Connect with us

Business

Ryanair fined £224m in Italy over ‘abusive strategy’ with travel agencies

Published

on

Ryanair fined £224m in Italy over ‘abusive strategy’ with travel agencies



Ryanair has been fined 256 million euros (£224 million) by Italy’s competition watchdog for allegedly using an “abusive strategy” to hinder third-party travel agencies.

The regulator claimed in its ruling that the low-cost airline deliberately made it difficult for agencies to buy flights on its website, between April 2023 and at least April this year.

The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) said: “Following a complex investigation, the authority found that Ryanair put in place an elaborate strategy affecting the ability of online and traditional travel agencies to purchase Ryanair flights on ryanair.com.

“In particular, the company’s strategy blocked, hindered or made such purchases more difficult… when combined with flights operated by other carriers and/or other tourism and insurance services.”

“These practices compromised the ability of agencies to purchase Ryanair flights and combine them with flights from other airlines and/or additional travel services, thereby reducing direct and indirect competition between agencies,” it added.

Ryanair said it would appeal the ruling and the fine, which it said was “unjustly levied”.

The Dublin-based carrier said: “Ryanair has campaigned for many years to offer consumers the lowest fares by booking directly on the ryanair.com website.

“This direct distribution model was ruled to ‘undoubtedly benefit consumers’ by the Milan Court, as recently as Jan 2024.”

Ryanair’s long-standing chief executive, Michael O’Leary, branded the ruling “legally unsound”.

He said: “This AGCM ruling is an affront to the precedent Milan court ruling, and also an affront to consumer protection and competition law.

“Ryanair has grown rapidly in Italy – and in many other markets across Europe – by always offering the lowest air fares in every single market in which we operate.

“This legally baseless AGCM Ruling, and its absurd 256 million euro fine, undermines consumer protection and competition law, and it will be overturned on appeal.”

It comes after Italy fined Ryanair 3 million euros (£2.6 million) in 2019 for its policy of charging passengers for cabin baggage, but the penalty was later overturned by an administrative court.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Trump tariffs: The uncertainties facing businesses and consumers after tariff changes

Published

on

Trump tariffs: The uncertainties facing businesses and consumers after tariff changes



Businesses say questions remain after US President Donald Trump announced he will impose global tariffs of 15%.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

‘Pakistan’s citizens pay high taxes but get nothing in return’

Published

on

‘Pakistan’s citizens pay high taxes but get nothing in return’


New Delhi: Pakistan’s successive governments, both civil and military, have been imposing higher and regressive taxes, pushing the overwhelming majority of citizens towards an unbearably high cost of living, and adding insult to injury, the state provides nothing in terms of welfare and has total apathy towards the economically vulnerable segments of society, an article in the Pakistani media said. 

Pakistan’s fiscal crisis is not simply about deficits and numbers. It is about a broken social contract—a growing disconnect between what citizens pay and what they receive. High taxation without welfare delivery has not only failed to generate effective revenue but also has eroded trust, discouraged investment, and weakened the formal economy, the article in the Lahore-based The Friday Times lamented.

Pakistan’s growth failure is often explained through familiar cliches: low productivity, weak exports, lack of innovation, or insufficient entrepreneurship. These are symptoms, not causes. The real problem lies deeper—in a state-engineered cost structure that has made doing business prohibitively expensive and structurally irrational, it said.


Add Zee News as a Preferred Source



The article cites a recent private sector analysis reported by Nikkei Asia, which has quantified what businesses have been saying for years: operating a business in Pakistan is 34 per cent more expensive than in comparable South Asian economies. According to the study conducted by the Pakistan Business Forum (PBF), the excess cost is not incidental or cyclical. It is structural, cumulative, and policy-induced.

“With only 3.4 million effective taxpayers, a mere 4 per cent of the 85.6 million-strong workforce funding the entire state, we have declared war on the middle class. Having forced this captive minority to bridge a multi-trillion rupee deficit while the informal elite remain untouched, we have classified excellence as a taxable offence and transparency as a path to insolvency, the article states,” the article said.

The tragedy is not that Pakistan collects too little (which is a myth in terms of the tax-to-GDP ratio in our peculiar milieu), it is that it taxes irrationally—high taxes on a narrow tax base with low yield and tax expenditure of nearly Rs 5 trillion. Despite successive mini-budgets, super taxes, levies on petroleum, enhanced withholding regimes, and expanded presumptive taxation, the debt-to-tax ratio remains shocking, over 700 per cent, it noted

A microscopic segment of the population — salaried individuals, documented businesses, corporate entities, and compliant exporters — finances a bloated public apparatus. The informal economy thrives, retail and wholesale sectors remain largely undocumented, agriculture as a sector is scarcely taxed, and real estate speculation continues under preferential regimes. Instead of broadening the base, fiscal managers repeatedly resort to increasing rates on the already documented, it added.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

‘Buy America’ to ‘bye America’: Why investors are looking beyond US stocks – The Times of India

Published

on

‘Buy America’ to ‘bye America’: Why investors are looking beyond US stocks – The Times of India


US investors are increasingly moving money out of domestic equities and into overseas markets, signalling a shift away from the long-dominant “buy America” trade as returns from Big Tech moderate and global markets outperform.Data from LSEG/Lipper shows US-domiciled investors have withdrawn about $75 billion from US equity products over the past six months, including $52 billion since the start of 2026 — the largest outflow in the first eight weeks of a year since at least 2010, news agency Reuters reported.The trend reflects growing diversification by American investors, even as a weaker dollar makes overseas investments more expensive. Analysts say the shift mirrors earlier moves by global investors who had already begun reducing exposure to US assets.Since the global financial crisis in 2009, strong economic growth and technology-sector dominance helped US equities deliver outsized gains, reinforcing the “buy America” investment strategy. More recently, the artificial intelligence boom pushed the S&P 500 to record highs last year, cushioning markets despite policy uncertainty linked to President Donald Trump’s trade and diplomatic approach.

Investors look beyond US tech dominance

Rising concerns over AI-related risks and elevated valuations of megacap technology stocks have prompted investors to reassess opportunities abroad. Bank of America’s February fund manager survey showed investors rotating from US equities into emerging markets at the fastest pace in five years.“I’ve had lots of conversations with our wealth business in the U.S. this year,” said Gerry Fowler, UBS’s head of European equity strategy and global derivatives strategy. “They’re all talking about investing more offshore because at the end of the year, they looked at the performance of foreign markets in dollars and they’re like, wow, I’m missing out.”So far this year, US investors have invested about $26 billion into emerging-market equities, with South Korea attracting $2.8 billion and Brazil $1.2 billion, according to LSEG/Lipper data.The dollar has declined roughly 10% against a basket of currencies since last January, partly reflecting policy developments under the Trump administration. While this raises the cost of overseas investments, stronger foreign market performance can enhance dollar-denominated returns.Over the past 12 months, the S&P 500 has gained around 14%, compared with a 43% rise in Tokyo’s Nikkei index, a 26% jump in Europe’s STOXX 600, a 23% return from Shanghai’s CSI 300 and a doubling in South Korea’s KOSPI index.

Valuation gap drives global rotation

Investors are increasingly rotating away from high-growth technology stocks towards industrial and defensive sectors, which are more prominent in markets such as Germany, the UK, Switzerland and Japan.Laura Cooper, global investment strategist at Nuveen, told Reuters that the shift reflects a broader reassessment of valuations. “Increasingly we are seeing U.S. investors look at the global landscape from a valuation perspective,” she said, highlighting cyclical growth momentum in Europe and Japan.European banking stocks surged 67% last year and have risen another 4% so far in 2026, illustrating renewed interest in cyclical sectors.US equities continue to trade at higher valuations, with the S&P 500 valued at roughly 21.8 times expected earnings, compared with about 15 times in Europe, 17 times in Japan and 13.5 times in China.Kevin Thozet, portfolio adviser at Carmignac, said flows of US capital into Europe have accelerated since mid-2025. Since Trump’s inauguration last January, US investors have channelled nearly $7 billion into European equity funds, reversing earlier outflows recorded during his first term.“If I’m taking a very long-term view, it’s, maybe, this idea of a great global rotation,” Thozet said.(Disclaimer: Recommendations and views on the stock market, other asset classes or personal finance management tips given by experts are their own. These opinions do not represent the views of The Times of India)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending