Connect with us

Business

Two charged after collapse of funeral firm Safe Hands affected 46,000 people

Published

on

Two charged after collapse of funeral firm Safe Hands affected 46,000 people


Getty Images Stock photo shows white flowers being placed on a wooden coffin by people attending a funeral outdoors.Getty Images

The Serious Fraud Office said the charges were a “critical step” in its investigations

Two people have been charged following the collapse of a pre-paid funeral firm that left tens of thousands of people out of pocket.

About 46,000 customers lost thousands of pounds when Safe Hands Plans Ltd collapsed in 2022 and went into administration.

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has charged two men – Richard Wells and Neil Debenham – with conspiracy to defraud. It said Wells was the former director of SHP Capital Holdings Ltd – the parent company of Safe Hands – with Debenham described as a “fellow senior executive”.

Wells and Debenham are due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 5 February.

The SFO said the charges of Wells, 39, residing in Spain, and Debenham, 43, of Norwich, were a “critical step” in its investigation.

Emma Luxton, director of operations, added planholders were left “exposed, out of pocket and uncertain about their funeral arrangements”.

Pre-paid funeral plans are designed to allow people to pay for their own funeral in advance, in order to help their families financially when they die.

Since July 2022, pre-paid funeral providers have required approval to operate from the Financial Conduct Authority.

Safe Hands was one of dozens of companies operating in the previously unregulated sector, and collapsed four months before the measures came in.

Denise has glasses on and looks out of the window

Overall, planholders like Denise Hudson are owed an estimated £70.6m in total

The administrator for Safe Hands, FRP Advisory, initially said planholders could receive repayments of between 8.5p and 12.5p for every pound they lost by June 2025.

But after a six-month delay, the amount repaid to those affected by the funeral firm collapse proved to be much less – about 4p for every pound.

Planholders are owed an estimated £70.6m in total.

Among them are Denise Hudson, from Derby, who paid nearly £2,500 for a Safe Hands plan after seeing a TV advert in 2019, and was last year given a cheque for less than £100 by administrators.

“That was my savings. I gave it in good faith. I actually thought what it said on the tin, it is in safe hands,” she said.

Hudson told the BBC she might “frame” the cheque for £96.50, using it as a reminder to keep fighting.

An older couple standing arm in arm

David and Sandie Beatty said they were “angry” and “disappointed” when Safe Hands collapsed

In 2017, Sandie and David Beatty, from Bingham in Nottinghamshire, paid Safe Hands £3,395 to cover the funeral costs for the first of them to die.

Sandie said they felt “angry, disappointed, sick” when the firm collapsed.

Aimee Geary, an NHS worker from Anstey in Leicestershire, paid £3,000 to Safe Hands in 2017.

Geary said: “Other people thought I was young [to be planning my funeral]. I’m very organised, and I didn’t want anyone else to have a job when I’m not here.

“It’s sad that you try to plan something and it has been taken away from you.”

A picture of Aimee Geary, with long blonde hair and wearing a green top, standing in front of a fire place

Aimee Geary paid £3,000 for a Safe Hands plan in 2017



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

‘I had £20,000 stolen and had to fight a 13-month fraud reporting rule to get it back’

Published

on

‘I had £20,000 stolen and had to fight a 13-month fraud reporting rule to get it back’



Sarah has now got her money back but there are calls to reform the deadline for reporting scams to banks.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Intellia Therapeutics says its Crispr-based treatment succeeds in pivotal trial

Published

on

Intellia Therapeutics says its Crispr-based treatment succeeds in pivotal trial


Intellia Therapeutics, building exterior and company sign, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Spencer Grant | Universal Images Group | Getty Images

Intellia Therapeutics said its Crispr-based treatment for a rare swelling condition met its goals in a late-stage trial, marking a milestone for the field of gene editing and putting the company on track to seek approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The company’s treatment uses Nobel Prize-winning technology Crispr to edit DNA and turn off the gene that controls production of a peptide that’s overactive in people with hereditary angioedema, causing them to experience potentially life-threatening swelling attacks. Intellia’s treatment is administered once through an hourslong infusion, making the edits directly in the liver.

Intellia said the one-time treatment reduced attacks by 87% compared with a placebo, meeting the study’s main goal. Six months after treatment, 62% of patients were free from attacks and weren’t using other therapies, Intellia said.

The company described the safety and tolerability of the treatment as “favorable,” reporting the most common side effects were infusion-related reactions, headaches and fatigue. Analysts were closely watching safety in the trial since a patient in a separate trial of a different treatment from Intellia died. That patient developed a liver injury and ultimately died from septic shock following an ulcer, according to the company.

“When you think about where we started with Crispr, just 12 years ago with some of the fundamental insights, I think there was a lot of talk about what might be possible, and we’ve had reports along the way in terms of milestones, but this is the first Phase 3 data in any indication with in vivo Crispr where you’re actually changing a gene that causes disease,” said Intellia CEO John Leonard.

The only FDA-approved Crispr-based medicine comes from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Called Casgevy, the gene editing is done outside the body, or ex vivo. The process requires collecting a person’s blood cells, making the edits outside the body, then reinfusing them back into a patient. Intellia’s treatment, meanwhile, makes the edits inside the body, or in vivo.

Intellia said it has started a rolling application with the FDA and plans to complete the filing in the second half of this year. The company expects to launch the treatment in the U.S. in the first half of next year, if it’s approved.

If approved, Intellia’s treatment, lonvoguran ziclumeran, will compete with about a dozen other chronic drugs for HAE. Despite the allure of a one-time treatment, genetic medicines haven’t always been a commercial successes. BioMarin withdrew its gene therapy for Hemophilia A because of weak sales, for example.

Leonard said there are important differences between the two, like the fact that BioMarin’s therapy faced questions about how long the effects would last. In contrast, he said Intellia hasn’t seen a single case in almost six years where the effects diminished over time.

Despite the results, he’s reluctant to call Intellia’s treatment a functional cure.

“I think this is a tipping point for the disease and tipping point for Crispr-based in vivo therapy where you can make a change [and] it’s permanent,” Leonard said. “And, as far as we can tell, we don’t have a single patient in this program or other program where there’s been any waning of the effect of what we did to the gene or the effect of what we’ve seen with the clinical aspects of the disease itself. So it’s pretty exciting.”

Clarification: This story has been updated to clarify that a patient in a separate trial of a different treatment from Intellia developed acute liver injury and ultimately died from septic shock following an ulcer.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

European flight prices are falling in short-term, Wizz Air boss says

Published

on

European flight prices are falling in short-term, Wizz Air boss says



While many airlines say they are raising prices due to high fuel costs, József Váradi says European airlines are trying to boost demand



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending