Connect with us

Politics

Legality of US capture of Venezuela’s Maduro in focus at United Nations

Published

on

Legality of US capture of Venezuela’s Maduro in focus at United Nations


Venezuelas captured President Nicolas Maduro poses next to US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) administrator Terry Cole as he is led in custody from a US federal airplane, at Stewart Air National Guard Base in Newburgh, New York, US, January 3, 2026. — Reuters
Venezuela’s captured President Nicolas Maduro poses next to US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) administrator Terry Cole as he is led in custody from a US federal airplane, at Stewart Air National Guard Base in Newburgh, New York, US, January 3, 2026. — Reuters
  • US veto power prevents accountability at UN Security Council.
  • US cites self-defence under UN Charter Article 51.
  • Legal experts argue US operation violated international law.

UNITED NATIONS: The legality of the US capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro will be under the spotlight at the United Nations on Monday, but Washington is unlikely to face strong criticism from allies over its military operation in the Latin American state.

The 15-member UN Security Council will meet on Monday after US Special Forces seized Maduro in an operation on Saturday that knocked out power in parts of Caracas and struck military installations. Venezuelan authorities also said it was deadly. Maduro is now in detention in New York awaiting a court appearance on Monday on drug charges.

Russia, China and other Venezuelan allies have accused the United States of violating international law, but US allies – many of whom opposed Maduro – have been less vocal about any concerns over the use of military force.

“Judging by the reactions from European leaders to date, I suspect that US allies will equivocate exquisitely in the Security Council,” said Richard Gowan, director of global issues and institutions at the International Crisis Group, a think-tank.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres views the US operation as setting “a dangerous precedent,” his spokesperson said on Saturday. Many legal experts also say the US action was illegal, although Washington will be able to block any attempts by the UN Security Council to hold it accountable.

Washington cites self-defence

In the wake of the US operation, European states have largely called for international law to be respected without specifically calling out Washington, though French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said the US had violated “the principle of not resorting to force, that underpins international law.”

Smoke rises from explosions in Caracas, Venezuela, January 3. — Reuters
Smoke rises from explosions in Caracas, Venezuela, January 3. — Reuters

The UN Charter states that members “shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.” There are currently 193 members of the United Nations.

US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz on Sunday cited Article 51 of the UN Charter, which says that nothing “shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations.”

“In this case, you have a drug kingpin, an illegitimate leader indicted in the United States, coordinating with the likes of China, Russia, Iran, terrorist groups like Hezbollah, pumping drugs, thugs, and weapons into the United States of America, threatening to invade its neighbours,” he told Fox News.

However, legal experts say the US operation was illegal because it lacked UN Security Council authorisation, did not have Venezuelan consent, and does not constitute self-defence against an armed attack.

“The action violated international law,” said Tom Dannenbaum, a professor at Stanford Law School. “Serious legal objections to Maduro’s regime do not eliminate the need for a legal basis to use military force in Venezuela.”

US veto shields Washington

But Washington cannot be held accountable for any violation by the UN Security Council, which is charged with maintaining international peace and security. The US wields a veto – along with Russia, China, Britain and France – so can block action.

US President Donald Trump speaks as White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, look on during a press conference following a US strike on Venezuela where President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured,  from Trumps Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, US, January 3, 2026. — Reuters
US President Donald Trump speaks as White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, look on during a press conference following a US strike on Venezuela where President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured, from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, US, January 3, 2026. — Reuters

Maduro was indicted in 2020 on US charges including narco-terrorism conspiracy. He has always denied any criminal involvement.

“Even if Maduro were to be responsible for the smuggling of some drugs into the US, such smuggling of drugs does not constitute an armed attack and does not authorise the US to use force in self-defence,” said Milena Sterio, a professor at Cleveland State University College of Law.

She also said Washington “cannot exercise extra-territorial jurisdiction to arrest individuals anywhere it pleases.”

Adil Haque, a professor at Rutgers Law School, also said the US capture of Maduro “was an illegal infringement of the inviolability and immunity of a sitting Head of State, who may lack democratic legitimacy but was clearly effectively discharging his official functions on behalf of his State.”

Cuba says 32 of its citizens killed in Maduro extraction

The Cuban government said on Sunday that 32 of its citizens were killed during the US raid on Venezuela to extract Maduro for prosecution in the United States.

A damaged building following US strikes on Venezuela, during which President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured, in Catia La Mar, Venezuela, January 4, 2026. — Reuters
A damaged building following US strikes on Venezuela, during which President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured, in Catia La Mar, Venezuela, January 4, 2026. — Reuters

Havana said there would be two days of mourning on January 5 and 6 in honour of those killed and said funeral arrangements would be announced.

The Cuban government statement gave few details, but said all the dead were members of the Cuban armed forces and intelligence agencies.

“True to their responsibilities concerning security and defence, our compatriots fulfilled their duty with dignity and heroism and fell, after fierce resistance, in direct combat against the attackers or as a result of bombings on the facilities,” the statement said.

Cuba has provided some security for Maduro since he came to power. It was not clear how many Cubans were guarding the Venezuelan president when they died and how many may have perished elsewhere.

Maduro, 63, and his wife Cilia Flores were seized by US forces in the Venezuela capital Caracas on Saturday and flown to the United States. Maduro is being held in a New York detention center awaiting a Monday court appearance on drug charges.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Has the Iran war changed the Gulf forever?

Published

on

Has the Iran war changed the Gulf forever?


Smoke rises in the sky after blasts were heard in Manama, Bahrain on February 28, 2026. — Reuters
Smoke rises in the sky after blasts were heard in Manama, Bahrain on February 28, 2026. — Reuters

Members of the Reuters Gulf team, like so many of our neighbours in the region, have huddled in stairwells and windowless bathrooms, listening to volleys of missiles being intercepted above our homes while trying to soothe frightened kids and field messages of concern from abroad.

We have become newly alert to where a window might blow in, how to track down difficult-to-find supplies of basics like chicken or bananas and how every rumble, even a neighbour closing a cupboard, can send the heart racing.

Across a region whose newly treacherous airspace is closed and where the only viable escape route is a long cross-desert drive through territory under Iranian attack, we’re all weighing the same impossible questions: stay or go, and how?

Federico Maccioni, a member of Reuters’ finance team in Dubai, said that for the first time, he perceived a hint of doubt about what lies ahead for the city. Still, Rachna Uppal, the news agency’s Abu Dhabi-based chief economics correspondent, said she was struck by how normal life continued, with people shopping, attending dental appointments, and even jetskiing.

A satellite image shows the Breaker residential tower in Seef, Bahrain on March 2, 2026. — Reuters
A satellite image shows the Breaker residential tower in Seef, Bahrain on March 2, 2026. — Reuters

Meanwhile, as reporters, they’re stretched across the Gulf to make sense of it all. This week in Gulf Currents, Iran’s drones are proving relentless, punching through Gulf defences and striking airports, hotels and data centres.

Tourism is buckling, business hubs are paralysed, and decades of Gulf state-building are suddenly in doubt. This briefing unpacks the economic shock, the strategic stakes and what this war may change forever.

Gulf fundamentals

For decades, the Gulf’s rise rested on two core assumptions, i.e. its cities offered a safe haven in an unstable region and that vast wealth from uninterrupted energy exports would keep flowing. This week’s events have shaken both pillars at once, perhaps irreversibly.

First to falter was the idea of the Gulf as a sanctuary insulated from the region’s violence. Dubai, the flagship embodiment of that promise, was built on the premise that turmoil stopped at its borders. But days of Iranian missile and drone strikes on airports, ports and luxury landmarks punctured that carefully constructed brand.

Smoke billows from Jebel Ali port after an Iranian attack, following United States and Israel strikes on Iran, United Arab Emirates on March 1, 2026. — Reuters
Smoke billows from Jebel Ali port after an Iranian attack, following United States and Israel strikes on Iran, United Arab Emirates on March 1, 2026. — Reuters 

UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed tried to project business-as-usual as he strolled through Dubai Mall on Monday evening, yet outside, flights were grounded, financial markets shut, and jumpy residents queued for supplies, all while deep thuds rolled through the skyscrapers as air defences intercepted barrage after barrage.

The psychological blow raises doubt about whether cities like Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh — the success of which has been built on confidence, mobility, and positive perceptions — can maintain premium appeal when they suddenly prove vulnerable to regional turmoil.

Economic fragility, repercussions

The second rupture is economic, and deeper still.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the shutdown of QatarEnergy’s vast LNG operations, supplier of a fifth of global LNG and long proud of never missing a shipment, have unleashed a supply shock once considered inconceivable.

Damage caused by an Iranian drone strike on one of the buildings next to the Navy Base Headquarters of US Navy 5th Fleet in Juffair, Bahrain on March 4, 2026. — Reuters
Damage caused by an Iranian drone strike on one of the buildings next to the Navy Base Headquarters of US Navy 5th Fleet in Juffair, Bahrain on March 4, 2026. — Reuters 

Iraq has slashed production; Saudi Arabia is rerouting crude; hundreds of tankers sit idle near the port of Fujairah, which is still burning after an attack, without safe passage. Prices for oil, gas and related commodities have surged.

The Gulf’s ability to bankroll diversification, mega-investments and a generous social contract depends on secure energy exports. That assumption is suddenly fragile.

Some of this damage cannot be undone.

What future holds?

This war has unlocked a larger unknown: what will relations between the Arab Gulf and Iran look like after this?

After years of tentative détente, Gulf Arab states had begun recalibrating ties with Iran, acknowledging geography and mutual interest. That fragile trust has now been ruptured.

Smoke rises after reported Iranian missile attacks, following United States and Israel strikes on Iran, as seen from Doha, Qatar on March 1, 2026. — Reuters
Smoke rises after reported Iranian missile attacks, following United States and Israel strikes on Iran, as seen from Doha, Qatar on March 1, 2026. — Reuters

The scale of Iran’s attacks has erased the political space Gulf leaders had carved out for dialogue. Having been attacked directly, Gulf capitals must now confront a harder question: even if the fighting stops, can trust in Iran as a neighbour ever be rebuilt, or has the relationship entered a long, hostile freeze?

The implications are profound. The Gulf’s economic model, energy security, and regional diplomacy, long treated as constants, have all been destabilised. Even if the fighting stops soon, the era of hedging with Iran is perhaps over. And a more guarded, security-driven Gulf lies ahead.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

China to build ‘birth-friendly society’, refine social security system

Published

on

China to build ‘birth-friendly society’, refine social security system


A man carries a child outside a childrens hospital in Beijing, China November 24, 2023. — Reuters
A man carries a child outside a children’s hospital in Beijing, China November 24, 2023. — Reuters

China said on Thursday it would build a “childbirth-friendly society” in the next five years, pledging to address concerns over employment, education, medical care, health and income, according to an official government report.

Authorities will improve population services and respond proactively on ageing, including “promoting high-quality, full employment, improving the income distribution system, and refining the social security system.”

They will also foster “positive attitudes towards marriage and childbearing,” the report said, adding that it would boost housing support for families with children.

China’s population fell for a fourth consecutive year in 2025, as the birth rate plunged to a record low, official data showed in January, with experts warning of further decline.

Policymakers have made population planning a key part of the country’s economic strategy and this year Beijing faces a total potential cost of around 180 billion yuan ($25.8 billion) to boost births, according to Reuters estimates.

Key costs are the national child subsidy, which was introduced for the first time last year, as well as a pledge that women throughout pregnancy have “no out-of-pocket expenses” in 2026, with all medical costs, including in vitro fertilisation (IVF), fully reimbursable under its national medical insurance fund.

Authorities will continue to implement the childcare subsidy system and expand demonstrations and trials for subsidised childcare services, the report said, without giving further details.

Services for women in early stages of pregnancy as well as reproductive health would be improved while authorities aimed to better prevent and treat birth defects.

Authorities will also refine policies on free preschool education and increase the supply of regular senior secondary school places, with government spending on education mandated to be higher than 4% of GDP, the report said.

Developing the ‘silver economy’

China’s population has been shrinking since 2022 and is ageing rapidly, complicating Beijing’s plan to boost domestic consumption and rein in debt.

New policies will be introduced to promote “high-quality development of the silver economy”, targeted at those aged 60 and older, with elderly care services to be increased, particularly in rural areas, the report said.

Authorities will also draw up measures to refine supportive policies designed for seniors including pension finance, wellness and care, it said.

By 2035, the number of Chinese over-60s is set to hit 400 million – roughly equal to the populations of the US and Italy combined – meaning hundreds of millions of people are set to leave the workforce at a time when pension budgets are already stretched.

China has already increased retirement ages, with men now expected to work until they are 63 rather than 60, and women until they are 58 rather than 55.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nepal goes to the polls; voters seek change after youth-led protests

Published

on

Nepal goes to the polls; voters seek change after youth-led protests


A woman votes at a polling station in Patan Durbar Square during the general election in Lalitpur, Nepal, March 5, 2026. — Reuters
A woman votes at a polling station in Patan Durbar Square during the general election in Lalitpur, Nepal, March 5, 2026. — Reuters
  • Voting to run from 7am to 5pm local time, counting to follow.
  • Nepal faces political instability, economic issues and corruption.
  • Rastriya Swatantra Party’s Balendra Shah gains youth support.

KATHMANDU: Nearly six months after a wave of unprecedented youth-led protests and the deaths of 77 people forced Nepal’s then prime minister to quit, people began voting on Thursday in a general election that will choose a new parliament in the Himalayan nation.

Perched between China and India, the country of 30 million people has been plagued for decades by political instability, crippling a largely agrarian economy and worsening unemployment — structural issues compounded by rampant corruption.

The long-festering malaise erupted into street demonstrations last September, triggered by a social media ban, that brought thousands on the streets, leading to clashes and fatalities that forced the resignation of Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli.

On Thursday, voters flocked to schools, temples, and ancient courtyards that have been converted into polling booths across the country, with some braving the morning chill in the capital Kathmandu to vote early.

Voting started at 7am local time (0115 GMT) and will close at 5pm, with counting scheduled to start soon after, according to the country’s election commission.

Officials said more than 300,000 security personnel, including the military, had been deployed to ensure peaceful voting in the more than 23,000 polling booths across the country.

Polling officials prepare a polling booth ahead of Nepal´s general election in Kathmandu on March 4, 2026. — AFP
Polling officials prepare a polling booth ahead of Nepal´s general election in Kathmandu on March 4, 2026. — AFP

Oli, who leads the moderate Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist, UML), is once again in the fray, along with more than 3,400 other candidates from 65 parties.

They include the country’s oldest party, the Nepali Congress led by 49-year-old Gagan Thapa, and the Nepali Communist Party (NCP) comprising former Maoist insurgents who joined mainstream politics.

Together with UML, these parties have dominated Nepali politics for the last three decades, although the country has seen 32 government changes in the past 35 years.

But the frontrunner for these polls is the three-year-old Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP), which has fielded the charismatic rapper-turned-politician Balendra Shah as its prime ministerial candidate.

People queue to vote as a member of the Nepal police stands guard at a polling station during the general election in Damak, Jhapa district, Nepal, March 5, 2026. — Reuters
People queue to vote as a member of the Nepal police stands guard at a polling station during the general election in Damak, Jhapa district, Nepal, March 5, 2026. — Reuters

The 35-year-old former mayor of Nepal’s capital Kathmandu is drawing large crowds, connecting with legions of young voters clamouring for change on the ground and online, even as he takes on Oli, 74, on his home turf in the Jhapa constituency along the Indian border.

Jobs, corruption, main issues

In Jhapa, Menuka Chauhan,70, standing in line for more than 40 minutes at a polling booth, said she was worried about her son, who was working in Qatar as a security guard, as tensions in the Middle East escalated.

“I can’t sleep at night. I worry all the time. My son tells me bombs keep dropping there. I wish there were employment opportunities here,” she said.

Promises of jobs, reining in corruption, and improving governance — all demands raised during the September protests — have dominated much of the election campaign.

“The election is critical to address the aspirations of the youths expressed during the Gen Z protests,” said political analyst Puranjan Acharya.

Nepal Army personnel patrol a street on the eve of Nepals parliamentary elections in Kathmandu on March 4, 2026. — AFP
Nepal Army personnel patrol a street on the eve of Nepal’s parliamentary elections in Kathmandu on March 4, 2026. — AFP

“If the newly elected leaders are seen as unfit to do so, there is a risk of further trouble.”

Some 19 million voters are eligible to cast their ballot for 275 members of parliament through a mixed electoral system — 165 seats in direct first-past-the-post elections and 110 through proportional representation.

Early trends are likely to emerge by Friday but complete results could take a week or more as counting of proportional representation votes would take time, election commission officials said.

“Voting is not just about sending someone to victory,” Interim Prime Minister Sushila Karki, who took over after Oli, said in a public broadcast this week.

“It’s a decision you make about your future and that of your children.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending