Connect with us

Business

Startup founder Charlie Javice sentenced to 7 years in prison for defrauding JPMorgan Chase

Published

on

Startup founder Charlie Javice sentenced to 7 years in prison for defrauding JPMorgan Chase


US businesswoman Charlie Javice (L), founder of Frank, arrives for her sentencing hearing at federal court in Manhattan on Sept. 29, 2025, in New York City.

Timothy A. Clary | AFP | Getty Images

Charlie Javice, founder of a startup acquired by JPMorgan Chase in 2021 for $175 million, was sentenced to just over seven years in prison Monday for defrauding the bank by overstating how many customers the fintech firm had.

In March, a 12-person jury found Javice and her chief growth officer Olivier Amar guilty on three counts of fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit fraud. Prosecutors had sought a sentence of 12 years.

Javice, 33, cried as she delivered an emotional statement to the court Monday. Standing to address the judge, Javice said she felt profound remorse for her actions and asked for forgiveness from JPMorgan, employees of the startup, shareholders and investors.

At one point, Javice turned and directly addressed her family, sitting in the front row, to apologize and thank them for what she called unwavering support.

“I will spend my entire life regretting these errors,” Javice said.

“I’m asking with all of my heart for forgiveness,” she said. “I ask your Honor to temper justice with mercy … I will accept your judgment with dignity and humility.”

Judge Alvin Hellerstein told Javice her words were “very moving” and that the way she’s devoted her life is “highly commendable,” but that he couldn’t give her the forgiveness she sought.

“I sentence people not because they’re bad, but because they do bad things,” Hellerstein told Javice before delivering the 85-month prison sentence. “I don’t think you’ll be committing other crimes and that you’ll be devoting your life to service, but others have to be deterred.”

In addition to prison, Javice was sentenced to three years of supervision, along with $22.36 million in forfeiture and $287 million in restitution to JPMorgan. She will remain out on bail while she appeals the ruling.

JPM acquisition

JPMorgan bought the startup, called Frank, to help the biggest U.S. bank by assets market its financial products to students. Frank was a digital platform that helped students apply for financial aid. In September 2021, JPMorgan told CNBC in an exclusive interview on the deal that the fintech firm had served more than five million students since Javice founded it.

But months after the deal closed, JPMorgan discovered that Frank had fewer than 300,000 real customers; the rest were synthetic identities created by Javice with the help of a data scientist.

Javice was arrested in 2023 on charges that she defrauded JPMorgan in the deal. Details that emerged later showed that Frank employees expressed disbelief when Javice directed them to boost their customer roster before the acquisition.

The week before selling her company to JPMorgan, Javice directed an employee to fabricate millions of users. When the employee declined, Javice reassured him, according to testimony given earlier this year.

“She said: ‘Don’t worry. I don’t want to end up in an orange jumpsuit,'” the employee testified.

Not Theranos

On Monday, Javice’s attorney Ronald Sullivan argued for a lighter sentence for his client, making the case that Frank helped customers. He contrasted the case against that of Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos infamy, whose fraud he said had “dangerous medical consequences,” and who was sentenced to 135 months in prison.

“Ms. Javice’s sentence should be nowhere near Elizabeth Holmes,'” Sullivan told Judge Hellerstein.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Micah Fergenson disagreed, arguing that Javice’s crime was fueled by greed.

“JPMorgan didn’t get a functioning business, they acquired a crime scene,” Fergenson said.

A courtroom sketch of Charlie Javice at her sentencing at court on Sept. 29, 2025 in New York City.

Elizabeth Williams | CNBC

The episode was embarrassing for JPMorgan, which was thought to be one of the most sophisticated of corporate acquirers. Concerned about threats from fintech and big tech firms, the bank, led by CEO Jamie Dimon, went on a shopping spree of smaller fintech firms starting in 2020.

But JPMorgan, eager to edge out rivals bidding for the startup, failed to confirm that Frank actually had millions of customers before shelling out $175 million for the company.



Source link

Business

Iran war worries fail to dampen business sentiment in Japan

Published

on

Iran war worries fail to dampen business sentiment in Japan



Business sentiment among major Japanese manufacturers rose from 16 to 17 in March, according to the Bank of Japan’s quarterly survey released on Wednesday.

The improvement in the so-called diffusion index in the closely watched “tankan” report, recorded for the fourth quarter straight, comes even as worries grow about Japan’s economic growth and oil supplies because of the US-Israeli war on Iran.

The survey is an indicator of companies foreseeing good conditions minus those feeling pessimistic.

The index for large non-manufacturers, such as the service sector, stood unchanged from the last tankan at 36.

Japan’s inflation has so far remained relatively moderate, but worries are growing about prices at the gas stands and other products. Investors and consumers alike are filled with uncertainty about how much longer the war may last and what US president Donald Trump might say next. Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 has gyrated wildly in recent weeks.

Analysts say the Bank of Japan may start to raise interest rates because of concerns about inflation, given the soaring energy costs and declining yen, two elements that greatly affect living costs for the average Japanese consumer.

Historically, Japan has benefited from a weak yen because of its giant exports, exemplified in autos and electronics. A weak yen raises the value of exports’ earnings when converted into yen.

But in recent years, a weak yen is working as a negative, as resource-poor Japan imports much of its energy, as well as other key products such as food and manufacturing components.

The US dollar has been soaring against the yen lately.

Japan’s central bank had a negative interest rate policy for years to fight deflation until it normalised policy in 2024. It kept the rate unchanged at 0.75 per cent in March. The next Bank of Japan monetary policy board meeting is set for April 27 and 28.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Iran war: Asia stocks jump after Trump suggests conflict could end in weeks

Published

on

Iran war: Asia stocks jump after Trump suggests conflict could end in weeks



The price of Brent crude oil to be delivered in May rose by a record 64% in March as the conflict disrupted energy supplies.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Household energy bill drop ‘short-lived respite’ amid fears of July hike

Published

on

Household energy bill drop ‘short-lived respite’ amid fears of July hike



Household energy prices are falling by 7% from Wednesday in a “short-lived respite” for households already braced for a predicted 18% hike from July.

Ofgem’s price cap has dropped from £1,758 to £1,641 – a reduction of £117 or around £10 a month for the average household using both electricity and gas.

This is an 11% fall year on year, but still £600 more than bills were in the winter of 2020 to 2021.

The reduction is lower than the average £150 cut to bills pledged by the Chancellor in November, when she moved 75% of the cost of the renewables obligation from household bills onto general taxation and scrapped the energy company obligation (Eco) scheme.

And it comes amid increasing concern about the amount energy bills could rise by from July as a result of the Middle East conflict, with latest predictions from Cornwall Insight suggesting this could be 18% or £288 a year – to almost £900 above pre-crisis levels.

In the meantime, consumer groups have urged households to send in meter readings to ensure their energy usage is billed at the lowest possible rate, and investigate fixed rate deals if they remain on their firm’s standard variable rate.

A spokesman for Energy UK, which represents firms, said: “Suppliers are required to set direct debits as accurately as possible based on the best and most current information available.

“So – as well as factors like current balance, payment record and previous energy usage – this will also include the latest projection of energy costs over the coming months.

“Suppliers regularly review direct debt levels so any current assessment for price cap customers would likely take into account that bills look set to go up again in July. Customers on fixed deals however will not see any increase until their current deal comes to an end.”

Simon Francis, coordinator of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, said: “The fall in bills from April 1 offers brief relief for households, but the respite will be short-lived.

“Given the ongoing profits made by the energy industry, households deserve more than a temporary reprieve before prices rise again.

“For the millions of households already in energy debt to their suppliers, this is a real concern and risks pushing more people into crisis.

“The Government must use the window between now and July to act. That means targeted support for those hit first and hardest, including households off the gas grid and those on heat networks, faster action on energy debt, and preparations to bring costs down if prices deteriorate further.”

National Energy Action chief executive Adam Scorer said: “Any price drop is good news, but everyone knows that it will be overtaken by events.

“It is likely to be a false dawn. And the people who know that the best are those already struggling to afford their energy bills and know the real cost of an energy crisis.

“Unfortunately, today’s good news is hugely overshadowed by the fear and dread of what may be to come.”

Which? energy editor Emily Seymour said: “April’s energy price cap fall will bring much needed relief for households. What you save will vary depending on how much you use.

“Despite this drop, many households are already concerned about the next price cap announcement in May, which will set rates from July and is currently predicted to rise by £288, or 18%, per year for the average household.

“It’s important to remember this isn’t confirmed yet, so don’t feel pressured into making quick decisions.

“If you’re currently paying variable rates, it’s worth checking the market to see what fixed deals are available. Fixing could offer protection against future increases, but only if the price is right.

“Options have reduced in the last few weeks, but some energy companies are still offering fixes with prices around those of the January-March price cap.

“If you’re worried about paying your energy bills, contact your supplier as soon as possible. Energy companies are obliged to help if you’re struggling to pay and won’t disconnect you for missing a payment. Request a review or break in payments, and access any available hardship funds.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending