Buckingham Palace has recently seen DEFCON-1 being announced, and according to sources, there is a frenzy going on in the Firm as a result.

For those unversed, this is all due to the public calls for Andrew to be stripped of not just his dukedom or military honors, but also the title of prince that he enjoys as the younger brother of the reigning monarch, and son of the late Queen Elizabeth II.

A warning about the Firm’s state has been shared by a Whitehall source. According to their findings, the reason for DEFCON-1 was Andrew’s title fiasco that rocked the Firm, reason being Parliament “was sniffing around” according to celebrity news reporter Rob Shuter.

On his substack he explained that, behind closed doors, senior MPs has begun talks about Andrew’s behavior and conduct, and there were even plans to have him summoned “to testify under oath.”

According to the reporter, “the moment lawmakers start treating a royal like a cabinet minister, everything collapses. That’s DEFCON-1 at the Palace.”

For those unversed, should Parliament step in once into the Firm’s ‘jurisdiction’, they “can do it again. And if they tug the Andrew thread, more follows: private security, foreign dealings, royal finances, Queen Elizabeth’s decisions. The mere specter of hearings sent chills down centuries of royal precedent,” he added too.

According to Mr Shuter, that is why Andrew’s title was handled as swiftly as it was, and “we have never seen royal paperwork move that quickly,” he even added.

A big reason for that though, is because “the King had leverage — Prime Minister Keir Starmer owes him for discreet whispering in Donald Trumps ear. Lammy didn’t blink.”

However, before the news signed off a senior advisor was also quoted saying that King Charles’ reasons for going this route were not because “for shame,” instead Andrew “was sacrificed to protect the system.”

• Khamenei tables conditions to resume cooperation with US.
• Says US must completely abandon support for Israel for talks.
• Iran’s FM says ready for talks only on nuclear programme.

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Monday that Tehran would only consider cooperation with the United States if it changed its policy in the region, including supporting Israel.

“If they completely abandon support for the Zionist regime, withdraw their military bases from here [the region], and refrain from interfering in this region, then it [cooperation] can be considered,” said Khamenei.

“The arrogant nature of the United States accepts nothing other than submission.”

In mid-June, Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign against Iran, triggering a war which saw the US join briefly with strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.

The 12-day war with Israel, which prompted an Iranian response with missile and drone strikes, derailed nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington, which had begun in April.

A ceasefire between Iran and Israel has been in place since June 24.

“If the country becomes strong and the enemy realises that confronting this strong nation will not yield profit but will bring loss, the country will certainly gain immunity,” Khamenei added.

Iran has been reeling under years of international sanctions, especially after the United States in 2018 withdrew from a nuclear accord and reimposed sanctions.

In September, the United Nations reinstated sanctions under the so-called “snapback” mechanism after Britain, France and Germany triggered the process.

On Sunday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in an interview with Al Jazeera that Tehran remained “ready to enter negotiations” with Washington, but only on its nuclear programme, ruling out any talks on its missile capabilities.

He added that talks could resume “whenever the Americans are ready to negotiate on an equal footing and based on mutual interests. Apparently, they are not in a hurry. We are not in a hurry either.”

Canadians supporters of Prince Harry have that Meghan Markle has completely ignored their support for the Duke of Sussex’s Invictus Games.

The Duchess of Sussex sparked fresh backlash as after a video showed her celebrating the Los Angeles Dodgers’ World Series win against the Toronto Blue Jays.

The clip was shared by Kelly McKee Zajfen . 

A fan said, “Canada just warmly welcomed Harry’s Invictus Games.  “That also deserves a level of respect from a royal.” I don’t care who she supports in sports, but she doesn’t need to post it. Again it speaks volumes of narcissism .”

Many others reminded Meghan Markle of how Canada had welcomed her and Harry when the couple departed the UK.

Others said the Duchess of Sussex should also not forget that Harry’s father, King Charles III, is the head of state of Canada.

Many Canadians were unhappy because it came just months after political tensions started between the two countries due to US President Donald Trump’s controversial statements about making Canada the 51st state of the United States.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle had first arrived in Canada after stepping down from their royal duties and before settling in California with their Prince Archie.

The couple now live in US with their two children, Archie and Lilibet, the couple’s daughter who was born in Los Angeles.