Connect with us

Business

Our son can’t come home for Christmas after insulation mould took over

Published

on

Our son can’t come home for Christmas after insulation mould took over


Zoe ConwayNews Correspondent

The Wadleys tell the BBC of the ongoing impact of problems with the insulation

Tony and Becs Wadley say they can’t spend Christmas at home after insulation installed under a government scheme has caused black mould in several rooms, and their asthmatic son can’t be inside the property.

Mr Wadley says the situation is tearing the family apart: ”It’s awful. Elliott can’t come into our house, it’s as if he’s been ostracised from his own home.”

The couple are among more than 300 people who have contacted the BBC in recent weeks to tell us about insulation that has gone wrong in their homes.

The Department of Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) said it was taking action to ensure consumers are no longer let down by poor installations.

Becs Wadley Black mould in one of the Wadley's bedrooms earlier in 2025Becs Wadley

Black mould in one of the Wadleys’ bedrooms earlier this year. It spread under internal wall insulation which was installed in 2024.

Mr and Mrs Wadley got a government grant to have energy efficiency measures fitted in their Gower Peninsula house because they hoped a warmer home would help Elliott’s asthma. The grant covered the cost of insulating his bedroom walls.

But months after the work was completed, the Wadleys discovered black mould was growing behind the insulation boards. It was removed by the installer and replaced with a new insulation system. But this also had to be removed along with all the plaster after it became damp. Elliott, 19, hasn’t entered the house since April, instead staying with his grandmother during university breaks.

”I miss him like you wouldn’t believe’,” says Mrs Wadley.

The family are going to stay with Mr Wadley’s sister for Christmas so they can all be together.

Billions of pounds of public money has been spent on insulating homes over the last 15 years.

The Wadleys’ home was insulated under a government scheme known as ECO4. In October, the National Audit Office (NAO) spending watchdog found that 98% of homes fitted with external wall insulation under ECO4 and the Great British Insulation Scheme since 2022 had major issues that needed to be repaired.

It added that 29% of homes that had internal wall insulation fitted under the schemes had major issues.

The report also said there had been “weak” government oversight and regulatory ”failure”.

DESNZ said it had “inherited a flawed system of oversight and regulation”. A spokesman for the department said it was “committed to introducing comprehensive reforms through the Warm Homes Plan to ensure that consumers get the quality installations they deserve and failures like these are not repeated”.

The spokesman added: “People should not be expected to navigate a complex web of organisations when they want to improve their homes – and with this government, they won’t.”

Becs Wadley A smiling family photo of Becs and Tony Wadley with their three sons Felix, Freddie and Elliott Becs Wadley

Becs and Tony Wadley with their three sons Felix, Freddie and Elliott.

In the downstairs rooms of the Wadleys’ home the insulation has also failed and has had to be removed. There is black mould on the walls while electric sockets hang loose with the wires exposed. The family says it has been in this condition for months.

The installer, Stellar Energy, says it has ”no record of any immediate safety hazards being flagged.” It says the descriptions of the exposed wires and sockets was “highly inconsistent” with their standard operating procedures, which required all such work to be made safe.

Building surveyor, David Walter, says the insulation wasn’t fitted correctly and says the installer ”didn’t understand what they were doing and what they were doing to the building which is why we’ve got these problems.”

Stellar Energy told the BBC the design was ”technically correct for a stone house and was installed…in strict accordance with the mandatory technical specifications of ECO4.”

Mr Wadley says he wouldn’t have signed up for the grant if he’d known what would happen. ”You wouldn’t put your family through this. Nobody would. Somebody needs to take responsibility.”

Stellar Energy says it ”sincerely regrets any distress this situation has caused the family” and says its priority is ”providing a final resolution to ensure the home meets the high standards” it strives for.

Scott Proudman had external wall insulation fitted to his family's home in 2021

Scott Proudman had external wall insulation fitted to his family’s home in 2021 under a government scheme. He is facing a £20,000 bill to get it replaced.

Scott Proudman contacted the BBC about the botched external wall insulation fitted to his Bristol home in 2021.

His family had been eligible for a government grant because of his eight-year-old daughter’s disabilities. Born 24 weeks premature, she has cerebral palsy, a partial visual impairment and was recently diagnosed with autism.

”I feel like a failure every time I come home because this was meant to be something to look after my family, to make life easier, and it hasn’t,” he says.

When the work was done, insulation boards were fixed to the outside of the house and render was applied to make it waterproof. But the render has been falling off for years.

Scott Proudman Render is falling off Scott Proudman's home.Scott Proudman

Render is falling off Scott Proudman’s home. As a result, the insulation underneath it is no longer waterproof and damp and mould could grow inside the house.

Building surveyor Mr Walter, says poor design and poor workmanship has caused the render to disintegrate. He says rainwater will very likely get under the cracked render and behind the insulation and will likely cause dampness inside.

”It’s like a timebomb. It’s going to get worse and worse, affecting the inside of the property,” he says.

Mr Walter says all of the render and insulation will have to come off and will cost tens of thousands of pounds to put right.

Right now the family is stuck with the repair bill because the installer, SPMS Wales, is being liquidated and Mr Proudman says they weren’t given the required guarantee for the work. Trustmark, the organisation responsible for overseeing quality, told Mr Proudman it couldn’t help because the company is no longer accredited.

Mr Proudman says he chose the company ”because it was on a government website and was Trustmark registered. I can’t believe how few rights consumers have.”

Brett Langdon, a director at SPMS Wales says he is ”very sorry the Proudmans have ended up in this situation” and says all works ”were done to the manufactures specification.” He says he gave a guarantee to the Proudmans but has told the BBC he can’t remember who the guarantee is with. He says the delamination of the render was “due to a failure of the system”.

In a statement TrustMark said it was ”very sorry to hear about what’s happened to Mr and Mrs Proudman and Mr and Mrs Wadley and the conditions both families’ homes have been left in. It is totally unacceptable and we are in discussions with the relevant Scheme Providers and guarantee providers to help resolve these situations.”

And it said it underlined ”the need for reform to the current system”.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews

Published

on

Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews



Food delivery giant Just Eat, funeral firm Dignity and motor platform Autotrader are among five firms under investigation by the UK’s competition watchdog as part of its crackdown on fake and misleading online reviews.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it had launched probes against the companies – also including customer review and feedback firm Feefo and Pasta Evangelists – to see whether consumer laws have been broken.

Since April last year, companies have been banned from certain tactics around online reviews under law, such as fake posts, paid-for reviews that are not clearly marked as incentivised, as well as for hiding negative feedback.

Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said: “Fake reviews strike at the heart of consumer trust – with many of us worrying about misleading content when looking at reviews online.

“With household budgets under pressure, people need to know they’re getting genuine information – not reviews or star ratings that have been manipulated to push them towards the wrong choice.

“We’ve given businesses the time to get things right. Now we’re deploying our new powers to tackle some of the most harmful practices head on.”

The CMA said it was looking into whether Just Eat’s ratings system had inflated some restaurant and grocer star ratings, giving a misleading picture of quality.

For Autotrader and Feefo, the CMA is investigating whether a number of one-star reviews – moderated by Feefo, which handles reviews for the new and used car site – were hidden on the platform and did not count towards the star ratings.

Dignity is under investigation by the CMA into whether it asked staff to write positive reviews about the firm’s crematoria services.

And artisan fresh pasta chain Pasta Evangelists is being probed over allegations it offered customers discounts for leaving five-star reviews on delivery apps without this being disclosed.

If the CMA finds the firms have broken the law, it can order them to change their practices and fine them up to 10% of their annual global sales.

An Autotrader spokesperson said: “We endeavour always to operate as a responsible and compliant business and will co-operate fully with the CMA’s investigation.”

It comes after the CMA recently secured commitments from Google and Amazon to beef up their systems to identify and remove fake reviews.

Amazon last June agreed to put in place “robust processes” to quickly detect and remove fake reviews alongside sanctions for rogue sellers and businesses after an investigation by the CMA to curb the customer hazard.

The tech giant said it would sanction businesses that boost their star ratings via bogus reviews or catalogue abuse, including bans from selling on the website, while users could also be banned for posting fake reviews.

Consumer group Which? welcomed the investigations and said the CMA must “get tough” on firms found to be breaking the law with reviews.

Sue Davies, head of consumer rights policy at Which?, said: “Investigations are a welcome first step, but enforcement will be key – the regulator must be prepared to get tough, use its powers and issue serious fines if these companies aren’t playing by the rules.”

The CMA said it swept more than 100 review publishers as part of the clampdown and sent advisory letters to 54 firms to improve their compliance with the law, with 90% having made changes in response and 75% telling the watchdog they better understood the rules.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply

Published

on

Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply



Anthony Albanese says nation’s supply remains “secure” amid reports of panic buying and shortages.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial

Published

on

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial



A woman has been awarded $6m in a verdict that could have implications for hundreds of other cases in the US.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending