Business
Tesla asks court to throw out fatal Autopilot crash verdict
Carmaker Tesla has asked a federal court in Florida to throw out a verdict from a jury that found the company partly liable in a 2019 crash that killed a pedestrian and severely injured another.
Lawyers for the victims had argued that Tesla’s Autopilot driver assistance software contributed to the crash, failing to alert the driver of a Model S and activate the brakes.
Tesla blamed the driver for the crash, and on Friday asked the court to overturn the verdict, order a new trial, or reduce the punitive damages award.
The firm was ordered to pay $243m (£189m) in damages amid claims that boss Elon Musk misrepresented the software’s capabilities.
In a written argument to the court, Tesla said the $243m award flew in the face of “common sense.”
“Auto manufacturers do not insure the world against harms caused by reckless drivers,” the company said.
But Brett Schreiber, who is representing the victims, said the bid “is the latest example of Tesla and Musk’s complete disregard for the human cost of their defective technology”.
“The jury heard all the facts and came to the right conclusion that this was a case of shared responsibility, but that does not discount the integral role Autopilot and the company’s misrepresentations of its capabilities played in the crash,” he added.
Mr Schreiber said he was confident the court would uphold the original verdict.
At trial, the jury heard that driver George McGee had lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone as he was approaching an intersection, causing his car to continue through it and crash into an SUV parked on the other side.
Neither Mr McGee nor the Autopilot software hit the brakes in time to prevent the vehicle from hitting the two victims who were standing nearby.
Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, was killed when she was struck by McGee’s Model S and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, suffered life-long injuries.
Tesla accused the victims’ lawyers of overwhelming the jury “with a flood of highly prejudicial but irrelevant evidence” including statements from Mr Musk.
The lawyers also argued that the multi-million punitive damages award should be discarded or significantly reduced because such punishment requires clear evidence of “egregious wrongdoing” by the manufacturer.
The jury awarded the victims $329m in total damages, including $129m in compensatory damages and $200m in punitive damages which aims to deter Tesla from harmful behaviour in the future.
While other federal lawsuits have been brought against Tesla alleging its Autopilot played a role in fatal crashes, the Florida case which Tesla appealed on Friday was the first federal case of its kind to go to a jury.
Last year, Tesla settled a lawsuit over a 2018 crash that killed an Apple engineer after his Model X collided with a highway barrier while operating the company’s Autopilot software.
In 2023, a California state jury found Tesla was not at fault in a case in which it was alleged that Autopilot had led to a death.
At trial, Mr McGee said his concept of Tesla’s Autopilot was that it would assist him if he made a mistake – adding that he felt the software had failed him.
Mr McGee has settled a separate lawsuit with the victims for an undisclosed sum.
Business
Aviva flags potential for Iran conflict to send claims costs rising
The boss of insurer Aviva has cautioned that a lengthy conflict in the Middle East could send the cost of vehicle parts and repairs surging in an echo of the aftermath seen after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Chief executive Amanda Blanc said the group has seen limited claims so far relating to the US-Israel war with Iran, but flagged the potential for claims costs to jump if supply chains are badly disrupted for a long time.
She said: “We have a good case study on this in terms of the Ukraine situation back in 2022 and the impact on the supply chain, which had an inflationary impact on vehicle parts and replacement vehicles.
“Obviously, if this goes on for a prolonged period of time, we would expect that this could have some impact, but to speak about this from an Aviva perspective, we are very well placed to manage that with our supply chain and our owned garage network.”
Ms Blanc added: “We will take action as necessary to make sure we look after our customers and price accordingly for any new inflationary impact.”
She said there had been “very limited” travel claims so far.
Ms Blanc added: “We have had calls from customers asking about whether they should travel and those sorts of things, and we are pointing them to the Foreign Office guidance on that.”
Full-year results from Aviva on Thursday showed annual earnings leaped 25% higher, while the firm also announced it was resuming share buybacks as it continues to benefit from its £3.7 billion takeover of Direct Line.
The group unveiled an earnings haul of £2.2 billion for 2025, up from £1.8 billion in 2024, including a £174 million contribution from Direct Line, helping the group hit its financial targets a year early.
Aviva unveiled a £350 million share buyback after putting these on hold due to the Direct Line deal, which completed last year.
Ms Blanc cheered an “outstanding performance”.
She said: “We have transformed Aviva over the last five years and whilst we have made significant progress, there is so much more to come.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) is also a big area of focus for the firm, according to Ms Blanc.
“We have clear strengths in artificial intelligence which are creating major opportunities to transform claims, underwriting and customer experience,” she said.
Business
South East Water faces £22m fine for supply failures
The firm was unable to cope during high demand, Ofwat says, leading to “immense stress” for customers.
Source link
Business
Middle East heat may ripple across India’s energy supply chain, flags Goldman Sachs – The Times of India
As tensions continue to heat up in the Middle East, concerns are raising about disruptions to one of the world’s most critical energy shipping routes, the Strait of Hormuz. Any disruption could significantly affect major oil-importing countries such as India, as the narrow Strait of Hormuz is central to global energy trade. The strait sees almost 20 million barrels of oil passing through each day, or about a fifth of the world’s consumption, pass through the route. The waterway also carries roughly 19% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments, making it a crucial corridor for energy-importing economies.A recent report by Goldman Sachs has flagged early signs of stress in the region. The report warned that tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has already begun showing signs of disruption, with shipping firms, oil producers and insurers adopting a cautious approach following reports of damaged vessels in nearby waters.According to the firm, financial markets have already begun factoring in the geopolitical risk. Oil prices currently carry an estimated risk premium of $18-per-barrel, reflecting the potential market impact if energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz were disrupted for about a month.

Even is the oil facilities are not directly damaged, a shutdown of the shipping route could expose a significant portion of global supply. The report estimates that in an event of full closure, about 16 million barrels per day of oil flows could be affected, despite the availability of some pipeline routes designed to bypass the strait.And the risks are not limited to crude oil shipments with almost 80 million tonnes of LNG exports annually, much of it from Qatar, moving through the passage. Any prolonged disruption could tighten gas supply globally and potentially drive European benchmark gas prices back to levels seen during the 2022 energy crisis.

Asian economies stand among the most exposed to such disruptions. Major importers such as China, India, Japan and South Korea depend heavily on oil and LNG shipments that transit through the strategic corridor.While global oil inventories and spare production capacity could help cushion short-term shocks, the report warned that sustained disruption to Gulf shipping routes could trigger sharp volatility in global energy markets and push prices higher across oil, gas and refined fuel products.Market participants and governments are closely watching tanker traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, along with diplomatic and military developments involving the United States, Iran and Gulf nations, to assess whether the current disruptions remain temporary or escalate into a broader energy supply shock.
-
Politics1 week agoWhat are Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities?
-
Business6 days agoIndia Us Trade Deal: Fresh look at India-US trade deal? May be ‘rebalanced’ if circumstances change, says Piyush Goyal – The Times of India
-
Business7 days agoAttock Cement’s acquisition approved | The Express Tribune
-
Politics1 week agoUS arrests ex-Air Force pilot for ‘training’ Chinese military
-
Business1 week agoHouseholds set for lower energy bills amid price cap shake-up
-
Fashion7 days agoPolicy easing drives Argentina’s garment import surge in 2025
-
Sports6 days agoLPGA legend shares her feelings about US women’s Olympic wins: ‘Gets me really emotional’
-
Fashion6 days agoTexwin Spinning showcasing premium cotton yarn range at VIATT 2026
