Connect with us

Tech

Meta Ramps Up Efforts to Disrupt Industrialized Scamming

Published

on

Meta Ramps Up Efforts to Disrupt Industrialized Scamming


With organized, industrial-scale scamming causing a multibillion-dollar crisis around the world, Meta announced new account protections on Wednesday aimed at flagging potentially suspicious activity to users as early in a scam interaction as possible. The company also shared details about a recent Thai law enforcement collaboration that resulted in 21 arrests and Meta disabling over 150,000 user accounts associated with Southeast Asian scam compounds.

The disruptive action—a joint effort of the Royal Thai Police, the FBI, the United Kingdom’s National Crime Agency, the Australian Federal Police, and other law enforcement agencies—focused on alleged scammers targeting victims in numerous countries, including the US and UK as well as multiple Asian and Pacific region countries. The account protections Meta debuted on Wednesday include expanding its Messenger scam detection features for more users around the world, introducing warnings about potentially suspicious activity when a user is initiating a new WhatsApp device link, and testing new Facebook alerts to flag potentially suspicious friend requests.

“Transnational scam syndicates continue to exploit digital platforms and operate across multiple jurisdictions,” Gregory Kang, the deputy assistant commissioner of the Singapore Police Force, said in a statement on Wednesday. “Joint operations like this demonstrate the importance of close cooperation between law enforcement agencies and industry partners.”

Mainstream social media and communication platforms are a crucial digital meeting ground where online scammers—who are often forced laborers—and victims from around the world can cross paths. Professionalized “pig butchering”-style investment scamming has expanded in Southeast Asia and proliferated around the world, creating more urgency than ever to block and deter fraudulent activity on consumer platforms.

Meta began speaking publicly about its work focused on scam compounds at the end of 2024. That year, the company said that it had taken down more than 2 million accounts related to scam compounds.

On Wednesday, the company said that in 2025 it took down 10.9 million Facebook and Instagram accounts “associated with criminal scam centers” and removed more than 159 million scam ads across all categories. Meta has increasingly come under fire for not taking enough proactive action against scams across its platforms—with Reuters reporting in December that billions of scam ads appear everyday and internal Meta estimates forecast up to 10 percent of its revenues may come from scam advertising. A company spokesperson at the time disputed the figures. Law enforcement in many regions—including Thai and Cambodian police—have carried out a spate of operations in recent months to intervene in scam compounds, make dozens of arrests, and seize funds. And the crackdowns aren’t limited to Southeast Asia. Meta said in February, for example, that it provided support for a Nigerian Police Force and UK National Crime Agency operation focused on disrupting an alleged scam center in Nigeria.

Meta announced other efforts on Wednesday to combat scamming and abusive behavior on its platforms. The company said it is further expanding advertiser verification with a goal that 90 percent of ad revenue will come from verified advertisers by the end of 2026, which would be a major increase from 70 percent currently. The goal, Meta says, is for the final 10 percent to accommodate small, local businesses and other low-resource, benign entities that just want to run a few ads.

The company also said that its anti-scam specialists have built AI detection systems to help flag more situations where scammers may be impersonating brands, celebrities, or other public figures. These systems are also designed to catch more “deceptive links” that could be used to fool targets into visiting malicious websites.

The scamming ecosystem and industry around the world has expanded and matured to such a degree that no one platform or government can solve the problem. But experts have consistently emphasized to WIRED in recent years that Meta platforms are a key battleground where more detections and defenses could make a difference in the barrier to entry for scammers who are trying to reach new victims.

As Chris Sonderby, Meta vice president and deputy general counsel, put it in a statement on Wednesday, “we will continue to invest in technology and partnerships to stay ahead of these adversaries.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

My Favorite Piece of Coffee Gear Makes Me Do All the Work, and That’s Why I Love It

Published

on

My Favorite Piece of Coffee Gear Makes Me Do All the Work, and That’s Why I Love It


Coffee is the original biohack and the nation’s most popular productivity tool. As we adjust to the changeover to daylight saving time, the caffeine-addicted WIRED Reviews team is writing about our favorite coffee brewing routines and devices. Today, contributor Brad Bourque pays homage to his manual espresso maker. Look out for other Java.Base stories about other WIRED writers’ favorite brewing methods.

For me, coffee is as much a nerdy obsession as it is a practical necessity. I dislike maintenance, and I prefer simplicity, but I also need my coffee to be bold and interesting. For years, I used a kettle and Aeropress, which were easy to keep clean and tucked away in a crowded cabinet. My roommates at the time really appreciated that. But when I got a place of my own, I wanted something more substantial, if also still dead simple. The Flair Signature, a manual espresso maker, seemed like an obvious choice. It still sits proudly on my counter in all its stainless steel glory, occupying a permanent spot by my sink.

Where larger, electric espresso machines generate the pressure and heat needed for espresso inside their massive housings, the Flair takes a different approach. A large lever sits atop a small stack of brewing equipment, and you use that lever to create the bars of pressure necessary to get espresso. There’s a chamber for your grounds and another atop it for hot water. Fill them up in the correct order, pull down on the handle, guided by the handy pressure gauge, and watch in delight as thick, crema-topped espresso drips out the bottom.

There are other crucial pieces to this puzzle, and I’ve fully committed to the bit by opting for a simple gooseneck kettle and hand burr grinder, chosen for their simplicity and consistency. Coffee enthusiasts should instantly recognize the Stagg EKG kettle from Fellow, and yes, mine is draped in green and yellow reminiscent of my favorite soccer team, thank you for noticing. The 1ZPresso JX-Pro S isn’t particularly fancy, but it’s easy to clean and consistent, and it came highly recommended by Reddit, though I’ll admit I’ve been tempted by the Comandante C40, a hand grinder that costs more than the rest of my setup combined.

Flair

Espresso Maker Classic

The entire workflow is thankfully almost silent, a blessing on quiet and/or hungover Sunday mornings. I can throw some Steely Dan on the record player, fire up the kettle, and start turning the hand grinder as I take care of my other morning chores. While it seems straightforward, it’s a process that has a surprising number of variables to tweak, and I feel them firsthand every time I pull a shot. Each minor adjustment to the grind or water temperature creates a cascading set of changes to both the process and the end result. It’s a daily chase for unattainable perfection that I’m well familiar with after using the Aeropress for so long, and I find it deeply satisfying when I feel like I’ve nailed it. Knowing I was fully responsible for that great first sip gives me a bigger boost in the morning than any amount of caffeine could.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Technology Is Reshaping Sleep Apnea Treatment

Published

on

Technology Is Reshaping Sleep Apnea Treatment


Inspire therapy—a hypoglossal nerve stimulation implant—has been FDA-approved for more than 11 years, with over 100,000 patients treated across the US, Europe, and Asia. Ruchir Patel, Inspire’s senior medical director, says data show reductions in daytime sleepiness, a 79 percent drop in sleep apnea severity, and a 90 percent reduction in snoring. Early US data report average nightly usage of more than 6.5 hours. “This is an exciting time because there are more treatment options available than in the past,” he says.

Pharmaceutical approaches are also emerging. In 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration approved Zepbound (tirzepatide) for moderate to severe OSA in adults with obesity—the first weight-loss drug to carry a specific sleep apnea indication.

Meanwhile, Cambridge, Massachusetts–based startup Apnimed has developed a nightly pill targeting neuromuscular pathways that influence upper airway tone. Rather than mechanically splinting the airway open, the drug aims to stabilize it biologically.

“For a long time, OSA was understood primarily as an anatomical problem, so the logical solution was mechanical,” says John Cronin, chief medical officer at Apnimed. As understanding evolved, the question became: “Could we design a therapy that targets the biology of the condition directly, rather than relying solely on mechanical support?” The company has completed two phase three trials and plans to submit a New Drug Application to the FDA this year.

For all the innovation, Steier remains pragmatic. “I couldn’t be happier than finding someone who’s got typical sleep apnea and gets CPAP therapy,” he says. Modern machines automatically adjust pressure to airway resistance. “A single night can make all the difference.” Patients return re-energized, telling him they’ve got their lives back.

Sleep medicine is still relatively young, and research is only beginning to capture the diversity of the condition. That complexity also underpins efforts to improve CPAP use rather than abandon it.

Amanda Sathyapala, an associate professor at Imperial College London’s National Heart and Lung Institute, led the research showing 62 percent of patients were not using CPAP enough to make a meaningful health impact. Her team has studied the psychology of adherence, finding that factors such as understanding risk and confidence using the device shape long-term use.

Drawing on behavioral science, she developed CPAP Buddy, an app offering video-based behavioral therapy, peer support, and round-the-clock answers to patient questions. The project has received £2.2 million from the UK’s Medical Research Council, alongside backing from CPAP manufacturer Fisher & Paykel.

“CPAP is likely to be the most effective treatment that you can get because it’s giving air directly into the airway,” Sathyapala says. “[CPAP] is always going to be the most efficacious once the person’s using it, therefore it’s worth trying to get people to use it.”

For her, the problem is not the machine but behavior. “I don’t like to give up if we haven’t tried the right things,” she says. Using CPAP, she adds, is no different from “losing weight, stopping smoking, starting up a long-term physical activity program—it’s a behavior change.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Labour scarcity is forcing IT leaders to rethink automation economics | Computer Weekly

Published

on

Labour scarcity is forcing IT leaders to rethink automation economics | Computer Weekly


It often feels as though every enterprise technology conversation now begins and ends with artificial intelligence (AI). New models, valuations and promises of transformation dominate the headlines. But when I speak with CIOs and CFOs, their urgency sounds different. They are not debating which AI platform will win. They are asking a more immediate question: how do we run this organisation with fewer people and tighter budgets and navigate more volatility than at any point in recent memory?

Labour has become a critical binding constraint — and the pressure is structural rather than cyclical.

Labour costs are now the biggest cost pressure facing firms, cited by 72% of  UK businesses in the latest British Chambers of Commerce survey. And as the population ages, fewer working-age people will be available to support rising demand. The OECD forecasts that by 2060, the working-age population will decline by more than 30% in a quarter of advanced economies. The labour equation is tightening, not loosening. In a recent Censuswude survey of nearly 4,300 C-suites, 98% say a talent shortage is affecting their IT vision.

For enterprise and public sector organisations alike, that reality fundamentally changes the logic of IT investment. 

Automation becomes economic logic

Labour is typically the largest operating expense in any organisation. When labour becomes scarcer and more expensive, automation stops being an innovation initiative and becomes an economic imperative. The CBI reports that 38% of businesses have been unable to grow or respond to demand due to labour shortages. We are approaching an automation tipping point: the moment when deploying intelligent automation becomes cheaper, faster and lower-risk than finding, hiring and retaining additional staff.

In highly competitive markets, lowering the cost-to-serve is not optional, but mandatory for survival. Organisations that thrive will not necessarily be those with the latest shiny toy systems, but those with a good product and the lowest sustainable operating cost. For UK public sector bodies, including NHS trusts and central government departments, the challenge is particularly acute. Consumer and citizen expectations continue to rise while budgets and recruitment capacity remain constrained. Doing more with the same or fewer resources is no longer aspirational. It is an operational reality.

The question, therefore, is not whether to automate, but how to do so pragmatically and without introducing unnecessary complexity or risk.

The reprioritisation moment

Many organisations remain tied to expensive maintenance cycles and vendor-driven upgrade roadmaps. Core enterprise software such as ERP still continue to run mission-critical processes, bringing together finance, HR, procurement and logistics. But high maintenance costs and forced platform upgrades, migrations and replatforming consume capital and scarce talent that could otherwise be directed toward productivity gains.

Increasingly, leaders are questioning whether every upgrade delivers real economic value, or whether capital would be better deployed on automation capabilities that sit above existing systems and target operational bottlenecks directly.

CIOs and CFOs face a simple reality: there is not enough time, money or people to pursue every vendor roadmap simultaneously. In fact, a recent IDC survey of 700 IT leaders across 10+ countries reveal 47% of organisations have delayed innovation due to upgrade requirements, and 92% feel locked into their ERP provider’s roadmap, limiting flexibility and driving dissatisfaction. Cloud migrations, AI add-ons, compliance initiatives and security upgrades may each have merit, but when bundled and mandated, siloed into a single system, they not only exceed available budgets and internal capacity, but erode their agility needed to adapt to changing landscapes and business needs.

Prioritisation is a strategic discipline rather than a tactical exercise.

Building on top of what already works 

The most effective organisations are not ripping out core systems. Instead, they are building new capabilities on top of them using agentic AI. Rather than embarking on multi-year transformation programmes, they are identifying specific operational bottlenecks — such as manual data entry, slow procurement workflows or compliance reporting burdens — and layering targeted automation on top of existing platforms.

This incremental model delivers measurable time-to-value in weeks or months, not years. It reduces risk and allows organisations to prove returns before expanding further. Not every solution requires advanced AI. While AI is a powerful tool,  it remains just one tool among many. The objective should always be to solve clearly defined business problems faster, better and more economically — not to pursue technology for its own sake.

For organisations balancing fiscal responsibility with investing in growth, that distinction matters.

Beyond the hype cycle

Technology markets will remain volatile. IT providers will reposition, new platforms will emerge and investment cycles will rise and fall. Demographic change, however, will outlast the hype.

Labour scarcity is not a temporary disruption. It is a structural shift that will define the next two decades of enterprise and public sector strategy. AI and automation can play a decisive role in responding to that shift — not as speculative transformation projects, but as pragmatic tools that enable organisations to adapt faster and to put people to work for higher-value, strategic initiatives rather than keeping the lights on.

The organisations that lead will not be those that adopt AI most aggressively. They will be those that apply automation deliberately; aligned with economic reality, workforce constraints, measurable time-to-value and long-term operational resilience. 

Seth Ravin is CEO and chairman at third-party software support company, Rimini Street.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending