Connect with us

Entertainment

King Charles Sandringham Estate announces closure for major reason

Published

on

King Charles Sandringham Estate announces closure for major reason


King Charles Sandringham Estate announces closure for major reason

Sandringham Estate, the private country retreat to King Charles and Queen Camilla, has announced its closure for few days due to major reason.

The announcement of closure was made on social media.

Taking to Instagram, the estate said, “What a brilliant first night of @heritagelivefestivals, It was a truly fantastic evening with the Pet Shop Boys, Scissor Sisters, and Dave Pearce, creating a great atmosphere here on The Estate.”

“We can’t wait to welcome everyone to the Mariah Carey concert this evening!”

It further announced, “Just a friendly reminder that The Sandringham Estate will be closed to general visitors from 14th to 17th August for this concert series. This includes our The House & Gardens, Visitor Centre car parks, Courtyard facilities (café and restaurant), and play area.”

The Sandringham Estate adds, “We look forward to welcoming everyone back from 18th August onwards. Thank you for your understanding.”

Sandringham has been the private home of the monarch since 1862, when Queen Victoria purchased it for her son, the future King Edward VII.

Last week, it also announced, “Summer holidays are in full swing, and The Sandringham Estate has a host of wonderful experiences this August.

“Get ready for fantastic creative workshops, concerts from music legends, mini golf fun, and the chance to explore our magnificent House and Gardens looking their very best.”





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

US judge blocks Trump’s plan to lay off thousands of government workers

Published

on

US judge blocks Trump’s plan to lay off thousands of government workers


A man casts a shadow as he walks toward the Hubert H. Humphrey Building, headquarters of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), in Washington, DC, US, April 1, 2025. — Reuters
  • About 4,100 workers have been notified of layoffs during shutdown.
  • Two unions representing government employees brought case.
  • Judge says explicit political motivation not allowed under law.

A federal judge in California on Wednesday ordered President Donald Trump’s administration to halt mass layoffs of federal workers during a partial government shutdown while she considers claims by unions that the job cuts are illegal.

During a hearing in San Francisco, US District Judge Susan Illston granted a request by two unions to block layoffs at more than 30 federal agencies while the case proceeds.

The decision is likely to be appealed quickly, but it offers a reprieve for federal workers facing a nearly year-long push by the Trump administration to slash their ranks.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The White House said last week that it had begun substantial layoffs across the US government, as Trump followed through on a threat to cut the federal workforce during the government shutdown, now in its 15th day. In an order on Wednesday, Trump extended an existing freeze on hiring new federal workers, with exceptions for military personnel and appointees to political roles.

About 4,100 workers at eight agencies have been notified that they are being laid off so far, according to a Tuesday court filing by the administration.

Illston’s ruling came shortly after White House Budget Director Russell Vought said on “The Charlie Kirk Show” that more than 10,000 federal workers could lose their jobs because of the shutdown.

Illston at the hearing cited a series of public statements by Trump and Vought that she said showed explicit political motivations for the layoffs, such as Trump saying that cuts would target “Democrat agencies.”

“You can’t do that in a nation of laws. And we have laws here, and the things that are being articulated here are not within the law,” said Illston, an appointee of Democratic former President Bill Clinton.

Judge demands details on layoffs

Democracy Forward, a legal group that represents the unions, said Illston made clear that the president’s targeting of federal workers was unlawful.

“Our civil servants do the work of the people, and playing games with their livelihoods is cruel and unlawful and a threat to everyone in our nation,” Skye Perryman, the group’s president and CEO, said in a statement.

Illston ordered the administration to provide by Friday an accounting of any “actual or imminent” layoffs and to outline the steps agencies are taking to comply with her ruling.

A US Department of Justice lawyer, Elizabeth Hedges, at the hearing said she was not prepared to address Illston’s concerns about the legality of the layoffs. She instead argued that the unions must bring their claims to a federal labour board before being able to sue over them in court.

Illston disagreed and chided the Justice Department for refusing to take a position on the unions’ legal claims.

“The hatchet is falling on the heads of employees all across the nation, and you’re not even prepared to address whether that’s legal,” she said.

The American Federation of Government Employees and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees claim that implementing layoffs is not an essential service that can be performed during a lapse in government funding, and that the shutdown does not justify mass job cuts because most federal workers have been furloughed without pay.

Trump’s Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress but need at least seven Democratic votes to pass a funding bill in the Senate, where Democrats are holding out for an extension of health-insurance subsidies. Democrats have said they will not cave to Trump’s pressure tactics, and a renewed bid to pass a spending bill failed on Wednesday.





Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Tony Danza responds to Valerie Bertinelli’s dating claim

Published

on

Tony Danza responds to Valerie Bertinelli’s dating claim


Tony Danza jokes he never found Valerie Bertinelli’s ‘date note’

Tony Danza is clearing the air on Valerie Bertinelli’s claim that he missed a date.

Danza, 74, and Valerie Bertinelli, 65, recently made guest appearances on The Drew Barrymore Show for a cooking segment.

The duo prepared the actor’s so-called “date sauce,” a recipe Danza admits he never made for Bertinelli because, according to him, he never found the note she left in his car with her phone number.

“So, this is a sauce that you never made for me — even though I left my phone number in your glove box,” Bertinelli said, draping an arm around Danza, who chuckled in response.

Barrymore chimed in, “Did you ever find Val’s phone number in your glove box?”

“No, I did not!” Danza replied with a grin. “I think she’s full of baloney!” he added to which Bertinelli laughed along.

Bertinelli also admitted that her attempt to woo Danza never got off the ground. “He never called me!” she said to the audience’s shock, with Barrymore adding, “They never do, by the way.”

Bertinelli was married to Eddie Van Halen from 1981 to 2007 and Tom Vitale from 2011 to 2022, and most recently dated writer Mike Goodnough before splitting in November 2024.

Meanwhile, Danza’s previous marriages were to Rhonda Yeoman from 1970 to 1974 and Tracy Robinson from 1986 to 2013.





Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Prince Andrew victim Virgina Giuffre speaks on his entitlement: ‘His birthright’

Published

on

Prince Andrew victim Virgina Giuffre speaks on his entitlement: ‘His birthright’


Prince Andrew’s abuse victim has shed light on her experience in an honest confession.

 In a posthumous memoir, Virginia Giuffre has described she was chosen to ‘please’ the Duke of York by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

In an excerpt from “Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice,” Giuffre noted that after a night of dancing at London hotspot Tramp, Maxwell allegedly told her: “When we get home, you are to do for him what you do for Jeffrey.”

She added: “Back at the house, Maxwell and Epstein said goodnight and headed upstairs, signaling it was time that I take care of the prince. In the years since, I’ve thought a lot about how he behaved. He was friendly enough, but still entitled.”

The deceased added that she saw Andrew full of himself, pretending that it was his ‘birthright’ to abuse her.’ 

Giuffre then explained her discomfort and admitted that experience was traumatising.

“Afterward, he said thank you in his clipped British accent. In my memory, the whole thing lasted less than half an hour,” she wrote.

Giuffre then added that Maxwell allegedly told her the next morning: “You did well. The prince had fun.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending