Business
TCS Employee Says He Got Physically Assaulted By HR When Asked For Severance After Termination; Harrowing Ordeal Goes Viral On Reddit

New Delhi: A former Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) employee has alleged that he was physically assaulted by the HR team when he requested severance compensation following an abrupt termination. According to the employee, the termination was carried out without any reason. He has reportedly filed a formal police complaint regarding the alleged assault.
The former TCS employee took to Reddit to share his ordeal, sparking a heated discussion around the treatment of employees by HR teams in big companies. His post quickly became viral, sparking a heated debate on social media. The episode has drawn attention to a deeper and alarming problem of mistreatment and alleged physical assault of employees in top companies when they demand what is rightfully owed to them after years of dedicated service.
The employee shared his post on Reddit with the title “Got terminated by TCS, then assaulted by HR when I asked about severance – what should I do?” In the post, the employee describes the whole incident that happened to him at TCS Yamuna Office, Noida on September 19, 2025. “I was suddenly terminated and wanted to know 3 simple things: On what grounds was I terminated. If TCS will give severance pay (they announced in media they would). What the process is for separation (like returning laptop, etc.),” he wrote.
(Also Read: GST Cut Benefits Not Passed On To You? Here’s The Direct GST Helpline Number)
The employee said that he visited the office when the HR ignored his calls and emails, where he was informed that he was terminated. He alleged that the HR team tried to snatch his phone and twisted his hand while restraining him. “After emailing HR and even calling, I got no reply. By 10:30 AM my access was blocked. So I went to the office in person around 4:30 PM. When I met HR (Naresh Dash), he told me: “We won’t reply. You are terminated. Fight wherever you want.” Later, when I tried again with my phone camera on for safety, another HR (Prerna) shouted to “snatch his phone” and they physically restrained me. My right hand was twisted, I was in pain, and honestly I felt humiliated,” he wrote.
The employee said that police came later and took him to Sector-168 police station where he filed a written complaint with video evidence. He said that the police even asked the HR to come to the station but they refused.
The employee said that he is stuck now with no severance, termination and physical abuse, leaving him feeling humiliated. “Now I’m stuck — no severance, no formal reply, and physical assault on top of it.
“Has anyone here dealt with similar issues in IT companies? What’s the best way to escalate — labor court, DCP, or straight to court?” he wrote.
(Also Read: 13 Key Points You Need To Know About GST 2.0 As Tax Cuts Kick In From Today)
Netizens react
The Reddit post quickly gained traction, sparking intense discussion among users. Several users advised him to share the video evidence on social media while others encouraged him to take legal action.
One user commented, “Post video and ordeal on Twitter tagging Ministry of Labour, Industries, Finance Ministry, PMO and Tata sons chairman.”
“Classic case to go legal. You can milk them enough to go on the road of riches, from what you mention here,” another user commented.
“It is so depressing to hear what a big company is doing, not following the Tata values. Not sure what Chandrasekhar is doing.” one user commented.
One user commented, “Put the video out. Now it’s not about termination , it’s about physical harassment. Once the video goes viral , see how the company flips. The company will put everything on the HRs and fire them instead.”
“Police has just made a diary entry. U need to file an FIR,” commented another user.
“What are you doing with the video for two days? Post it already, demand an apology demand lakhs as compensation,” commented another user.
“These MF’s HR are worst kind of people, dont have any empathy, they are used to roaming free but when they have to do a little work they agitated,” commented another user.
Business
TCS Set To Announce Q2 Earnings On Oct 9, Board To Consider FY26 Second Interim Dividend

Last Updated:
IT major TCS on September 22 announced that its board will declare the September quarter results on October 9.

TCS Q2 Results
TCS Q2 Results, Dividend Record Date 2025: IT major Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) on September 22 announced that its board will declare the September quarter results on October 9.
In a stock exchange filing, TCS said, “A meeting of the Board of Directors of Tata Consultancy Services Limited is scheduled to be held on Thursday, October 9, 2025, to approve and take on record the audited standalone financial results of the Company under Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) for the quarter and six-month period ending September 30, 2025.”
The board is also expected to consider a second interim dividend for FY26. TCS added, “The second interim dividend, if declared, shall be paid to the equity shareholders of the Company whose names appear on the Register of Members of the Company or in the records of the Depositories as beneficial owners of the shares as on Wednesday, October 15, 2025, which is the Record Date fixed for the purpose.”
In the June quarter, TCS reported a 6% rise in net profit at Rs 12,760 crore, up from Rs 12,040 crore in the same period last year. The company’s revenue increased by 1.3% to Rs 63,437 crore from Rs 62,613 crore a year ago, though it declined 3% on a constant currency basis.
For Q1FY26, the board had declared an interim dividend of Rs 11 per share.
On September 22, TCS shares on the NSE closed 3% lower at Rs 3,075.5 each. The same day, key IT stocks collectively lost around Rs 85,400 crore in market capitalization following the US announcement of a steep fee on new H-1B visa applications.
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips by experts in this News18.com report are their own and not those of the website or its management. Users are advised to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.
Aparna Deb is a Subeditor and writes for the business vertical of News18.com. She has a nose for news that matters. She is inquisitive and curious about things. Among other things, financial markets, economy, a…Read More
Aparna Deb is a Subeditor and writes for the business vertical of News18.com. She has a nose for news that matters. She is inquisitive and curious about things. Among other things, financial markets, economy, a… Read More
September 23, 2025, 11:31 IST
Read More
Business
Disney says ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live’ will return to ABC on Tuesday

Disney plans to bring “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” back to air on ABC’s broadcast network beginning on Tuesday, the company said in a statement.
The decision was announced nearly a week after ABC said it was suspending the late night show indefinitely. The network had pulled the show days after the host made comments linking the alleged killer of conservative activist Charlie Kirk to President Donald Trump’s MAGA movement.
“Last Wednesday, we made the decision to suspend production on the show to avoid further inflaming a tense situation at an emotional moment for our country. It is a decision we made because we felt some of the comments were ill-timed and thus insensitive,” Disney said in a statement Monday. “We have spent the last days having thoughtful conversations with Jimmy, and after those conversations, we reached the decision to return the show on Tuesday.”
The late night host will address the matter during his show set to be taped on Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters.
Following days of discussions, Disney CEO Bob Iger and Dana Walden, co-chair of Disney Entertainment, made the decision to return the show to air, the person said. The two executives informed Kimmel on Monday, the person added.
Local station owners learned of the show’s return on Monday when Disney made the public announcement, according to two people familiar with the matter.
Jimmy Kimmel at the Disney Advertising Upfront on Tuesday, May 13, 2025.
Michael Le Brecht | Disney General Entertainment Content | Getty Images
Broadcast pushback
“Jimmy Kimmel Live!” was suspended after Nexstar Media Group, which owns more than 200 broadcast TV stations across the U.S., announced its stations affiliated with ABC would preempt Kimmel’s show. Sinclair, another large broadcast TV station owner, similarly threatened to preempt the program.
Sinclair said in a release last week that it would not lift the suspension on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” until it had formal discussions with ABC “regarding the network’s commitment to professionalism and accountability.”
As of Monday evening, a Sinclair representative said the company still planned to preempt the broadcast.
“Beginning Tuesday night, Sinclair will be preempting Jimmy Kimmel Live! across our ABC affiliate stations and replacing it with news programming,” according to a statement from Sinclair. “Discussions with ABC are ongoing as we evaluate the show’s potential return.”
Sinclair owns and operates nearly 40 ABC-affiliate stations across the U.S., including one in Washington, D.C., according to its website.
A Nexstar representative didn’t comment on the matter.
Kimmel said during his monologue last Monday that the “MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
“In between the finger-pointing there was grieving. On Friday the White House flew the flags at half-staff, which got some criticism, but on a human level you can see how hard the president is taking this,” he continued, teeing up a clip of Trump on the White House lawn in which the president fields a question on Kirk but swiftly pivots to talking about construction.
Immediately following ABC’s suspension of the show, everyone from entertainers to politicians weighed in on whether Kimmel should return to air, and whether the incident should affect station owners’ broadcast licenses.
Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr had suggested ABC’s broadcast license was at risk in light of Kimmel’s comments, telling CNBC last week, “we’re not done yet” with changes to the media landscape.
Trump suggested the federal government might revoke broadcast station licenses for the networks that are “against” him.
The FCC didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Monday.
Networks like ABC are part of a system that requires them to obtain over-the-air spectrum licenses from the federal government in order to broadcast across local stations. Since the networks are free to air over public spectrum — meaning anyone with an antenna can watch them — they must by law operate in “the public interest.”
Both Nexstar and Sinclair are currently looking to do deals that would require regulatory approval.
Nexstar recently announced a proposed $6.2 billion deal to merge with fellow broadcast station owner Tegna, a deal that would upend longstanding regulations for the industry on how many stations a parent company can own.
And Sinclair said in August it’s exploring merger options for its broadcast business, though it has yet to reach an agreement.
Political pressure
Kimmel’s suspension drew comparisons to CBS’s cancellation of “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” in July and raised questions about the protection of free speech in a Trump-era broadcast environment.
Trump’s scrutiny of media companies has intensified during his second term marked by high-profile defamation lawsuits, the defunding of public broadcasters and regulatory interference from the FCC. He’s particularly singled out ABC and NBC for what he called “unfair coverage of Republicans and/or Conservatives.”
Current and former late show hosts rallied behind Kimmel after his suspension and said the president’s influence amounted to censorship. Former Disney CEO Michael Eisner blasted the FCC’s “intimidation” of ABC.
A letter organized by the American Civil Liberties Union, signed by more than 400 people including Hollywood stars and artists, backed Kimmel, saying his suspension marked a “dark moment for freedom of speech in our nation.”
Meanwhile, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas criticized the FCC’s Carr for his comments related to the suspension of Kimmel.
And on Monday, New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani withdrew from an upcoming town hall on an ABC affiliate in protest of the network’s suspension of Kimmel.
Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast’s planned spinoff of Versant.
Business
Which? launches super-complaint against ‘broken’ insurance industry

Kevin PeacheyCost of living correspondent

Making a claim to an insurance company can be worse than the distress of the original incident, according to Which?, as it launches a rare type of action against the sector.
The group’s super-complaint – which is an action by a consumer body on customers’ behalf – says the home and travel insurance sectors are “broken”.
Which? highlighted cases including an insurer initially refusing to pay out for a cancelled holiday, because the trip had technically started before the flight was turned back after two hours.
The insurers’ trade body said providers worked hard to help customers, handle claims efficiently, and had paid out many millions of pounds.
Rocio Concha, director of policy at Which?, said that serious failings in the travel and home insurance markets had been “tolerated for too long” by the insurance industry and the regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
“We have heard heartbreaking stories from people who have found the experience of dealing with an insurance company worse than the distressing life events that led to their claim,” she said.
She added that a super-complaint was “a major intervention”. Such a move is rare, and only used by consumer advocates when they believe a large number of consumers are being significantly harmed by practises across a particular sector.
Refused insurance claims
Millions of people across the UK take out insurance policies they hope they will never need to draw on.
Estimates suggest around 30 million people have buildings and contents insurance, with a similar number buying either annual or single-trip travel cover during last year.
Which? said that 99% of car insurance claims were upheld, but acceptance rates fell to 63% of buildings insurance claims and 80% of travel insurance claims.
It pointed to the case of Yvette Greenley, whose flight from Luton to Egypt was sent back owing to technical difficulties.

Mrs Greenley said the problem with the flight and a lack of alternatives meant her holiday to celebrate her 60th birthday with her sister, Beverley, was over. She cancelled her leave and went back to work.
While the airline refunded the cost of the ticket, the insurer initially refused the £140 claim for accommodation and travel to and from the airport because the holiday had begun.
“I was flummoxed, then fuming about it. They seemed to dismiss the fact that the plane turned around,” she said.
The insurer later apologised, settled the claim and paid compensation.
In recent years, BBC News has reported cases including:
Analysis of cases, in addition to surveys and research by Which? have led to the super-complaint that, by law, requires a response within 90 days.
‘A number of failures’
The complaint is based on three areas of concern. The first is the way that claims are handled, with many being outsourced by insurers to specialists.
The second is the sales practices of insurers, which the consumer group argues are inappropriate and lead to widespread confusion over what is covered in a policy.
Finally, it accuses the FCA, as the regulator, of failing to provide an appropriate degree of protection for consumers.
It has received support from James Daley, managing director of independent consumer group Fairer Finance.
“The FCA has only recently finished a number of studies looking at this market – and while it acknowledged a number of failures, it seems to have no appetite to tackle these,” he said.
A spokesman for the FCA said it would respond to the super-complaint in due course, but had been “focused on raising standards”.
“We uncovered issues when we recently reviewed insurers’ home and travel claims handling. We’ll be holding them and their senior managers accountable for the changes needed,” he said.
They included issues over outsourcing and storm definitions.
The Association of British Insurers, which represents providers, said that its members worked hard to ensure customers knew the details of policies and handled claims as quickly and efficiently as possible.
“In the first half of this year alone, insurers have paid out over £1.7bn for more than 300,000 home insurance claims. Last year, travel insurers also paid out £472m across more than 500,000 claims,” a spokeswoman said.
“We’re working closely with the regulator to ensure good outcomes for customers and will engage with Which? to understand the details of its concerns.”
-
Tech1 week ago
The Top 11 Protein Powders, According to My Stomach
-
Tech1 week ago
How to Switch to Google Fi
-
Tech1 week ago
The Hypershell Pro X Exoskeleton Made My Hikes Feel Easier—Then I Checked My Stats
-
Fashion1 week ago
UK retailer ASOS & ITF sign deal to protect transport workers’ rights
-
Tech1 week ago
The MOTIF Hand: A tool advancing the capabilities of previous robot hand technology
-
Tech1 week ago
How AI Is Upending Politics, Tech, the Media, and More
-
Fashion1 week ago
India’s new GST makes artisan-made ethnic wear costlier
-
Fashion7 days ago
ONLY, RE&UP, Deniz Partner to Advance Circular Fashion