Business
What Trump’s reclassification of pot and CBD could mean for seniors, research and stocks
Tarek Adieh, of Tampa, Florida, looks at cannabis flower from wholesaler Dep Kings at Champs Trade Show at the Palmer Events Center, Sept. 11, 2025.
Jay Jannar | Hearst Newspapers | Getty Images
President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order this week that would broadly expand access to cannabis. Industry advocates, executives and researchers who spoke to CNBC said the changes would come with big implications for both consumers and the health-care industry.
Trump said Monday he’s “strongly” considering an executive order that would reclassify pot as a Schedule III drug under the Drug Enforcement Administration, which would place cannabis alongside Tylenol with codeine, rather than Schedule I with the likes of heroin and LSD, as it’s classified now. The order would also authorize a pilot program allowing Medicare to cover cannabis products for seniors.
The proposal is expected to apply specifically to cannabidiol products, better known as CBD, aimed at treating chronic pain, sleep deprivation and other age-related ailments, said Shawn Hauser, a partner at cannabis-focused law firm Vicente LLP.
CBD has spiked in popularity in recent years, moving into the mainstream via canned cocktails and body lotions, but has yet to win full-throated backing from federal drug regulators.
“I expect the executive order will make clear what kind of cannabinoids are covered, that they have to come from a federally legal source,” Hauser told CNBC.
While many in the cannabis industry view the shift to Schedule III as a done deal, the inclusion of a controversial Medicare provision adds an extra wrinkle that could embed cannabis-derived products into the U.S. health-care system, despite limited clinical evidence of their efficacy, some experts told CNBC.
Insiders like Hauser expect the final order to define legal cannabinoids, administrative methods and a framework for Food and Drug Administration oversight.
“A lot of people want to see it, the reclassification, because it leads to tremendous amounts of research that can’t be done unless you reclassify,” Trump told reporters Monday. “So we are looking at that very strongly.”
Rescheduling and Medicare coverage are likely to trigger new investments from institutional capital and investors that typically follow federal insurance coverage to big pharmaceutical companies, said Timothy Seymour, founder and chief investment officer of Seymour Asset Management and a CNBC contributor.
“The valuation of the sector will be worth a lot more because institutional investors will be allowed in, will have access and will have liquidity, and exchanges will trade them,” Seymour told CNBC. “That immediately could double or triple the sector.”
The push for reclassification comes as a 2024 report found that more Americans reported using marijuana daily, or near-daily, than reported drinking alcohol at the same frequency. It was the first time the share of daily use had flipped in marijuana’s favor, based on analysis of 40 years of data from Carnegie Mellon University.
A budtender organizes and inventories marijuana flower at The Health Center, a medical cannabis and recreational marijuana dispensary in Denver.
Vince Chandler | Denver Post | Getty Images
Medicare disagreements
The Medicare initiative is being championed by billionaire Howard Kessler, a financier and longtime Trump ally who founded The Commonwealth Project in 2019. The organization says it advocates for senior care, including through cannabis use.
Kessler and advocates like Hauser have urged the administration to bypass typical FDA hurdles — like yearslong clinical trials — and use a pilot program to gather real-world data on the safety and outcomes of cannabinoids in the senior population.
Kessler did not respond to a request for comment. The White House also did not respond to a request for comment.
In September, cannabis companies’ stocks rallied on optimism that Trump would soon weigh in after he shared a Commonwealth Project video on Truth Social that branded CBD coverage as “the most important senior health initiative of the century.”
However, the Medicare proposal has drawn scrutiny, even from other Trump allies.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has raised concerns about the cost and liability of such a program, the Washington Post first reported, while FDA officials argue that reimbursing Americans for non-agency-approved treatments would be unprecedented.
Beyond the politics, the scientific case for medical cannabis remains contentious.
Research shifts
The FDA has so far only approved CBD-based drug Epidiolex to treat rare forms of epilepsy. This narrow approval reflects both regulators’ caution and the fact that high-quality clinical trials are still limited for most of the other conditions where cannabis is being promoted.
Critics warn that a Medicare pilot program could endanger seniors, a demographic that often takes multiple daily medications. A recent FDA-funded study suggested that prolonged CBD use may cause liver toxicity and interfere with other life-saving medications.
“It’s not at all based on science. This is all based on money, and it’s egregious. That’s not the way we make medical decisions,” said Meg Haney, director of the Cannabis Research Laboratory at Columbia University. “[Kessler], who’s a buddy with the president … can make a lot of money selling something that has no evidence behind it.”
Other research has cast doubt on cannabis’ efficacy entirely, suggesting it may not be effective for many of the conditions targeted by the proposed pilot, Haney said.
For example, a 2023 review of 134 studies involving adults age 50 and older found medical cannabis to have inconsistent outcomes for improving conditions like end-stage cancer and dementia. The review also found more frequent links to harms including depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment and injury.
Rescheduling cannabis would, however, ease barriers to conducting clinical trials that experts say have historically stifled scientific research.
“Medical research has effectively been under lock and key,” said Ryan Vandrey, a Johns Hopkins University professor who helps run its Cannabis Science Lab. “Schedule I makes large, placebo-controlled trials incredibly difficult. Without that data, policymakers are being asked to make decisions in the dark.”
Investing potential
For investors, the specific terms of rescheduling are critical.
Rescheduling would improve growers’ access to banking and financial services because it would lift certain IRS tax restrictions, which bar cannabis businesses from deducting standard expenses.
The economic backdrop is already shifting: The annual value of the U.S. cannabis production jumped 40% last year from the previous year, according to the Department of Agriculture. The global market for cannabis-derived products is projected to hit $160 billion by 2032, according to Grand View Research.
Rumors of rescheduling and a possible pilot program helped shares of weed producers Tilray Brands and Canopy Growth jump 44% and 52%, respectively, on Friday.
As Seymour described it, Medicare coverage and federal insurance involvement is the “holy grail” that could unlock institutional capital.
A Schedule III classification could also help legitimize the sector for institutional investors who have been hesitant to wade in, paving the way for more stocks to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq and shifting valuations from retail sentiment to fundamental cash flows.
“The Schedule I classification is what has held back a lot of institutional investors,” Seymour said. “Having to go out and tell their shareholders … that they own a company who’s selling something that is on a par with heroin, LSD or cocaine … is kind of a tough thing to swallow.”
Stocks of largest market cap cannabis companies in the U.S.
Business risks
If cannabis shifts to a reimbursable prescription drug model or federal legality, the category could attract interest from major pharmaceutical companies and distribution could eventually migrate from state-licensed dispensaries to national pharmacy chains like CVS and Walgreens.
That could spell trouble for smaller weed businesses.
Already, large pharmaceutical companies have the deep pockets needed to fund the multiyear, double-blind clinical trials required for FDA-approved drugs — a barrier to entry that few current cannabis operators can surmount.
However, Seymour views Medicare coverage as a catalyst for merger and acquisition activity rather than an immediate death knell.
“You are going to see more consolidation in the sector,” Seymour said. “Smaller companies that have good businesses, that are profitable … are probably going to be seen as targets.”
Meanwhile, Green Thumb Industries CEO Ben Kovler foresees more competition among pharmaceutical companies and cannabis companies to achieve medical breakthroughs.
“The pharma sector, in the past, has been a major lobbyist against [cannabis] because it is a threat,” Seymour said. “Therefore, yes, it’s a huge opportunity for pharma.”
— CNBC’s Brandon Gomez contributed to this report.
Business
Vets to be legally required to publish price lists and cap prescription fees
Vets will be legally bound to prescription fee caps and publishing price lists among new measures which will start coming into force later this year, the competition watchdog has announced.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said its final reforms for the sector will help pet owners better navigate the vet services market.
Other legally binding measures will include a price comparison website and mandatory branding by the large groups to boost competition and drive down prices.
The CMA said pet owners using a vet practice that is part of a larger chain can expect to see changes before Christmas, including standard price lists.
The measures follow the CMA finding that fees have risen at almost twice the rate of inflation, with pet owners not being given enough information about their vet and the prices of treatments.
Martin Coleman, chairman of the independent Inquiry Group, said: “This is the most extensive review of veterinary services in a generation, and today’s reforms will make a real difference to the millions of pet owners who want the best for their pets but struggle to find the practice, treatment and price that meets their needs.
“Too often, people are left in the dark about who owns their practice, treatment options and prices – even when facing bills running into thousands of pounds.
“Our measures mean it will be made clear to pet owners which practices are part of large groups, which are charging higher prices, and for the first time, vet businesses will be held to account by an independent regulator.
“Our changes put pet owners at the centre but also help vets by enhancing trust in the profession and protecting clinical judgment from undue commercial pressure – and that is important to ensure our pets continue to get the best care.”
The CMA said practices must publish a comprehensive price list for standard services, including consultations, common procedures, diagnostics, written prescriptions and cremation options under its new rules.
Prescriptions – for which “many” practices charge £30 or more for each – are to be capped at £21 for the first medicine and £12.50 for any additional medicines.
Practices must also provide a written estimate in advance for any treatment expected to cost £500 or more, including aftercare costs, as well as an itemised bill.
Emergency care will be the only exception for written estimates.
Prices and information about who owns the surgery are to be made available to pet owners through the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) ‘Find a Vet’ service, which will share the data with third-party comparison sites.
Vet businesses must make it clear whether they are part of a group or an independent business, with details of group ownership to be displayed on signs at the surgery and online.
British Veterinary Association president Rob Williams said: “The majority of the CMA’s measures focus on increasing transparency and information, which will help pet owners make more informed choices and support competition, which is a really positive step.”
He added: “Delivering highly skilled veterinary medicine is costly and whilst we recognise prices have risen sharply in recent years this is due to a number of factors, including the higher costs all businesses are experiencing – and vet practices are not immune.
“Plus, thanks to advances in diagnostics and medical technology over the last 20 years, vets can now do much more to manage disease and injury in animals, whereas in the past the only option available may have been to euthanase.
“Owners today also have a greater expectation of their vet, with many expecting human quality healthcare for their pets and whilst this is possible to deliver, it comes at a cost.”
Business
Gold price prediction today: Pressure on gold prices to continue on March 24, 2026 amid US-Iran war? Check outlook – The Times of India
Gold price prediction today: Gold prices are likely to remain range-bound in the near future, says Praveen Singh, Head Currencies and Commodities, Mirae Asset ShareKhan
Source link
Business
Estée Lauder is in talks to merge with Puig amid ongoing turnaround plan
An Estée Lauder pop-up store is seen inside a Daimaru store on Nanjing Road in Shanghai, China, Aug. 6, 2021.
Costfoto | Future Publishing | Getty Images
Estée Lauder Companies said Monday that it is in talks with Spanish beauty group Puig to potentially merge the two companies.
“No final decision has been made, and no agreement has been reached,” Estée Lauder said in a statement.
Shares of the U.S. beauty company were down nearly 8% following the news, which was first reported by the Financial Times. Puig’s stock rose roughly 3%.
Puig owns major beauty brands including Charlotte Tilbury, Jean Paul Gaultier and Rabanne. The companies did not disclose any financial details of the potential deal.
Estée Lauder has been struggling amid ongoing headwinds from tariffs and its restructuring as it enacts its “Beauty Reimagined” turnaround plan to revitalize the business. In its second-quarter earnings report last month, the beauty retailer said it’s expecting a $100 million hit to its full-year profitability due to tariff impacts.
Estée Lauder’s stock has dropped roughly 25% this year.
-
Sports1 week agoJapan suffers shocking collapse to Venezuela in World Baseball Classic
-
Entertainment1 week agoStrategic oil stocks to be released ‘immediately’ in Asia and Oceania: IEA
-
Sports1 week agoTransfer rumors, news: Real Madrid open to Camavinga exit, as Premier League clubs circle
-
Business1 week agoNew Income Tax Act 2025 To Take Effect From April 1: 10 Key Changes That Will Affect Your Money
-
Sports1 week agoPCB files complaint over allowing Bangladesh to take review on penultimate ball – SUCH TV
-
Business7 days agoStocks and pound rise as US rate call approaches
-
Tech6 days agoJustice Department Says Anthropic Can’t Be Trusted With Warfighting Systems
-
Sports6 days agoMarch Madness 2026 – How to watch in SA, start time, schedule, TV channel for NCAA championship basketball tournament
