Connect with us

Sports

The worst Manchester derby ever is upon on us. How did we get here?

Published

on

The worst Manchester derby ever is upon on us. How did we get here?


How are things going at Manchester United?

Here’s the first sentence of a piece written by ESPN’s Rob Dawson two weeks ago: “Ruben Amorim says he is planning to remain as Manchester United manager, but he has admitted he cannot guarantee he will still be in the job after the international break.”

He’s still in the job — thanks, perhaps, to a 97th-minute penalty from Bruno Fernandes to secure a 3-2 win … over Burnley … at Old Trafford. Yes, so bleak are the vibes that a last-second home victory over the projected worst team in the league is viewed as a potential turning point.

There was Amorim’s tactics board becoming a meme in the Carabao Cup shootout loss to fourth-tier Grimsby Town. There was the opening week loss to an Arsenal side that never got out of first gear and barely even turned on the ignition. There was the 1-1 draw with Fulham thanks to a Rodrigo Muniz own goal. There, still, have been zero Premier League starts for €76.5-million signing Benjamin Sesko.

And yet, if you look at the Premier League table, you’ll notice that Manchester United aren’t even the worst team in their own city. No, they’ve got four points from three matches.

Manchester City? They’ve lost two out of three — something an eventual Premier League winner has done only once in the history of the league.

After missing almost all of last season to a torn ACL, reigning Ballon d’Or winner Rodri is back for Man City — and he’s saying stuff like this: “I’m not Messi. I’m not going to come back and just make the team win and win and win.”

When the two Manchester sides met back in April, they produced one of the worst games of last season: a scoreless draw in which City didn’t attempt a shot over the final 20 minutes and neither team created a single dangerous chance. While this Sunday’s match at the Etihad shouldn’t be as uncompetitive as that one, the schedule is catching the two sides at their lowest collective point since the Abu Dhabi takeover of City back in 2008.

So, ahead of what might be the worst Manchester derby in recent memory, let’s take a look at how we got here and why one side of the city might be closer to turning it around than the other.


Top 50 most expensive transfers this summer by true cost
Worst 2025 summer transfers, from Cunha to Isak
Why Man United’s best player might be their biggest flaw


A brief, recent history of Manchester City and Manchester United

Everything you need to know is somewhere in this chart, which sketches out the points-per-game averages for both Manchester clubs over every 10-month stretch since 2008:

We’ll start with City. The Abu Dhabi takeover happens, and the line shoots straight up all the way through AGUEROOOOOOOO in 2012. Then things stall out under manager Roberto Mancini before bouncing back up under Manuel Pellegrini, and then falling back down until 2016, when Pep Guardiola arrives.

After that? An immediate improvement to levels reached only by one other team in the history of the league. There’s a fall-off during the seasons wrapped around the height of COVID but then a bounce back up to the three straight titles from 2022 through 2024.

Things remained OK for a month or two at the start of last season, and now the alarms in the room are going off. While the 10-month points average has been lower at times since 2008, it’s lower than it’s been at any point since Guardiola’s first season.

play

1:10

Onuoha: Man City can’t afford to lose the Manchester derby

Nedum Onuoha emphasizes the importance of winning the Manchester derby following a disappointing start to the season for Manchester City.

With United, well, the 10-month points average is lower than it’s been at any point since 2008 — and at any point since the Premier League began.

At the start of our data set, we’re at perhaps the peak of Sir Alex Ferguson’s tenure as manager. United won the Champions League in 2008 and then made it back to the finals in 2009 and 2011, where they lost, both times, to the current manager of Manchester City. United won the Premier League in each of those three seasons, too, but the 2011 title came with just 80 points — tied for the fewest points of any title-winner this century. That opened up room for City to steal the title in 2012 — only for United to sign a past-his-peak Robin van Persie, get one last world-class season from him, and win one more title in Sir Alex’s final season.

After that, it’s a good example of how progress isn’t linear. From 2013 to today, United’s per-game performance has gone from title-winning to below league-average: they’re winning a full point fewer per game, or about 40 points — 40! — over a full season.

But there have been ups and downs on the way down. You had the immediate drop-off under David Moyes, and then pretty much the same story with the next four managers, Louis van Gaal, Jose Mourinho, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, and Erik ten Hag: brief, immediate improvement, but ultimate decline.

And that brings us to today, to Man United under Ruben Amorim. There’s been no improvement — it’s been downhill from Day One.

Why one Manchester club is closer to turning it around than the other

I’ve compared Manchester United to the Dallas Cowboys before and yes, now, I’m doing it again.

The Cowboys are the most popular sports franchise in the most popular sport in the United States. It’s actually impossible for them to be boring, because if they are boring, we treat it as if it’s some national crisis: Why are the Dallas Cowboys so boring? Meanwhile, the Indianapolis Colts can go about existing in the same level of mediocrity — not so good, not so bad — and nobody cares.

See what I’m getting at here? The same holds true for United, only in the spotlight of the most popular sport in the world.

Now, it’s a little different here because the massive levels of inequality in soccer make it so Man United’s mediocrity is a much bigger institutional failure than the Cowboys winning half of their games. If Manchester United are not competing for the Premier League and the Champions League in most years, then something has gone terribly wrong. And yes, that means things have been going terribly wrong for over a decade now.

But because of the popularity of both the Cowboys and Manchester United, it means that these teams almost have to exist at extremes, and that means the public sentiment or the conventional wisdom around these teams is almost always wrong. The Cowboys traded arguably their best player, Micah Parsons, on the eve of the 2025 NFL season, the sky was falling, disband the franchise … and then they nearly beat the defending Super Bowl champs, the Philadelphia Eagles, on the road in Week 1.

play

1:23

Is Ruben Amorin still the right man for Manchester United?

Janusz Michallik casts doubt over Ruben Amorim’s tenure at Manchester United thus far after their last minute win vs. newly promoted Burnley.

With Manchester United, we’ve tried to make them into title contenders under Jose Mourinho, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, and Erik ten Hag after just a handful of positive results. I know because I literally wrote about it a little over two years ago in a piece titled, “No, Manchester United are not in the Premier League title race.” I got lots of angry comments about it — and then they lost, 7-0, to Liverpool just a few weeks later. They finished eighth the following season.

However, I think the opposite applies here, too. When Manchester United are bad, it’s often not as bad as it seems. Like, potentially, right now.

Now, I’m not suggesting that Manchester United are good or that Ruben Amorim is their savior. But the biggest issue for Man United so far this season hasn’t been anything more than the kind of variance we’d expect to even out over the rest of the season for any other club in the world.

Through three matches, they have attempted 58 shots — 14 more than anyone else in the league — and they’ve generated the most expected goals:

The only problem is they’ve turned all of that into just four actual goals, which puts them tied with the likes of West Ham and Burnley for the eighth-best mark in the league.

While it is kind of funny that Man United signed two players — Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo — who massively outperformed their xG last season only to immediately suffer through a finishing slump, this isn’t going to continue. I’m not going to defend the loss to Grimsby Town, but if United finish their chances in that one, then we probably never talk about it again, either.

Now, United aren’t close to challenging for titles — and their team-building approach isn’t going to help with that, either — but they finished in 15th-place last season. Even with the finishing slump, they’re already six spots better through the first three matches of this season. For a team that only scored 44 goals last season, the attack already looks much better.

At Manchester City, though, the same issues from last season persist.

City allowed 1.2 goals per game last season and 20 touches inside their own penalty area — both significantly higher marks than in any of the previous seven seasons. Every time they turned the ball over, it was a five-alarm fire. They spent a bunch of money this past summer, but none of it seemed concerned with their most glaring weakness: the aging legs and limited range in the middle of the field.

New arrivals Rayan Cherki and Tijjani Reijnders are plus players in possession, but negatives without the ball. Rayan Aït-Nouri isn’t a bad defender, but it’s not like left-back defending was their issue last year.

Sure enough, through three matches, City have allowed 1.3 goals per game on 1.3 expected goals allowed per game. And they’ve conceded 22 touches inside their own penalty area. What makes that even more concerning is that their schedule hasn’t been particularly difficult — their opponents finished 8th, 16th, and 17th last season. It seems like they figured that Rodri would solve all of their issues, and Rodri himself is already suggesting that was a bad idea.

While manager Pep Guardiola has solved plenty of tactical problems before, we’re coming up on a year from when Rodri went down last season. That means a year without Guardiola figuring out how to fix this tactical problem.

City could still bounce back and reemerge as title contenders, but betting markets and projection systems now have their title odds in a distant third — much closer to Chelsea in fourth than Liverpool and Arsenal up at the top. Just a few weeks ago, it was supposed to be a three-team race.

As for United? The over-under totals from Sporting Index projected them at 59 points to start the season. Now, that number is up to 60. All of that yelling and screaming, and almost nothing has changed.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Illinois defense gets tough, ousts Houston to reach Elite Eight

Published

on

Illinois defense gets tough, ousts Houston to reach Elite Eight


HOUSTON — David Mirkovic had 14 points and 10 rebounds, and third-seeded Illinois flexed its defensive muscles to eliminate last year’s national runner-up from the NCAA tournament, beating Houston 65-55 in the South Region semifinals on Thursday night.

Next up is a meeting Saturday with ninth-seeded Iowa to see which Big Ten team will advance to the Final Four. It will be the 11th Elite Eight appearance for Illinois (27-8) and its second in three seasons under Brad Underwood.

In the Sweet 16 for a seventh consecutive time, the second-seeded Cougars (30-7) were thrilled to be playing just over two miles from their campus. But their poor shooting gave Houston fans little to cheer about and delighted the orange-clad Illini faithful who made the long trip to Texas.

“At the beginning of the game Houston fans were a little louder, but as game was going, [our fans] started being louder in their city,” Mirkovic said. “So it’s just really important for us, I would say just like a wind to our back. They pushed us, and thanks for them.”

Star freshman point guard Kingston Flemings, who is expected to be an NBA lottery pick, had 11 points on 4-of-10 shooting. Milos Uzan made just 2 of 11 shots.

But they were far from the only Cougars who struggled offensively. The team shot just 34% in its lowest-scoring game of the season.

Underwood was asked about his team’s defensive performance.

“I think it’s a mental focus,” he said. “We’ve been very good at times defensively. It’s just sustaining it. We’ve got very capable defenders, we’ve got size and length, and we just got to make shots difficult.”

Illinois finished well under the 84.7 points a game it averaged entering Thursday. But its offense was still plenty powerful enough to send Houston back to its nearby campus. Keaton Wagler had 13 points and a team-high 12 rebounds for the Illini; he and Mirkovic became the first pair of freshman teammates to each have a double-double in the same NCAA tournament game since freshmen became fully eligible in 1972-73, according to ESPN Research.

“Coaches were telling us before the game: ‘It’s going to be a guard game to get rebounds. We need 10-plus out of the guards,'” he said. “So I took that challenge on. I went in there, tried to play as tough as I could, not let them get any second-chance rebounds. I went in there and tried to get every rebound I could.”

Andrej Stojakovic — with his dad, three-time NBA All-Star Peja Stojakovic, in the stands — also scored 13.

By the time the final seconds ticked off the clock, many Houston fans had cleared out and the Illinois supporters stood and cheered as their team celebrated.

“I was proud of our kids’ effort,” Houston coach Kelvin Sampson said. “We just didn’t play good enough.”

The Illini were up by one early in the second half when they broke it open with a 17-0 run for a 44-26 lead with about 12 minutes left. Jake Davis scored five points during the burst, including a 3-pointer, and Mirkovic and Ben Humrichous capped it with consecutive 3s.

The Cougars missed seven consecutive shots as Illinois built its lead. When Uzan finally ended Houston’s drought with a 3-pointer with 11:20 left, it had been almost seven minutes since the team had scored.

“We were getting stops and we were limiting them to one shot, and to tough shots as well,” Wagler said. “Making them shoot tough middies or contested at the rim, 3-pointers, all of that, and then we were going in and grabbing the rebound and offensively we were getting the shots that we wanted, we were knocking them down.”

Consecutive 3-pointers by Chase McCarty got Houston within nine with about six minutes left. But Wagler and Tomislav Ivisic made 3-pointers to fuel an 8-0 run that extended the lead to 58-41.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

NCAA men’s tournament: Rick Pitino’s case for best men’s college basketball coach ever

Published

on

NCAA men’s tournament: Rick Pitino’s case for best men’s college basketball coach ever


This St. John’s team can’t shoot.

The Red Storm are 182nd nationally in field goal percentage (45.2) and 225th from 3-point range (33.2).

It doesn’t seem to matter. Rick Pitino’s team (30-6) has been opportunistic, physical and fearless in reaching the Sweet 16, where it will play Duke on Friday.

It is reminiscent of Pitino’s 2012-13 Louisville team that shot just 33.3% from behind the arc (216th nationally) yet won the national title. It’s a far cry, however, from his underdog 1987 Providence team, which reached the Final Four thanks to his then-revolutionary idea of prioritizing the newly created 3-pointer. Those Friars hit 42.2% of them.

Pitino can win one way, or the other, or back again; from the Camelot of Kentucky to the late-career rehab of Iona College.

The years change, the teams change. The players, style of play, rules, roster construction, and even the cuts of his neatly tailored suits change.

One thing remains constant.

Pitino wins.

The case for Rick Pitino as the greatest college basketball coach of all time takes some contorting, but each year it gains credence. The 73-year-old coached his first game 50 years ago, in 1976 as an interim at Hawai’i. He now appears better than ever.

Pitino’s 915 victories, .743 winning percentage and two national titles will never compare numerically to, say, Mike Krzyzewski’s 1,202 victories, Adolph Rupp’s .822 win percentage or John Wooden’s 10 championships.

Part of that is by choice — Pitino spent eight seasons in the NBA, including six as head coach in New York and Boston. He also had various NCAA and personal scandals that made him a temporary pariah and, to some, permanently ruined his reputation.

His legacy will always be linked to scandal. He had that Louisville national title, along with 123 victories, “vacated” by the NCAA as a result of its investigation into allegations that a staffer provided escorts at on-campus parties for players and recruits. The program was also at the center of a federal fraud and bribery case involving Adidas.

For a stretch, he was essentially professionally exiled to Greece, where he coached pro ball for two seasons, winning a couple of titles there, too.

Outside the lines, Pitino is one thing. Inside them, though, is a different story. Had he just stayed at Kentucky in 1997 rather than jump to the Celtics — and kept his business in order (perhaps unlikely) — there is no telling what his career totals would be. UK was rolling, after all, winning another national title under Tubby Smith the season after Pitino left.

But he has always bounced around, rescuing six bottomed-out programs (Boston University, Providence, Kentucky, Louisville, Iona and St. John’s). In the season before his arrival, those teams were a combined 76-105 (.419).

No matter.

He led five of them back to the NCAA tournament within two seasons (or in UK’s situation, when a tournament ban concluded). At BU, it took four.

This isn’t to punish other great coaches who built national powers and then stuck with it. Maintaining a juggernaut isn’t simple and deserves credit. Yet, Pitino has proven it was him, not the institution, that made the difference.

Pitino has had talented players (especially the 1996 Kentucky national champions), but he has coached just three future NBA All-Stars — Donovan Mitchell, Jamal Mashburn and Antoine Walker.

This isn’t as impressive as Bob Knight, who won 902 games and three titles despite having just one player who would become an NBA all-star (Isiah Thomas), but it’s also not the Hall of Fame parade that Dean Smith (UNC), Krzyzewski (Duke) or Wooden (UCLA) had.

Pitino, a former New York point guard, is about basketball. He still conducts one-on-one development workouts. He still grinds game footage. He still finds the way to maximize what he has — sometimes with a full-court press, sometimes the old 2-3 zone he learned as an assistant under Jim Boeheim.

He still communicates, harshly but honestly, in a way, for example, that not only empowers current guard Dylan Darling to confidently call for the ball in the waning seconds of Sunday’s victory over Kansas, but allows Pitino to trust “Church Bells” — a nickname stemming from Pitino’s description of Darling’s, uh, fearlessness — to pull it off, even with his off hand.

Pitino’s career has bridged multiple eras; not just in style of play (he coached pre-shot clock and 3-point line), but style of pay. As an assistant at Hawai’i in the mid-1970s, the NCAA dinged him for giving players coupons to McDonald’s. Now, they can own a franchise.

Some of his best work has come recently.

He returned from his Greek purgatory to lead low-major Iona to two NCAAs in three seasons. At age 70, he took over St. John’s, and won consecutive Big East regular-season and tournament titles. Now, the Red Storm are in the Sweet 16 for the first time this century.

The players still listen. They still defend. They still hustle. They still believe.

They still win, even when they can’t shoot all that well.

That’s a pure college basketball coach, perhaps the best there has ever been.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Cam Newton views adding 18th regular-season game as ‘good business,’ questions how preseason games will work

Published

on

Cam Newton views adding 18th regular-season game as ‘good business,’ questions how preseason games will work


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As the NFL continues to expand its reach and capitalizes on the ever-growing popularity of the sport both domestically and globally, talk of adding an 18th regular-season game has become more apparent. 

The NFL Players’ Association has said players “have no appetite for a regular-season 18th game,” while owners like New England Patriots’ Robert Kraft believes “every team will go 18” at some point sooner than later. 

For former MVP quarterback Cam Newton, he’s taking a step back and viewing an 18th regular-season game from both sides. That assessment has him believing preseason games, which every team plays three before Week 1 of the regular season, will become even more diluted.  

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Cam Newton of team J Balvin looks on against team Druski during the Super Bowl LX Celebrity Flag football game on YouTube at Moscone Center South on Feb. 7, 2026 in San Francisco, California. (Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)

“Man, it’s a lot on the body,” he told Fox News Digital about another regular-season game added to the schedule, while discussing his Iconic Saga Productions partnership with Offscript Worldwide. “If you really look at it, what’s happening is they’re devaluing preseason games as we know it to be, and they’re trying to put it on the back end. 

“Because, one thing we all know — and I say this with all due respect — America’s new game has been, for some time, American football. It’s just good business. The Super Bowl garners a global audience that no sporting event can attest to, especially domestically in the United States. So, they know, the more they give, the more they’re able to garner from difference audiences.”

So, as Newton sees this simply as “good business” for the NFL, he’s implying the league will once again drop a preseason game from a team’s schedule to add the 18th game. It’s what happened when the 17th regular-season game was added in 2021, as the preseason schedule was reduced from four to three games. 

BILLS STAR DION DAWKINS EXPLAINS HIS ‘COUNTER’ TO POTENTIAL NFL 18TH GAME: ‘CAREERS ARE ONLY GETTING SHORTER’

“I think, when you’re talking about the 18th game, it really comes down to if teams are going to really focus on preseason, or negate preseason altogether, just to get right into the regular season. That’s going to be interesting to kind of see,” Newton added.

While the NFLPA has pushed back at the potential of an 18th game, citing player safety as one of the main reasons behind keeping the schedule as is, others like Buffalo Bills left tackle Dion Dawkins see it as inevitable. 

“It’s going to happen either way,” he told Fox News Digital in a recent interview. 

“Then, 20 years later, guess what? We’re talking about a 19th, then we’ll be talking about a 20th.… Then it’s like, ‘Yeah, we are combat athletes all year long.’ But who knows,” Dawkins added. 

Cam Newton on 'First Take' panel

ESPN analyst Cam Newton is on the set of “First Take” on Feb. 6, 2026 in San Francisco, California. (Aaron M. Sprecher/Getty Images)

For now, 17 games is what the NFL schedule will read in 2026. But, as Dawkins noted, who really knows? 

To Newton’s point, it’s simply good business as demand continues to skyrocket for the league as each season passes. 

EXPANDING CONTENT REACH WITH OFFSCRIPT

Newton may not be on the field any longer, but he remains tuned in with the NFL and every other sports moment through his content creation, most notably his “Funky Friday” and “4th & 1 with Cam Newton” shows as part of his Iconic Saga Productions. 

Newton and his production team announced a major partnership with Offscript Worldwide, a creator-owned ecosystem that connects culture-shaping brands and platforms under one roof, which includes REVOLT Sports and 3BlackDot. 

Offscript unveiled this new partnership at the 2026 IAB NewFronts, where they will begin collaborating with Newton’s independent production powerhouse, integrating his hit shows and amplifying the reach of athlete-driven storytelling for global brands. 

Cam Newton in February 2025

Cam Newton on radio row at the Super Bowl LIX media center on Feb. 7, 2025. (Kirby Lee/Imagn Images)

“When you really think about Offscript, it’s like the ecosystem that bridges so many different facets of our lives, from sports, to culture, to lifestyle and so many different things,” Newton explained. “That transition for me wasn’t foreign. Instead of training to be the best football player, or the best athlete. Now, I’m just training to be the best content creator I can possibly be. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“I just always want to be a beacon of the person, in a lot of ways, figured it out as I went. I’m just so thrilled that Offscript gives me and Iconic Saga the opportunity to continue to believe in our vision, and we’re not able to do these things without great partners like this.”

As this partnership kicks off, Newton will also be hitting the road for the “4th & 1 College Tailgate Experience,” visiting HBCU’s across the U.S. to celebrate their heritage and shine a national spotlight on student-athletes, academic programs, and the unique game-day culture that defines what it means to be an HBCU. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending