Connect with us

Business

A decade on from when the Wylfa nulear turbines fell silent on Anglesey

Published

on

A decade on from when the Wylfa nulear turbines fell silent on Anglesey


Gareth Wyn WilliamsBBC Wales

Getty Images Waves crashing near the Wylfa nuclear power station in northern AngleseyGetty Images

In 2015, Wylfa’s last reactor was closed down and it began the long process of being decommissioned, ending 44 years of generation

When the turbines fell silent at Wylfa exactly ten years ago today, Wales lost its last source of nuclear energy.

But, for Anglesey, the decade since has been characterised by job losses, stagnant investment and an economy still trying to replace one of the island’s largest employers.

Opened in 1971, it was the second Magnox power station in Wales after Trawsfynydd came online six years earlier, with seawater an ideal coolant due to its location on Anglesey’s northern coast.

With the same period also marking the opening of Anglesey Aluminium in nearby Holyhead, it was a time of industrial upheaval which brought long-term, skilled employment to a Welsh-speaking island long dominated by agriculture.

But while the plant remained operational beyond its planned lifespan, by the early 2010s it was among the oldest operating reactors in the world and the decision was made to shut down the last of the two reactors on 30 December 2015.

Gron Williams, from Holyhead, spent his entire working life at Wylfa.

Now 76, he started his apprenticeship as a teenager in September 1965 – six years before Wylfa became fully operational.

“You saw this big hole being dug, the big tunnels going out under the sea, you saw these big steel spheres being constructed by the welders at the time,” he said.

“They were actually putting the domes on and pouring the concrete around the vessels… that was very exciting.”

A man with short grey hair and glasses, wearing a blue polo shirt and beige jacket, He is stood on a grassy verge, with a view over a harbour behind him,

Gron Williams spent his entire working life at Wylfa, starting as an apprentice in 1965

“There was change happening because you saw more wealth coming to the island,” Mr Williams added.

“You saw people being able to afford to buy their own homes, you saw people being able to start businesses.”

But, despite extensions to the plant’s life, the second reactor was shut down in 2012.

Then on 30 December 2015, Reactor 1 followed, ending 44 years of operation at the site.

Mr Williams, who by then had worked up to become shift charge engineer, was in the central control room when the off button was finally pressed.

Nuclear Restoration Services (NRS) A black and white aerial photo of Wylfa under construction. Large piles of scaffolding are visible, surrounding a variety of industrial buildings.Nuclear Restoration Services (NRS)

Construction at Wylfa started in 1963 with the site becoming operational in 1971

Around 500 people were still working at the site at the time and Mr Williams described it as “the end of an era”, with jobs inevitably set to dwindle as the plant moved to the decommissioning phase.

He added Welsh was the language most commonly spoken at the site, but the failure to secure a replacement before the end of generation at Wylfa meant Anglesey “paid the price”.

“It’s lost the investment that should have been coming into the island to help with the infrastructure, with the requirements for people to be trained, for people to be able to live here and to continue to use their own language,” he said.

But the end of electricity generation did not mean the end of all work at the site.

After initially removing nuclear fuel from the reactors and transferring it to secure storage, it will move into its “care and maintenance” phase.

Eventually, several decades down the line, all remaining buildings will be removed.

Stuart Law at Wylfa, he is stood on the right of the image smiling. He has short brown hair, a black suit jacket, light blue shirt and dark blue tie. Behind him is a poster showing the change to Wylfa, with the title "A journey of innovation".

Site Director Stuart Law started working at Wylfa in 1993 after a spell at Trawsfynydd, another former Magnox plant in north Wales

But while current job numbers remain far short of its operational heyday, Site Director Stuart Law expects the number of people working there to remain relatively stable for years to come, adding 99.9% of all of radiation had gone from the site.

“We’re getting onto the other hazards, so the removal of asbestos and buildings that we don’t need.

“There are 43 structures that we’ve actually been able to remove from the site.

“We employ nearly 200 people who work for Nuclear Restoration Services (NRS), and there’s another 60 people who are pretty well full-time on site with contracting organisations. [We’re] a major employer, and we take part in that community as well.”

Ffion Morris stood in front of Wylfa. It is a head shot of her. She has a black puffa coat and a is looking at the camera. Her dark hair is a little windswept.

Ffion Morris is the third generation of her family to work at Wylfa, having done so while the site was operational and now through its decommissioning

Ffion Morris, the site’s engineering and maintenance manager, also worked at the site when it was operational and continues to during its decommissioning.

“Every day is quite different,” she said.

“Those days when we were generating it was very much a steady state, the mission was obviously to get gigawatts down into the grid into people’s homes.

“Now it’s making sure that we can ethically and morally decommission this site to pass on to future generations.

“I was here when the reactor was switched off. There was that kind of quiet silence… knowing how many thousands of people have gone through that gate.

“It’s all about the relationships that have been created on this site.”

Rolls-Royce An computer generated artists impression of the what the site will look like. A silver building surrounded by green area, trees and a car park which sits in front of it.
Rolls-Royce

The Rolls-Royce designed small modular reactors could power three million homes, and have been backed by a £2.5bn investment from the UK government

But while many now seek further detail on the proposals, scepticism towards nuclear remains among others on the island and beyond.

Linda Rogers, who lives in Llangoed, is a member of People Against Wylfa B (PAWB) and has spent decades campaigning against new nuclear developments at the site.

She is adamant the original Wylfa plant should represent the last nuclear generation in Wales.

“The 40 years that we had of Wylfa has left us as still one of the poorest areas in Wales.”

Linda Rogers at her home. She looks at the camera. Her long white her falls on her left shoulder and she has a grey blazer and white shirt on. Behind her is a Welsh dresser with a variety of ornaments displayed, including plates and framed pictures.

Linda Rogers has fought for decades against another development at Wylfa

“We have seen two major developments in those 10 years – one is a massive roll-out of renewables, and then on the other side the absolute disaster which are the attempts to bring online nuclear at Hinckley and at Sizewell, massive overruns and massive cost.”

She feels investment should be concentrated on technologies such as tidal energy, as proposed by Morlais off the western coast of Anglesey.

“We should be putting our money and our skills into sustainable development.

“In 2024, 90% of new electricity was generated by renewables, so the potential is there and growing.”

But local councillor Aled Morris Jones, who also chairs the Wylfa site stakeholder group, says the proposal to build SMR’s at Wylfa remains the best economic hope for the area.

A report by the council last year stated that north Anglesey “desperately needed investment”, with people of working age leaving in droves due to a lack of work, housing and opportunities.

With twice as many people over 50 as there are between the ages of 25 and 49, the local economy is “fragile”.

And with many youngsters deciding to leave, only four other areas in England and Wales have seen a bigger drop in birth rates than Anglesey.

“We can’t look back, all we can do is look to the future,” said Jones, adding the UK government’s investment brought “certainty, confidence and optimism”.

Aled Morris Jones stood in front of a wall. It is a head and shoulders shot. He is balding and has a blue zip up sweater on, over a light blue shirt.

Aled Morris Jones has for years advocated the economic benefits of another nuclear development on the island

While any SMRs at the site are at least decade away, Jones said local people needed more detail on the timescales.

“I think the important thing is tangible milestones.

“By what period the development consent order [planning application] goes in, by what period the final investment decision goes in… the important thing is to keep the community here in north Anglesey informed at all times.”

As Wales marks ten years without nuclear power generation, Wylfa’s legacy remains contested.

But it is likely that whatever happens next on the site will help shape how that legacy is ultimately judged.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Elon Musk-Sam Altman trial: Tech billionaires take their toxic AI row to court

Published

on

Elon Musk-Sam Altman trial: Tech billionaires take their toxic AI row to court



The battle between the AI big hitters has largely played out on social media. Now it is coming to the courtroom.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Shell strikes £12.1 billion deal to buy Canadian energy firm

Published

on

Shell strikes £12.1 billion deal to buy Canadian energy firm



Shell has agreed a 16.4 billion US dollar (£12.1 billion) deal to buy Canadian energy firm ARC Resources in a bid to boost its gas production and reserves.

The British energy giant said the acquisition will strengthen its resource base “for decades to come”.

It will also strengthen the business’s presence in North America, where it already operates gas plants.

The deal will combine ARC’s more than 1.5 million net acres of land with Shell’s approximately 440,000 in the Montney gas resource in Canada.

It will increase Shell’s production growth rate from 1% to 4% through to 2030, compared with 2025, according to the firm.

Shell’s chief executive Wael Sawan said acquiring the “high quality, low-cost” energy business “strengthens our resource base for decades to come”.

He added: “We are accessing uniquely positioned assets and welcoming colleagues that bring deep expertise which, combined with Shell’s strong basin level performance, provides a compelling proposition for shareholders.

“This establishes Canada as a heartland for Shell while furthering our strategy to deliver more value with less emissions.”

Shell has been carrying out a new growth strategy focused on extracting more oil and gas, moving from a focus on green energy and reducing spending on renewables.

It hopes the shift will support production targets and drive greater returns for investors.

The announcement comes a few weeks after Shell said it had cut its gas production outlook for the first quarter of 2026 after being affected by the conflict in the Middle East.

The energy giant trimmed its guidance for integrated gas production after volumes from Qatar were particularly affected during recent attacks.

The deal will see ARC’s shareholders receive 8.20 Canadian dollars (£4.50) and about 0.4 Shell shares for each ARC share.

Including about 2.8 billion US dollars (£2.1 billion) in debt that Shell will take on, the acquisition is valued at about 16.4 billion US dollars (£12.1 billion).

It is expected to complete in the second half of 2026, subject to shareholder, court and regulatory approvals.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

BP profits more than double as oil trading booms amid Iran war

Published

on

BP profits more than double as oil trading booms amid Iran war


BP has come under fire after revealing profits more than doubled in the first three months of the year, thanks to the soaring cost of crude caused by the Iran war.

Chief executive Meg O’Neill praised the quarter as sending the firm “in the right direction” and “strengthening the balance sheet” – but critics have labelled the energy giant’s revenues as “horrifying” as “millions suffer the fallout” from war.

The FTSE 100 firm revealed its preferred profit measure – underlying replacement cost profit – surged by over 130% to a better-than-expected $3.2bn (£2.4bn) in the first quarter, up from $1.38bn (£1.02bn) a year earlier and $1.54bn (£1.13bn) in the previous three months. Most analysts had expected first-quarter profits of $2.67bn (£1.97bn).

Campaigners accused the group of profiting at the expense of households, who have seen fuel prices rocket at the pumps and are set to see energy bills jump higher once more when the price cap is next updated on July 1.

The price of oil has risen from the mid-$60s range in February to over $100 now, spiking close to $120 several times during the course of the Iran war.

Patrick Galey, head of news investigations at campaigning organisation Global Witness, said: “It is horrifying to see BP’s profits grow as millions suffer the fallout from the US-Israel war on Iran. Unfortunately we’ve been here before – when Russia invaded Ukraine four years ago we saw big oil firms make bumper profits from spiralling fuel costs.  

“As oil prices drive up bills once again, it’s clear that fossil fuel companies don’t enhance affordability or energy security, they make life worse. They destroy the climate, push up the cost of living, and rake in billions in profit while innocent civilians die.

“It’s well overdue that we make oil companies pay for the damage their doing. If they broke it, they need to fix it. It’s clear they can afford to. BP profits, we all pay.”

Mike Childs, head of science, policy and research at Friends of the Earth, added: “Just as we saw in 2022 following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, fossil fuel giants are quids in when global instability drastically inflates fuel prices.

Most analysts had expected first-quarter profits of 2.67 billion dollars (£1.97 billion) (PA)

“But again, it’s ordinary people who pay the price when soaring energy prices threaten to plunge the UK into an even deeper cost-of-living crisis.”

The End Fuel Poverty Coalition called for a windfall tax on firms profiting from the Iran-related energy crisis.

The campaign group’s co-ordinator Simon Francis said: “These astronomical profits are a startling reminder that when conflict drives up the price of oil and gas, energy companies profit and households pay.”

BP’s new chief executive Meg O’Neill, who took over at the helm on April 1, said the group was ensuring fuel supplies are met across the UK.

She said: “The teams across BP are playing their part to keep oil, gas and refined products flowing during an incredibly challenging time – focused on maintaining safe, reliable and cost-efficient operations.”

She added: “We are working with customers and governments to get fuel where it’s needed, helping minimise disruption and the impact it can have on people’s lives.”

Ms O’Neill took over from Murray Auchincloss, who himself served only two years in the role after succeeeding Bernard Looney’s three-year tenure. Prior to the recent regular changes, Bob Dudley spent a full decade in the job up to 2020.

BP have struggled with strategy direction and the transition to clean energy, first doubling down on their green plan before an abrupt about-face turn.

In share price terms, the results saw BP rise 2.5 per cent in early trading on Tuesday, adding to a surge of more than 28 per cent in the past three months alone, as investors watched a soaring oil price and predicted the profits to come.

“In February, BP announced it was halting share buybacks as weak oil prices hurt profitability. How times change,” said Freetrade’s investment writer, Duncan Ferris.

“The firm has been among the best-performing supermajors since the escalation of conflict in Iran. Higher oil prices, and the opportunities they offer to the company’s traders, have breathed life into a stock battered by faltering low-carbon projects and investor unrest.”

Oil prices have raced higher since the US-Israel war on Iran started on February 28 and are now more than 60% up so far this year.

Brent crude reached close to 120 dollars a barrel at one stage and, despite falling back, is still above the 100 dollars level as peace talks falter and amid fears over a looming global energy supply crisis.

BP’s update showed its customers and products division – including its oil trading unit – reported profits of 2.5 billion (£1.84 billion), compared with 1.4 billion dollars (£1.03 billion) in the previous quarter and just 103 million dollars (£76.2 million) a year ago as traders were able to capitalise on highly volatile oil prices.

Additional reporting by PA



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending