Connect with us

Business

Learner drivers may have to wait six months before taking test

Published

on

Learner drivers may have to wait six months before taking test


Katy Austin,Transport correspondentand

Emer Moreau,Business reporter

Getty Images A young woman smiles as she sits in a yellow car with her seatbelt on holding the keys out the window.Getty Images

Learner drivers could have to practise for up to six months before they are allowed to sit their practical test

Learner drivers in England and Wales could face a minimum learning period of up to six months between sitting their theory and practical tests, the BBC can reveal.

The government will unveil the measure, which will be subject to consultation, as part of its wider road safety strategy launched on Wednesday.

The strategy will include proposals for a lower drink-driving limit in England and Wales, to bring them in line with Scotland.

The shake-up of driving laws is aimed at reducing the number of people killed or badly injured on Britain’s roads by 65% over the next decade, and by 70% for children under 16.

A fifth of all deaths or serious injuries from crashes involved a young car driver in 2024, according to official figures.

The government believes a minimum period between sitting the theory test and the practical test would help learner drivers develop their skills, including driving in different conditions.

The Department for Transport will consult on three or six months for the minimum learning period.

It would include any informal learning they may do with parents or guardians as well as formal lessons with a driving instructor.

Evidence from other countries suggests minimum learning periods could reduce collisions by up to 32%. Currently, learner drivers can take lessons from 17 and book a practical test as soon as they have passed a theory exam.

The majority of driving tests in Britain are taken by under-25s. In 2024-25, about 55% of tests were taken by drivers aged 17-24.

Learner drivers currently face a waiting time of around six months to take their practical tests anyway, due to a backlog from the Covid pandemic. The backlog is expected to last until late 2027.

The proposed changes could see an end to teenagers passing their tests days after turning 17, meaning the youngest drivers would be at least 17 and a half.

The road safety strategy is also expected to propose reducing the alcohol limit in for novice motorists and those within their two-year probation period from 80mg per 100ml of blood to around 20mg.

For all other drivers, the level would be lowered to around 50mg.

But some in the pub industry said it could hurt the sector.

The British Beer and Pub Association said the government would need to consider how to “mitigate the significant impact further restrictions would have for pubs, jobs and community hubs in rural areas, which may already suffer from little to no public transport”.

Graduated driving licences

There have been vociferous campaigns for “graduated driving licences” (GDLs) to be introduced in the UK. Different countries have varying types of GDLs, such as not allowing newly qualified drivers to carry passengers or not letting them drive at night.

Proponents of GDLs include some parents of young people who have died on the roads.

Sharron Huddleston started campaigning for GDLs to be introduced eight years ago after her daughter Caitlin was killed in a crash aged 18.

Sharron Huddleston, with blonde hair and glasses, looks at the camera with a forlorn expression. There is a photo of her with her two children on the wall behind her.

Sharron’s daughter Caitlin was killed in a car being driven by a novice driver

Sharron supports the proposed minimum learning period but said: “We need the post-test safety precautions as well.”

The driver, Skye Mitchell, who was also killed, had passed her test four months earlier.

Sharron believes Caitlin “would still be here” if the UK had graduated driving licences which forbade newly qualified, young drivers from carrying passengers their own age.

“All the girls [in the car] were 18,” she said.

“This is the strongest element of a graduated driving licence that would save many young lives.”

The AA has welcomed the measures announced by the government, but said not introducing GDLs was “a missed opportunity”.

Its president Edmund King told the BBC that “all the evidence, from Australia, from Canada, from other countries” shows that limiting the number of same-age passengers in a car for six months “will save lives”.

He said of the learning period: “That will help, but the question is: does it go far enough?”

The road safety strategy also contains plans to cut deaths by reducing speeding, drink and drug driving, not wearing seat belts and mobile phone use.

Technology, including built-in breathalysers that would prevent drunk drivers starting cars, will form a key plank of the strategy.

The government is also proposing new powers to suspend driving licences for people suspected of drink or drug-driving offences.

The BBC revealed in October that further research into headlight glare would be included in the strategy.

Alisa Fielder, 22 from Surrey, passed her test as a teenager but crashed a year ago as she was trying to overtake a lorry on a motorway. Nobody was injured, but her car was written off.

“I took too long checking the blind spot and all the cars in front had stopped,” she said.

“If I had maybe taken some more lessons then I would know that you can’t really take that long.”

Alisa sitting in the driver's seat of a car. She has long dark hair and is wearing a furry coat

Alisa did a driving assessment four years after getting her licence to see what skills she could improve

She didn’t drive for a year after the crash. She has since done an informal assessment with charity IAM RoadSmart to boost her confidence and figure out what she needs to work on.

“I wasn’t driving to the best standard and that’s why I had a crash.”

Alisa said the process of becoming a better driver should continue after a person passes their test. “Maybe more lessons that you’re required to take with a professional.”

Local Transport Minister Lilian Greenwood said young people make up just 6% of all drivers, but are involved in nearly a quarter of fatal and serious collisions.

“Inexperience puts drivers, their passengers, and other road users at greater risk,” she said.

The proposed learning period “is all about supporting young drivers to develop the confidence they need to stay safe and giving them more time to build their skills and gain experience in different driving conditions”.

A thin, grey banner promoting the News Daily newsletter. On the right, there is a graphic of an orange sphere with two concentric crescent shapes around it in a red-orange gradient, like a sound wave. The banner reads: "The latest news in your inbox first thing.”

Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day. Sign up here.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Bajaj deal with Allianz values insurance arms at Rs 93000 crore – The Times of India

Published

on

Bajaj deal with Allianz values insurance arms at Rs 93000 crore – The Times of India


MUMBAI: Bajaj Group on Thursday completed the acquisition of a 23% stake in its insurance joint ventures from Allianz SE for Rs 21,390 crore, marking the largest transaction in India’s insurance sector and bringing the group closer to full ownership of Bajaj General Insurance and Bajaj Life Insurance.The stake purchase involved Bajaj Finserv, Bajaj Holdings & Investment and Jamnalal Sons acquiring Allianz’s shares for Rs 12,190 crore in the general insurance arm and Rs 9,200 crore in the life insurance arm. The transaction raises the Bajaj Group’s ownership in both insurers to 97% from 74%, with Bajaj Finserv holding 75.01%, giving it management control.Bajaj’s purchase values the general insurance venture at Rs 53000 crore and the life jv at Rs 40,000 crore. This is much lower than what analyst reports from Jefferies, Avendus and Kotak which have valued the non-life company between Rs 85700 crore and Rs 54600 crore while the life company has been valued between Rs 56,800 crore and 56,200 crore.Allianz said it received a gross consideration of around 2.1 billion euros for the divestment of the first major tranche and expects to sell the remaining 3% stake by the second quarter of 2026. The German insurer said the decision followed constructive and amicable discussions, noting that its ability to operate in India had remained limited due to its minority position.“This transaction is transformative for the Bajaj Group, enabling us to contribute even more strongly to the Govt’s vision of ‘Insurance for All’ that is Made in India, Made for India and Made by India,” Sanjiv Bajaj, chairman and managing director of Bajaj Finserv, said. He said the acquisition provides strategic flexibility to expand markets, launch new products and build scale as insurance penetration is set to rise over the next two decades.Bajaj Finserv said the transfer of Allianz’s remaining 3% stake is expected to be completed over the next few months through a proposed buyback, subject to approvals. If completed, Bajaj Finserv’s stake could rise to around 77.3%.Allianz said India remains a market of high strategic priority and that it intends to stay invested in the country’s insurance growth. The company pointed to its recently announced plans with Jio Financial Services to form a 50:50 domestic reinsurance joint venture and explore new general and life insurance ventures.Allianz said it expects to recognise a non-operating IFRS gain of around 1.1 billion euros from the transaction in its first-quarter 2026 results and anticipates a positive impact of around five percentage points on its group solvency ratio, with proceeds to be redeployed in line with its strategic priorities, including investments in new India ventures.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gas market push: NSE in talks with IGX to launch Indian natural gas futures; aim to deepen price discovery and hedging – The Times of India

Published

on

Gas market push: NSE in talks with IGX to launch Indian natural gas futures; aim to deepen price discovery and hedging – The Times of India


The National Stock Exchange (NSE) is in discussions with the Indian Gas Exchange (IGX) to develop and launch Indian natural gas futures, an initiative aimed at strengthening the country’s natural gas market ecosystem, PTI reported.The proposed futures contract is expected to provide market participants with a transparent, efficient and robust risk management tool aligned with India’s evolving natural gas pricing framework, the exchange said.The collaboration seeks to combine NSE’s experience in the derivatives market with IGX’s role in spot natural gas trading, price discovery and physical market development. Once launched, the contract is expected to benefit gas producers, city gas distribution companies, power generators, fertiliser manufacturers, industrial consumers, traders and financial participants by enabling effective hedging against price volatility and supporting long-term planning.“The proposed collaboration with IGX marks a significant step in NSE’s efforts to deepen India’s commodity derivatives markets,” said Sriram Krishnan, Chief Business Development Officer of NSE.According to him, natural gas is emerging as a critical transition fuel in India’s energy mix, and a domestic futures contract would enhance price transparency, strengthen risk management capabilities and help build a credible gas price benchmark aligned with Indian market fundamentals.“By leveraging NSE’s market infrastructure and IGX’s physical market expertise, we aim to create a futures product that is relevant, liquid and trusted by the entire gas value chain,” Krishnan added.Subject to regulatory approvals, NSE and IGX will work with stakeholders to ensure a smooth launch of the proposed derivatives contract. Further details on contract design and timelines will be announced in due course, the exchange said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Workers’ rights reforms will cost billions less after concessions, analysis shows

Published

on

Workers’ rights reforms will cost billions less after concessions, analysis shows


Archie MitchellBusiness reporter

Getty Images A worker at a warehouse packages items as they pass him on a conveyor belt.Getty Images

A series of concessions on Labour’s flagship workers’ rights reforms will cut the cost to firms adopting them by billions of pounds, a government impact assessment shows.

An initial analysis by officials found that implementing the party’s measures to bolster workers’ rights would cost firms up to £5bn a year.

However, an updated analysis on Wednesday, which took into account major concessions made by ministers, said it will now cost companies £1bn a year.

The concessions were welcomed by business groups, but faced fierce criticism from some left-wing Labour MPs and union leaders.

The Employment Rights Act will give workers access to sick pay and paternity leave from the first day on the job and introduce new protections for pregnant women and new mothers.

In November, Labour dropped plans to give all workers the right to claim unfair dismissal from their first day in a job. Instead, it will bring in enhanced protections after six months in employment, the bill’s most significant measure.

Alongside concessions on unfair dismissal, the government will phase in the overall package over several years, with many of the measures still subject to consultation and secondary legislation.

The revised impact assessment also said the lower cost estimate reflected “clearer implementation timelines” and more available evidence about the policies.

But the British Chambers of Commerce said the £1bn figure “is likely to be a massive underestimate”.

Policy director Kate Shoesmith said: “The impact figure doesn’t adequately account for the harder to quantify costs. Those include staff time for understanding and implementing new processes or explaining these to colleagues.

“Concessions such as introducing the six-month qualifying period will reduce costs – but not on the scale this latest assessment suggests.”

The shadow business and trade secretary, Andrew Griffith, said: “The government spent a whole year denying it, but even after they fudged the figures to favour them, the truth is clear: their Unemployment Act will cost businesses billions.

“They have also been forced to admit it will cost young and vulnerable people their jobs – just as we always warned.”

The latest impact assessment also said the Employment Rights Act would have a small positive impact on employment, boosting the amount of people in work by 0.1%.

It also said the new measures could have a “small, positive direct impact on economic growth”.

Meanwhile, stronger workers’ rights could benefit about 18 million workers, up from an earlier estimate of around 15 million, the analysis showed.

Trade unions welcomed the latest impact assessment, saying it would bring “significant benefits to UK workers, our economy and wider society”.

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) said stronger rights at work are “good for workers and employers – driving up labour market participation, improving health, raising productivity and boosting demand”.

Its general secretary Paul Nowak called for ministers to “finish the job as soon as possible”, warning that secondary legislation to bring in the measures must be “watertight”.

Mike Clancy, general secretary of the Prospect trade union, said: “This impact assessment is clear that the Employment Rights Act is good for workers, good for growth, and good for wider society.

“The sensible compromises agreed between Government, businesses, and trade unions were intended to make this legislation more workable for all parties, while still delivering robust protections for workers, and this report clearly demonstrates the success of that approach.”

The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) said the Employment Rights Act will “transform the world of work, delivering stronger protections and higher living standards”.

A spokesperson said: “By making work pay, and more secure, this new analysis demonstrates how it will boost productivity, cut staff turnover, and put more money in the pockets of working people.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending