Queen Camilla has shown her full support to King Charles as stays determined about an important health decision, but behind the scenes, it’s a different story.

On Friday, the monarch had addressed the nation to uplift their spirits and shared the “good news” that the frequency of his treatment can be reduced. He credited his medical team, which he dubbed the “community of care”, that helped him in his cancer journey.

Buckingham Palace had shared how the monarch had been pleased by the positive reception of the news. Despite that, a report by The Sunday Times claims that Camilla wanted the diagnosis to remain private so that Charles could get treated “quietly”.

The update on Charles’s cancer treatment comes almost two years after his diagnosis. The Palace had officially made the announcement in February 2024 which had left the world in shock.

Although, time has proved to change Camilla’s mind over the matter. The source cited by the outlet suggest that “both of them now unequivocally think that being so open has been hugely positive”.

It is not the first time that Camilla’s disproval of her husband was laid bare. Reports had shared that the Queen Consort had a constant worry about her husband as he continued to take on royal duties and engagements.

The King had refused to slow don and Camilla commented that his recovery would be quicker is he “behaved himself” referring to the monarch’s workload.

• Conviction of ex-ISI chief strictly confined to his individual actions.
• Growing expectations of accountability beyond military: sources
• They add judges, bureaucrats, politicians may come under scrutiny.

ISLAMABAD: Following the conviction of former Inter-Services Intelligence director general (ISI DG) Lt Gen (retd) Faiz Hamid, certain political and media circles have begun speculating about the possibility of legal action against former army chief General (retd) Qamar Javed Bajwa.

However, informed sources have dismissed such claims, stating that there is neither any probe nor any proceeding underway against Gen (retd) Bajwa.

Sources said the gossip being circulated in some quarters is baseless. According to them, the military accountability process that culminated in the conviction of former spymaster was strictly evidence-based and confined to his individual actions, with no material linking the former army chief to the case.

Instead, sources indicate that after the army concluded the accountability process against one of its own senior officers, expectations are growing that accountability could extend beyond the military domain.

Judges, bureaucrats, politicians and even media persons who allegedly played roles in the past political engineering or overstepped constitutional and legal limits may come under scrutiny in the days to come.

A similar position had earlier been conveyed by the military spokesperson. In a last year press conference, the ISPR DG, while responding to questions arising from ex-ISI chief’s arrest and court martial proceedings, made it clear that the military accountability system is transparent and does not operate on allegations or assumptions, but on solid evidence.

When asked whether former prime minister Imran Khan could be tried under the Army Act in connection with the Gen (retd) Faiz case, the ISPR DG had termed the question hypothetical and said the matter was sub judice. 

However, he underlined that under military law, if any individual is found to have used a person falling under the jurisdiction of the Army Act for personal or political gains, and evidence exists, the law would take its own course.

The military spokesman was also questioned about the role of former army chief Gen (retd) Bajwa and former ISI DG Lt Gen (retd) Naveed Mukhtar in the appointment and promotion of Gen (retd) Faiz. In response, the ISPR DG I emphasised that it would be unfair to link others to the actions of an individual who, for his personal interests and at the behest of certain political elements, crossed his constitutional and legal limits.

These remarks, coupled with the absence of any evidence against Gen (retd) Bajwa or Gen (retd) Mukhtar, clearly suggest that there is no case against the former army chief in the Gen (retd) Faiz matter.

Sources maintain that while there is no move against Gen (retd) Bajwa, the post-Faiz scenario should open the door for a broader accountability process aimed at those in civilian institutions who allegedly facilitated or benefited from unconstitutional conduct in the past. 

Such accountability, they say, would be essential to ensure that responsibility is fixed across the board and not selectively applied.

Originally published in The News