Politics
US adviser Navarro says India’s Russian crude buying has to stop

- India’s Russian crude purchases funding Moscow war: Navarro.
- India urged to act like strategic partner of the US.
- New Delhi acts as “global clearinghouse” for Russian oil: adviser.
White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said India’s purchases of Russian crude were funding Moscow’s war in Ukraine and had to stop, adding that New Delhi was “now cozying up to both Russia and China”.
“If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one,” Navarro wrote in an opinion piece published in the Financial Times.
India’s Foreign Ministry has previously said the country is being unfairly singled out for buying Russian oil while the United States and European Union continue to purchase goods from Russia. US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods earlier this month, citing New Delhi’s continued purchases of Russian oil, taking total tariffs on imports from India to 50%.
“India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs,” Navarro said.
The adviser also said it was risky to transfer cutting-edge US military capabilities to India as New Delhi was “now cozying up to both Russia and China.”
Longtime rivals China and India are quietly and cautiously strengthening ties against the backdrop of Trump’s unpredictable approach to both. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping at the end of the month while Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi will visit India from Monday for talks on the disputed border between the two countries.
A planned visit by US trade negotiators to New Delhi from August 25-29 has been called off, a source said over the weekend, delaying talks on a proposed trade agreement and dashing hopes of relief from additional US tariffs on Indian goods from August 27.
Politics
Dubai warns of jail, hefty fine for spreading rumours

DUBAI: Dubai Police have issued a fresh warning that spreading rumours, false information or sharing content that contradicts official announcements is a criminal offence punishable by up to two years in prison and a fine of at least 200,000 dirhams.
In a statement on Wednesday, Dubai Police urged the public not to circulate images or information except those released through official channels by the Government of Dubai.
Authorities said publishing or forwarding unverified material, particularly content that could incite panic or fear among the public, would be treated as a violation of the law.
“Your social media post may seem ordinary to you, but for others it could be intelligence,” officials said, warning users to act responsibly online.
Under the regulations, offenders face a minimum of two years’ imprisonment and a fine starting from 200,000 dirhams (approximately Rs 15.2 million).
Politics
Israel Strikes Hezbollah Ally’s Office in Sidon

Israel carried out an airstrike on a headquarters belonging to Al-Jamaa Al-Islamiya, an ally of Hezbollah and Hamas, in the southern Lebanese city of Sidon, according to Lebanese state media.
Reports said the strike targeted the group’s office in the coastal city on Tuesday.
Rescue teams and emergency responders rushed to the site following the air raid.
Escalating Regional Tensions
The attack comes amid heightened tensions across the Middle East following expanding military confrontations in the region.
Israel has previously accused Hezbollah and allied groups of coordinating activities with Hamas.
Sidon, one of Lebanon’s major coastal cities, had largely avoided heavy bombardment during the last Israel-Hezbollah conflict.
Background
A November 2024 ceasefire had sought to end the previous war between Israel and Hezbollah.
However, the latest strike indicates renewed tensions and the possibility of further escalation in southern Lebanon.
Authorities have not yet released detailed casualty figures from the attack.
Politics
Trump, Rubio offer conflicting reasons for US entry into Iran war

- Trump claims Iran was about to strike first, contradicting Rubio.
- Conservatives criticise US involvement in Iran war.
- White House in damage control over conflicting war rationales.
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he ordered US forces to join Israel’s attack on Iran because he believed Iran was about to strike first, contradicting the rationale offered a day earlier by his secretary of state for how the war began.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters on Monday that the US launched the attack because of fears that Iran would retaliate in response to planned Israeli action against Tehran.
“We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action; we knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties,” Rubio said.
Trump rejected suggestions that Israel pushed the US into the conflict, as his administration gave varying accounts and faced criticism from some supporters and Democrats who accused him of launching a “war of choice.”
“I might have forced their (Israel’s) hand,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office as he met with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. “We were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. If we didn’t do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that.”
Iran has said the US assault was unprovoked.
Several prominent conservative commentators ratcheted up their criticism of the Iran attacks, arguing Rubio’s comments indicated that Israel, not the Trump administration, was calling the shots.
“So he’s flat out telling us that we’re in a war with Iran because Israel forced our hand,” conservative podcaster Matt Walsh wrote of Rubio to his 4 million followers on X. “This is basically the worst possible thing he could have said.”
Megyn Kelly, a conservative podcaster, told her audience that she had doubts about Trump’s decision to strike Iran.
“Our government’s job is not to look out for Iran or for Israel. It’s to look out for us. And this feels very much to me like it is clearly Israel’s war,” Kelly said in remarks aired prior to Rubio’s comments.
The criticism from Trump’s right flank comes as his Republican Party is fighting to hold on to control of the US Congress in the November midterm elections.
Damage control
The debate over the run-up to the war has forced the White House into damage control.
Trump on Tuesday took questions from reporters in a public setting for the first time since the US-Israeli air war began three days earlier. He previously discussed the attacks in two videos, one-on-one interviews with select journalists and brief remarks on Monday at the White House.
The president said he believed Iran was on the brink of launching attacks, presenting no evidence to support his view, after US negotiations with Iran last Thursday in Geneva. Iran had described those talks as positive, with more planned in the days ahead.
“It’s something that had to be done,” said Trump, who did not make a detailed case for war against Iran before it began.
Rubio, pressed on Tuesday about his prior comment during a visit to Capitol Hill, told reporters: “The bottom line is this: The president determined we were not going to get hit first. It’s that simple, guys.”
Two senior Trump administration officials held a conference call on Tuesday with reporters to describe events leading up to military operations, in particular the Geneva talks with Iranian officials held by US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and mediated by Oman.
The two officials said Witkoff and Kushner repeatedly pressed Iran to give up uranium enrichment. Instead, Iran presented a plan that would allow the Iranians to enrich uranium at higher percentages at the Tehran Research Reactor in northern Iran, they said.
The US envoys felt the Iranians were engaging in delay tactics, according to the officials.
“They were unwilling to give up the building blocks of what they needed to preserve in order to get to a (nuclear) bomb,” one official said.
Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon.
The envoys reported back to Trump, telling him it might have been possible to get a nuclear agreement similar to the one that former President Barack Obama’s team and world powers negotiated with Iran in 2015 but that it would take months.
Trump ordered US forces into action the next day, and the strikes began on Saturday.
-
Business5 days agoIndia Us Trade Deal: Fresh look at India-US trade deal? May be ‘rebalanced’ if circumstances change, says Piyush Goyal – The Times of India
-
Business1 week agoHouseholds set for lower energy bills amid price cap shake-up
-
Politics6 days agoWhat are Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities?
-
Politics6 days agoUS arrests ex-Air Force pilot for ‘training’ Chinese military
-
Sports1 week agoTop 50 USMNT players of 2026, ranked by club form: USMNT Player Performance Index returns
-
Business6 days agoAttock Cement’s acquisition approved | The Express Tribune
-
Fashion6 days agoPolicy easing drives Argentina’s garment import surge in 2025
-
Sports6 days agoSri Lanka’s Shanaka says constant criticism has affected players’ mental health
