Business
2026 is the year of obesity pills. Here’s how they could reshape the GLP-1 market
The booming GLP-1 space was built on weekly injections. In 2026, new obesity pills will push the market into its next chapter.
Patients are already getting their hands on the first GLP-1 pill for obesity from Danish drugmaker Novo Nordisk — a once-daily drug that shares the same brand name as its popular injection Wegovy. A GLP-1 pill from the company’s chief rival Eli Lilly isn’t far behind, with a U.S. approval expected within months.
For some people, pills may serve as a more convenient — and potentially cheaper — alternative to today’s blockbuster injections. The cash prices of Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy pill range from $149 to $299 per month, depending on the dose, which is slightly less than the newly lowered cash prices of injections.
While the pills aren’t expected to bring more weight loss than weekly shots, based on separate clinical trials, some health experts say expanding the range of treatments could still be a major win for patients.
Pills could attract new patients to seek obesity treatment for the first time, expanding the broader weight loss and diabetes drug market and potentially boosting sales for Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. The new users may include people who are afraid of needles, as well as patients who could benefit from existing injections but don’t view their condition as severe enough to warrant a weekly shot.
“I think that there are a lot of people out there who have never tried these GLP-1 drugs and are maybe waiting for the pills to come out,” said Dr. Eduardo Grunvald, medical director of the UC San Diego Health Center for Advanced Weight Management. “It’s kind of a natural preference for some people and even some prescribers.”
“Secondly, if you have to pay out of pocket, the pills are going to be a bit less expensive than the injections, so that’s another reason,” he said.
The logo of pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk is displayed in front of its offices in Bagsvaerd, on the outskirts of Copenhagen, Denmark, Nov. 24, 2025.
Tom Little | Reuters
It’s unclear exactly how many people are currently using GLP-1s in the U.S., especially for obesity. But around 1 in 8 adults said they were taking a GLP-1 drug to lose weight or treat another chronic condition as of November, according to a poll from health policy research organization KFF.
Now, pills are emerging as the next battleground for Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, which established the GLP-1 space that some analysts say could be worth almost $100 billion by the 2030s. In August, Goldman Sachs analysts forecast that pills could capture roughly 24% — or about $22 billion — of the global weight-loss drug market by 2030.
Here’s how obesity pills could reshape the space.
Pills could expand the market
Oral drugs may pull new patients into the obesity treatment market.
“I believe that this will quite a bit expand the market,” Novo Nordisk CEO Mike Doustdar told CNBC in late December. “We know from our own family members and circles of friends that there are many people who still would not rather take an injection … for this group of people, having a pill option is important.”
Pills could prompt some people to start obesity treatment because “they think it’s somehow more acceptable or approachable” than an injection, said Dr. Caroline Apovian, co-director of the Center for Weight Management and Wellness at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
That doesn’t mean a pill will be the best fit for everyone. But once patients enter the health-care system for treatment, doctors can guide them through all options – whether that’s an injection, metabolic surgery, or structured diet and exercise programs, Apovian said.
UCSD’s Grunvald said uptake of obesity pills is likely to be driven by primary care physicians, who treat the majority of eligible patients and may be more comfortable prescribing an oral drug.
Grunvald said obesity medicine specialists, who care for only about 5% to 10% of eligible patients, are more likely to continue favoring injections, which appear more effective than pills based on separate clinical trials.
Deborah, a 53-year-old librarian in St. Louis, Missouri, said she is curious about the new Wegovy pill in part because of its convenience factor. She declined to provide her last name due to concerns about stigma associated with GLP-1s.
Deborah said she would consider an oral GLP-1 because she is already accustomed to taking pills for other prescriptions. She said an oral drug would also bring other benefits, like making travel easier because it won’t require refrigeration, like injections do.
She said she is also interested in the potentially lower costs of pills. Deborah has been taking weekly injections of Wegovy since June, and was paying $449 per month in cash before Novo Nordisk lowered that price to $349 per month.
Pills cost slightly less
Cost could be a factor for other patients, too.
Novo Nordisk’s pill appears to have among the lowest cash prices in the market, at $149 per month for the starting dose and $299 per month for the two highest doses. Eli Lilly’s rival pill is expected to have similar pricing for cash-paying patients.
Those users will also be able to access the starting dose of both pills for $149 per month through President Donald Trump‘s direct-to-consumer website, TrumpRx, under a deal both companies struck with his administration in November.
Obesity injections have long been hard for patients to get, due in part to spotty insurance coverage and list prices of roughly $1,000 per month. Both Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly have moved to address those concerns by cutting cash prices for their injectable drugs to less than half that amount.
A combination image shows an injection pen of Zepbound, Eli Lilly’s weight loss drug, and boxes of Wegovy, made by Novo Nordisk.
Hollie Adams | Reuters
Eli Lilly in December said the highest doses of single-dose vials of Zepbound will cost $449 per month for cash-paying patients, while Novo Nordisk in November said nearly all doses of Wegovy will cost $349 per month in cash.
Those prices are closer to the cost of Novo Nordisk’s pill, which may still be expensive for some. But Grunvald said the roughly $150 monthly difference between the highest doses of Zepbound and Novo’s pill “could be a big difference for many people” willing to pay out of pocket.
Patients with insurance coverage for Novo Nordisk’s oral drug can pay as little as $25 per month for the treatment. But pills likely won’t move the needle to boost insurance coverage of GLP-1s for obesity in the U.S.
The direct-to-consumer cash prices of Novo Nordisk’s oral drug are likely “significantly less” than what employers and middlemen called pharmacy benefit managers would pay to cover the drugs, said John Crable, senior vice president of Corporate Synergies, an insurance and employee benefits brokerage and consultancy.
Crable said it is unclear how much the pill will ultimately cost payers such as employers since those prices are not publicly disclosed. But if they mirror injection costs — often higher than $1,000 per month — employers may be reluctant to add the drug to their formularies, he said.
Some companies that already offer coverage of obesity injections could add the pills this year. But Crable said some employers have actually dropped coverage of GLP-1s for obesity in 2026 due to their high costs.
“I don’t see employers being highly motivated to add what is probably going to be another high volume, very high cost drug to their formulary when the direct-to-consumer pricing for it is so much cheaper,” Crable said.
Injections are here to stay
Drugmakers have tried to make a case that patients using injections can switch easily to oral drugs. Eli Lilly in December released data showing that patients who initially took Wegovy or Zepbound shots maintained the majority of their weight loss after switching to the company’s pill.
But Apovian, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, said cost would be the only real reason to move patients who are doing well on injections to a pill.
“If the [cash price] is similar, I always prefer the injectables because I believe that the weight loss is better and the side effects are less,” she said.
Apovian said she wants to see real-world data on how pills perform compared with injections, but separate late-stage trials already offer some clues.
Zepbound has shown average weight loss of more than 20% in late-stage studies. That’s higher than results seen with both the Wegovy injection and pill as well as Eli Lilly’s oral drug in separate trials.
In those same studies, about 7% of patients or less stopped treatment due to side effects from the Zepbound and Wegovy injections.
The Wegovy pill showed similar discontinuation rates, while about 10.3% of patients taking the highest dose of Eli Lilly’s oral drug stopped treatment because of side effects.
Leerink Partners analyst David Risinger said patients with obesity who need to lose a larger percentage of their body weight will likely stick with injections, unless they have a fear of needles.
Pills, he said, could primarily attract new patients who are overweight or mildly obese and want to achieve only “modest” weight loss.
Some patients currently using weekly injections may try pills, Risinger added, though not all will find a daily oral option more convenient.
That includes Karen Galante, 42, of Horsham, Pennsylvania, who is taking a compounded version of semaglutide – the active ingredient in Wegovy – which she said is priced similarly to Novo Nordisk’s new pill.
Galante said she does not plan to switch.
“It’s hard enough for me to remember to take my vitamins every day,” she said. “I like the set-it-and-forget-it of taking one shot a week.”
More than enough room for Novo, Lilly
Risinger said he expects both pills from Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly to “take off like a rocket” this year.
He noted that uptake will be greater for the Wegovy pill initially since Eli Lilly’s drug, orforglipron, is likely still months away from entering the market.
But Risinger said he believes Eli Lilly’s pill will ultimately generate higher sales because patients could consider it more convenient.
Eli Lilly’s orforglipron is a small-molecule drug that is absorbed more easily in the body and doesn’t require dietary restrictions like Novo Nordisk’s pill, which is a peptide medication. Patients are supposed to drink no more than four ounces of water with the Wegovy pill and must wait 30 minutes before eating or drinking anything else each day.
But Novo Nordisk’s CEO Doustdar has argued that those dietary requirements won’t hinder uptake. He told CNBC in December it has not been an issue for the more than a million people who are taking the lower-dose version of the pill for diabetes, marketed as Rybelsus, which entered the market in 2019.
“Simply sip and go, and you’re going to be fine,” Doustdar said. “These people are waking up in the morning and taking their pill with a glass of water, and then they do their normal daily routine half an hour later and move on with their life.”
He also called the company’s drug the “most efficacious pill,” saying that no other products in development have been able to show its same level of weight loss in a late-stage trial.
The highest dose of Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy pill helped patients lose up to 16.6% of their weight on average at 64 weeks in one late-stage study. That’s comparable to the injectable form of the drug.
There are no head-to-head studies directly comparing that pill with Eli Lilly’s. In one of Eli Lilly’s late-stage trials, the highest dose of its pill helped patients lose 12.4% of their body weight on average at 72 weeks.
Despite that difference in efficacy, Risinger said the two pills are viewed as promoting roughly similar levels of weight loss. Some patients may also not need to take the highest dose of either pill, he added.
In an August note, Goldman analysts said they expect Eli Lilly’s pill to have a 60% share — or roughly $13.6 billion — of the daily oral segment of the market in 2030. They expect Novo Nordisk’s oral semaglutide to have a 21% share — or around $4 billion — of that segment. The analysts said they expect the remaining 19% slice to go to other emerging pills.
More competitors emerge
Other drugmakers are racing to bring their own oral options to the market, including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Structure Therapeutics and Viking Therapeutics.
Risinger highlighted Structure’s daily oral GLP-1, which will enter phase three trials later this year. Shares of Structure soared more than 100% on Dec. 9 after it released midstage data showing that its pill, aleniglipron, helped patients with obesity lose more than 11% of their weight at 36 weeks, when adjusted for placebo.
Additional trial data showed that a higher dose of the pill could deliver greater efficacy – more than 15% weight loss – surpassing the results seen with the highest dose of Eli Lilly’s orforglipron. Still, the tolerability data, or how well patients tolerated Structure’s treatment, appeared to be worse than that of Eli Lilly’s pill.
In a release at the time, Structure CEO Raymond Stevens said the pill could be “potentially best-in-class” for an oral small-molecule GLP-1.
Risinger said he expects that pill and another oral GLP-1 from AstraZeneca could launch as soon as late 2028.
He said potential pills that are taken weekly, as opposed to daily, and have “compelling profiles could tilt the balance more towards orals” in the market.
Risinger pointed to privately held Verdiva Bio, which is developing several oral peptide treatments designed to be taken once a week. That company has an ongoing phase two trial on an oral GLP-1.
Business
The FTSE 100 has hit a record high. Is now the time to start investing?
Kevin PeacheyCost of living correspondent
Getty ImagesAs the new year got into its stride, so did the UK’s index of leading shares.
The FTSE 100 climbed above 10,000 points for the first time since it was created in 1984, cheering investors – and the chancellor, who wants more of us to move money out of cash savings and into investments.
The index tracks the performance of the 100 largest companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and rose by more than a fifth in 2025.
But with many people still struggling with everyday costs, and with talk of some stocks being overvalued, does the FTSE’s success really make it a good time to encourage first-time investors?
Investing v saving
People can invest their money in many different ways and in different things. Various apps and platforms have made it easy to do.
Crucially, the value of investments can go up and down. Invest £100 and there is no guarantee that the investment is still worth £100 after a month, a year, or 10 years.
But, in general, long-term investments can be lucrative. The rise of the FTSE 100 is evidence of that. Shareholders may also receive dividends, which they could take as income or reinvest.
For years, the advice has been to treat investments as a long-term strategy. Give it time, and your pot of money will grow much bigger than if it was in a savings account.
In contrast, cash savings are much more steady and safe. The amount of interest varies between account providers, but savers know what returns will be. Savings rates have held up quite well over the last year, but interest rates are generally thought to be on the way down.
Savings accounts are popular when putting money aside for emergencies, or for holidays, a wedding or a car – for one predominant reason: you can usually withdraw the money quickly and easily.
“It is important that everyone has savings. It gives you access when you need it,” says Anna Bowes, savings expert at financial advisers The Private Office (TPO).
“It means you do not need to cash out your investments at the wrong time.”
Getty ImagesEvangelists for investing agree that savings are an important part of the mix for everyone managing their money.
“People starting out should have a cash buffer in case of emergency before going into investing,” says Jema Arnold, a voluntary non-executive director at the UK Individual Shareholders Society (ShareSoc).
One in 10 people have no cash savings, and another 21% have less than £1,000 to draw on in an emergency, according to the regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
But Arnold and others point out that cash is not without risk either. As time goes on, the spending power of savings is eroded by the rising cost of living, unless the savings account interest rate beats inflation.
Risk and reward
Our brains make a judgement about risk and reward thousands of times every day. We consider the risk of crossing the road against the reward of getting to the other side and so on.
With money, those who are more risk-averse have tended to stick with savings, while others have moved into investments. It also helps if you have money you can afford to lose.
It is worth remembering that millions of people already have money for their pension invested, although it is often managed for them and they may not pay much attention to it.
The FCA says seven million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings could receive better returns through investing.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has advocated more risk-taking from consumers. For those with the money, she says the benefit of long-term investing for them, and the UK economy as a whole, is clear.
She is altering rules on tax-free Isas (Individual Savings Accounts) in a much-debated move aimed at encouraging investing.
It is also why, in a couple of months’ time, we are all going to be blitzed with an advertising campaign (funded by the investment industry) telling us to give investing some thought.
It will be a modern version of the Tell Sid campaign of the 1980s, which encouraged people to invest in the newly privatised British Gas.
British GasBut is this a good time for such a campaign? Back then, lots of people invested in British Gas for a relatively quick profit.
Invest now, and there is a chance the value of your investment could take a short-term hit.
A host of commentators have suggested an AI tech bubble is about to burst. In other words, they say there is a chance the value of companies heavily into AI has been over-inflated and will plunge – meaning anyone investing in those companies will see the value of those investments plunge too.
It isn’t only commentators. The Bank of England has warned of a “sharp correction” in the value of major tech companies. America’s top banker Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of US bank JP Morgan, said he was worried, and Google boss Sundar Pichai told the BBC there was “irrationality” in the current AI boom.
In truth, nobody really knows if and when this will happen.
New rules on getting investment help
All of this may leave people keen for some help, and the regulator has come up with plans to allow banks to offer some assistance.
Currently financial advice can be expensive, and regulated advisers may not bother with anyone who hasn’t got tens of thousands of pounds to invest.
Financial influencers have tried to fill the gap on social media. Some have been accused of promoting financial schemes and risky trading strategies with glitzy get-rich-quick promises in front of fancy cars – but without authorisation or any explanation of the risks involved.
Some first-time investors have turned to AI for tips. Some are vulnerable to fraudsters offering investment opportunities that are too good to be true.
Nearly one in five people turned to family, friends or social media for help making financial decisions, according to a survey by the FCA.
So, from April, registered banks and other financial firms will be allowed to offer targeted support, preferably for free. It will stop short of individually tailored advice, which can only be provided by an authorised financial adviser for a fee. But it will allow them to make investment and pensions recommendations to customers based on what similar groups of people could do with their money.
It is a big change in money guidance but, as with investments, no guarantees that it will be successful.
Business
Budget 2026: Punjab, Telangana flag higher fiscal burden under VB-G RAM G; seek more central funds – The Times of India
Opposition-ruled states Punjab and Telangana on Saturday sought additional fiscal support from the Centre in the Union Budget 2026-27, arguing that the proposed Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G) will place a heavier financial burden on states due to its revised cost-sharing formula, PTI reported.The demands were raised at the pre-Budget meeting chaired by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, which was attended by finance ministers of states and Union Territories, along with Union Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary. The meeting also saw participation from the Governor of Manipur, chief ministers of Delhi, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya and Sikkim, and deputy chief ministers of several states, including Telangana.Opposition-ruled states said the changes to the rural employment framework weaken the employment guarantee and go against the spirit of cooperative federalism.Parliament last month passed the VB-G RAM G Bill, replacing the two-decade-old Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). Under the new scheme, the Centre will bear 60 per cent of the cost and states 40 per cent, compared with the 90:10 funding pattern under MGNREGA.Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema strongly opposed the proposed changes, saying the new framework dilutes the employment guarantee while shifting a significant financial burden to states.“Proposed MGNREGA changes weaken employment guarantee and burden states,” Cheema said at the meeting, calling for the restoration of the original demand-driven structure and funding pattern of the scheme.Telangana Finance Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka said the Union government had replaced MGNREGA with VB-G RAM G without consulting states. He noted that the shift from a 90:10 to 60:40 funding ratio would further strain state finances.He also pointed out that any additional man-days beyond the normative allocation would now have to be borne by states, which would create a serious obstacle in providing demand-based work to job seekers.“This is entirely against the spirit of cooperative federalism and starving them of funds for capital outlay, which is essential for maintaining growth momentum,” Vikramarka said.The Telangana finance minister also suggested that surcharges on income tax and corporation tax be credited to a non-lapsable infrastructure fund, from which states could receive grants for infrastructure development. Alternatively, he said, surcharges should be merged with basic tax rates to expand the divisible pool of central taxes.On GST reforms, Vikramarka said GST 2.0 may boost demand but questioned its sustainability, warning that states’ revenues could fall due to rate reductions. He called for a suitable mechanism to compensate states for any revenue loss.Punjab also sought a special fiscal package, citing the “double whammy” of border tensions and floods in 2025. On GST, Cheema said Punjab is facing an annual revenue loss of nearly Rs 6,000 crore following GST 2.0 and pressed for a predictable GST stabilisation or compensation mechanism for states.
Business
CY26 buying, macros propel PSX further higher | The Express Tribune
Shares of 324 companies were traded. At the end of the day, 90 stocks closed higher, 211 declined and 23 remained unchanged. PHOTO: FILE
KARACHI:
Pakistan’s equity market opened the new year on a strong footing as the benchmark KSE-100 index extended its bullish momentum in the second week, climbing 5,375 points, or 3% week-on-week (WoW), to close at 184,410.
The rally was triggered by renewed buying in heavyweight stocks amid improved market participation, supportive macroeconomic indicators, and positive company-specific developments, while easing yields in the latest T-bill auction and robust remittances further strengthened investor sentiment. On a day-on-day basis, the bullish momentum at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) continued unabated on Monday as the KSE-100 index surged past 182k, closing at 182,408, up 3,373 points (+1.88%).
On Tuesday too, the market’s surge continued, when the index gained 2,654 points (+1.45%) to close at 185,602. The powerful and sustained bullish trend remained intact on Wednesday as well, with the bourse maintaining its full strength and closing at a fresh all-time high of 186,518. In the initial five sessions of CY26, the index added a massive 12,464 points (+7.2%).
However, following the sharp rally, the PSX witnessed its first profit-taking session on Thursday, where the index closed at 185,543, down 976 points (-0.52%). On Friday, the PSX took a breather and the KSE-100 remained volatile, swinging in both directions before closing at 184,410, down 1,133 points (-0.61%). Despite the decline, the CY26-to-date gains stood strong at 5.95%, equivalent to a rise of 10,356 points.
Arif Habib Limited’s (AHL) weekly report noted that the KSE-100 index climbed from 179,035 points last week to 184,410 in the outgoing week, gaining 5,375 points (+3%), supported by a rally in heavyweight stocks driven by new year buying, and positive company-specific news and updates.
Among economic developments, the government through a T-bill auction raised Rs979.3 billion against the target of Rs850 billion. Yields were down across all tenors by 28.6 to 33.8 basis points. Participation remained strong at Rs2,554.6 billion.
Worker remittances reached $3.6 billion in Dec’25, marking a 17% year-on-year (YoY) increase. Cumulatively, 1HFY26 remittances clocked in at $19.7 billion, up 11% YoY.
AHL mentioned that tariff rebasing, following shift from financial year to calendar year, was likely to pull the power purchase price down by Rs0.51 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) in CY26 versus FY26. Cotton arrivals in factories remained stable as of end-Dec’25. In Punjab, cotton arrivals declined 4% in CY25, while Sindh arrivals improved by 4% YoY. However, total production are estimated at 6.8 million bales in FY26, representing a significant 33% shortfall against projections.
Meanwhile, the central government debt stood at Rs77.5 trillion as of Nov’25 compared with Rs70.4 trillion in Nov’24, up 10.2% YoY and 0.7% month-on-month, AHL added.
JS Global’s Syed Danyal Hussain, in his report, said that the benchmark KSE-100 index extended its bullish run in the second week of the year, closing at 184,410, up 3% WoW. The rally was largely led by banks, which contributed 57% to index gains, while cement stocks (8%) and auto shares (5%) provided limited support. Market participation improved notably, with average daily traded volumes rising 25% WoW.
On the macro front, he said, Pakistan recorded monthly remittances of $3.6 billion in Dec’25, reflecting a 17% YoY increase. Meanwhile, total public debt declined by Rs345 billion to Rs77.5 trillion in 5MFY26, largely supported by the transfer of State Bank’s profits to the government.
In policy developments, the government was exploring options to seek relaxations from the IMF ahead of the FY27 budget, with key proposals including a phased reduction in super tax over the next four years and lower power tariffs to enhance competitiveness.
Separately, the gas-sector circular debt climbed to Rs3.2 trillion, driven mainly by a sharp rise in late payment surcharges (Rs1.45 trillion). In the T-bill auction, the government raised Rs979 billion against the target of Rs850 billion, with yields falling by 29-33 basis points across different tenors. SBP’s reserves rose $141 million to $16 billion.
-
Sports6 days agoVAR review: Why was Wirtz onside in Premier League, offside in Europe?
-
Entertainment3 days agoDoes new US food pyramid put too much steak on your plate?
-
Politics3 days agoUK says provided assistance in US-led tanker seizure
-
Entertainment3 days agoWhy did Nick Reiner’s lawyer Alan Jackson withdraw from case?
-
Sports6 days agoSteelers escape Ravens’ late push, win AFC North title
-
Politics6 days agoChina’s birth-rate push sputters as couples stay child-free
-
Entertainment6 days agoMinnesota Governor Tim Walz to drop out of 2026 race, official confirmation expected soon
-
Sports6 days agoFACI invites applications for 2026 chess development project | The Express Tribune

