Connect with us

Sports

When Knicks fans are banned from MSG, is there any coming back?

Published

on

When Knicks fans are banned from MSG, is there any coming back?


AS THE FINAL SECONDS ticked away on the New York Knicks‘ playoff thrashing of the Boston Celtics in May and the mad revelers of Bing Bong Nation poured out of Madison Square Garden, Justin Brandel sorted through a tangle of emotions. He was watching in amazement from his Manhattan apartment and trying to keep up with the text thread blowing up his phone — his friends, fellow Knicks fans, hazarding guesses about how much the cheapest tickets would cost for Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals. $800 just to get in the door? $1,000? $1,500? Screw it, it’s worth it, his friends said. The last time the Garden hosted Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals was 1994. There’s a real chance we’ll all be dead before this happens again. These are the Knicks, after all.

As friends began to commit, Brandel itched to join them. Money wasn’t the issue. He makes a good living as a personal injury lawyer in the city. His problem, however, is that he was legally forbidden from entering Madison Square Garden — banned by James Dolan, the CEO of MSG Sports and MSG Entertainment.

Ah, yes, that. Perhaps you’ve heard a thing or two about this banning habit of Dolan’s. Charles Oakley became the poster child for it in 2017, when Dolan slapped the Knicks legend with a ban from MSG after a physical altercation with Garden security during which Oak made several unkind remarks about Dolan. It flared up again in late 2022, when a New York Times article revealed that MSG Entertainment and Dolan now maintained a list mainly comprised of people who’d gotten in their legal crosshairs and were banned as a result, including some Knicks and Rangers season-ticket holders. Despite backlash, the list is still in effect, and according to reports, over a thousand lawyers across about 90 firms have been banned since 2022.

The vast majority of the names on MSG’s banned list belong to people like Justin Brandel: lawyers who are employed at a firm engaged in active litigation against MSG Entertainment’s properties, which also includes the Beacon Theatre and Radio City Music Hall in Manhattan, the Chicago Theatre, and the recently opened Sphere in Las Vegas. The list has drawn little media coverage outside of New York. But within the city’s legal community, it has become something of a local legend — the vengeful billionaire who deploys the most modern security technologies available, including facial recognition, to facilitate one of the oldest of human pursuits: settling scores.

Brandel, like everyone on the list, was banned from all of Dolan’s venues, not just MSG, and he’d already gotten a dose of the consequences. Earlier this year, his parents surprised him on his birthday with tickets for him and his wife to see two of his favorite comedians, John Oliver and Seth Meyers, at the Beacon Theatre. “I had to explain to them that I couldn’t go,” Brandel says, “because I didn’t want to give the MSG Company the satisfaction of kicking me out without any refunds. They ended up taking a couple that they’re friendly with.” Great seats, too. Orchestra level. “They’re not this nice usually,” he jokes. “It’s typical for my family that the one time they splurge, I can’t go.”

As luck would have it, the lawsuit that got Brandel and his partners banned was settled shortly after the NBA playoffs began in April. So, maybe he wasn’t banned anymore? How was he supposed to know? It’s not like the ban came with instructions from someone at the Garden about how it worked. “If I was sure I wasn’t going to get kicked out, I’d definitely explore the market — there’s still a 12-year-old kid in me that hates Reggie Miller,” he says.

“There’s absolutely no chance, though, that I’m spending $1,000 to even potentially be escorted out of MSG.”


IT BEGINS WITH an official letter from the associate general counsel’s office at the Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corporation, sent via FedEx to the lawyer employed by the offending firm. It’s how Brandel and his partners learned they were banned in the first place.

“Dear Counsel,” the letter begins. “Due in part to the adversarial nature inherent in litigation proceedings, and because of the potential for contact with the Company’s employees and disclosure outside proper litigation discovery channels… this letter shall serve as notice [that] you and all attorneys at your firm… may not enter the MSG Venues defined above until the subject litigation has been resolved.”

Recipients immediately join a special club with no perks, aside from the defiant pride that often accompanies membership. Paralegals and support staff are spared. This ban applies only to lawyers. And any “affected attorneys” hoping to grandfather in some Knicks tickets they bought pre-banishment are in for some bad news: “[A]ny tickets to MSG venues they previously acquired or acquired in the future,” the letter states, “are hereby revoked and deemed revoked, void and invalid…”

Mark Seitelman got his letter late last year, about six weeks after he filed a lawsuit on behalf of an older gentleman who’d stumbled and injured himself at MSG. “Typically, when we get a FedEx delivery, it’s a settlement check,” Seitelman says. “It’s good news. You open it up, there’s a check.” This was not good news, even though the Garden’s legal department issued the letter on Dec. 23, and it arrived on Dec. 24. Merry Christmas!

Seitelman runs a small practice, just him and three other lawyers, but another firm on the list, Morgan & Morgan, is one of the largest in the country, with locations in all 50 states and more than 1,000 lawyers. Dolan’s properties, meanwhile, are live entertainment venues with huge crowds of people tripping over each other in the dark every night of the week. MSG Entertainment is currently defending itself in 19 active lawsuits — most of which involve personal injury claims at the Garden. MSG’s banned list, in other words, is very, very long, and in a constant state of flux as cases get resolved and new ones crop up. Very few of them wrap up quickly, though, and some drag on for years. Most of the lawyers on the list have zero involvement with the cases that landed them there.

There are other ways to get on MSG and Dolan’s list besides suing them — like telling Dolan that he should sell the Knicks — but whatever your sin was, your blackball becomes official the moment his lawyers seal up the FedEx envelope. After Dolan banned Oakley in 2017, a former art director at Hot 97 named Frank Miller Jr. designed a T-shirt that read “BAN DOLAN.” He sold six shirts. More than four years passed. Then, in 2021, one of those six customers got booted out of MSG for wearing the shirt to a Knicks game. The guy posted about it on Twitter, and Stephen A. Smith and Max Kellerman wound up discussing it on ESPN’s “First Take.”

Miller had relocated to Seattle by then, but several months ago, in March, he returned to New York to take his parents to a Cleo Sol concert at Radio City Music Hall for their 47th anniversary. They were all standing together in line for the security checkpoint when suddenly he was surrounded by guards. “They came running over like the ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.,’ with their fingers on their earpieces,” he says. His mother was panic-stricken, but he told his parents to go inside the theater, and he’d meet them when he could. He never did. He finally connected the dots to his “BAN DOLAN” T-shirt when the security guards presented him with a piece of paper labelled “trespass notice” — the same notice everyone on MSG’s banned list gets served if they defy it, intentionally or otherwise.

Miller’s parents stayed inside the theater for the show, and he wound up meeting a friend at a bar nearby in Rockefeller Center. He didn’t get to see Cleo Sol, but the bartender thoroughly enjoyed his story about getting banned by James Dolan over a T-shirt, so he did get a free martini.


MADISON SQUARE GARDEN Entertainment Corp.’s security department has been using facial recognition technology at its properties to aid with crime prevention and counterterrorism since at least 2018. But MSG and Dolan also had another idea for it.

In Dec. 2022, The New York Times broke the story that MSG Entertainment officials were using the technology to identify people on what was then being called an “attorney exclusion list” and summarily eject them from the premises, including a woman who was taking her 9-year-old daughter’s Girl Scout troop to see the annual “Christmas Spectacular” at Radio City Music Hall. In the coming weeks, the local media filled with stories from New York-area lawyers who had unwittingly shown up with tickets to a concert, or a stand-up comedy show, or a sporting event, only to be swarmed by security and barred from reentry with no refund. On Jan. 24, 2023, the New York attorney general’s office sent MSG Entertainment Corp. a letter demanding more information about the ban and expressing concerns about possible civil rights violations. This seemed to touch a nerve in Dolan. He gave a defiant interview to Fox 5 New York two days later.

“If there’s someone you don’t want to serve, you get to say, ‘I don’t want to serve you,'” he said, citing the Bill of Rights. “And if there’s somebody who is suing you and trying to put you out of business or take your money from you… You have a right to be, yes, a little unhappy about it.”

MSG Entertainment and Dolan eventually prevailed in court, and by this point, so many lawyers have done time on his banned list that most of them know what they’re getting into when they take him to court. The initial letter from FedEx puts the onus on the offending firm to alert all of its lawyers, but that message tends not to get relayed to employees in satellite offices beyond New York. Seth Diamond, an attorney with Morgan & Morgan’s office in Savannah, Georgia, took his family on vacation to New York during school spring break, and he bought Rangers tickets right behind the glass for his hockey-loving 7-year-old son. He didn’t know anything about the ban. If Dolan’s lawyers sent a letter to Savannah, he never received it. But as soon as he passed through security, a few steps before he got his tickets scanned, a Garden official pulled him out of line, verified his identity, and delivered the news. His son cried. He thought maybe he’d done something wrong, or that his parents were in trouble. Either way, he wasn’t seeing the Rangers that day, or any time soon. They wound up at a Build-A-Bear Workshop down the block.

Dolan seems wedded to the policy — he has spent lots of money fighting for it in court, and he continues to dedicate material resources to keep it going — but the company is not so forthcoming about the mechanics of enforcing it. Representatives for MSG Entertainment did not answer questions about the policy, but several hours after this story published, they issued a statement saying the policy exists “to ensure the safety and security of our patrons and employees” and that it applies to law firms or other individuals who engage in behavior deemed violent or threatening. As for the law firms, MSG said those suing the company or its employees “are deemed to be hostile and are prohibited from patronizing our venues until the litigation is concluded. They are predatory in nature … Once their litigation is concluded they are reinstated to regular patron status.”

In the absence of getting answers to questions, what we do know is reverse-engineered from experiences shared in interviews with more than a dozen lawyers who’ve been subject to it. For instance, multiple lawyers recounted that Garden security flashed portraits of them pulled from their firms’ websites before being escorted out. Presumably, someone has to scrape all those thousands of portraits from all those websites and feed them into MSG’s security apparatus. But MSG officials did not answer questions about how it works.

Of course, some firms put little effort into keeping their websites current, and some don’t post portraits at all. It’s why experiences tend to vary so widely, and rumors abound about loopholes — that the ban doesn’t include concerts (it does), or college sports (it does), or the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show (it does). Some people shared apocryphal tales about bans being appealed and overturned. Some people get the FedEx letter from MSG’s general counsel; some people don’t. Some people get swarmed the moment they step through the scanners, while others breeze right through. And sometimes, an anonymous office worker messes up and puts the right name on the wrong picture. That’s how Dan Watts, an attorney with Morgan & Morgan, discovered he was on the list — and how he managed to elude capture, at least for a little while.

Watts says he first heard “mutterings” about MSG’s exclusion list in early 2023 when accounts of it began popping up in local papers, “but I thought it was just hearsay — rumor.” He knew that Morgan & Morgan had an ongoing lawsuit against MSG Entertainment, but come on, he thought, there’s no way the Garden was banning every lawyer at every firm that sues him.

His next trip to MSG was in July 2023, for a Drake concert. A few steps past the security checkpoint, he got stopped by a few officers, “and I was like, Oh my God, this is real.” Then one of them asked him if his name was David Friedman. “David Friedman is another lawyer at the firm,” Watts says. “I said I wasn’t him. I showed my ID, and he showed me something on an iPad saying that David Friedman was a Morgan & Morgan employee, but it had my face from the website. So I was like, ‘I don’t know who that is.’ And they let me through.” Four months later, on his way into a Knicks game against the Phoenix Suns, he got stopped again, and they thought he was David Friedman again, so he played dumb again. “I was like, ‘Oh, this happened to me before — I think there’s some kind of misidentification here.’ So I showed him my ID and he was like, ‘This is very unusual…’ He shows me his group chat on WhatsApp with all the security guards. He’s like, ‘I’m going to get to the bottom of this. Enjoy the game.'”

This time, the Garden official snapped a photo of Watts’ ID, “and I kind of knew at that point…” He was busted. Game over.

Twenty days later, though, he pressed his luck once more because he couldn’t resist the siren call of his beloved St. John’s Red Storm, whose men’s basketball team plays some home games at Madison Square Garden. Watts is Queens born and raised, from a long line of Johnnies, most influentially his father, who raised Dan on a steady diet of Chris Mullin, Walter “The Truth” Berry, Coach Lou Carnesecca, and his wackadoodle sweaters — Big East basketball at its 1980s zenith. He tried to go to St. John’s Law, but he got wait-listed (“no hard feelings”), so he went to Hofstra instead, then took a job in the city practicing injury law, and he’s been a Red Storm season-ticket holder at Madison Square Garden ever since. He has stuck it out through a lean 21st century during which St. John’s reached the NCAA tournament just four times, never in consecutive seasons, never advancing past the second round. “St. John’s is New York City basketball,” he says. “It’s part of the culture in my household.”

On Dec. 16, 2023, Watts joined his mother and her partner, who’s on the Board of Trustees at St. John’s, for an early-season Red Storm game against Fordham. This time, he made it to his seats on the Garden floor, and he started to think maybe he was wrong — maybe he’d slipped security for good. But then the guards showed up, and this time they knew his name. Even his mother’s boyfriend, the St. John’s trustee, was powerless to overrule them. They answered to a much higher authority.


FROM JAMES DOLAN’S vantage point, the policy is pure common sense. You wouldn’t sue your neighbor and then show up at his house for his annual pool party, would you? The Garden is private property, even if Dolan is glad to blur the lines to keep receiving an estimated $42 million annual property tax break from the City of New York and enjoying all of the free law enforcement assets that come with being located directly above Penn Station, one of the world’s busiest transportation hubs. It’s private property, except when it’s not.

This argument would be more persuasive, though, if the ban covered only lawyers named in lawsuits against MSG and not all of their uninvolved colleagues as well, especially considering paralegals and support staff are still welcome. The initial letter from MSG’s general counsel hints at a legal rationale that sounds reasonable enough, which is that the corporation is merely taking steps to ensure that lawyers at the plaintiff’s firm do not infiltrate one of Dolan’s properties under the guise of being a normal ticket buyer and then use the opportunity to gather evidence, perhaps interview potential witnesses. “Ridiculous,” Seitelman says. “That type of staff keeps changing. What kind of adverse statements are we going to get from anyone? That’s the grounds for why they’re banning us?”

It would also be a clear violation of legal ethics and potential grounds for disbarment — you can’t just sneak onto a defendant’s property under false pretenses and go around digging for evidence. “I like my law license. It wasn’t cheap,” says Joseph DePaola, a lawyer at Greenberg Law P.C., which spent over a year on MSG’s banned list for representing a spectator who got punched at a Rangers game. “I don’t feel like giving it up for one case.” The letter from the general counsel alludes to this legal parameter in the context of a reminder, which seems like a tacit acknowledgement that the ban is needless: It just prevents lawyers from doing something that was already forbidden. Perhaps this is why MSG’s banned list appears to be the only one of its kind — no other major U.S. arena bans lawyers who are suing the building’s owner, at least none that we’re aware of. It’s also a rare instance of a business actively seeking customers to turn away.

Several of the lawyers I spoke with dismissed MSG’s stated reasons for the ban and suggested a more Machiavellian purpose. “It’s basically designed to chill litigation against MSG — to scare lawyers away from taking any case against Madison Square Garden or any of their entities,” DePaola says. “And we think it sets a really bad precedent.” That was one of the arguments that DePaola’s firm made against it in court. A judge initially lifted the ban, but an appellate court reversed the decision. One attorney told me about a lawyer at another firm who wanted to join her lawsuit against the Garden, contesting its use of facial-recognition technology, but his partners made him withdraw from the case — not because they feared Dolan’s wrath, though. They just didn’t want to give up their Rangers tickets. None of the lawyers I spoke with flinched at suing Dolan. If anything, the ban emboldened them.

John Morgan, the founder of Morgan & Morgan, a billionaire in his own right, now semiretired and living winters in Maui, was placed on MSG’s banned list in 2023, and he responded in kind, launching a website, SueMSG.com, for the sole purpose of soliciting personal-injury claims against Dolan properties. “We always are getting notice letters,” Morgan says. “I get letters. My wife gets letters. My kids get letters.” He just throws them in the trash. “The only thing I would’ve cared about is seeing Billy Joel, and I’ve seen him so many times, I don’t need to see him again. The last time I saw him, I was sitting next to him at lunch in Sag Harbor. So it doesn’t bother me. I’m sure it bothers some of my lawyers, but that’s life.”


THE FIRST TIME in my life I went to a concert unchaperoned was at Madison Square Garden. INXS — the Australian rock band — in 1991. I remember taking the Metro-North to Grand Central Terminal with my friends from our town, an hour upstate, and walking through crisp February air over to the Garden. I remember the house lights going black, and over 15,000 people standing up and screaming in anticipation, and the harmonica wail that opens “Suicide Blonde,” INXS’s latest radio hit. “Suicide Blonde” is built on top of a three-chord guitar riff that I’d heard a hundred times before, but never like this — a thick rumble that filled the air so completely it felt like I was bathing in it. I’d heard the term “arena rock” before, but now I understood exactly what it meant, and I was hooked on it.

The best concert I’ve ever seen was U2 at the Garden just over a month after 9/11. I’m not a spiritual person, but that night was the closest I’ve ever come to a religious experience. I saw U2 again at the Garden on their next tour, and this time I surprised my future wife with tickets for her birthday. I saw R.E.M., my favorite band, twice.

Duke, my alma mater, has played at least one men’s basketball game at the Garden every season since I graduated nearly 30 years ago (aside from 2001-02), and I’ve been to most of them. I was there in 1999, No. 2 Duke versus No. 8 St. John’s, Elton Brand versus Ron Artest, when we overcame a 40-point eruption from Marvis “Bootsy” Thornton to win in overtime 92-88. I was there in 2011, when we beat Michigan State for Coach Mike Krzyzewski’s 903rd career win, surpassing his mentor, Bob Knight, who was in the building as well, to become the NCAA Division I’s all-time winningest men’s basketball coach. I was there for Michael Jordan’s second comeback game — my only time watching MJ in person — when he joined the Washington Wizards at age 38. His first game back was at the Garden, and he scored 19 points on 7-of-21 shooting. I was there to watch Derrick Rose silence the Garden during his MVP season against the Melo-led Knicks. And I was there last winter when Duke and Cooper Flagg handed Illinois the most lopsided defeat in the history of its men’s basketball program.

I share all this not just because it has crossed my mind more than once that this article could very well get me (and perhaps my editor — sorry, Justin) banned from Madison Square Garden, as well. I’ve tempted fate in the past — way back in 2011, during the lawless early days of Twitter, before we worried too much about things like digital footprints and facial recognition technology, I tweeted that Dolan was an “imbecile” for surrendering so many assets in the Carmelo Anthony deal (when they could’ve just signed him over the summer) and in 2013, I called him a “d—” for firing a Garden security guard who didn’t recognize him. Rude, I know, but I was also a pebble in an ocean of anti-Dolan agita. I never thought twice about it. (Dolan rehired the guard the next day.)

This is different. It occurred to me several times while Duke was stomping Illinois that this might be my last time in the building. And that thought sent me reeling through decades of memories and contemplating how my life would be different if someone erased them from my brain. No U2 after 9/11. No Michael Jordan in the flesh. No annual catch-ups with old Duke pals who came into the city just for the game. What’s being erased is nothing less than several of the peak moments of my life, when I felt most alive, when the emotions we typically experience in spoonfuls — joy, elation, catharsis, community — got turned up to arena-rock levels.

Nicolette Landi, a personal injury attorney with Harris Keenan & Goldfarb, was one of the original casualties of the policy back when news of it first reached the public. Landi loves Mariah Carey, so for Christmas, her husband bought her floor seats, $375 each on StubHub, for Carey’s annual holiday show at the Garden. It would be Landi’s first time seeing her queen. She didn’t know anything about a banned list. This was late 2022 — no one did. Plus, she says now, “I was at the Garden that October for a concert. I had no problem. I was there in November for a Knicks game — no problem.” Landi was nine months into her job at the firm, and at some point, between that Knicks game in November and the Mariah Carey show in December, she and all the other lawyers at Harris Keenan & Goldfarb got professional photos taken, which then got uploaded to the firm’s website.

Landi didn’t even make it through security at the Mariah Carey show. “As soon as my bag was going through the [conveyor] belt, there were 10 security guards around me,” she says. After she showed one of them her ID, he said into a radio, “Yeah, it’s her.” Her husband turned to her and said, “Oh my God, what did you do?” She had no clue. By happenstance, her father’s best friend is head of security at the Garden — he has helped her with tickets in the past — so she called him while they waited. “I saw them pull your name up,” he told her, but his hands were tied. “They won’t even let me come downstairs. They know I know you.” A few minutes later, she and her husband were out on the sidewalk. “I was like, ‘Well, what do we do now? I guess we just go home.’ I mean, it was like a Tuesday.” She bought a counterfeit Mariah Carey T-shirt outside “because I couldn’t get a real one. And then that was it.”

Her big night was over, but Landi’s private battle with Dolan was just beginning. The next year, she bought tickets to Mariah Carey’s Christmas show again, and this time, she snuck in by wearing a baseball cap and a COVID mask, and by strategically looking down as she went through security. (“If you look up, you’re toast.”) Landi says everyone at her firm defies the ban. “We’ve all snuck into the Garden here.” Two years later, her brother had tickets for a suite at a Rangers-Devils game at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey, and during a trip to the bathroom, he spotted James Dolan, who’d come from another suite nearby and was watching his team in a road arena. “And my brother — he’s Italian, so he just had to open his mouth,” Landi says. He called Dolan an a–hole and blasted him for banning his sister. Dolan’s security followed him back to his suite and demanded his ID or they’d have him thrown out. The very next day, Landi says, her brother got a letter from MSG Entertainment’s general counsel informing him that he’d been banned from all of its properties, too, only his ban was “indefinite.”

This news filled him, his sister says, with a pride unlike any he has ever known.


IT ENDS THE SAME way it begins: with an official letter from the general counsel’s office at MSG Entertainment Corporation, sent via FedEx to every lawyer at the banished firm. “Dear Counsel,” it begins. “The litigation of which your firm represented one or more plaintiffs who were asserting claims against Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp… has been resolved accordingly [and so] all attorneys employed at your firm may once again attend events at the company venues… We are happy to welcome you back and look forward to seeing you in the future.” MSG Entertainment is glad to take your hard-earned money again. No hard feelings!

It took a year in the wilderness for Joseph DePaola and his firm, but their letter “releasing us from our sentence” finally arrived in August 2023. “Pleasant letter,” he says. “Very nice.” (He still keeps a screenshot of the letter in his phone, just in case.) Brandel’s case has been resolved for months, but he’s still waiting for his letter. Unless he leaves Morgan & Morgan, though, the wait might never end for Dan Watts. That SueMSG.com website is like an open dare, and its existence all but guarantees the firm will always be suing MSG for something.

That goes for Seth Diamond, too, though at least the ban won’t dog him at all back in Savannah. And as unpleasant as the experience was, he views it as a learning opportunity for his 7-year-old son, a life lesson about money, power and decency. “Remember,” he told his boy afterward, “that the person who made this decision — they have more money than probably anyone you’ll ever meet in your life. But they’re doing things that aren’t good. And so what did we learn from this? It doesn’t matter if you have all the money in the world. What really matters is how you treat people.”

His son seemed to get it, he says. “I’m hoping it sticks.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

‘Head coach’ vs ‘manager’: Why job title matters for Chelsea, Man United

Published

on

‘Head coach’ vs ‘manager’: Why job title matters for Chelsea, Man United


Who would be a football manager? Well, as it turns out, in the Premier League the answer is an increasing number of head coaches.

The difference between the job titles of “manager” and “head coach” may seem mere semantics at first glance, but events at Manchester United and Chelsea this month point to deeper structural problems that many clubs are now grappling with.

Both Ruben Amorim and Enzo Maresca chose to go public with frustrations they deemed as unnecessary interference from the infrastructure around them.

Maresca went first. In mid-December, after a routine 2-0 home win over Everton, which should have calmed the mood around Stamford Bridge, Maresca opted instead to ignite a fire by declaring the buildup “the worst 48 hours” of his tenure due to “a lack of support.”

Why did Man United, Chelsea, Madrid all sack managers? It’s about culture
How Man United chose Carrick as head coach: A no-fuss, loyal, safe option
Real Madrid fired Xabi Alonso after 233 days. Where did it all go wrong?

His working relationship with senior figures at the club quickly eroded, and Chelsea parted company with Maresca just 19 days later. We will never know for certain, but perhaps Amorim, increasingly disgruntled at United, was inspired by those events in west London.

The following day, Amorim hinted at internal issues at a prematch news conference before facing Leeds United and, after that game, launched a full-scale assault on his bosses, insisting he joined United to “be the manager, not the head coach.” Amorim was sacked the following morning.

Chelsea have since doubled down on their existing head coach model by appointing Liam Rosenior as Maresca’s successor, not least because of his experience working for the club’s owners, BlueCo, at their sister team, Strasbourg of France’s Ligue 1.

United’s next move seems less certain after they installed Michael Carrick as an interim boss before making a permanent appointment in the summer.

The club still appears stuck at a crossroads created by legendary manager Sir Alex Ferguson’s departure in 2013, just as Arsenal were when Arsène Wenger left in 2018. They were the two most prominent exponents of the old model, which dictated that control comes at all costs for a manager. But what balance works best in 2026?


What’s the difference between ‘head coach’ and ‘manager’?

play

2:02

Rosenior: I’m accountable for my players mistakes

Chelsea boss Liam Rosenior refused to criticise Robert Sánchez after errors in the 3-2 Carabao Cup semifinal defeat to Arsenal.

This isn’t a new problem. Ferguson and Wenger once sat on stage together at a League Managers’ Association meeting, opining on how the preeminence they enjoyed was founded on controlling all aspects of their respective clubs. They were becoming increasingly isolated cases.

“The manager is the most important man at the club,” Wenger said. “If not, why do you sack the manager if it doesn’t go well?”

“Very good,” said Ferguson, sitting alongside him, smiling.

Ferguson later praised then-Premier League bosses Alan Curbishley and Kevin Keegan for leaving their posts on “a point of principle,” specifically that West Ham and Newcastle United, respectively, were letting players leave against the wishes of their managers. That was in 2008.

The intervening 18 years have seen the power balance shift steadily away from autonomous managerial figures toward head coaches, who are expected to work within a structure which divides responsibilities, including scouting, recruitment, medical determinations and data analysis among several others. A manager is a visionary to whom everyone must answer. A head coach is more of a prominent cog within a larger machine.

In one clear example of the transformation in thinking, Arsenal appointed nine new department heads around the time of Wenger’s departure in 2018 and trebled the number of operations staff in three years.

Top Premier League clubs routinely arrive at away games with two team buses — the expanded support staff no longer fit onto one bus with the playing squad. Club doctors Stephen Lewis (Chelsea) and Zaf Iqbal (Arsenal) were even listed on the official teamsheet for Wednesday’s Carabao Cup semifinal first-leg clash at Stamford Bridge.

Where the boundaries are drawn for each member of this infrastructure is where the tension usually lies for a head coach.

Today, there are only five Premier League clubs employing someone whose official job title is ‘manager’: Arsenal, Everton, Manchester City, Crystal Palace and Leeds.

One of those is Mikel Arteta, but he is a unique case. He was appointed as Arsenal head coach in December 2019 — following Unai Emery’s unsuccessful attempt to operate within the club’s post-Wenger model — but then “promoted” to manager in September 2020 after winning the FA Cup a month earlier in a Covid-delayed season.

Arteta revealed last week that the plan to promote him was actually hatched before his Wembley triumph.

“It was in my house,” he said. “They came to me and started to propose the idea of what they thought and the way they wanted to structure the club. That was after probably five, six months in the job.

“They believed that and [I said] ‘this is where I think I can help, this is my vision, this is what I would do, this is how I see this project.’ I presented it, and from there we started all together to start to add value to those ideas.

“I didn’t demand it. I didn’t ask for it, and they believed it was the right thing to do. When you have a leader, which is ownership in this case — Stan [Kroenke] and Josh [Kroenke, representing owners Kroenke Sports Enterprises] — and Josh that is very close to us with clear alignment to all of us what he wants to do, how he wants to create that space for everybody, I think it is very easy to work like this.

“At the end, it is about the relationships and the people that we have from great teams with very different qualities. Sometimes, I have been more on certain things; when there is somebody who is much better than me on that, I let them do it. For me, the title doesn’t really reflect the way we operate daily.”

Although KSE is an American company, well-placed sources within football point to the increase in U.S. ownership — now 22 of the top 44 clubs comprising England’s top two leagues — as a contributing factor. They want their clubs to retain a stable, long-term identity of their own, impervious to the idiosyncrasies of the man in the dugout.

The modern-day trend certainly appears to be clubs seeking to establish an identity based on principles set by their own sporting infrastructure, rather than the shorter-term whims of a manager or head coach who is just passing through. The League Managers’ Association published data last year suggesting the average tenure of a sacked manager is 1.42 years.

But there are signs head coaches are pushing back against this transient existence. Amorim and Maresca took internal tensions public while Tottenham Hotspur captain Cristian Romero broke ranks with an Instagram post that suggested the Spurs hierarchy “only show up when things are going well, to tell a few lies.”

It doesn’t help advocates of the head coach model that Arsenal under Arteta lead the Premier League from Pep Guardiola’s Manchester City and Aston Villa, who named Emery as head coach but whose influence is widely acknowledged to extend far beyond the limitations that title would suggest.


Finding the right fit

play

1:25

Was the Man United job ‘too big’ for Ruben Amorim?

Julien Laurens explains what went wrong for Ruben Amorim at Manchester United after being sacked following 14 months at the club.

Supporters have protested against Chelsea’s BlueCo owners, who completed their takeover in 2022 and whose methods have frustrated head coaches of high pedigree before Maresca, including Thomas Tuchel and Mauricio Pochettino.

The appointment of Rosenior has emboldened critics, suggesting the owners want a “yes man” as head coach, willing to acquiesce to the specialists who operate separately to his immediate coaching staff.

Predictably, Rosenior pushed back on any such notion when speaking at his first Chelsea news conference.

“Being a head coach, you talk about football systems and tactics,” he said. “[But] that’s 10% of the job. The job is to create spirit, energy, a culture. It doesn’t matter if you’re called a head coach, manager or anything else. The job is the same. My job is to have a team that runs, fights for each other, that plays with spirit and quality. That’s what I’m going to focus on.”

Whatever the rights and wrongs of Chelsea’s strategy — which includes employing five sporting directors, an independent medical team whose advice on player load must be followed and regular technical feedback sessions for the head coach after every game — they know exactly what they want.

Multiple sources told ESPN that BlueCo had quickly identified Rosenior as a leading candidate among a small pool of options, ruling out higher-profile names almost immediately. The belief in their model is resolute and clear.

If anything, control has been tightened. Maresca brought six staff with him from Leicester City. Rosenior has three from Strasbourg — assistant Justin Walker, first-team coach Kalifa Cissé and analyst Ben Warner — while Calum McFarlane was promoted from Chelsea’s under-21s and goalkeeper coach Ben Roberts remains in post. Set-piece coach Bernardo Cueva was appointed independently from Maresca and stayed on. All six of Maresca’s staff left.

There seems to be less clarity at United. Even caretaker boss Darren Fletcher admitting that he called Ferguson for “his blessing” before accepting the temporary position smacked of a club still struggling to emerge from the shadow of its past. They didn’t appoint a director of football and technical director until 2021, and Amorim was the first man in the club’s history to be appointed “head coach” rather than “manager.”

However, club sources have told ESPN that director of football Jason Wilcox sees recruitment falling within his sphere of influence and has said publicly that he can’t help but “interfere” in what the head coach is doing. It is, at least from the outside, a confused picture.

Carrick has brought in two staff members for his five-month stint: ex-England No. 2 Steve Holland and Jonathan Woodgate, who worked under Carrick at Middlesbrough.


‘Manager’ is a title that’s earned

Recruitment is invariably a point of friction. Club sources told ESPN that Maresca wanted a center back last summer after Levi Colwill got injured but was told to find internal solutions.

Conversely, ESPN sources say Arteta fought hard and won a battle to sign Mikel Merino from Real Sociedad in 2024 despite others involved in recruitment casting doubt over his ability and transfer fee.

Tottenham are grappling with their own approach, appointing Fabio Paratici as co-sporting director alongside Johan Lange in October, only for Spurs to confirm on Wednesday that the former will leave next month to join Fiorentina.

Gone are the days when the chief scout — and wider scouting staff that followed — operated as close allies of the manager. Some head coaches now insist on bringing their own trusted recruitment staff, often as part of their initial appointment, because they want specialists who share their way of seeing the game. This guarantees the coach a voice early in the scouting process and keeps them closely involved in the club’s strategic thinking and player selection.

Sources working in recruitment say that even though power has gradually shifted away from the manager or head coach, cases where players are signed without that individual’s involvement remain extremely rare, to the point of being almost unheard of in a top-five league environment.

However, the level of power can change over time. If a sporting director signs off on a run of mediocre transfers, a head coach may use that to push for greater influence over recruitment. Equally, when a head coach is flavour of the month with successful results, some will take the opportunity to gain a greater say in squad building.

What matters initially are the job description and the powers laid out in the contract. Perhaps the conclusion is that head coaches who want to become managers have to go to great lengths to earn it.

Arsenal recognised they needed a cultural overhaul and believed in Arteta to deliver it. Guardiola earned it before he arrived as City’s whole football structure was tailored to lure him to the club. Emery has improved Villa to such a dramatic extent that the case for greater influence was almost impossible to ignore.

Maresca and Amorim chanced their arm and failed. They almost certainly won’t be the last.

Information from ESPN’s Rob Dawson and Tor-Kristian Karlsen contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

U.S. names sporting events athletes exempt from visa ban

Published

on

U.S. names sporting events athletes exempt from visa ban


WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has identified a host of athletic competitions it classifies as “major sporting events” — aside from soccer’s 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympic Games — that athletes and coaches will be allowed to travel to the U.S. to take part in despite a broad visa ban on nearly 40 countries.

In a cable sent to all U.S. embassies and consulates Wednesday, the State Department said athletes, coaches and support staff for the World Cup, the Olympics and events endorsed or run by a long list of collegiate and professional sporting leagues and associations would not be subject to the full and partial travel bans that apply to citizens of 39 countries and the Palestinian Authority.

However, the cable made clear that foreign spectators, media and corporate sponsors planning to attend the same events would still be banned unless they qualify for another exemption.

“Only a small subset of travelers for the World Cup, Olympics and Paralympics, and other major sporting events will qualify for the exception,” it said.

President Donald Trump’s administration has issued a series of immigration and travel bans as well as other visa restrictions as part of ongoing efforts to tighten U.S. entry standards for foreigners. At the same time, the administration has been looking to ensure that athletes, coaches and fans are able to attend major sporting events in the U.S.

Trump’s Dec. 16 proclamation banning the issuance of visas to the 39 countries and the Palestinian Authority had carved out an exception for athletes and staff competing in the World Cup, the Olympics and other major sporting events. It delegated a decision on which other sporting events would be covered to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Wednesday’s cable lists the events that are covered, including “all competitions and qualifying events” for the Olympic Games, Paralympic Games, Pan-American Games, and Para Pan-American Games; events hosted, sanctioned or recognized by a U.S. National Governing Body; all competitions and qualifying events for the Special Olympics; and official events and competitions hosted or endorsed by FIFA, soccer’s governing body, or its confederations.

The exemption also will cover official events and competitions hosted by the International Military Sports Council, the International University Sports Federation and the National Collegiate Athletic Association as well as those hosted or endorsed by U.S. professional sports leagues such as the National Football League, the National Basketball Association and Women’s National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball and Little League, National Hockey League, Professional Women’s Hockey League, NASCAR, Formula 1, the Professional Golf Association, Ladies Professional Golf Association, LIV Golf, Major League Rugby, Major League Soccer, World Wrestling Entertainment, Ultimate Fighting Championship and All Elite Wrestling.

The cable said other events and leagues could be added to the list.

Of the 39 countries, a full travel ban applies to Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Niger, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen, and people with Palestinian Authority-issued passports.

A partial ban is in place for citizens of Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Burundi, Cuba, Dominica, Gabon, Gambia, Ivory Coast, Malawi, Mauritania, Senegal, Tanzania, Tonga, Togo, Venezuela, Zambia and Zimbabwe.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Trump to attend College Football Playoff championship game in Miami with Rubio

Published

on

Trump to attend College Football Playoff championship game in Miami with Rubio


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump will return to the sidelines Monday with Secretary of State Marco Rubio for the College Football Playoff championship in Miami, where the Indiana Hoosiers will face the Miami Hurricanes.

Trump’s expected attendance was first reported by Axios. 

President Donald Trump, right, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attend an NFL game between the Washington Commanders and the Detroit Lions at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Md., Nov. 9, 2025.  (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Monday’s appearance at the national championship game marks another high-profile outing for the president, who has attended several major sporting events during his second term.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

In April, Trump sat alongside UFC President Dana White outside the octagon for UFC 314 in Miami and again two months later at UFC 316 in New Jersey. He also attended several events in September, including the Ryder Cup at Bethpage Black in New York and a New York Yankees game on Sept. 11, 24 years after the 9/11 attacks.

Trump waving at Bethpage

President Donald Trump waves to the crowd as he arrives on the first hole on the first day of competition for the Ryder Cup at Bethpage Black. (Brendan Mcdermid/Reuters via Imagn Images)

TRUMP WARNS COLLEGE SPORTS ARE IN ‘BIG TROUBLE’ IN CRYPTIC POST

President Trump has taken a special interest in sports in his second term. 

In December, he warned the current state of name, image and likeness (NIL) was not sustainable and could pose a threat to college athletics, especially sports outside of football. He has also made ensuring the fairness and safety in girls and women’s sports a top priority of his administration.

Donald Trump attends Army-Navy game

President Donald Trump attends the 126th Army-Navy Game between the Army Black Knights and the Navy Midshipmen at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore Dec. 13, 2025. (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Top-seeded Indiana, led by Heisman Trophy winner Fernando Mendoza, will take on Miami at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida, Monday at 7:45 p.m. ET.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending