Sports
Men’s summer transfer grades: Tottenham get C+ for Simons

Premier League clubs increased their spending in the January window to £370 million — up on the £100 million paid out last year — though Manchester City are chiefly responsible after splashing out £180 million of that on their own. We were nowhere near the 2023 record of £815 million, but will the summer see a rise in expensive moves?
This year, for the first time, the transfer window has been split into two because of the Club World Cup. The first window ran from June 1-10, and it was closed for six days before reopening (for Premier League clubs at least) on June 16. But as always, international deals not involving clubs in the Club World Cup, and free transfers, didn’t go through until July 1.
Here are grades for all the major confirmed transfers in the men’s game, with each listed by date and then by highest fee.
All fees are reported unless confirmed with an asterisk.
Aug. 29
RB Leipzig: B+
Tottenham Hotspur: C+
Simons’ career path is starting to look downright bizarre, and it’s hard to escape the idea that the constant chopping and changing has affected his ability to realise his potential.
Perhaps this move to Tottenham Hotspur provides him with a clean slate, and working with an attentive coach in Thomas Frank will help him nail down exactly who he is as a player and help him finesse his decision-making in the final third, which stands out as a current weakness in his game.
Southampton: A
West Ham: C+
Make no mistake, Fernandes is a quality player. He more than stepped up to Premier League level last season in spite of Southampton’s struggles, combining creativity with workrate in a series of all-round displays. But this looks like a panic move from West Ham’s perspective, who have started the season horribly and ended up paying about £10m more than they were hoping to for the Portuguese.
Aug. 26
Chelsea: A
Borussia Dortmund: B-
Chukwuemeka is obviously brimming with potential, but given injuries have restricted him to just 1,128 league minutes in the past five years, it’s a minor miracle the Blues have managed to recoup €20m, potentially rising to €24m, and secure a “heavy” percentage of any future deal, too.
Perhaps the fact Chelsea defender Aaron Anselmino is also heading to Dortmund on loan has acted as a bit of a sweetener. Ultimately, BVB badly need players, while Chelsea badly need to get rid of them.
Aug. 25
Southampton: A-
Everton: B
Dibling is affectionately known in some circles as “Tyler Dribbling,” as that’s his forte on the pitch. He ranks in the 99th percentile for successful take-ons and the 98th percentile for progressive carries, neatly reflecting what he excels at.
There isn’t a whole lot else to his game right now, but he’s very young and played for an extremely poor team last season, and it’s understandable that he didn’t rack up goals, assists or touches. Southampton have secured a good fee, with potential add-ons and other clauses, while Everton are rightly investing in obvious potential. Anyone who can dribble like this has the chance to become a top player, and Dibling is likely to learn a lot from Jack Grealish this term.
Aug. 23
Crystal Palace: A
Arsenal: B-
After conducting plenty of early summer groundwork on Eze, Arsenal will be delighted to finally secure the 27-year-old’s signature. In doing so, they’ve swooped in and gazumped their great rivals, Tottenham Hotspur, at the 11th hour — which makes the deal even sweeter. Eze has grown into a Premier League star and looks fully ready for a big move like this. He’ll add creativity to the Gunners’ left side and balance out the team nicely, taking some of the focus off Bukayo Saka on the right.
Palace lose a legend, a player they cannot hope to replace like-for-like, but after helping them win the FA Cup, he departs with a blessing — and for a club-record fee that could end up as high as £67.5m with add-ons.
Borussia Dortmund: B
Borussia Mönchengladbach: C+
This isn’t how it was supposed to go for Reyna. The American emerged as a potential USMNT superstar when he debuted for Dortmund at the age of 17, but over the past four years, his career has stalled completely at the club and international level.
Gladbach are taking a cheapish punt on what could still be an electric talent, but he needs to steer clear of injuries and add more creative layers to his game to prove worth even the modest €7m fee.
Aug. 18
Liverpool: A
Bournemouth: C+
If you ever hear anyone ask how Liverpool can afford such a mighty summer spend, point them to this deal. Doak is no doubt brimming with potential, with quick feet and an eye for a pass, but securing £25m for a player who has just three Premier League appearances to his name is phenomenal work.
This is pricey stuff for Bournemouth, but they are (A) flush with cash after letting a host of top players leave, and (B) in a race against time to rebuild a team that has been ravaged. At the very least, they’ve been able to plump for a player who will only get better.
Aug. 17
Aston Villa: B+
Newcastle United: B
The phrase “pure profit” comes to mind. Aston Villa often turn to Ramsey when fit, but as an academy graduate, he’s basically a walking PSR fix that the club have decided to flick the switch on. £39m, potentially rising to around £44m, is a good fee, and it could unlock two or three more new signings for them this month.
Newcastle is acquiring a talented, homegrown player whose direct style of play suits Eddie Howe’s tactics, but the “when fit” notion is key. Ramsey has endured a series of injury issues these past two years, starting just 27 Premier League games out of 76 as a result.
Aug. 16
Ipswich Town: A
Nottingham Forest: B-
Ipswich’s 2024-25 Premier League campaign might have ended in a rather meek relegation, but some players still caught the eye for the right reasons. The first was Liam Delap, who moved to Chelsea for £30 million, and the second was Hutchinson, who has sealed his own quick return to the top tier with Forest.
The £37.5 million fee is a little on the steep side, but he’s young, homegrown, creative and full of potential; this is about the right price to sign such a player. In a better team, there’s every chance he hits new levels, fast.
Bournemouth: A
Brentford: C+
Ouattara is a solid Premier League performer — 11 goal contributions last season, from a variety of different positions, prove that to be the case — but a £37 million deal that could rise to £42.5 million with add-ons, for someone who has not commanded a spot in Bournemouth’s best XI for two years, has a tinge of desperation to it. Unfortunately, that’s just the situation Brentford are in.
After losing their manager (Thomas Frank) and a host of stars (Christian Norgaard, Bryan Mbeumo), they now prefer to recruit younger players and slowly integrate them. But given the talent drain they’ve experienced this summer, it would perhaps have been wiser to go for a more-proven player.
Manchester City: A-
Nottingham Forest: B
From City’s perspective, the initial £22 million fee might look a bit low for a player or McAtee’s quality, but there’s more to this deal than meets the eye. First, it could rise to £30 million with add-ons, and second, there’s a clause to claim a percentage of his next transfer and also one that gives City an option to re-sign him in case he goes supersonic and Pep Guardiola demands him back.
Forest will be happy to add a homegrown left-footer to their options on the wing following the departure of Anthony Elanga to Newcastle United. McAtee captained England to Under-21 European Championship glory this summer and is ready for the next step.
Aug. 15
Parma: A
Liverpool: B-
Liverpool have swooped really early for what they believe is a future star at center back. Leoni is 18, fewer than 35 senior appearances into his career and has just 14 top-level starts to his name.
One particular trait the Reds likely keyed in on was his brilliance in duels. He’s 6-foot-5 and won 63% of his aerial duels last season, but more impressive than that, he stood up to Romelu Lukaku in a 0-0 draw with Napoli and Juventus’ Dusan Vlahovic when Parma won. He’ll need coaching up in other areas — particularly his pass selection. The fee goes down as the fourth-biggest the Crociati have ever received for a player and it’ll allow them to strengthen across the board.
1:20
Hutchison: Grealish loan move to Everton ‘perfect for both parties’
Don Hutchison reacts to Jack Grealish’s agreed loan move to Everton from Manchester City ahead of the upcoming Premier League season.
Aug. 12
Manchester City: C+
Everton: C+
This is an exciting but seriously expensive gamble by Everton and no, that ridiculous £50 million option fee isn’t even a factor in that. Reports suggest this deal could cost the Toffees as much as £12 million for the year, once you account for the loan fee and a large chunk of Grealish’s wages being covered.
Soon to be 30, and with only 1,720 Premier League minutes under his belt in the past two seasons, it’s a lot to stake on a player who once dazzled but now represents a question mark.
AC Milan: B+
Newcastle United: B+
A transfer that works out nicely for all parties? It’s a rarity in football, but Malick Thiaw stands proof it can happen. Newcastle have been in desperate need for another center back for over a year now. In Germany international Thiaw they’re getting a player who can play on either side, suit multiple partners, match the physicality and speed of the league and thread a nice pass through the lines.
Milan bank a fee they couldn’t refuse, which could rise by a further €4 million with bonuses. They can use it to further bolster a squad that has seen more than 15 senior players depart this summer.
Bournemouth: B
PSG: B
PSG pursued Zabarnyi all summer, finally striking a deal in the week the Premier League starts. This is a great fee for Bournemouth to receive, but context and timing must be considered for the grade: They’ve now lost four-fifths of their starting defensive unit from last season and look extremely undermanned ahead of the opening game at Liverpool.
The Ukrainian’s developed quickly into a solid all-round center back. He was always a good passer, but he has improved significantly in the air since joining Bournemouth and is well suited to PSG’s style of play.
Aug. 11
Napoli: B
Atlético Madrid: B
Raspadori’s a nifty, nippy striker who comes alive in the box and finishes naturally off both feet. You can see why Diego Simeone would want that kind of profile in his squad, especially when you consider Atleti have endured a mini-exodus of forwards lately, losing Ángel Correa, Álvaro Morata and Memphis Depay in the past 12 months.
The Italian never quite managed to win a starting role at Napoli, and with Antonio Conte clearly preferring a target striker such as Romelu Lukaku or new arrival Lorenzo Lucca, the time seems right to try something new.
1:33
Is Sesko the right striker for Man United?
Gab Marcotti assesses whether Benjamin Sesko should move to Manchester United amid links to the Premier League club.
Aug. 9
RB Leipzig: A
Man United: B-
Man United emerged victorious in the tug-of-war with Newcastle for Sesko’s signature. Eyebrows have been raised at the price (add-ons could see it rise to an eventual €85 million), but this is the cost of doing business in the young striker market, after Hugo Ekitike joined Liverpool for just under €80 million in July.
Leipzig played the situation perfectly. First, they refused to budge when Arsenal bid less earlier in the summer; then, they stoked a bidding war between two other Premier League giants, eventually extracting maximal value.
Lille: B
PSG: B+
Signing a young goalkeeper when you already have one of the best in the world (Gianluigi Donnarumma) seems a strange thing to do. But with Donnarumma’s contract talks stalling (he’s into his final year), PSG moved quickly to land the 23-year-old Chavalier for a decent fee. It’ll be odd if they don’t find a new club for Donnarumma now though.
Lille, meanwhile, bank a very decent fee for one of their top young stars. And that will help them rebuild.
Liverpool: B+
Al Hilal: B-
After spending an initial €75 million to sign Núñez from Benfica a few years ago, Liverpool did well to recoup most of it. Núñez is unpredictable as a player and never quite settled, so it’s right for both parties to move on, and the Reds can use the money for another signing.
It’s not the marquee transfer Al Hilal got when bringing in Neymar, but Núñez should fare better in Saudi Arabia than he did in the Premier League.
Aug. 8
OGC Nice: C+
Aston Villa: B+
Following the departures of Jhon Durán and Marcus Rashford this year, Villa urgently needed to find another striker in this transfer window. In Guessand, they’ve signed a player who has a No. 9 skill set but can happily play wide, making him a smart fit in terms of squad building.
The Ivory Coast international just turned 24 years of age and provided 20 goal contributions in Ligue 1 last season, making the initial fee — which could rise to €34m with add-ons — look good from Villa’s perspective, but perhaps a little low from Nice’s.
Aug. 6
Club Brugge: A-
AC Milan: B+
Jashari shone for Club Brugge in the Champions League last season, often feeling like the heartbeat of a midfield that stood up to some incredibly strong tests. He can receive the ball under pressure, skip forward with it and redistribute, then even arrive in the box for the odd goal.
After an arduous negotiation, both sides will feel like they’ve come out with a fair deal. If add-ons are met, this fee could reach €39m, which would be a record departure for Club Brugge; while Milan have found an excellent replacement for Tijjani Reijnders.
Chelsea: B
Everton: B+
Dewsbury-Hall experienced a strange 2024-25 season with Chelsea. He signed for £30m but barely featured in the Premier League (259 minutes), instead being restricted to Conference League action. He did at least feature in all 13 European games, scoring four goals and helping the Blues win the competition. But that’s not enough to satisfy anyone, so a move to Everton works for all parties.
If he rediscovers his Leicester City form from the year before — where he scored 12 goals and provided 14 assists en route to the Championship crown — then £25m, plus a potential £4m in add-ons, will prove good value for a team in need of his skill set.
1:31
Son Heung-Min tells LAFC: I’m here to win
Son Heung-Min speaks for the first time as an LAFC player and promises the club he has come to MLS to win.
Tottenham Hotspur: A+
LAFC: B
The way Son has bowed out at Spurs is genuinely heartwarming: He captained the club to a long-awaited trophy, then departed on his own terms, playing his final game in South Korea. It’s picture perfect. It was also fairly obvious he was slowing down and picking up more injuries last season, so, quietly, Spurs will be delighted to receive a really strong fee for the 33-year-old.
With a transfer fee of $26.5m, LAFC have set a new MLS record for a player who ideally plays in the position their current biggest difference-maker, Denis Bouanga, plays. It’s a big marketing move, but will it work out on the pitch? Can Son adapt, potentially by shifting to striker, and deliver the star performances this kind of fee demands from the off?
Juventus: C+
Marseille: B
Weah’s playing time took a nosedive from the point Igor Tudor was appointed Juventus manager in March, starting just three Serie A games over the stretch and barely featuring at the Club World Cup. A summer move always felt likely.
Marseille are getting a decent player on favorable terms, as the loan means they can push the payment into next season and they can sign him permanently for €14m. Weah will replace Luiz Henrique, who moved to Inter in early June, as a versatile right-sider.
Vancouver Whitecaps: B+
Müller’s move to MLS is one of the most fascinating deals of the summer. He’s built an elite career out of being smarter than everyone else and taking up clever positions you wouldn’t expect, but to unlock that skillset, you need teammates who complement you and have the vision to pick you out.
No doubt he’ll enjoy playing off Brian White, who occupies defenders, and with Ryan Gauld, who should be able to play those unexpected passes when fit again. The way Jayden Nelson runs at defenses will open pockets for Müller, too. On paper, it’s a fit, but will it translate to the pitch?
0:55
What will Jorrel Hato’s role be at Chelsea?
Steve Nicol reacts to Chelsea’s agreement to sign 19-year-old defender Jorrel Hato from Ajax.
Aug. 3
Ajax: B-
Chelsea: B+
Hato is not your average teenager. He is incredibly experienced for his age; he’s played more than 100 games for Ajax’s first team, operating at both left back and center back in back-three and back-four systems. Few gain this much exposure, this early.
He’s a technically gifted footballer who moves smoothly across the pitch and shows great passing technique and range. There’ll be plenty to learn defensively at Premier League level and he’s also a bit too one-footed for comfort, but Chelsea will be confident they can coach up what is obviously a stellar prospect.
Bayern Munich: C
Tottenham Hotspur: B
Palhinha is not the midfield profile Spurs are crying out for; they need a reliable controller and playmaker from deep, whereas the big Portuguese excels in the defensive side of the game. That said, on a loan with no obligation, he’s a handy presence to add to the squad.
The 30-year-old’s time at Bayern Munich has been a complete failure and the club haven’t exactly secured a particularly good deal here. It would be no surprise if Spurs did not take up the €30m option to make the move permanent in 2026, leaving Bayern right back where they started.
July 31
Napoli: C
Galatasaray: B
There’s two ways to look at this transfer from Galatasaray’s perspective. The first is that, for a player of Osimhen’s quality — he’s arguably a top-five striker in world football — this is a pretty reasonable fee. For a comparison, Alexander Isak would cost double this if he were to move. The second is that this blows the Turkish transfer record out of the water. It was previously set by Youssef En-Nesyri’s €19.5m move to Fenerbahce, so more than tripling that figure seems incredibly excessive in the context of the Süper Lig.
Whichever way you look at it from Napoli’s perspective, they haven’t managed this situation well. They’ve fumbled opportunities to earn more from this transfer in the past after the relationship between the club and the player completely broke down in 2023. Sure, they still won Serie A last season without him, but they have taken a financial hit.
1:15
Why are Premier League clubs not moving for Osimhen?
Gabriele Marcotti and Julien Laurens debate why Premier League clubs are not moving for Victor Osimhen after the Nigerian striker turned down Al Hilal’s lucrative offer.
DAN NDOYE
€40m (£34.6m; $46.1m)
Bologna: B+
Nottingham Forest: B
Ndoye’s had a phenomenal 12 months, first starring at Euro 2024 for a strong Switzerland team, then capping a great domestic campaign by helping Bologna win the Coppa Italia to end a 51-year trophy drought. He leaves the Rossoblù‘s in a good place, having netted them a fee that could rise to €45m with add-ons.
As a winger, he’s fast, clever when he needs to be, and physical when he needs to be. Forest certainly need those qualities now Anthony Elanga has departed, so Ndoye stands to become an important player for the club very quickly.
2:17
Why Luis Díaz is a ‘really good fit’ for Bayern Munich
Alejandro Moreno reacts to Luis Díaz’s proposed transfer to Bayern Munich from Liverpool.
July 30
Liverpool: A
Bayern Munich: C+
It’s tough to escape the feeling Liverpool have played a blinder here. They insisted Díaz was going nowhere all summer, then watched as Bayern scratched around for solutions in an increasingly desperate situation.
The German champions said goodbye to Thomas Müller and Leroy Sané, missed out on Athletic Club’s Nico Williams, then saw Jamal Musiala brutally injured at the Club World Cup. They probably shouldn’t have paid this much to sign a 28-year-old winger, but perhaps felt they were left with no other choice. Liverpool will be quietly happy to take the money and reload.
July 29
Burnley: D
Manchester City: A
Trafford enjoyed an unbelievable 2024-25 season with Burnley, keeping 29 clean sheets en route to promotion, going 1,132 minutes without conceding at one stage, and preventing 11.8 more goals than expected based on the shots he faced.
To top all that off, he’s so good with the ball at his feet he looks like an outfielder at times. Losing this player upon promotion is frankly horrid for the Clarets, who stand no chance of finding a like-for-like replacement.
The £27m fee received isn’t anywhere near enough to save the optics on this, even if there may have been a PSR element at play.
City, though, will be delighted. Trafford is an academy graduate who has flourished elsewhere and is now returning to provide a long-term solution between the sticks.
1:07
What does Trafford’s return to Man City mean for Ederson?
Julien Laurens talks about James Trafford’s transfer to Manchester City after rejoining the club from Championship runners-up Burnley.
July 26
Sporting CP: B
Arsenal: B
Arsenal’s long chase for a No. 9 is over. Gyökeres brings goals, physicality and a determination to prove he belongs at Premier League level. The fact he’s tormented teams in the Champions League for Sporting suggests he won’t have trouble doing that.
– Various: How Gyökeres became the most-sought striker in soccer
While €10m of potential add-ons could take this transfer above the €70m mark, it still feels like it’s relatively in keeping with the market — and that’s a win for the Gunners, because their desperation for a striker threatened to drive this price into orbit.
Atletico Madrid: C
Inter Miami: A
Lionel Messi continues to open doors for Inter Miami. De Paul was desperate to unite with his compatriot at club level and has seemingly made a sacrifice to do so, as he’ll only earn a Designated Player salary starting in 2026 should Miami make the move permanent.
– Becherano: How Inter Miami were able to sign De Paul
This is a huge coup for the MLS club, who in ordinary circumstances would not be able to nab a quality midfielder from Atlético Madrid.
July 24
Valencia: C-
Arsenal: A
All of Arsenal’s summer business has been geared towards the here and now up until this point, but Mosquera represents a nod to the future. He’s nowhere near ready to challenge William Saliba and Gabriel Magalhães for a spot in the XI, but his physical tools suggest he could be molded into something great. If you’re thinking this fee looks a little low, Valencia would regretfully agree.
A package that could rise to roughly €20m is below market value for a high-potential center back with 82 LaLiga appearances to his name already, but Los Che lacked leverage in negotiations as Mosquera had entered the final year of his contract.
July 23
Eintracht Frankfurt: A
Liverpool: B
Liverpool tried and failed to sign Alexander Isak. Instead, they settled for the next best thing on the market in Ekitike.
The Frenchman’s career is firmly back on track after a brilliant 18-month spell with Eintracht Frankfurt saw him register 19 goals and 10 assists in the Bundesliga. The way Ekitike plays the No. 9 role is far from traditional. He’s tall and slim, but would rather peel off to the flank, collect the ball and start dribbling, as opposed to battling defenders and seeking contact.
It’s easy to see him slotting into that role with the Reds, as that’s largely how Luis Díaz played as their center forward last season. There’s a cap on how high Liverpool’s grade can be here because this is a big fee (it could rise to £79m), but Ekitike is at least the right style and age (23) to spend heavily on.
Manchester United: C+
Barcelona: A
Something had to give for Rashford to find a new home this summer. In the end, it was Rashford himself. He has reportedly taken a sizable wage cut to facilitate a loan to Barcelona. This is still far from ideal for Man United, as the much-coveted permanent exit has not come, while the permanent option price has dropped from £40m to around £26m.
But it is, finally, a concrete step toward Rashford’s time at Old Trafford coming to an end. Barça, meanwhile, have ended up replacing Ansu Fati with a player who can contribute much more, offers a completely different dimension to the team and still hasn’t actually committed to anything long term.
1:14
Why did Man United take so long to agree a deal for Bryan Mbeumo?
Julien Laurens reacts to Man United’s deal for Bryan Mbeumo from Brentford.
July 21
Brentford: A
Manchester United: C
Man United zeroed in on Mbeumo and, in the end, paid more than pretty much anyone expected to make the deal happen. He’s been a consistently strong performer in the Premier League for the last four seasons and has a wand of a left foot. The concern should be whether the Cameroon international’s historic 2024-25 season, in which he scored 20 goals and provided seven assists, can be repeated. He overperformed his xG (expected goals) to a frightening degree, scoring 7.5 goals more than expected, and likely won’t get to take six penalties next year as a teammate of Bruno Fernandes.
Brentford, obviously, will not care about any of this. They’ve extracted a huge price from United here; it could rise to £71m with add-ons.
July 18
Chelsea: C+
Arsenal: B-
This is a curious transfer from just about every angle. Madueke has done well to add elements to his game over the past two years and now seems definitively good enough to play for a top club. Yet just as he made that leap his departure was sanctioned, while the winger Chelsea signed this summer (Jamie Gittens) isn’t as polished.
Arsenal certainly needed to add a winger, but it felt like a left sider who could also play on the right was the clear move — not the other way around. It’s a touch surprising that Madueke, who seemed on the verge of exploding, would either accept a losing battle against Bukayo Saka for the right-wing spot, or commit to the less-favored left wing. There must be more pieces to this puzzle. Consider the low(ish) grades open to revision, should more come to light.
1:13
Ogden wonders why Arsenal are signing Madueke before a striker
Mark Ogden talks about Noni Madueke’s reported move to Arsenal from Chelsea.
July 17
Rosenborg: C
Man City: A+
In what was starting to look like Martin Ødegaard’s tour of Europe in 2014 to select his next club at age 16, his Norway compatriot Nypan has settled on Man City. Nypan is expected to spend the first phases of his career in England out on loan.
But the key to this deal, and the reason why City get an A+, is that £12.5m is reportedly the sum total of the fee. No clauses, no add-ons; just £12.5m for one of Europe’s premier young talents.
July 16
Real Betis: B
Atlético Madrid: B
Cardoso proved quite the find for Betis, who signed him 18 months ago for $6.3m, reached a Conference League final with his help, then flipped him for roughly five times their investment.
The American is a prolific tackler and interceptor (94th percentile in LaLiga in 2024-25) and has a knack for turning out of pressure on the ball well, often pirouetting or skipping away from markers. Diego Simeone will love those traits, plus the fact that he doesn’t dally with his passes. He’ll have to fight hard for a spot in this midfield, but he brings a fresh, youthful, energetic element to the setup.
July 15
Charlotte FC: B
Derby County: B+
Agyemang feels like the exact sort of striker profile that can make a splash in the Championship. He’s a little rough around the edges, sure, but he can battle, hustle defenders and provide a threat on goal. It’s an outside-of-the-box signing for Derby, which should be praised, but it’s in no way cheap, considering their typical budget.
This fee could rise to around $10m in the future, which gives Charlotte a lot of flexibility to replace him, especially now MLS clubs can sign each other’s players for money.
July 14
Benfica: A
Real Madrid: B-
Carreras is a tall, physical, rumbling fullback who drives into space with a powerful stride; from a stylistic point of view, think Marcos Alonso in attack. He’s arguably better defensively than he is going forward, which likely makes him a good counterbalance to Trent Alexander-Arnold on the other flank.
Benfica have done brilliantly to hold out for Carreras’ full release clause and, 18 months after signing him for less than €10m, have quintupled their investment.
FC Copenhagen: D
Barcelona: A+
Bardghji, 19, stands as proof of football’s cruel, unpredictable nature. Back in November 2023, when he scored a beautiful Champions League winner against Manchester United, the world appeared to be at his feet; but an ACL tear in May 2024 ruled him out for a whole year, delaying his progress.
This is a gamble well worth taking for Barça, who know full well what Bardghji could become if he stays fit and gets back on track. For Copenhagen, it’s a gut punch to lose what looked set to be a huge payday for so little, as his contract ran into its final six months.
AC Milan: A
It threatens to be a turbulent summer at AC Milan; they have another new manager, another new sporting director and are shedding top talents like Tijjani Reijnders and Theo Hernández.
In that situation, an experienced head like Luka Modrić could prove to be a low-risk, high-value pickup, especially when you consider the man in charge, Max Allegri, has always preferred a veteran makeup to his team.
July 12
PSV Eindhoven: A-
Bayer Leverkusen: B
The rising star of the United States men’s national team, Tillman’s big summer just got even bigger thanks to a move to Bayer Leverkusen, where he’ll attempt to fill the Florian Wirtz-sized hole in their team. The 23-year-old looks like a good fit for new coach Erik ten Hag’s squad, as he not only boasts tremendous off-the-ball movement and natural finishing technique, but also works extremely hard defensively and uses his big frame well.
PSV will miss him, but at least €35m plus another €5m in add-ons makes him one of their five most expensive departures ever.
July 11
Nottingham Forest: B+
Newcastle United: B-
After three straight windows of chasing his signature, Newcastle finally have Elanga. Manager Eddie Howe is all-in on him and believes he can elevate his first XI — which is something the club haven’t managed to do for a whole year. The Sweden international scored six goals (including a magnificent solo effort against Manchester United) and provided 11 assists last season. He’s one of the fastest players in the league and, at 23, you get the sense he’s still on the up.
Forest will miss him dearly, but have at least landed a strong fee (which could rise to £55m with add-ons) in return for him.
AC Milan: C
Al Hilal: A
It’s not often Saudi Pro League clubs land what feels like a bargain, but it’s hard to escape the idea that a fee that could top out at €30m with add-ons for one of the world’s best left backs is anything other than a steal. He should enjoy life as a wing back under former Inter manager Simone Inzaghi.
That said, Hernández had a poor season in 2024-25 and had come to the final year of his contract, so perhaps this is the best Milan could do out of a bad situation.
2:00
The ESPN FC crew love Spurs’ moves for Kudus and Gibbs-White
Mark Ogden, Stewart Robson and Shaka Hislop react to Spurs signing Mohammed Kudus from West Ham, and reports that Morgan Gibbs-White will soon join him.
July 10
West Ham: A-
Tottenham Hotspur: B
Kudus is one of the most exciting footballers to watch in world football; very few can dribble or carry the ball over long distances in the way he can. Unfortunately, there’s a distinct lack of composure, decision-making or end-product at the end of those runs — five goals and three assists last season was a disappointing haul — that has deeply frustrated Hammers fans.
Spurs are making a big bet that they can be the ones to finesse Kudus’ game and unlock his remarkable potential. On paper, Thomas Frank is exactly the kind of coach who can do that, but off the back of a £55m transfer fee, there isn’t much room for error.
Brentford: D
Arsenal: A-
With both Jorginho and Thomas Partey’s contracts expiring at the end of June, Arsenal have been pushed to totally revamp the base of their midfield. In that situation, a proven, Premier League-quality, experienced head and good all-rounder like Nørgaard seems a smart pickup.
The fee may rise to £15m with add-ons, but that still feels like a rough deal for Brentford, who just lost their captain and heartbeat. He made 34 league starts, provided nine goal contributions and racked up the most combined tackles and interceptions on the team (128) last season; that’s a tough player to replace.
July 6
Real Sociedad: A
Arsenal: B
It was finally time for Zubimendi to move on from his beloved Real Sociedad. They did well to hold on to him for as long as they did, and after a difficult season in which La Real finished 11th in LaLiga, the €60m can fund a rebuild.
The Spain international is a masterful midfielder whose top quality is that he tends to make everyone around him better. He’s a strong possession recycler and anticipates how play will develop superbly, which makes him a natural fit at the base of Mikel Arteta’s midfield.
July 5
Borussia Dortmund: A
Chelsea: C+
Gittens had a curious 2024-25 season. The Englishman was one of Dortmund’s best players during their dysfunctional run up to Christmas, scoring nine Bundesliga goals and adding three assists during that time. But he then faded to a substitute role as the team found structure and discipline after the winter break.
What, if anything, can we take from that? Chelsea have signed him because they see potential; they love his sharp movements, incredible agility and improving finishing. But there’s plenty for Gittens still to learn and he’ll have to compete hard for a spot in this XI.
July 4
Lille: D
Juventus: A-
Following five consecutive strong scoring seasons with Lille, David finally gets his big move. Not only does Juventus feel like a good fit for him, but from the Old Lady’s perspective, the reported wages — circa €100,000 per week — are quite reasonable considering how out-of-control free transfers can often get.
But what’s good for David and Juve is not good for Lille. Europe’s top clubs have sniffed around David year on year and Les Dogues refused to agree to a transfer; now, they’ve lost him for nothing, and they stand no chance of replacing him like-for-like (38-year-old Olivier Giroud is their attempt).
1:43
Ogden: No logic behind Chelsea signing João Pedro
Mark Ogden reacts to Chelsea’s proposed move for Brighton’s João Pedro.
July 2
Brighton: B+
Chelsea: B-
Pedro joins Nicolas Jackson and Liam Delap to create a suddenly well-stocked, well-rounded forward group at Chelsea. The Brazil international’s game is far more subtle than the other two, and perhaps he’s the closest thing to Roberto Firmino the Premier League can offer: He’s good for about 10 goals, then offers so much more in terms of playmaking, flicks and chance creation.
There’s a fair question to be raised as to whether this style of striker would encroach upon Cole Palmer’s space, but Pedro can also play wide or as the attacking midfielder, meaning there’ll be options as to how to deploy him. The fee, which could rise to £60m with add-ons, means Brighton have been well compensated for their loss.
Villarreal: B+
Atlético Madrid: B-
Over the past two seasons, Baena has marked himself out as one the most creative players in Spain, creating the most chances in LaLiga (176), registering the most assists (23), and coming second only to Lamine Yamal in big chances created (36). This is undoubtedly a skill set worth paying a fee that could rise to €50m for, but should we be concerned that the majority of genius midfielders that link up with Diego Simeone’s combative Atletico side tend to fall flat?
Liverpool: B
Bayer Leverkusen: B
Quansah has become the latest young Englishman to embrace the lure of the Bundesliga. Leverkusen lost Jonathan Tah to Bayern Munich earlier this summer so were in the market for a good young defender. They’ve picked a good — potentially great — one.
From Liverpool’s perspective, it always hurts to lose an academy product, but Quansah only just ticked over 1,000 minutes last season in all competitions due to the presence of Virgil van Dijk and Ibrahima Konaté. If he’s feeling the need to kick on at 22, at least the Reds got a healthy fee for his transfer, with another potential £5m in add-ons.
July 1
Bayer Leverkusen: C
Liverpool: A-
Replacing Alexander-Arnold at right back in like-for-like fashion is impossible, so it’s for the best that Liverpool have opted for a completely different type of player in Frimpong. The Dutch player is more of a winger who will now need to adjust and convert back to a position he hasn’t called home for a good few years.
A fee of €35 million represents a clever, opportunistic deal for the Reds. But it’s tough on Leverkusen, who are losing an excellent player in his prime, who was a huge personality in the squad, for below market rate.
0:55
Hislop: Frimpong is a like-for-like replacement for Trent
Shaka Hislop reacts to the news of Liverpool signing Bayer Leverkusen’s Jeremie Frimpong as Trent Alexander-Arnold’s replacement.
Espanyol: C-
Barcelona: A
García has emerged as one of the outstanding young goalkeepers in world football. He was the best shot-stopper in LaLiga last season, saving 7.7 more goals than expected based on the shots he faced, and was a willing sweeper off his line too.
On the face of it, it doesn’t feel like Barcelona need another goalkeeper, given Marc-Andre ter Stegen is fit again and Wojciech Szczesny has extended his contract. But the former is 33 years old and the latter 35, so it seems like the team has one eye on the future with this signing. At €25m it’s an unmissable market opportunity — and the fact they’re taking him off local rivals Espanyol makes it even sweeter.
Chelsea: C
Arsenal: A
Recruiting reliable second-choice goalkeepers is a tricky task. Put simply, you want quality, but you don’t want to commit too much money toward a player you don’t plan on using too often. With that in mind, Kepa for £5m is a bit of a masterstroke from Arsenal; the Spaniard is vastly experienced, confident with the ball at his feet and a great deputy for David Raya.
For Chelsea … well, it’s the end — finally — of an incredibly unsuccessful €80m deal (which is still a world record for a goalkeeper) struck back in 2018.
Barcelona: B+
AS Monaco: C+
Fati once stood where Lamine Yamal now stands — with the world at his feet — but injuries have derailed what was supposed to be a fast track to stardom and he has managed just 747 league minutes across the past two seasons. It left Barcelona stuck with a huge contract (reports suggest the Spaniard earns more than €250,000 per week) that they can’t afford, and a player who no one will sign permanently because he’s barely played since 2023.
A loan move (with an €11m option to sign permanently) is probably the best Barça could do given the situation, while he signed a new three-year deal to preserve his transfer valuation. For Monaco, time may prove this a shrewd move, but for now it looks like an expensive gamble given they’re covering half of his salary.
Manchester City: C-
Napoli: B+
It’s the end of an era for Manchester City and the Premier League as a whole, with Kevin De Bruyne departing for new pastures. Soon to be 34, it’s no disaster that the Citizens didn’t get a fee for the Belgian; it just stings that a club legend is gone.
Napoli have signed a hugely experienced, talented and driven midfielder, one who should keep famously combustible manager Antonio Conte happy. The lack of longevity in this deal prevents it from earning an A grade, but it’s still an extremely exciting pickup for the Partenopei.
June 28
AS Monaco: A-
At 32 years of age, having last played 90 minutes in March 2022, we truly have no idea what Pogba can offer following the end of his 18-month ban after he tested positive for DHEA, a banned substance. But, in a way, that doesn’t really matter. Simply getting the midfielder back on the pitch is a win for the sport, as he’s such a joyful, elegant presence, while there’s barely any risk from Monaco’s perspective with this deal. They’re happy to see what he’s got left in the tank.
June 26
Bournemouth: B
Liverpool: A-
Athleticism is the name of the game for top-level full-backs and Kerkez has a seemingly unlimited supply of it. At 21, his game still needs some refining, but the signs are incredibly promising. The last time Liverpool bought a rampaging, aggressive left-back from lower down the Premier League hierarchy it was Andy Roberson from Hull City in 2017. That move worked out better than anyone could have imagined, so why not try it again?
The fee of £40m may prove slightly better value for the Reds than it does for Bournemouth in the end.
June 20
FLORIAN WIRTZ
£100m (€117.5m; $135.5m)
Bayer Leverkusen: A+
Liverpool: B
Wirtz is one of the finest young players in the world, a creative machine, ranking in the 93rd percentile (or better) across Europe for shot-creating actions, progressive passes and successful take-ons. It’s no wonder the elite clubs queued up and fought for him. The byproduct of that scramble, though, is that the price has gone up and up and up.
An initial £100m, plus another £16m in add-ons, makes this monster deal — the fourth-most expensive of all time, if things go to plan. Barely any deals in this sort of price range actually prove to be a success because expectations are ramped up to an obscene degree, and that’s something Wirtz will battle from the moment he walks through the door. The Germany international is a phenomenal footballer, but B is the maximum grade we can give Liverpool for this transfer because of the price.
Leverkusen, meanwhile, have played this masterfully.
June 14
MATHYS TEL
€35m (£29.8m; $40.4m)
Bayern Munich: A-
Tottenham Hotspur: B
Spurs rightly bristled at the €60m asking price for Tel back in January, opting instead to pay €10m to loan the France U21 forward. Clearly they like what they saw, as they’ve paid a further €35m (plus a possible €5m in add-ons) to make him a Lilywhite for good.
Once considered one of Europe’s hottest prospects, Tel’s lack of gametime (nine Bundesliga starts in 2½ years) at Bayern set him back. Spurs are smart to try to tap into that potential for a more reasonable fee, while Die Rekordmeister have somehow made a profit on a player they didn’t really improve along the way.
0:41
Vickery: Mastantuono shows signs of a young Zidane
Tim Vickery speaks about River Plate’s Franco Mastantuono ahead of the Club World Cup.
June 13
River Plate: A
Real Madrid: A
The River Plate production line just keeps on rolling. In the last few seasons alone, they’ve developed Enzo Fernández, Julián Álvarez, and Claudio Echeverri — and now, come August when he turns 18, Mastantuono’s name will be added to the list of famous exports.
The teenager has already dazzled in the Argentine Primera División, teeing up goals, scoring spectacular efforts himself, and constantly nutmegging defenders. He plays with the sort of freedom and spontaneity that marks him out as a potential superstar.
June 12
Bayern Munich: C
Galatasaray: A
This is a showstopper of a transfer from Galatasaray, who have managed to coax 29-year-old Sané to the Turkish Süper Lig on a three-year contract. They’re reportedly paying him plenty, but the figures mentioned — around €175,000 per week plus a loyalty bonus — hardly tip into the extortionate.
It’s worth remembering there’s a signing on fee at play too, so Gala have invested a substantial sum into the German despite the transfer technically being “free,” but the fact Bayern will be sad to lose him says it all. What a way for the Turkish champions to compound their dominance.
Wolves: A
Man United: B
Wolves parted with £44m to sign Cunha in 2022. At the time, few doubted his talent, but many pointed to a lack of production in front of goal as a concern. He answered those worries with 19- and 21-goal contribution campaigns in the past two seasons, effectively carrying his side through turbulent times.
The Brazil international looks an ideal fit for Rúben Amorim’s support forward role in the 3-4-3 formation, and he’s clearly a player willing to take responsibility and make things happen in the final third, which Man United need more of. This is a player in his prime, ready to lead … but his hot-headed nature can sometimes get the better of him.
2:23
How would Reijnders & Cherki fit in Man City’s XI?
Julien Laurens puts together a potential starting XI for Manchester City next season.
June 10
AC Milan: B
Manchester City: A-
Reijnders is a beautiful player to watch. He doesn’t run, he glides, and it won’t take City fans long to fall in step with the Dutchman. He’s mobile, smooth, uses the ball well and offers a goal threat, too.
It’s a €55m deal that could rise to €70m with add-ons, which is a price that suits everybody. Milan will be loathe to lose him, but after finishing eighth in Serie A and missing out on European football altogether, the financial shortfall has to be made up somewhere.
Lyon: C+
Manchester City: A
Cherki’s move to Man City is fascinating, as it puts one of the most skillful, mercurial young footballers on the planet in the hands of Pep Guardiola. That should be a match made in heaven, but Pep has had some trouble with off-the-cuff attackers in recent years — just ask Jack Grealish and Jérémy Doku.
But while success is not guaranteed, the fee — which could rise to €42.5m — makes it a must-seal deal for City, as the Frenchman has the talent to potentially step into the Kevin De Bruyne void. Lyon will miss him dearly, but they need the revenue.
Sunderland: B
Borussia Dortmund: B+
Even promotion to the Premier League isn’t enough to keep your star players! Sunderland will play top-tier football in 2025-26 but do so without a key fixture in their midfield, as Jobe Bellingham follows his brother Jude’s path to Dortmund. At the very least, they receive a club record fee for the 19-year-old — €33m, potentially rising to €38m.
Dortmund are hoping lightning strikes twice, and the signs so far are positive: Jobe boasts remarkable physical dominance, plus the unerring tendency to pop up at the right time and deliver a crucial moment.
June 9
Wolves: C+
Man City: A
In what’s threatening to become an extremely expensive full-back market once again given the dearth of quality at the position, £33 million for Äït-Nouri is a dreamy deal for City. He’s a superb carrier of the ball, capable of hugging the touchline or venturing infield, and looks really strong technically. At just 24 years of age, there’s room for more improvement too.
Most would have expected Wolves to bank more for the Algerian. He has only one year left on his deal, but there was an option for the club to trigger another season top. Instead, they’ve let him move onwards and upward.
Bayer Leverkusen: C-
Bayern Munich: B-
A Leverkusen stalwart, Tah has a career trajectory that suddenly shot upwards in 2023-24, when he expertly marshalled the back line to an unbeaten Bundesliga title run. The role Xabi Alonso curated for him was very specific, at the heart of a back three, which brought out his best. It’ll hurt to lose the Germany international for free.
Clearly, Bayern are convinced Tah is the plug-and-play answer to their central defensive issues, but they’ll have to get more out of him, over a longer period, than Leverkusen did for that to be the case. There’s reportedly a big signing-on fee (€15m) and big wages (over €200,000 per week) being committed to this deal, so don’t be fooled into thinking Tah has come particularly cheap.
He was due to join on July 1, but Bayern paid a small fee to bring the transfer forward for the Club World Cup.
June 6
Marseille: B
Inter: B+
After months of negotiations, Inter and Marseille reached an agreement on Luis Henrique in time for him to represent the Nerazzurri at the Club World Cup. The €25m fee might seem a touch low for the Brazilian, but L’OM’s bargaining position was weak, given they had to sanction his departure before mid-June in order to avoid a financial breach.
Curiously, Luis Henrique arrived at the club while they were managerless, with Simeone Inzaghi having left for Saudi Arabia. He likely would have been set for an adaptation to wing-back under the now former boss, but now? We must wait and see.
June 5
Al Ahli: D
FC Porto: A
Two years ago, Veiga became a flash-point topic in football. A rising star in LaLiga, fresh off a breakout campaign with Celta Vigo, he opted to join Saudi Arabian outfit Al Ahli over Napoli on a reported annual salary of €12m, became one of the first young or prime-age players to make such a choice, and drew staunch criticism for it — notably from Toni Kroos, who labelled it “embarrassing.”
Now Veiga returns to Europe, having helped Al Ahli win their first Asian Champions League crown. In signing him, FC Porto have elevated their midfield in time for the Club World Cup for an extremely reasonable fee.
1:55
Will Liam Delap be able to step up his game at Chelsea?
The “ESPN FC” crew debate whether Chelsea are taking too much of a risk by signing Liam Delap to be their long-term solution at striker.
June 4
Ipswich Town: C
Chelsea: A-
Delap caught the eye in his first Premier League campaign despite his team’s overall struggles and eventual relegation. He scored 12 goals for a team that collected just 25 points, bulldozing his way into shooting positions and running the channels nonstop.
While there’s no guarantee the 22-year-old adapts to a top club and elevates this Chelsea squad, taking advantage of his £30m release clause was a no-brainer. There’s just no downside to this deal for the Blues: He’ll either make an impact, or they’ll easily move him on … probably for more money.
June 3
Liverpool: B-
Brentford: A
Kelleher’s long-awaited move to become a Premier League No. 1 has arrived. He was the perfect deputy at Liverpool, stepping in and playing to an extremely high level when Alisson was injured, yet never kicking up a fuss when sent back to the bench. There’s only so long you can keep a player like that until they want and deserve more.
Brentford have pulled off a masterstroke in nabbing him. A £12.5m initial fee looks like a steal, and while add-ons could take the deal up to £18m, it’s still low given the Republic of Ireland international’s age (26) and proven quality. In sending Mark Flekken to Bayer Leverkusen and replacing him with Kelleher, the Bees have upgraded between the sticks.
June 2
Sporting CP: C-
Chelsea: B+
Essugo was tucked into a larger deal that also takes 18-year-old winger Geovany Quenda (€52m) to Chelsea in 2026. He’s the lesser-hyped of the two, although he did make waves when he made his Champions League bow aged 16 in 2021. He’s an energetic, aggressive defensive midfielder who covers ground, plugs gaps and tackles resolutely.
The loan move to Las Palmas this season has helped him get a foothold in the senior game, and his performances suggest Chelsea got the better end of this part of the deal.
June 1
0:51
Marcotti: Huijsen’s £50m transfer clause ‘like a free transfer’
Gab Marcotti talks about Dean Huijsen’s reported transfer to Real Madrid from Bournemouth.
AFC Bournemouth: A
Real Madrid: A
Madrid moved quickly and beat off a host of competition to secure Huijsen’s signature following his 2024-25 breakout campaign in the Premier League. The Spaniard’s comfort with the ball at his feet, slaloming dribbles and genuine two-footedness have marked him out as one of the best young center backs in the world; his style reminds of a young Gerard Piqué.
Bournemouth got to enjoy him for only one season, but in acquiring him from Juventus and accepting a release clause of £50 million, they would have been under no illusions as to whether this was a long-term marriage. Perhaps the big move has come sooner than expected, but they’ve been well compensated nonetheless.
Liverpool: D
Real Madrid: A
We were all set to add Alexander-Arnold’s name to the list of remarkable Real Madrid free transfers — but the FIFA Club World Cup has scuppered that. In the end, Los Blancos paid around €12 million to usher in the right-back before this summer’s tournament, cementing the fact they’re taking it incredibly seriously.
Time might prove this to be an excessive move from Madrid, but at the end of the day, they’ve still signed a stunning player for a small fee. Liverpool’s grade gets bumped up from an F as they at least got something in return for their academy graduate.
Valencia: B
Liverpool: A-
Liverpool have doubled down on their policy of keeping the goalkeepers room stacked with talent by bringing in the best shot stopper under 25 in Europe. Mamardashvili looks like the second coming of Gianluigi Donnarumma; his big, burly frame, incredible reflexes and aerial dominance all impress. It should be noted, though, that he shares the Italian’s lack of finesse when passing the ball.
The transfer fee looks great for the Reds and bad for Valencia. Part of the reason it’s cheap is because Los Che got to keep him for one extra season on loan, but history will read: Mamardashvili for €35 million. And it’ll be seen as an absolute bargain.
ESTÊVÃO
€34m (£28.5m, $38.5m)
Palmeiras: A-
Chelsea: A
“I think he’s going to be a genius.” Neymar’s verdict of Estêvão will be music to the ears of Chelsea, who committed when the player was just 17 years old to a deal that could rise to around €67 million ($76m) if add-ons are met.
He’s ridiculously exciting to watch, already has tons of first-team experience under his belt and led the Brazilian top tier with 22 goal contributions in 2024. Palmeiras were never going to hang on to a player nicknamed “Messinho” for long, but they at least kept him for the Club World Cup.
Bayern Munich: C
AS Monaco: B+
Eyebrows were raised when Bayern signed Dier from Tottenham Hotspur in January 2024. After all, he couldn’t crack Ange Postecoglou’s XI, so how was he going to get game time in Munich? But 18 months and more than 45 appearances later, he departs well regarded. In fact, given the long-term injuries Die Röten are dealing with at center back, they’ll probably end up missing him.
Monaco will be counting on Dier’s experience to guide a team that is, by design, young and full of promise. He looks a good fit for that elder statesman role.
Sports
Barnwell: The NFL-altering Micah Parsons trade, and what comes next for the Cowboys and Packers

The quickest way to make a boring, redundant soap opera more exciting is a shocking twist. After months of publicly flirting with the idea of trading star edge rusher Micah Parsons, Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys talked themselves into the most unexpected of moves Thursday afternoon — shipping Parsons to the Green Bay Packers for two first-round picks and defensive tackle Kenny Clark. It would be the most stunning trade of the year for just about any other city in America besides Dallas, which has now seen its sports teams deal away two young cornerstones in Parsons and NBA standout Luka Doncic in a matter of eight months.
Like Doncic, Parsons is the sort of young superstar at a critical position who isn’t supposed to ever hit the market. Organizations pray that they’ll land someone as impactful in the draft as Parsons. Even while missing four games last season with a high ankle sprain, the Penn State product became the second player in NFL history to rack up 12 or more sacks in each of his first four seasons. The only other one to do that is another player Packers fans came to love: Reggie White.
The Packers hope Parsons becomes the third in a series of defensive stars who were underappreciated by their prior teams before joining Green Bay and firmly establishing themselves as no-doubt Hall of Famers. White and Charles Woodson, Parsons’ predecessors in that designated role, joined as free agents later in their careers after they had turned 30. Parsons just turned 26. This is a player entering his prime. Getting what Parsons has proved to be is a coup. But there’s a chance the Packers get an even better version of the star edge rusher.
Subscribe: ‘The Bill Barnwell Show’
This is a trade as opposed to a free agent acquisition, though. And a Packers team that has typically loathed giving away draft picks just shipped two first-rounders to the Cowboys in the hope that it has finally landed the defensive difference-maker it has sought for years. There’s a lot to discuss here from the Packers’ side. But first, as I try to sort through the various questions emanating from this trade, there’s one I keep getting over and over again:
Jump to:
What were the Cowboys thinking?
Did the Cowboys get enough in return?
Is this a steal for the Packers?
Are the Packers now atop the NFC?
What are the Cowboys thinking?
I’d tread carefully in attempting to occupy the same headspace as Jerry Jones, who has handled this process with all the deftness and precision of the final offensive snap in any recent Cowboys playoff loss. Jones will surely be happy to come out and tell us why he traded Parsons in the weeks to come, either directly or through other members of the media. He might even be telling the truth.
If I’m being realistic, I suspect that there was probably some combination of factors that led to the move. (And no, it wasn’t the possibility of Parsons getting hit by a car.) Three arguments come to mind as the most likely from the Cowboys’ perspective. You’ll have to decide how convincing they are for yourselves.
1. Jones believed he had been betrayed and decided to take a stand against a player (and an agent) on principle. In the various reports between Parsons’ trade request and the consummation of this Packers deal, it became clear that there was a disconnect between the team and player. According to Jones, the owner thought he had agreed on the framework of a deal with Parsons sometime during the spring. In his trade request, Parsons characterized this as an informal discussion — one that took place without his agent, David Mulugheta.
Jones responded by essentially blaming Mulugheta for the conflict between the two parties. Jones told former Cowboys legend Michael Irvin that he went to Parsons’ agent with the terms of the deal he believed they had negotiated in March, only for Mulugheta to allegedly respond by telling Jones to “stick it up [his] ass.” (According to ESPN’s Ryan Clark, Mulugheta denies that claim.)
I don’t want to accuse any of the parties involved of being untruthful or exaggerating, but it’s very clear that there are some very large egos involved in these discussions. Jones is an 82-year-old billionaire. Parsons is an elite player. Mulugheta is one of the most notable and significant agents in the league. These are three people used to getting their way without much pushback.
Did Jones eventually just decide that renegotiating the deal he believed he had made with Parsons would give any Cowboys player ammunition to push back and change their mind if they agreed to a deal they didn’t like? Did Jones spend so much time publicly discussing the idea of trading Parsons that he eventually talked himself into it? Or did a person of immense power and privilege get challenged and decide that he wasn’t willing to back down, even if it meant trading away a core franchise player?
2. The Cowboys decided they couldn’t win with their existing roster construction if they paid Parsons. If there was a little bit of Option No. 1 in regard to Jones’ ego in this trade, the most prominent discussion behind the scenes regarding Parsons and the Dallas roster had to be about what would happen in the years to come.
This goes back to a question I had last season before the Cowboys paid receiver CeeDee Lamb and extended quarterback Dak Prescott on what is still a record-setting contract. On their prior deals in 2021-23, the Cowboys were paying Prescott, Lamb and Parsons an average of just under $48 million per season combined. During that run, Lamb and Parsons were on rookie contracts, while Prescott was playing out a four-year, $160 million extension.
With Prescott and Lamb earning massive raises in 2024 and Parsons seemingly set to land one on his own, that price was going to go up dramatically. As it turns out, their three new deals are going to combine to average $141 million per year, a near-nine-figure jump per season. If the Cowboys couldn’t win a Super Bowl with their three top players making $48 million, how were they going to do it after that price tag nearly tripled?
Though the cap will go up in the years to come, Dallas’ big three was set to take up more than 50% of the NFL’s cap in terms of average salary. (That doesn’t mean that the three players would actually eat up half of the Dallas budget given how the league handles accounting and how the Cowboys structure their contracts, but it’s a reasonable shorthand for how significant their deals are relative to the broader NFL.) For context, the average salaries of the top three deals for the Eagles last year came in at just over 42% of the cap.
Over the past decade, I can’t find a team that had its top three players’ average salaries amount to more than 50% of the salary cap. The closest might be 2022, when the Rams had Aaron Donald, Cooper Kupp and Matthew Stafford combine to represent 48.5% of that year’s cap. All three got hurt and the Rams went 5-12.
That Rams team isn’t an aberration. The 2021 Chiefs (47%) lost in the AFC Championship Game and promptly traded away their fourth-biggest earner, wide receiver Tyreek Hill. Their top three by salary were Patrick Mahomes, Chris Jones and Frank Clark. The 2022 Packers (46.5%) went 8-9 and then traded away their most expensive player, Aaron Rodgers. The only other teams above 45% were the 2023 Chargers and 2022 Raiders — both of which had losing records and followed their disappointing years by making changes to their cores.
1:54
Schefter breaks down how Parsons to the Packers came to be
Adam Schefter breaks down the massive Micah Parsons trade from Dallas to Green Bay.
We’ll never know if the Cowboys could have built a Super Bowl contender around market-value deals for their three stars, but I don’t think anybody would have argued that it would be easy. The Cowboys have traditionally been a (very good) draft-and-develop organization, and they landed all three of their standouts with their own picks. But the returns post-Parsons in the draft haven’t been as consistent.
And yet, it’s tough to say that Dallas clearly couldn’t see a future with its big three intact before the trade. If what Jones says is true and he did agree to the framework of a deal with Parsons in March, that contract would have surely come in somewhere around $40 million per season, before Myles Garrett and T.J. Watt extended the market. While $7 million more per year isn’t an insignificant sum, the Cowboys were pretty clearly willing to pay Prescott, Lamb and Parsons a staggering amount of money. I’m not sure the difference between what the Packers paid Parsons and what Jones might have been able to get away with in March was enough for the Cowboys’ owner to throw in the towel.
3. Jones believed the Cowboys could be disappointing on defense, even with Parsons in the lineup. Echoing the same logic the Bengals might have been using as they negotiated a deal with Trey Hendrickson, Jones and the Cowboys had very recent evidence that Parsons alone wasn’t a guarantee of a great defensive season. In 2024, the Cowboys ranked 29th in EPA per play and points allowed per possession. They allowed opposing teams to score touchdowns on 75% of their trips to the red zone, the fifth-worst rate allowed by any defense in a single season since 2000. Perhaps Jones figured: If the Cowboys could be so bad with Parsons on the field for most of the season, was it really worth $47 million more per year to keep him around?
Of course, there are 10 other players on defense, and I’m not sure I’d pin many of those problems on Parsons. Just about every offense the Cowboys faced last season was very clearly focused on stopping him. The Dallas defense under Mike Zimmer was second in sack rate and first in turning pressures into sacks because of both Parsons himself and the sheer amount of attention teams paid to him. Zimmer brought along plenty of his A-gap pressure packages to create mismatches, but the most success the Cowboys had on defense last season came when the veteran coordinator used the threat of Parsons to manipulate and then attack opposing pass protections.
Over the past four years, the Cowboys were the league’s best defense with Parsons on the field by EPA per play. Across 1,039 snaps, those same Cowboys immediately became the league’s worst defense by the same metric when Parsons was on the sideline or inactive. Acknowledging that every team is going to get worse when its best player isn’t playing, I’m not sure anything I can tell you is going to be more instructive than those figures. The best defense in the league with Micah Parsons … and the worst defense in the league without him.
Did the Cowboys get enough back in the trade?
One of two things appear to have happened Thursday. One is that the Cowboys simply decided they were done negotiating with Parsons and traded him for the best offer they could find by the end of the day. ESPN’s Adam Schefter, Dan Graziano and Todd Archer reported earlier in the day that the Cowboys were at least willing to listen to potential Parsons trade conversations for the first time, which seems to hint toward this being the most likely scenario. If the Cowboys were going to add a player before the start of the season as part of this trade, they would naturally want him in the building for a week of practice if possible.
The other argument, I suppose, is that the Cowboys didn’t believe they could land this much in a deal for Parsons and got blown away by what they were offered for their best defender. On a much smaller scale, for example, the Broncos might have wanted to hold onto wide receiver Devaughn Vele heading into the season. When the Saints called up old pal Sean Payton and offered a fourth-round pick for the 27-year-old Vele, though, the Broncos coach decided it was too good of an opportunity to pass up.
I’m not sure I buy the blown-away theory as true. Though Jones said Thursday night that he believed trading Parsons and amassing draft picks was in the best interest of the Cowboys and gave them the best chance to win, that shouldn’t have been a conclusion they came to only this week. There was never a chance Parsons was getting dealt for anything short of this sort of package, and the Cowboys shouldn’t have had any trouble landing a deal like this for Parsons in March, when Jones thought the best thing for the Cowboys was signing Parsons to a new deal.
We’ve seen teams trade two first-round picks as the primary compensation for talented young players toward the end of their rookie contracts. That includes the Rams’ 2019 trade for Jalen Ramsey, Seattle’s move for Jamal Adams in 2020, and the last end-of-summer swap for a cornerstone pass rusher, when the Bears sent two first-rounders to the Raiders for Khalil Mack just before the 2018 season began.
The Mack deal is the closest comparable to this trade. Heading into Mack’s fifth-year option, the Raiders landed two first-round picks, a third-round selection and a sixth-round pick for their top player. In return, the Bears took home Mack and a second-round pick. Without discounting selections in future years, the Bears sent a tad over two first-round picks of pure draft capital to land him.
Though Mack had a Defensive Player of the Year title under his belt before that move, the Cowboys had a reasonable case to expect more for their star player. Parsons has been a star from the moment he stepped onto the field, whereas Mack was inconsistent as a rookie (four-sack campaign) before making a huge leap in Year 2. Parsons is more than a year younger now than the 27-year-old Mack was when he was shipped to the Bears, which matters a lot to many NFL franchises as they evaluate talent and trade value.
No team pays more attention to age than the Packers, who have fielded the youngest team in football over the past two seasons and have had a general distrust for anyone even approaching 30, let alone over it. GM Brian Gutekunst has moved on from the likes of Davante Adams, David Bakhtiari and Jaire Alexander over the past few years as they’ve approached or turned 30. When Green Bay has made signings from outside the organization, it has been for some of the younger free agents on the market — like 26-year-olds Xavier McKinney in 2024 and Nate Hobbs in 2025.
It’s probably no surprise then that the Packers were willing to part with Clark as part of this deal; he is months away from turning 30. I’ll get to the Packers’ side of this swap in a moment, but for the Cowboys, adding Clark is a suggestion that they think they can be competitive and even potentially better on defense with him than they were with Parsons.
There’s no doubt that Clark is a very good run defender. Per the FTN Football Almanac, he ranked 18th in stop rate and 27th in rush yards per tackle among defensive tackles. Clark also ranked 21st in ESPN’s run stop win rate among interior linemen. For a team that ranked last in the NFL in EPA allowed per designed run last season and was run over by these very Packers on the ground in their most recent playoff game, you can understand why the Cowboys believed Clark could be a very useful player to add to their interior.
0:42
Tannenbaum: Trading Micah Parsons was a ‘massive strategic mistake’
Mike Tannenbaum sounds off on Jerry Jones and the Cowboys’ decision to trade Micah Parsons to the Packers.
He’s also a reminder of how missed draft picks can cause teams problems. The Cowboys used their 2023 first-round pick on nose tackle Mazi Smith in the hope that he would be able to plug their issues with the run, only for the 24-year-old to underwhelm in his first two pro campaigns. If the Cowboys had hit on the Smith pick, they probably wouldn’t go over the top to get Clark as part of the Parsons deal. We’ll never know if that would have been enough to keep Parsons in Dallas, but it would have made a deal less pressing.
At the same time, though, Clark managed only one sack and five knockdowns in his first season under new Packers defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley. Clark admitted after the season that he suffered a foot injury in the Week 1 loss to the Eagles and played through it during the season before undergoing surgery. But Hafley’s defense was supposed to put the veteran in a position to penetrate and create pressure more often. Instead, he was really a nonfactor against the pass.
Matt Eberflus’ defense typically plays its best football when it has a 3-technique who can create havoc on the interior, with DeForest Buckner being a good example in Indianapolis. The Bears never landed that player while Eberflus was Chicago’s coach, and that’s one of the reasons he’s now the defensive coordinator in Dallas. With the Cowboys, though, Osa Odighizuwa is ticketed to be that 3-technique. Clark will return to playing more nose tackle in Dallas, and though he can be valuable in that role, it’s not the spot he was so excited to play before the 2024 season.
The Cowboys will pay Clark $2.3 million in 2025, and the veteran tackle is owed $41.5 million between 2026 and 2027, none of which is guaranteed. It would hardly be a surprise if Clark pushed for a new deal as part of the trade, but one year removed from his last contract, he might need to show up with a big season in 2025 to get Jones to pull out his checkbook for another extension.
Frankly, while the Cowboys needed to upgrade their run defense this offseason, there were plenty of ways to do that and hold onto Parsons. They could have signed Clark’s former teammate T.J. Slaton Jr., who led all interior linemen in run stop win rate. He signed a two-year, $14.1 million deal with the Bengals. Teair Tart, who was excellent for the Chargers last season in a situational role, re-signed in Los Angeles for one year at $4.5 million. It’s not quite trading Doncic away to improve team defense, but there were more reasonable and cost-effective ways to address a legitimate weakness.
Before the trade, my belief was that the Cowboys needed to land more than two first-round picks to justify trading Parsons. They got that sort of package in the long run, but I would have liked to have seen even more to explain moving on. Given his age and contract, Clark wouldn’t have landed more than a midround pick if the Packers had decided to shop him this offseason.
And now, having waited to trade Parsons until the final week of the preseason, the Cowboys have plugged one hole and opened another. Their top edge rusher is Dante Fowler Jr., whose 10.5-sack campaign with the Commanders a year ago was more than he totaled in 2022-23 in his prior stint with the Cowboys. Marshawn Kneeland had zero sacks in 11 games as a rookie, and Sam Williams is coming off of a season lost to a torn ACL. Jones used a second-round pick on edge defender Donovan Ezeiruaku this year, and though Dallas probably would have liked to work the rookie in as a situational pass rusher, there’s now more on the 21-year-old’s plate than he could have imagined.
One of these young players has to take a step forward for the Cowboys to field a reliable pass rush in 2025. And without Parsons, that dominant sack rate and pressure-to-sack rate from 2024 is likely to collapse, creating a new problem for Eberflus’ unit.
I admit that I’m a little surprised there weren’t other teams willing to top this offer. One obvious team comes to mind. Lions general manager Brad Holmes came from the Rams, who were wildly aggressive in adding superstar players like Parsons and believed the late-first-round picks they were likely to send in return were overvalued. Plus, the Lions have one of the most complete rosters in the NFL, and their biggest question mark on defense is across from Aidan Hutchinson.
Maybe Detroit thought it wouldn’t be able to afford Hutchinson and Parsons together, especially with Hutchinson’s market now likely to rise as a result of the Parsons deal. But if there was any team in the league that could have seen adding Parsons as the all-in move to win a title, wouldn’t it have been the Lions? (And now they will be facing a tougher division after the trade.)
Is this a steal for the Packers?
Not necessarily. Nothing seems more fun for fans than trading picks that represent unknown players for guys who are stars right now, but those recent trades involving multiple first-round picks have a very mixed success rate. Ramsey won a Super Bowl with the Rams, which helps make that one a victory, but he was gone after four years for a third-round pick and Hunter Long. Mack lasted four years in Chicago, and after a first-team All-Pro nod in his debut season, he wasn’t really the same again.
Laremy Tunsil was perfectly fine in Houston, but the Dolphins turned that 2019 trade into a bevy of first-round picks when the Texans had a disastrous year and sent the third pick to Miami — which redirected it to San Francisco for three more first-rounders as part of the Trey Lance deal. Adams was a major disappointment in Seattle. Quarterback deals are an entirely different species, but although the Matthew Stafford deal worked out well, trades for Deshaun Watson and Russell Wilson turned into disasters for their new franchises.
That combination of first-round picks and what is almost always a market-resetting contract sets the bar for success almost impossibly high. Before the start of this offseason, the top of the edge rusher market was Nick Bosa‘s contract, which came in at $34 million per season. At that point, Bosa was the only edge rusher in the league making more than $28.5 million per year, meaning the 49ers star was already a meaningful outlier relative to the rest of the players at his position.
Since then, the top has blown off. Myles Garrett‘s new four-year deal averaged $40 million per season, while T.J. Watt‘s $41 million contract took the price for edge rushers up even further. Though I suspect there’s some fluff in Parsons’ contract, the early reports suggest that his new deal with the Packers is for four years and $188 million, averaging a whopping $47 million per year. That’s 38% more than what Bosa was making and 66% more than the average salary of the second-largest edge rusher contract (Josh Hines-Allen, $28.25 million) heading into the 2025 league year.
Even that, though, undersells how much Parsons costs the Packers. All of those players signed extensions to stay with their existing teams. The Packers sent two first-round picks to the Cowboys as part of the deal. Obviously, they hope and expect those selections will be late in the first round, though history tells us that teams making that assumption usually fall on their face and end up sending something more significant.
Those picks have surplus value. Though they’re not sold for cash, we’ve seen franchises eat money as part of deals for players such as Brock Osweiler, Ryan Tannehill and, more recently, Brian Robinson Jr. solely for the purpose of landing more or superior draft capital as part of a trade. We know draft picks are an inexact science, but the opportunity to land a potential starter or even a superstar for a fraction of their market value over four years is incredibly valuable. Heck, the Cowboys just got four years out of Parsons for a total of $17 million, or roughly half of what Bosa got paid for one season of football.
By trading those two first-rounders to the Cowboys, the Packers are incurring the opportunity cost of missing out on potential starters and roster contributors on below-market deals. We’ll never see who they would have picked, of course, but they’ll need to fill their roster in other ways, either by signing free agents or by using other draft picks that are less likely to pan out in place of those potential first-rounders.
Ben Baldwin’s non-quarterback draft value chart attempts to place a number on what each pick in the draft is worth. If we operate conservatively and assume that the Packers will send the 24th pick in the 2026 and 2027 drafts to the Cowboys, without any future draft discounts, that’s an additional $18.2 million per year in opportunity costs that the Packers are assuming by making this trade. You can quibble with the figure, of course, but one thing I can say for sure is that valuing the picks as being worth $0 is wrong.
You have to include the value of what it took to acquire Parsons as part of these numbers. And with the cost of those picks added on top of his deal, Parsons will cost the Packers more than $65 million per season over the next four years. The four-time Pro Bowler will make more, at least implicitly, than any other player in the game — his old teammate Prescott included — and twice as much as Bosa, who was the highest-paid edge rusher in the NFL a few months ago.
It’s an incredible amount of resources to pour into one player. And just like the Cowboys, the Packers will believe this is a problem that they might not have needed to address if their draft picks had lived up to expectations. After signing Za’Darius Smith and Preston Smith in free agency before the 2019 season, Gutekunst started to build for the future by using his first-round pick that year on edge rusher Rashan Gary and his 2023 first-rounder on Lukas Van Ness.
Gary has emerged as a solid two-way defender, and he made the Pro Bowl last season. But he has yet to top 10 sacks in a single season. Gary has at least lived up to expectations, but Van Ness — drafted just before the likes of Will McDonald IV and Christian Gonzalez — has only seven sacks over his first two years and hasn’t been able to command starting snaps. If the Packers had drafted McDonald, who had 10.5 sacks and 24 knockdowns last season for the Jets, would they feel the need to make a move for Parsons?
In terms of their broader roster construction, though, you can understand why the Packers would believe they’re in a position to take this sort of plunge. Gutekunst has done an excellent job of building through the draft and creating a roster that generates plenty of surplus value from players on rookie deals. The Packers are very disciplined, and as we’ve seen, they are more than comfortable moving on from players when Gutekunst believes they’re no longer producing what their salaries would suggest.
What Green Bay doesn’t have, though, is star power. Gutekunst has hit a lot of singles and doubles, and there’s still plenty of time left to evaluate many of the players on his roster. But the Packers didn’t have many players who projected to be among the best at their position in 2025. Outside of Gary, their two other Pro Bowlers a year ago were McKinney and Josh Jacobs, both of whom were signed in free agency. Though I’m still plenty optimistic about Jordan Love and think Edgerrin Cooper has All-Pro potential, the Packers didn’t have a player like Parsons.
0:39
How much better will Micah Parsons make the Packers?
Damien Woody and Mike Greenberg break down the impact Micah Parsons will have on the Packers’ young corps.
With Love and Parsons combining to average $102 million per season at the top of the roster, the Packers will have to make some tougher choices in the years to come. The writing might have already been on the wall at receiver after Gutekunst used picks on Matthew Golden and Savion Williams this April, but it’s difficult to imagine the Packers retaining the likes of Jayden Reed, Romeo Doubs or Christian Watson on second contracts. It would hardly be a surprise if the Packers move on from 29-year-old center Elgton Jenkins after the season, a decision that would save the team $20 million in 2026, albeit at the expense of its most versatile lineman.
At the same time, NFL teams aren’t built solely on surplus value, and you’re not going to win a Super Bowl just by virtue of having 53 decent players on rookie deals. There are a few players in the league who are force multipliers — who not only have a significant impact themselves but also a meaningful one on the players around them. Getting one of those guys usually means drafting them and holding on to them for as long as possible, because they don’t come up for trades in the prime of their careers and almost never hit free agency. There’s no choice but to pay a premium for them, but they’re the only players who have a realistic shot of being the best guy on the field for a team that wins the Super Bowl.
Although I’ve dismissed those arguments for players such as Adams and Montez Sweat as part of trades in the past, it’s much easier to see that case for Parsons. Since the AFL-NFL merger in 1970, Parsons is one of 33 players to make it to the Pro Bowl in each of his first four seasons. Twenty-two of those players are eligible for the Hall of Fame, and 14 of those 22 are enshrined in Canton. Most of the 11 who aren’t yet eligible are locks to join them. How often do you have a chance to trade for a 26-year-old who appears to be better than a 50-50 shot to make it to the Hall of Fame one day?
Does the trade turn the Packers into the best team in the NFC?
It’s entirely possible. Keep in mind that advanced metrics were already fond of what the Packers did last season, when they finished third in the NFC North behind the Lions and Vikings. DVOA pegged the Packers as the third-best team in the NFL behind the Ravens and Lions, even while Green Bay went from Love to Malik Willis early in the year for two starts because of a knee injury. ESPN’s Football Power Index also had the Packers third in the league at the end of the regular season behind the same teams (with the 1-2 order switched). Things didn’t end well in a postseason loss to the Eagles, but that did include a series of unfortunate injuries and a fumbled opening kickoff that probably should have been ruled Packers’ ball. (Yes, the Eagles were still the better team.)
The Packers might have already projected to be the best team in the North in 2025, given that the Lions and Vikings went a combined 15-3 in one-score games last season (that won’t happen again). The Vikings were the oldest team in the league and are starting over again at quarterback. I wouldn’t fault anybody for picking the Lions, who will obviously be healthier on defense in 2025, but they did lose both of their well-regarded coordinators. Per ESPN BET‘s odds, the Packers are now co-favorites to win the division with the Lions (+185), which seems fair to me.
Parsons obviously changes what the Packers are capable of doing on defense. Hafley has a chess piece he can move anywhere around the formation. Though Parsons has no trouble playing as an edge rusher and looping around tackles, he’s devastating when attacking guards and was extremely effective last season when Zimmer lined him up in the A-gap as part of his Mug fronts, both directly rushing and as part of twists and games.
1:04
Newton dismisses Packers as Super Bowl contenders despite acquiring Parsons
Cam Newton isn’t having the Packers as Super Bowl contenders and says they’re not even the best team in their division.
Assuming the back injury that plagued Parsons during the preseason magically heals on the flight to Green Bay, I would also expect the star defender to make an immediate impact. Remember that Mack held out for the entire preseason, was traded to the Bears days before the start of the season and then absolutely terrorized Aaron Rodgers and the Packers in the first half of his first game with Chicago (sack, forced fumble, fumble recovery and a pick-six). The Bears eventually blew a 20-0 lead and lost the game, but it’s entirely reasonable to suggest that Mack’s best game in a Bears uniform was his first one.
There are two pressing concerns for the Packers’ defense. Parsons might help one and hurt the other.
On paper, the clear weak spot for the Packers is at cornerback, where they moved on from Alexander after years of waiting for their top corner to get healthy. They will play plenty of three-safety looks and signed Hobbs away from the Raiders in free agency, but there’s some uncertainty about how he’ll fit. Hobbs was best in the slot with the Raiders, but he’ll likely play on the outside when the Packers have two cornerbacks on the field this season. His passer rating allowed as the nearest defender in coverage was north of 100 when Hobbs started the play as an outside corner with the Raiders, up more than 11 points from where it landed out of the slot.
Parsons doesn’t play cornerback, but a defensive back’s best friend is heavy pass pressure. The Packers ranked 23rd in QBR allowed when their pass rush didn’t get home last season, but with Hafley rarely sending extra rushers at the QB, they also ranked only 22nd in pressure rate. Adding Parsons means the Packers can stick with rushing four or fewer guys, which appears to be their preferred defensive philosophy. It will also help that CB depth chart, which features Keisean Nixon and Carrington Valentine alongside Hobbs, from being stuck in coverage for too long.
Leaning into playing coverage at the expense of blitzing, the Packers allowed just 14 plays of 30 yards or more last season, one behind the Bills for the best mark in football. There’s a story the Packers can tell themselves: If they can keep opposing teams from hitting explosive plays and force them to slowly march down the field, Parsons will inevitably either draw a holding penalty, take down the opposing quarterback or create a pressure for somebody else. I’d argue that’s a little too simplistic, but if Parsons can steal a drive or two each game, that’s an incredibly valuable player.
The downside is one that the Packers saw firsthand. Though I don’t think Parsons is some awful liability against the run, he’s clearly a much less imposing player there than he is in the passing game. Per the FTN Football Almanac, Parsons ranked 68th among edge rushers in stop rate against the run and 81st in yards per run stop. And his 21.7% run stop win rate ranked 76th among edge defenders with 300 snaps or more last season, although he was 40th by the same metric the prior season.
Adding Parsons to the existing roster wouldn’t have singlehandedly sunk Green Bay’s run defense. In combination with the departures of Clark and Slaton, though, there’s suddenly a void in the interior of Green Bay’s line. Karl Brooks will assume a larger part of the rotation alongside Devonte Wyatt with Clark leaving, but Brooks’ ascension means there’s now less depth behind the third-year pro. Undrafted free agent Nazir Stackhouse made the 53-man roster, and he might be in line to see meaningful snaps at the nose this season. It’s easier to find a nose tackle than a franchise edge rusher, but the Packers probably need to find some help on the interior to keep their run defense sound as the year goes along.
Realistically, without the Parsons addition, the Packers were probably going to take a step backward on defense this season. They forced 31 takeaways in 2024, the fourth-highest total of any team. McKinney, who led the team with eight picks, had just nine in his first four years with the Giants combined. The Packers weren’t merely a turnover-driven creation — they were ninth in the league in points allowed per possession on drives that didn’t end in takeaways. But outside of Cooper playing a full season and the arrival of Hobbs, there weren’t many reasons to think they were going to make a leap forward on defense in 2025.
Now, that seems entirely possible. For years, even while the offense has ranged from solid to spectacular, the defense has been a perennial disappointment. Gutekunst has stuffed the unit with first-round picks, and coach Matt LaFleur eventually gave in to fan sentiment and replaced Joe Barry with Hafley, who looked to be a much better coordinator in his first season with the Packers. Green Bay was fourth in EPA per play on defense last season. It’s not wild to imagine a world where Parsons pushes the Packers to the top of the charts this season.
And yet, would that be enough? Even Parsons at his unblockable best wasn’t enough to inspire Dallas into a deep playoff run, in part because the Cowboys didn’t have enough around their three top stars. Gutekunst is making a huge bet that he has already done enough to justify going over the top for the sort of transcendent star his team lacked.
And Jones, surprisingly, has decided that the sort of glamorous superstar his franchise became known for targeting, acquiring and retaining over his past 30 years in charge might not be someone the Cowboys want to hold onto long term. It’s a stunning decision from the Cowboys, and unlike their brethren on the NBA side, it’s one that can’t be bailed out or softened by a draft lottery.
Sports
Shedeur Sanders confident in Colorado despite crushing loss: ‘They have a great head coach’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Former Colorado Buffaloes quarterback Shedeur Sanders shared his confidence in his former collegiate team despite suffering their first loss of the season against Georgia Tech.
The Buffaloes lost to the Yellow Jackets, 27-20, as Haynes King put together the game-winning drive in the fourth quarter. King scored on a 45-yard run with 1:07 left in the fourth quarter. Colorado failed to put together the equalizing touchdown in the last moments.
WATCH ON THE FOX ONE APP — START YOUR 7-DAY FREE TRIAL TODAY
Georgia Tech quarterback Haynes King, left, runs past Colorado cornerback Teon Parks (3) for a touchdown in the second half of an NCAA college football game Friday, Aug. 29, 2025, in Boulder, Colorado. (David Zalubowski/AP Photo)
It was the team’s first game without Sanders and Heisman Trophy winner Travis Hunter. Both players entered the NFL Draft after last season.
Sanders was still confident the team will figure it out, especially since his father, Deion, is the head coach.
“They’ll figure things out. They have a great head coach,” he wrote on X.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Colorado Buffalos quarterback Shedeur Sanders (2) greets fans after defeating the Arizona Wildcats at Arizona Stadium. (Mark J. Rebilas/Imagn Images)
Deion Sanders hasn’t been without his quarterbacking son for any of his collegiate coaching career. They were together at Jackson State and at Colorado once he took the Buffaloes’ job.
“Coach Prime” named Kaidon Salter the starting quarterback to start the year. He had 159 passing yards and a touchdown pass to Dekalon Taylor in the loss.
Sanders said the team will be fine despite the loss.

Colorado head coach Deion Sanders directs his team against Georgia Tech in the first half of an NCAA college football game Friday, Aug. 29, 2025, in Boulder, Colorado. (David Zalubowski/AP Photo)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“We could’ve won the game. It’s not like we had our butts kicked,” he said. “They ran the heck out of the ball. If we take advantage of the opportunities, I have a whole different mood up here right now.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Sports
T20I tri-series: Pakistan win toss, elect to bat first against UAE

Pakistan won the toss and elected to bat first against the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in the second match of the T20I tri-series at Sharjah Cricket Stadium on Saturday.
Playing XIs
Pakistan made two changes to their lineup, with Salman Mirza and Hasan Ali replacing Shaheen Afridi and Haris Rauf.
Pakistan: Sahibzada Farhan, Saim Ayub, Fakhar Zaman, Salman Ali Agha (c), Hasan Nawaz, Mohammad Nawaz, Mohammad Haris (wk), Faheem Ashraf, Hasan Ali, Salman Mirza and Sufiyan Muqeem.
UAE: Muhammad Zohaib, Muhammad Waseem (c), Asif Khan, Alishan Sharafu, Rahul Chopra (wk), Ethan DSouza, Dhruv Parashar, Saghir Khan, Haider Ali, Junaid Siddique, Muhammad Jawadullah.
Head-to-Head
Both teams have faced each other once in T20Is, with Pakistan emerging victorious during the 2016 T20 World Cup in Mirpur, Bangladesh.
Batting first, UAE posted 129-6, highlighted by a brilliant 46 off 42 by Shaiman Anwar, while captain Amjad Javed and Muhammad Usman contributed 27 and 21 runs respectively.
Pakistan chased down the total, losing three wickets for 17 runs early before a 114-run partnership between Umar Akmal and Shoaib Malik sealed the win in 18.4 overs.
Malik played a crucial knock of 63 off 49 balls, while Umar Akmal scored a valuable 50 off 46 deliveries.
Form Guide
Pakistan will carry forward strong momentum, having recently won the three-match T20I series against West Indies and dominated the tri-series opener against Afghanistan.
UAE will aim for a win after a successful run against Bangladesh (2-1) in May and victories over Kenya, Uganda, and Nigeria in the Pearl of Africa T20I series.
UAE: L, W, W, W, L (Most Recent First)
Pakistan: W, W, L, W, W
-
Tech3 days ago
Review: Google Pixel 10 Series
-
Sports3 days ago
New Zealand rugby player Shane Christie, who suffered multiple concussions, dies aged 39 – SUCH TV
-
Tech3 days ago
Top CDC Officials Resign After Director Is Pushed Out
-
Fashion3 days ago
ICE cotton futures fall for 2nd consecutive day on strong crop outlook
-
Fashion3 days ago
Portugal Jewels Chiado boutique nominated for two global design awards
-
Fashion3 days ago
Israel’s Delta Galil posts $470 mn Q2 sales, updates 2025 guidance
-
Sports3 days ago
Dolphins GM Chris Grier says fans threatened his family in string of vile emails after team’s lackluster year
-
Sports3 days ago
New-look Pac-12 extends CW deal through 2031