Connect with us

Politics

Taliban Turns to India for Trade and Investment Despite Past Hostility

Published

on

Taliban Turns to India for Trade and Investment Despite Past Hostility



Afghanistan’s Taliban-led government is increasingly turning to India for trade, investment, and development support, signaling a significant shift in its foreign policy and economic priorities.

For over two decades, Taliban rhetoric painted India as a Hindu “kafir” state that backed “anti-Islam” forces in Kabul.

India was frequently accused of meddling in Afghan affairs, with Indian consulates labeled as intelligence hubs and Indian aid dismissed as foreign interference.

Now, the same government is sending its foreign and commerce ministers to New Delhi, seeking investment, markets, and infrastructure support.

From Ideology to Pragmatism

The pivot represents a marked departure from past ideological positions. The Taliban once justified the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas as a fight against “un-Islamic idols” and the Buddhist-Hindu civilization. Today, they court India, a country that actively promotes and protects the very cultural heritage the Taliban attacked.

Similarly, the Taliban’s historical narrative of labeling the Kabul republic as “India’s puppet” contrasts sharply with their current dependence on India for wheat supplies, reconstruction funds, trade corridors, and access to ports. Analysts note that this transactional approach highlights a pragmatic prioritization of economic stabilization over past ideological claims.

Strategic Choices Over Religious Rhetoric
Despite their repeated emphasis on Muslim solidarity and historic ties with Pakistan, the Taliban have increasingly bypassed their immediate Muslim neighbor amid tensions over border issues, TTP activity, and refugee flows, choosing instead to strengthen ties with India.

Likewise, the Emirate has historically opposed “Western economic systems” and interest-based finance. Yet, it is now leveraging India’s connections to global financial institutions to access banking channels, investments, and reconstruction projects.

Domestic Absolutism vs Foreign Flexibility
While maintaining strict domestic policies—restricting girls’ education, women’s work, and media freedoms in the name of “pure Sharia”—the Taliban display flexibility abroad, negotiating with former ideological adversaries to secure aid, trade, and diplomatic recognition.

Notably, issues such as Kashmir, India’s Citizenship Amendment Act, and anti-Muslim violence receive little attention during official visits to New Delhi, reflecting a prioritization of economic and diplomatic objectives over ideological messaging.

Borders and Recognition
The Taliban continue to challenge the Durand Line with Pakistan but show restraint in dealings with India, respecting its security concerns and acknowledging practical realities, despite India not formally recognizing the Taliban regime. These repeated ministerial visits underscore a clear pursuit of de facto recognition and international legitimacy.

Expert Takeaway
Observers suggest that Afghanistan’s Taliban government has set aside past jihadist and ideological rhetoric in dealings with India, prioritizing trade, aid, and political recognition. Analysts note that this pragmatic approach demonstrates the tension between the Taliban’s domestic ideological rigidity and their foreign policy pragmatism in a fragile state.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR designated as terrorist organisations in Texas

Published

on

Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR designated as terrorist organisations in Texas


A Muslim Brotherhood member shouts solgans in front of riot police during a demonstration in front of the Press Syndicate in Cairo, Egypt, April 15, 2016. — Reuters
A Muslim Brotherhood member shouts solgans in front of riot police during a demonstration in front of the Press Syndicate in Cairo, Egypt, April 15, 2016. — Reuters

TEXAS: In a highly unusual and politically charged move, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has issued a proclamation designating the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as “terrorist” and “transnational criminal organisations”, effectively banning both groups and anyone associated with them from purchasing land in the state.

The declaration was made despite the fact that neither the Muslim Brotherhood nor CAIR appears on the United States government’s official list of terrorist organisations. CAIR, the country’s largest Muslim civil rights group, condemned Abbott’s action as baseless, unconstitutional and an open display of Islamophobia.

The organisation accused the governor of weaponising conspiracy theories to target Muslim communities, warning that any attempt to formalise this proclamation into policy would be met with legal challenge.

Observers say the governor’s announcement cannot be separated from the controversy surrounding EPIC City, a proposed Muslim-led residential development near Dallas.

Abbott and other Republican officials had previously opposed the project, passing legislation against so-called “Sharia compounds”, despite the absence of any evidence suggesting the development sought to impose Islamic law or operate outside state regulations. Federal civil rights investigators also closed their inquiry into the project without filing charges.

Critics argue that linking CAIR to the Muslim Brotherhood revives a long-discredited narrative used to undermine Muslim community institutions and restrict their right to organise or collectively own property.

Republican state representative Cole Hefner welcomed Abbott’s decision, calling it necessary “to keep the state safe”. But Texas State Representative Salman Bhojani, one of the few Muslim lawmakers in the state, denounced the move as an attack on religious freedom.

He said Muslim Texans deserve the same dignity, trust and civil liberties as every other community, urging the governor to reverse what he called a harmful and discriminatory proclamation.

Abbott’s designation has intensified fears among civil rights advocates, who warn that the move could pave the way for further restrictions on Muslim civic life in Texas.

Legal experts maintain that the authority to classify groups as foreign terrorist organisations lies exclusively with the federal government, raising serious constitutional questions around the governor’s unilateral declaration.

Muslim organisations and human rights groups say the proclamation reflects an escalating political effort to marginalise Muslims under the guise of state security, marking what they describe as a troubling new chapter in Islamophobic policymaking in the United States.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Explosive weapons killed most children on record in 2024: NGO

Published

on

Explosive weapons killed most children on record in 2024: NGO


Palestinian children inspect the site of an overnight Israeli strike on a house, in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, October 29, 2025. — Reuters
Palestinian children inspect the site of an overnight Israeli strike on a house, in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, October 29, 2025. — Reuters 

Explosive weapons killed or injured children at record levels last year, as wars increasingly move into urban areas, Save the Children said in a report published Thursday.

Nearly 12,000 children were killed or injured in conflict last year worldwide, said the UK-based charity, citing UN figures. This was the highest number since records began in 2006, and was up by 42% on the 2020 total.

Previously, children in war zones were more likely to die from malnutrition, disease or failing health systems.

But as conflicts, such as those in Gaza, Sudan and Ukraine, take place more and more in urban areas, children are being caught up as bombs and drones strike hospitals, schools and residential areas, Save the Children said.

More than 70% of child casualties in war zones in 2024 were caused by explosive weapons, such as missiles and grenades, up from an average of around 59% in the period from 2020 to 2024, according to the report.

“The world is witnessing the deliberate destruction of childhood — and the evidence is undeniable,” said Narmina Strishenets, senior conflict and humanitarian advocacy advisor at Save the Children UK.

“Children are paying the highest price in today’s wars… Missiles are falling where children sleep, play and learn — turning the very places that should be the safest, like their homes and schools, into death traps.”

Children’s smaller bodies and developing organs means injuries from blasts can be much more severe and recovery can be more complex and prolonged.

“Children are far more vulnerable to explosive weapons than adults,” said Paul Reavley, a consultant paediatric emergency physician and co-founder of the Paediatric Blast Injury Partnership, a coalition between Save the Children UK and medical specialists.

“Their anatomy, physiology, behaviour and psychosocial needs make them disproportionately affected.”

The conflicts that claimed the most casualties among children in 2024 were in the Palestinian territories of Gaza and the occupied West Bank, Sudan, Myanmar, Ukraine and Syria.

The deadliest conflict in recent years for children is in Gaza, where 20,000 children have been killed since Israel launched its war on the territory in retaliation for Palestininan resistance group Hamas’s October 2023 attack, the report said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump to Meet Zohran Mamdani at the White House on Friday

Published

on

Trump to Meet Zohran Mamdani at the White House on Friday



US President Donald Trump announced that he will meet New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani at the White House on Friday, marking the first encounter between the Republican leader and the democratic socialist who won this month’s mayoral election.

The two figures have previously been critical of one another, with Trump supporting Mamdani’s rival, Andrew Cuomo, during the campaign.

Meanwhile, Mamdani has criticized Trump administration policies, including immigration crackdowns and the handling of protests against US support for Israel amid the Gaza conflict.

Trump confirmed the meeting on social media, stating, “We have agreed that this meeting will take place at the Oval Office on Friday, November 21st.”

Earlier in the week, Mamdani told reporters that his team had contacted the White House to arrange the discussion. “My team reached out to the White House to fulfill a commitment I made to New Yorkers over the course of this campaign,” he said on Monday.

Mamdani’s transition team has not immediately responded to Trump’s announcement on Wednesday.

Trump has repeatedly turned the powers of the presidency on political rivals. During the New York City mayoral election campaign, Trump threatened to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding from the city if Mamdani won.

Mamdani made countering the 79-year-old Republican president’s actions in the city, especially on immigration, a centrepiece of his successful campaign.

Mamdani will be sworn in as New York City mayor on January 1, 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending