Business
Private equity management fees hit new low in 2025
A view of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on Wall Street November 13, 2024, in New York City.
Angela Weiss | AFP | Getty Images
A version of this article appeared in CNBC’s Inside Alts newsletter, a guide to the fast-growing world of alternative investments, from private equity and private credit to hedge funds and venture capital. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.
Private equity firms that raised funds in 2025 charged the lowest average management fee rates ever recorded, continuing a multiyear downward trend.
Buyout funds of last year’s vintage asked investors to pay a mean rate of 1.61% of assets, according to data through June from Preqin, published in a December report. That’s well below the legacy 2% management fee that the industry has been known for since its inception.
There are a few reasons for this trend toward fee compression – and they’re not all dire. Of course, the industry has experienced a difficult few years of fundraising, requiring many managers to offer fee discounts to secure commitments. Even still, the industry raised $507 billion in aggregate capital across 856 funds during the first three quarters of 2025, which is expected to be essentially the same amount as 2024, when the final quarter of the year is tallied, according to Preqin.
In response to a difficult fundraising environment, managers have been consolidating and capital is increasingly going toward the biggest funds. Nearly 46% of the capital raised in 2025 was done so by the 10 largest funds, up from 34.5% in 2024, according to PitchBook.
The rise in prevalence of larger funds is also why fees are compressing. Funds seeking more than $1 billion contributed to dragging down the mean, while middle-market and newer, smaller firms charged closer to that 2% figure, Preqin data shows. Larger funds can spread fixed costs – such as compensation, compliance and technology – over a broader base. In other words, just because fee rates are lower doesn’t mean the fee dollars are.
“In the near-to-medium term, we expect private-equity fee compression to continue,” Preqin’s Brigid Connor wrote in the report. “We believe the biggest driver of this trend is growing fund sizes.”
However, Connor said it’s unclear whether fund sizes will grow large enough to the point where private equity fees fall to the levels of actively managed, public equity strategies.
Preqin doesn’t break out details about incentive fees, which are typically paid when assets are sold or taken public, as a proportion of the appreciation. However, so-called realizations have been muted over the last few years after an onslaught of buyouts during 2020 and 2021 created a sizable backlog. Higher rates have increased the cost of capital – a headwind for managers seeking to monetize assets at higher valuations than they paid for them.
That dynamic led to the challenging fundraising environment and also made it more difficult for managers to collect sizable incentive fees.
There’s a broad expectation that could change in 2026 – especially if there are several more rate cuts from the Federal Reserve – and the gap between buyers and sellers of assets continues to narrow.
Business
Saks Global struggles to line up financing as potential bankruptcy filing looms
Pedestrians walk past a Saks Fifth Avenue store in Chicago, Dec. 30, 2025.
Scott Olson | Getty Images
Beleaguered retail chain Saks Global is struggling to line up as much as $1 billion in financing to keep its business afloat during a potential Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, CNBC has learned.
The luxury chain has been working to secure a “debtor-in-possession” loan, which would allow it to fund operations in the event of a potential bankruptcy filing, people familiar with the matter said. But investors have so far shown little interest in lending Saks the money because they’re skeptical the company can successfully reorganize and pay them back, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the discussions are private.
While DIP lenders get repaid before other creditors during bankruptcy proceedings, they don’t always recoup their full investment, and some investors are concerned that could happen if they finance Saks, the people said.
The storied 159-year-old department store, which now owns Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman, is both a destination and a symbol for luxury fashion, known for offering top brands like Chanel and Dior alongside up and comers like Good American. Across the entire enterprise, Saks Global has more than 70 full-line luxury stores and about 100 off-price locations.
Since Saks missed an interest payment to bondholders late last month, only a “limited number” of investors have shown interest in financing the DIP loan, while a number of others have declined to get involved, the people said.
Saks declined to comment on investor interest in its fundraising efforts.
A wide array of firms invest in companies that could be headed for bankruptcy, including top banks and private equity. However, the only firms likely to be interested in investing in Saks at this point are either liquidators that also have investment vehicles or alternative asset managers that have experience in distressed retail, one source said. Still, even some of those investors have declined to get involved with Saks’ DIP loan, the people said.
Liquidation is one of several potential outcomes Saks faces. However, if it can’t line up a DIP loan, which would be used to pay for essential expenses like payroll, rent and inventory, that scenario would be more likely. The retailer is already struggling to pay those costs.
Failure to line up financing would prevent Saks from filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which would give the company a chance to reorganize and potentially find a buyer willing to take on its business as a going concern. It could then be faced with Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which is reserved for liquidation.
That could mean the end for one of the most fabled department stores in history, whose flagship store on Fifth Avenue, considered by some to be its most valuable asset, has become a global destination.
In the meantime, Saks has also been in talks with liquidators for a number of stores that are in the process of closing, but not yet the entire chain, the people said.
Saks’ troubles have been mounting since it acquired its longtime rival Neiman Marcus in a $2.7 billion deal in 2024, which was heavily financed with debt.
The tie-up between the two rivals was expected to create a luxury retail powerhouse that could better streamline costs and negotiate with vendors.
Instead, Saks has struggled to pay its vendors on time, leading to inventory gaps and declining sales. A slowdown in the overall luxury market, which has seen growth stagnate in recent years, has compounded the issues.
Business
Government to water down business rate rise for pubs
Simon Jack,BBC Business Editorand
Lucy Hooker,Business reporter
Getty ImagesA climbdown on forthcoming increases to the business rates bills faced by pubs in England is set to be announced by the government in the next few days.
The government is expected to say it will make changes to how pubs’ business rates are calculated, resulting in smaller rises to bills.
Treasury officials say they have recognised the financial difficulties facing many pubs after sharp rises in the rateable value of their premises.
The move follows pressure from landlords and industry groups that included more than 1,000 pubs banning Labour MPs from their premises.
The BBC understands it will apply only to pubs and not the whole hospitality sector.
The Treasury is also thought to be ready to relax licensing rules to allow longer opening and more pavement areas for drinking.
In her November Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves scaled back business rate discounts that have been in force since the pandemic from 75% to 40% – and announced that there would be no discount at all from April.
That, combined with big upward adjustments to rateable values of pub premises, left landlords with the prospect of much higher rates bills.
A campaign to dilute the impact of these rises has been gaining traction in recent weeks, with pub owners and industry groups lobbying for more support.
Conversations between the government and the hospitality sector were “ongoing”, DWP minister Dame Diana Johnson said.
Speaking to Radio 4’s PM programme, she said: “We as a government want to make business rates fairer but you’ll also know we’re coming to the end of the transitional relief that was available because of Covid.”
On Wednesday Labour MPs called on the government to rethink its support for the industry.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said: “What has happened is that over Christmas Labour MPs were banned from every single pub they tried to get into… so now they are pushing for a U-turn.”
She said the Conservatives had a “much better plan” which was to “slash business rates for all of the High Street, not just pubs”. She said business rates bills of less than £110,000 would be scrapped completely.
Reform also welcomed the climbdown, saying “pubs have already been lumbered with astronomical energy costs”.
The party’s deputy leader Richard Tice said: “Pubs are the backbone of our communities and a huge part of British heritage. Their closures would be a cultural catastrophe as much as an economic one.”
To calculate a pub’s business rate bill the rateable value of its premises is multiplied by a set figure: “the multiplier”.
The government had already offered some relief by reducing the multiplier for pubs, and may be about to reduce it further.
Alternatively they could boost the £4.3bn “transitional relief” fund brought in to ease the impact of withdrawing support following the pandemic.
Geoff RobbinsGeoff Robbins, who owns the Wheatsheaf Pub in Faringdon, Oxfordshire with his wife Jo, said it was “a great relief” that more help was on the way.
His rates are due to rise by around 80% over the next three years. He needs a discount on most of that, he reckons, after factoring in higher gas, electricity and staffing costs.
“Rates are a tax against your business whether you make a profit or loss… you’ve got to pay, there’s no way round it,” said Geoff, who got in touch with BBC Your Voice.
Industry groups also welcomed news there would be additional help.
Emma McClarkin, chief executive of the British Beer and Pub Association, said it was “potentially a huge win” for the sector.
“This could save locals, jobs, and means publicans can breathe a huge sigh of relief,” she said.
Kate Nicholls, chair of UK Hospitality, representing the industry, said the support should apply not just to pubs, but to all hospitality businesses affected by rising rates, including cafés and restaurants.
“We need a hospitality-wide solution, which is why the government should implement the maximum possible 20p discount to the multiplier for all hospitality properties,” she said.
Other sectors are calling for the support to be even broader, to include live music venues, theatres, galleries, gyms and retailers.
Unpicking the recent Budget would be seen by many as another U-turn following climbdowns on winter fuel payments, disability benefits and inheritance tax on farms and family businesses.
Shadow business and trade secretary Andrew Griffith said the change showed Rachel Reeves’ Budget was “falling apart”.
“Labour were wrong to attack pubs and now have been forced into another screeching U-turn,” he said.
Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesperson Daisy Cooper said: “This is literally the last chance saloon for our treasured pubs and high streets – so the government must U-turn, today.
“These businesses are worried sick, making decisions now, and can’t wait a minute longer.”
The calculation of business rates is an issue that is devolved in all four UK nations.
The discount on rates during the pandemic only applied to hospitality businesses in England.
Scottish businesses are waiting for the Budget there next week to hear how the Edinburgh government will approach the issue.
Pubs there will hope the Scottish government follows the UK government in offering some relief.
Additional reporting by Kris Bramwell

Business
RFK Jr.’s new food guidelines could boost beaten down fast-casual chains like Chipotle and Sweetgreen
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. attends a briefing at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., January 7, 2026.
Kevin Lamarque | Reuters
New federal dietary recommendations have sparked mixed reactions from the embattled restaurant industry, as changing guidelines could encourage Americans to dine out less often or choose from a smaller pool of restaurants when they do leave home.
The Departments of Health and Human Services and Agriculture unveiled the nutrition guidelines on Wednesday. The recommendations, which are updated every five years, pushed for higher consumption of protein and full-fat dairy and reduced intake of processed foods and sugary drinks.
The guidelines are primarily a public health tool for federal agencies, health-care providers and nutrition experts, so it’s unclear how much they will influence individual consumer choices. Although the recommendations largely focus on eating at home, they lightly touched on the restaurant industry as well.
“When dining out, choose nutrient-dense options,” the guidelines advise.
While the recommendations could discourage Americans from spending at restaurants — especially at a time when high inflation has curbed trips to dine out — some pockets of the industry had a positive reaction to the changes. The changes could give a particular boost to struggling fast-casual chains like Sweetgreen and Chipotle, which have long touted the type of natural ingredients championed by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “Make American Healthy Again” movement.
One lobbying executive who represents restaurant companies, whose organization was involved in meetings with the White House on the new guidelines, said the outcome could have been “far worse” for the sector. The person, who declined to be named because their organization was involved in private discussions, said the end result was better for the industry than proposed guidance from earlier in 2025 was.
However, the executive said they are still concerned the guidelines could encourage Americans to eat at home when diners have affordable options to incorporate those foods at restaurants. That implication could also ruffle feathers among restaurant chains and their franchisees.
Despite those potential concerns from some, industry lobbying group the National Restaurant Association backed the new guidelines.
“Now, more than ever, restaurant operators are offering a wider variety of options, allowing consumers to choose what best fits their dietary needs, preferences, and lifestyles. We congratulate Secretary Kennedy and the Trump Administration on the release of the new guidelines and look forward to continued collaboration with policymakers to ensure that nutrition guidance remains practical, flexible, and supportive of access and innovation,” National Restaurant Association spokesman Sean Kennedy said in a statement to CNBC.
Restaurant franchise lobbyist the International Franchise Association, called the approach “nuanced” and said it may limit the number of price increases restaurants have to make.
“Fortunately, the more nuanced approach of these guidelines helps ensure our members will not have to raise prices and that consumers can continue to make their own choices,” the group said. “Any future regulations or guidance must keep potential cost increases top of mind, as restaurant owners already face numerous regulatory burdens and supply chain challenges, which most often disproportionately affect small business owners, like franchisees, and ultimately, American consumers.”
How fast casual could benefit
Some of the most supportive reactions came from chains that had been beaten down in 2025, including Chipotle and Sweetgreen. Both fast-casual names saw pullbacks from younger consumers who continue to struggle in a K-shaped economy, where spending has concentrated more among the highest earners.
Sweetgreen, which was the biggest restaurant sector laggard last year with a nearly 80% stock decline, cheered the new guidelines.
A spokesperson told CNBC in a statement: “We keep ultra-processed ingredients and added sugars out of our restaurants, source transparently from partners we know and trust, and cook our food from scratch. That is why we are excited to see the new Food Pyramid so clearly emphasizing whole, real, and unprocessed foods.”
Sweetgreen founder and CEO Jonathan Neman wrote on X, “The U.S. government is for the 1st time urging Americans to avoid highly processed food, added sugar, and refined carbohydrates. Today, the government finally told the American people the truth. Avoid highly processed food (which is 70% of a child’s diet). Avoid refined carbohydrates. CELEBRATE REAL FOOD… LFG!”
Chipotle will debut a High Protein Menu on Tuesday, December 23, with items ranging from 15 to 81 grams of protein per item.
Source: Chipotle Mexican Grill
Similarly, Chipotle, which recently debuted a high protein and GLP-1 friendly menu, told CNBC it has already catered to similar dietary guidelines.
“Our menu of real ingredients makes it easy to follow the new dietary guidelines that prioritize high-quality protein, healthy fats, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains—while limiting highly processed foods and refined carbohydrates,” Chipotle spokeswoman Laurie Schalow said in a statement. “With real food made from wholesome ingredients—without artificial colors, flavors, or preservatives—Chipotle offers choices that fit a balanced, modern approach to eating.”
The company’s stock was down nearly 40% in 2025, but some Wall Street analysts have pointed to it as a potential winner in the new GLP-1 landscape, where users of the drugs often opt for smaller portions with more protein.
Kennedy has spearheaded the MAHA platform, championing a diet based on whole foods to prevent chronic disease. At times, his beliefs, like his advocacy for beef tallow and encouragement of more red meat in diets, have run afoul of both public health experts and industry players, like McDonald’s.
Kennedy’s criticism of processed foods has put fast-food chains on the defensive, although President Donald Trump is a vocal and loyal fan, particularly of McDonald’s.
-
Sports4 days agoVAR review: Why was Wirtz onside in Premier League, offside in Europe?
-
Business4 days agoAldi’s Christmas sales rise to £1.65bn
-
Politics4 days agoChina’s birth-rate push sputters as couples stay child-free
-
Sports1 week ago
Tom Wilson’s New Year’s Eve: Two goals, a fight, a win and an Olympic nod
-
Entertainment4 days agoMinnesota Governor Tim Walz to drop out of 2026 race, official confirmation expected soon
-
Sports4 days agoFACI invites applications for 2026 chess development project | The Express Tribune
-
Sports4 days agoSteelers escape Ravens’ late push, win AFC North title
-
Business4 days ago8th Pay Commission: From Policy Review, Cabinet Approval To Implementation –Key Stages Explained

