Business
Google avoids break-up but must share data with rivals
Lily JamaliNorth America Technology Correspondent, San Francisco and
Rachel ClunBusiness reporter, BBC News
ReutersGoogle will not have to sell its Chrome web browser but must share information with competitors, a US federal judge has ordered.
The remedies decided by District Judge Amit Mehta have emerged after a years-long court battle over Google’s dominance in online search.
The case centred around Google’s position as the default search engine on a range of its own products such as Android and Chrome as well as others made by the likes of Apple.
The US Department of Justice had demanded that Google sell Chrome – Tuesday’s decision means the tech giant can keep it but it will be barred from having exclusive contracts and must share search data with rivals.
Google had proposed less drastic solutions, such as limiting its revenue-sharing agreements with firms like Apple to make its search engine the default on their devices and browsers.
On Tuesday, the company indicated that it viewed the ruling as a victory, and said the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) probably contributed to the outcome.
“Today’s decision recognizes how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI, which is giving people so many more ways to find information,” Google said in a statement after the ruling.
“This underlines what we’ve been saying since this case was filed in 2020: Competition is intense and people can easily choose the services they want,” the statement continued.
The tech giant had denied wrongdoing since charges were first filed against it in 2020, saying its market dominance is because its search engine is a superior product to others and consumers simply prefer it to others.
Last year, Judge Mehta ruled that Google had used unfair methods to establish a monopoly over the online search market, actively working to maintain a level of dominance to the extent it broke US law.
But in his decision, Judge Mehta said a complete sell-off of Chrome was “a poor fit for this case”.
Google will also not have to sell off its Android operating system, which powers most of the world’s smartphones.
The company had argued that off-loading parts of its operations, such as Android, would mean they would effectively stop working properly.
“Today’s remedy order agreed with the need to restore competition to the long-monopolized search market, and we are now weighing our options and thinking through whether the ordered relief goes far enough in serving that goal,” Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater wrote on X after the ruling.
Shares in Alphabet, Google’s parent company, jumped by more than 8% after the ruling.
Smartphone-makers such as Apple, Samsung and Motorola will also benefit.
Before the ruling, Google paid such firms billions of dollars to exclusively pre-load or promote the tech company’s products.
It was revealed at trial that Google paid more than $26bn for such deals with Apple, Mozilla and others in 2021.
Now, Google will not be allowed to enter into any exclusive contracts for Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant or the Gemini app.
It means phone manufacturers will be free to pre-load or promote other search engines, browsers or AI assistants alongside Google’s.
Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, said the ruling was “good news for big tech”.
“Apple also gets a nice win because the ruling forces Google to renegotiate the search deal annually,” he said on X.
Judge Mehta’s ruling “doesn’t seem to be as draconian as the market was expecting,” said Melissa Otto, head of research at S&P Global Visible Alpha.
With Google’s search operation expected to generate close to $200bn this year, and tens of billions of that expected to go to distribution partners it is a win-win for the major corporate players involved in the case, Ms Otto said.
The decision is not the end of the tech giant’s court battles.
Later this month, Google is scheduled to go to trial in a separate case brought by the justice department where a judge found the company holds illegal monopolies in online advertising technology.
Millions of car finance payouts are in jeopardy after the UK’s financial watchdog indicated its compensation scheme faces significant delays, changes, or even collapse.
This uncertainty stems from four legal challenges against the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The FCA has advised motor finance firms to prepare for the possibility that its redress scheme, which could see an average payout of £829, may not proceed.
The regulator stated that while a hearing date is unclear, these cases are unlikely to be heard before October.
In the meantime, it is in discussions about the “possibility of suspending some elements” of its compensation scheme, while still urging lenders to prepare for payouts.
But the regulator said it was also considering its options should parts of the scheme be quashed by the courts, including proceeding with a revised version or asking lenders to plan for a scenario where “there would be no scheme”.
This could mean lenders need to be ready to respond to complaints from car finance customers individually, rather than under the rules of an industry-wide programme set by the FCA.
“Many people will be frustrated that the legal action will delay payouts due to begin this year,” the FCA said.
“We remain committed to ensuring consumers receive any compensation owed as promptly as possible.”
The FCA set out the final details of its compensation scheme in March, which it estimated could cost the industry about £9.1 billion in total.
It had been expecting millions of claims to be paid out this year and the vast majority settled by the end of 2027.
The financial services arms of carmakers Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz and the car finance arm of French bank Credit Agricole, as well as Consumer Voice, a group representing consumers, are asking the courts to quash the scheme, arguing the rules are unlawful.
“Between the four separate legal challenges, it is claimed in effect that the FCA’s approach to establishing the schemes has been both unduly favourable to consumers and unduly favourable to lenders,” the watchdog said.
At least one claim alleges that the FCA has breached the rights of lenders under the 1998 Human Rights Act, according to the watchdog.
Despite the uncertainty of the legal cases, the watchdog is still advising consumers to complain directly to their lender if they think they might be owed compensation, which they can do for free using a template letter on its website.
Business
Us Job Growth Data 2026: US adds stronger-than-expected 115,000 jobs in April despite Iran war impact – The Times of India
America’s employers added a stronger-than-expected 115,000 jobs in April despite economic uncertainty triggered by the Iran war, according to data released by the US labor department on Friday.The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3 per cent, while hiring beat economists’ expectations of 65,000 new jobs, although it slowed from the revised 185,000 jobs added in March.The latest data suggests the US labour market has remained resilient even as the conflict in West Asia disrupted global oil supplies and pushed average US gasoline prices above $4.50 a gallon this week.“The labor market is not booming, but it is proving harder to break than many feared,” Olu Sonola, head of US economics at Fitch Ratings, said, as quoted by news agency AP.
Healthcare, transport sectors lead hiring
Healthcare companies added 37,000 jobs in April, while transportation and warehousing firms added 30,000 positions, according to the report.However, manufacturers cut 2,000 jobs during the month and have shed 66,000 jobs over the past year despite President Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies aimed at boosting factory employment.Average hourly earnings rose 0.2 per cent from March and 3.6 per cent year-on-year, broadly aligning with the Federal Reserve’s inflation target.The labour force participation rate fell to 61.8 per cent, its lowest level since October 2021, as retirements and tighter immigration policies reduced the number of people seeking work.
Iran war and inflation concerns remain
Economists said the economy has so far weathered the impact of the Iran conflict better than expected, although risks remain if high energy prices persist.“Businesses to some extent are viewing the conflict in Iran as temporary,” Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC, told AP. “We continue to see solid growth in consumer spending. And we’re seeing strong business investment, particularly around tech and AI.”However, Faucher warned that “the longer conflict in Iran lasts, the higher energy prices go, the longer they stay elevated the greater the drag on the economy.”The Iran war sharply disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz after Iran closed the crucial route following US-Israeli strikes on February 28. The move caused oil prices to surge and raised fears of slower global economic growth.
Fed likely to hold rates steady
The stronger-than-expected jobs report is also expected to reduce pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates soon.Inflation climbed to 3.3 per cent in March, its highest level in two years, driven largely by rising fuel prices.Friday’s employment data “actually makes it less likely that we see a rate cut anytime soon,” Faucher said, adding that the Fed may prefer to focus on bringing inflation back towards its 2 per cent target before easing borrowing costs.
The solid figures came despite rising gas prices and economic uncertainty sparked by the Iran war.
Source link
Renée Zellweger joins cast of ‘A Woman in the Sun’
Terrell Owens declares he ‘couldn’t care less’ about the Cowboys years after tumultuous exit
The Best LED Skincare Deals I’ve Seen This Mother’s Day Are at Megelin
-
Politics5 days agoIran weighs US reply delivered via Pakistan as Trump signals opposition to deal terms
-
Tech1 week agoThis Indigenous Language Survived Russian Occupation. Can It Survive YouTube?
-
Business1 week agoPSX plunges over 4,800 points | The Express Tribune
-
Fashion1 week agoCanada’s Lululemon appoints Esi Eggleston Bracey to board of directors
-
Fashion7 days agoUS’ J.Jill, Inc. appoints Kimberly Wallengren as CMO
-
Tech1 week agoAlmost half of UK businesses hit by cyber attacks | Computer Weekly
-
Entertainment1 week agoDavid Allan Coe, country singer who wrote “Take This Job and Shove It,” dies at age 86
-
Business1 week agoGovernment hikes jet fuel prices by 5% for international airlines – The Times of India