robot that determines its position and tells it where to fly — was hand-tuned by a human, limiting the robot’s performance.

For the robot to fly quickly and aggressively like a real insect, it needed a more robust controller that could account for uncertainty and perform complex optimizations quickly.

Such a controller would be too computationally intensive to be deployed in real time, especially with the complicated aerodynamics of the lightweight robot.

To overcome this challenge, Chen’s group joined forces with How’s team and, together, they crafted a two-step, AI-driven control scheme that provides the robustness necessary for complex, rapid maneuvers, and the computational efficiency needed for real-time deployment.

“The hardware advances pushed the controller so there was more we could do on the software side, but at the same time, as the controller developed, there was more they could do with the hardware. As Kevin’s team demonstrates new capabilities, we demonstrate that we can utilize them,” How says.

For the first step, the team built what is known as a model-predictive controller. This type of powerful controller uses a dynamic, mathematical model to predict the behavior of the robot and plan the optimal series of actions to safely follow a trajectory.

While computationally intensive, it can plan challenging maneuvers like aerial somersaults, rapid turns, and aggressive body tilting. This high-performance planner is also designed to consider constraints on the force and torque the robot could apply, which is essential for avoiding collisions.

For instance, to perform multiple flips in a row, the robot would need to decelerate in such a way that its initial conditions are exactly right for doing the flip again.

“If small errors creep in, and you try to repeat that flip 10 times with those small errors, the robot will just crash. We need to have robust flight control,” How says.

They use this expert planner to train a “policy” based on a deep-learning model, to control the robot in real time, through a process called imitation learning. A policy is the robot’s decision-making engine, which tells the robot where and how to fly.

Essentially, the imitation-learning process compresses the powerful controller into a computationally efficient AI model that can run very fast.

The key was having a smart way to create just enough training data, which would teach the policy everything it needs to know for aggressive maneuvers.

“The robust training method is the secret sauce of this technique,” How explains.

The AI-driven policy takes robot positions as inputs and outputs control commands in real time, such as thrust force and torques.

Insect-like performance

In their experiments, this two-step approach enabled the insect-scale robot to fly 447 percent faster while exhibiting a 255 percent increase in acceleration. The robot was able to complete 10 somersaults in 11 seconds, and the tiny robot never strayed more than 4 or 5 centimeters off its planned trajectory.

“This work demonstrates that soft and microrobots, traditionally limited in speed, can now leverage advanced control algorithms to achieve agility approaching that of natural insects and larger robots, opening up new opportunities for multimodal locomotion,” says Hsiao.

The researchers were also able to demonstrate saccade movement, which occurs when insects pitch very aggressively, fly rapidly to a certain position, and then pitch the other way to stop. This rapid acceleration and deceleration help insects localize themselves and see clearly.

“This bio-mimicking flight behavior could help us in the future when we start putting cameras and sensors on board the robot,” Chen says.

Adding sensors and cameras so the microrobots can fly outdoors, without being attached to a complex motion capture system, will be a major area of future work.

The researchers also want to study how onboard sensors could help the robots avoid colliding with one another or coordinate navigation.

“For the micro-robotics community, I hope this paper signals a paradigm shift by showing that we can develop a new control architecture that is high-performing and efficient at the same time,” says Chen.

“This work is especially impressive because these robots still perform precise flips and fast turns despite the large uncertainties that come from relatively large fabrication tolerances in small-scale manufacturing, wind gusts of more than 1 meter per second, and even its power tether wrapping around the robot as it performs repeated flips,” says Sarah Bergbreiter, a professor of mechanical engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, who was not involved with this work.

“Although the controller currently runs on an external computer rather than onboard the robot, the authors demonstrate that similar, but less precise, control policies may be feasible even with the more limited computation available on an insect-scale robot. This is exciting because it points toward future insect-scale robots with agility approaching that of their biological counterparts,” she adds.

This research is funded, in part, by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Office of Naval Research, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, MathWorks, and the Zakhartchenko Fellowship.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Thursday’s Cold Moon Is the Last Supermoon of the Year. Here’s How and When to View It

Published

on

Thursday’s Cold Moon Is the Last Supermoon of the Year. Here’s How and When to View It


A cold supermoon is on its way. On December 4, Earth’s satellite will delight us with one of the last astronomical spectacles of 2025. Not only will it be the last full moon of the year, but it’s also a cold moon—which refers to the frigid temperatures typical of this time of year—and, finally, a supermoon. Here’s how and when best to enjoy this spectacle of the year-end sky.

What Is a Supermoon?

The term supermoon refers to a full moon that occurs when our satellite is at perigee, the point at which its orbit brings it closest to our planet. (The moon’s orbit is elliptical, and its distance from Earth varies between about 407,000 km at apogee, the point of maximum distance, and about 380,000 at perigee.)

In addition to being the third consecutive supermoon of the year, as reported by EarthSky, it will be about 357,000 km away from us, making it the second-closest full Moon of the year. Consequently it will also be the second-largest and brightest.

Although most of us won’t notice any difference in size compared to a normal full moon (it appears up to 8 percent larger to us), its brightness could exceed that of an ordinary full Moon by 16 percent. This time, moreover, it will be 100 percent illuminated just 12 hours after its perigee.

The Cold Supermoon

In addition to its name, which refers to the cold temperatures of this period, December’s full moon will be the last of 12 full moons in 2025 and the highest of the year. With the winter solstice approaching on December 21, the sun is at its lowest point in the sky, so the full moon is at its highest point. In other words, this means that the super cold moon will be particularly high in the sky. As EarthSky points out, however, it is not the closest full Moon to the December 21 solstice. While it occurs 17 days before, the first full moon of 2026 will occer on January 3—just 12 days ater teh solstice. That will be the fourth and last consecutive supermoon.

How to Enjoy the Show

Although the moon may appear full both the night before and the night after, the exact time of the full moon is scheduled for 6:14 pm ET on Thursday, December 4. In general, moonrise is the best time to be subject to the so-called lunar illusion, during which the moon appears larger than usual to us. NASA still doesn’t have a scientific explanation for why this happens, but as you might expect, the effect is greatest during a supermoon. Weather permitting, therefore, find an elevated place or meadow with an unobstructed view of the eastern horizon and enjoy the last moon show of the year.

This story originally appeared on WIRED Italia and has been translated from Italian.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending