Connect with us

Politics

US pulling non-essential staff from embassy in Beirut amid Iran tensions

Published

on

US pulling non-essential staff from embassy in Beirut amid Iran tensions


This picture shows US Embassy building in Awkar east of Beirut on June 23, 2025. — AFP
This picture shows US Embassy building in Awkar east of Beirut on June 23, 2025. — AFP
  • US military builds up in Middle East amid tensions with Iran.
  • Iran, United States remain divided over nuclear talks.
  • Iran denies atomic weapon ambitions, seeks diplomatic solution.

The State Department is pulling out non-essential government personnel and their eligible family members from the US embassy in Beirut, a senior State Department official said on Monday, amid growing concerns about the risk of a military conflict with Iran.

“We continuously assess the security environment, and based on our latest review, we determined it prudent to reduce our footprint to essential personnel,” said a senior State Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

“The Embassy remains operational with core staff in place. This is a temporary measure intended to ensure the safety of our personnel while maintaining our ability to operate and assist US citizens,” the official said.

A source at the US embassy said 50 people had been evacuated, while an official at Beirut airport said 32 embassy staff, along with family members, had flown out of Beirut airport on Monday.

The US has built up one of its biggest military deployments in the Middle East, with President Donald Trump warning on Thursday that “really bad things will happen” if no deal is reached to solve a longstanding dispute over Tehran’s nuclear programme. Iran has threatened to strike US bases in the region if it is attacked.

“Should employees occupying emergency positions wish to depart post, please review alternative arrangements to fill the emergency position and consult with your regional bureau Executive Office as necessary,” an internal State Department cable on the pullout seen by Reuters said.

US interests were repeatedly targeted in Lebanon in the 1980s during the 1975-90 civil war, during which the US held the Iran-backed Hezbollah responsible for attacks including the 1983 suicide bombing against the US Marines headquarters in Beirut that killed 241 servicemen and a 1983 suicide attack on the US embassy in Beirut that killed 49 embassy staff.

Talks on thursday, divisions remain

Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is scheduled to travel to Israel on Saturday and meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was still planning to do that but “the schedule remains subject to change,” the US official said.

The US wants Iran to give up its nuclear program, but Iran has adamantly refused and denied it is trying to develop an atomic weapon. Washington views enrichment inside Iran as a potential pathway to nuclear weapons.

Iran Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Sunday that he expects to meet with Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff in Geneva on Thursday, adding that there was still “a good chance” of a diplomatic solution.

Both sides remain sharply divided — even over the scope and sequencing of relief from crippling US sanctions — following two rounds of talks, a senior Iranian official told Reuters.

Citing officials on both sides and diplomats across the Gulf and Europe, Reuters reported on Friday that Tehran and Washington are sliding rapidly toward military conflict as hopes fade for a diplomatic settlement.

On Sunday, Witkoff said the president was curious as to why Iran has not yet “capitulated” and agreed to curb its nuclear programme.

It would be the second time the US and Israel have attacked Iran in less than a year, following US and Israeli airstrikes against military and nuclear facilities last June.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Trump warns of higher tariffs for nations that ‘play games’ after court ruling

Published

on

Trump warns of higher tariffs for nations that ‘play games’ after court ruling


US President Donald Trump attends an event to honour Angel Families who have lost family members to crimes committed by people in the country illegally, at the White House in Washington, DC, US, February 23, 2026. — Reuters
US President Donald Trump attends an event to honour “Angel Families” who have lost family members to crimes committed by people in the country illegally, at the White House in Washington, DC, US, February 23, 2026. — Reuters
  • Trump terms US Supreme Court verdict on tariffs “ridiculous”.
  • Court verdict, Trump’s move throw world trade into confusion.
  • Trump has raised global tariffs to 15% following court verdict.

President Donald Trump on Monday said any countries that wanted to “play games” after a key US Supreme Court tariff ruling would face much higher tariffs.

The court said tariffs Trump imposed last year based on a national emergency law were illegal, rekindling uncertainty from other countries about already signed or pending trade deals with the United States.

“Any Country that wants to ‘play games’ with the ridiculous Supreme Court decision, especially those that have ‘Ripped Off’ the US for years, and even decades, will be met with a much higher Tariff, and worse, than that which they just recently agreed to. BUYER BEWARE!!!” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

Trump, on February 20, vowed to continue his global trade war after the US Supreme Court ruled that he lacked the power to unilaterally set tariffs on imports

Responding to the court verdict, the US president said he was undeterred by what he called a ridiculous ruling, announcing new 10% tariff on imports from all countries.

A day later, he said he will raise the temporary tariff from 10% to 15% on US imports from all countries, the maximum level allowed under the law.

The new levies are grounded in a separate but untested law, known as Section 122, that allows tariffs up to 15% but requires congressional approval to extend them after 150 days.

In a social media post, Trump said he would use the 150-day period to work on issuing other “legally permissible” tariffs. The administration intends to rely on two other statutes that permit import taxes on specific products or countries based on investigations into national security or unfair trade practices.

“I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been ‘ripping’ the US off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level,” he wrote in his post.

The US Supreme Court’s annulment of Trump’s tariffs and his subsequent move to impose a temporary 15% global tariff have thrown world trade into a new bout of confusion.

For some countries — notably China and Brazil — the new 15% baseline is substantially lower than the US tariffs they had been dealing with.

But for the couple of dozen countries that had sought to avoid the impact of the reciprocal tariffs by clinching bilateral deals with the United States — Britain, the European Union and Japan among them — the question now is whether those deals will stick.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Iran says would respond ‘ferociously’ to any US attack, even limited strikes

Published

on

Iran says would respond ‘ferociously’ to any US attack, even limited strikes


Iranian women walk past a banner bearing a portrait of Irans supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during the Iranian-Islamic fashion design fair at the Imam Khomeini Grand Mosque in Tehran on February 22, 2026.— AFP
Iranian women walk past a banner bearing a portrait of Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during the Iranian-Islamic fashion design fair at the Imam Khomeini Grand Mosque in Tehran on February 22, 2026.— AFP
  • Any strike, even limited, would be considered aggression: Iran.
  • EU calls for diplomatic solution ahead of talks.
  • Talk schedule confirmed by Iran, Oman but not by US.

Iran said on Monday that a US attack of any scale would spur the Islamic republic to respond “ferociously”, after President Donald Trump said he was considering limited strikes against the country.

The United States has built up forces in the Middle East to pile pressure on Iran to make a deal at negotiations due to restart on Thursday, with Trump weighing a limited strike if no agreement is reached.

On Monday Iran’s foreign ministry reiterated that any strike, even limited, would be “would be regarded as an act of aggression. Period”.

“And any state would react to an act of aggression as part of its inherent right of self-defence ferociously so that’s what we would do,” ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei said at a briefing in Tehran attended by an AFP journalist.

The two countries concluded a second round of indirect talks in Switzerland on Tuesday under Omani mediation.

Further talks, confirmed by Iran and Oman but not by the United States, are scheduled for Thursday.

The European Union, which has been sidelined in mediation on Iran, called for a diplomatic solution ahead of the talks.

“We don’t need another war in this region. We already have a lot,” EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said ahead of a meeting of EU foreign ministers.

“It is true that Iran is at its weakest point that they have been. We should be really using this time to find a diplomatic solution.”

Fears of conflict

Iran has, however, insisted only discussions on the country’s nuclear programme are on the table at mediated talks. The West believes the programme is aimed at making a bomb, which Tehran denies.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is leading the negotiations for Iran, while the United States is represented by envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Trump is wondering why Iran has not “capitulated” in the face of Washington’s military deployment, Witkoff said in an interview with Fox News broadcast over the weekend.

Baqaei responded Monday by saying that Iranians had never capitulated at any point in their history.

Trump had initially threatened military action over the violent crackdown on the protests that rights groups say saw thousands of people killed by security forces, but his attention soon shifted to Iran’s nuclear programme.

Scattered anti-government protests have continued in the country, despite the threat of suppression and arrests.

Students rallied to commemorate those killed in competing pro- and anti-government demonstrations as the university semester restarted over the weekend.

Iranians’ fears of a new conflict have grown and the concerns have also prompted several foreign countries to urge their citizens to leave Iran.

India on Monday joined Sweden, Serbia, Poland and Australia in calling for its citizens — estimated at 10,000 in the country by the foreign ministry — to leave Iran.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nepal bus crash kills 19, including British tourist

Published

on

Nepal bus crash kills 19, including British tourist


Rescuers pictured alongside overturned bus in Nepal on February 23, 2026. — X@DDNewslive
Rescuers pictured alongside overturned bus in Nepal on February 23, 2026. — X@DDNewslive

KATHMANDU: A bus in Nepal skidded off a mountain road and plunged into an icy river, police said Monday, killing at least 19 people, including a British tourist.

The bus, en route from the tourist city of Pokhara to the capital city Kathmandu, fell more than 200 metres (655 feet) into the Trishuli River in Dhading district in the early hours of Monday morning.

“Out of 44, in total 19 people died, and 25 are undergoing treatment,” senior local police officer Prakash Dahal told AFP, confirming one British citizen was among the dead.

One Chinese person and a New Zealander were injured, he said, without giving further details.

Mohan Prasad Neupane, information officer at the district administration office, said the rescue operation had been completed by dawn.

“The injured are undergoing treatment,” Neupane said.

In July 2024, two buses with more than 50 people on board were swept off the highway into the same river after a landslide.

Deadly crashes are relatively common in the Himalayan republic because of poor roads, badly maintained vehicles and reckless driving.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending