Politics
Stateless siblings trapped across a border dispute

Two sisters living in India’s Kerala state have been left stateless after failing to provide proof that they had renounced their Pakistani citizenship.
The News, citing BBC, reported that the sisters told a court they surrendered their Pakistani passports to the High Commission in New Delhi in 2017.
However, they said renunciation certificates were not issued because they were under 21 at the time — the minimum age required in Pakistan to formally give up citizenship.
They approached the High Commission again after turning 21, but it still refused to grant the certificate without giving any explanation, says the petitioners’ mother, Rasheeda Bano (her daughters didn’t want to speak to the media). She and her son are now Indian citizens but her daughters, she says, have been in limbo for years.
The situation, she says, has severely impacted her daughters’ lives, as they are unable to even apply for passports.
The BBC has reached out to the Pakistani High Commission in India but hasn’t received a response.
Neighbours India and Pakistan share a tense relationship which has often spilled over into hostility, like in May this year, when the countries engaged in a four-day military conflict. But migration is not uncommon, especially among members of families who ended up on different sides of the border when India was partitioned and Pakistan was created in 1947.
Over the past few decades, the process has become harder as there is much higher scrutiny of documents. As of December 2021, citizenship applications of more than 7,000 Pakistani nationals were pending with the government, according to data shared in parliament.
Bano says that when the Pakistani High Commission did not provide the renunciation certificate, she requested them to return her daughters’ passports, but this wasn’t done.
The sisters have in their possession a certificate given by the high commission in 2018 which states that they have submitted their passports and Pakistan has no objection if they are granted Indian citizenship. But Indian authorities have refused to accept this in place of a renunciation certificate, forcing the sisters to move court.
Last year, a single-judge bench of the Kerala High Court ruled in their favour, saying that it was clear that the petitioners wouldn’t be able to produce the document.
“It would be directing them to do the impossible,” the court observed, ordering the Indian government to grant them citizenship. But the federal home ministry appealed against this and on August 23 this year, a two-judge bench of the same court overturned the earlier order.
“For a person to be considered a citizen of India, they must be recognised as such by the Indian state alone, without any competing claims from another country’s government,” it said. “The formal renunciation process is the mechanism that ensures this legal clarity,” the court added. The sisters have the option to appeal against the order in a higher court.
According to Pakistan’s rules, people under the age of 21 cannot renounce their citizenship independently, but their names can be included in the renunciation application filed by their father.
The sisters’ father, Mohammed Maroof, was born in Kerala but was adopted by his grandmother after he was orphaned at the age of nine. When she migrated to Pakistan in 1977, she took him along.
Their mum Bano said her parents were also Indians but they got stuck in Pakistan while visiting relatives in 1971, after borders were shut when the two countries went to war.
Unable to return even after months, they found it easier to apply for Pakistani citizenship. She was born a few years later.
Bano and Maroof, who have four children, moved to India in 2008 on long-term visas to be closer to their “roots”. But Maroof was unable to adjust to life in India and soon returned to Pakistan.
Bano and her son, who was above 21 years of age, were eventually granted Indian citizenship.
She said the family often faced stigma when they produced their Pakistani identity documents, but at least they had something to fall back on — for the sisters even that is not an option anymore.
Simple tasks like getting a mobile phone connection, or enrolling their children in school was difficult for them, she said. Authorities eventually allowed the sisters to get an Aadhaar Card, which acts as an identity document in India. But that’s still not considered proof of citizenship, denying them basic rights.
Bano says her daughters’ lives have also been affected by the lack of passports. The husband of one of them had to leave his job in the Gulf and come to India as she couldn’t travel to him. Meanwhile, her other daughter has a son who needs medical treatment abroad but she is unable to leave India.
“The sisters didn’t get the certificate in 2017 because they were then minors. Now that they are adults, they can’t go back to Pakistan because they have surrendered their passports. So how will they get the certificate?” says their lawyer M Sasindran.
“They are stuck now”.
Originally published in The News
Politics
Saudi Arabia has told Iran not to attack it, warns of possible retaliation, say sources

- Iran was warned of possible retaliation, sources say.
- Saudi foreign minister spoke to Iranian counterpart.
- Iran’s president apologises to Gulf states for ‘actions’.
Saudi Arabia has told Tehran that while it favours a diplomatic settlement to Iran’s conflict with the United States, continued attacks on the kingdom and its energy sector could push Riyadh to respond in kind, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The message was conveyed before a speech on Saturday in which Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian apologised to neighbouring Gulf states for Tehran’s actions — an apparent attempt to defuse regional anger over Iranian strikes that hit civilian targets.
Two days earlier, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan spoke to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and set out Riyadh’s position with clarity, the sources said.
Saudi Arabia is open to any form of mediation aimed at de‑escalation and a negotiated settlement, the sources quoted the minister as saying, underlining that neither Riyadh nor other Gulf states had let the US use their airspace or territory to launch airstrikes on Iran.
But Prince Faisal was also quoted by the sources as saying that if Iranian attacks persisted against Saudi territory or energy infrastructure, Saudi Arabia would be forced to permit US forces to use their bases there for military operations. Riyadh would retaliate if attacks on the kingdom’s critical energy facilities continued, he said.
The sources said the kingdom had remained in regular contact with Tehran through its ambassador since the US and Israeli military campaign against Iran began on February 28, following the collapse of talks on Iran’s nuclear programme.
The Saudi and Iranian foreign ministries did not respond to requests for comment.
Drone, missile attacks on Gulf States
The United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia have all come under heavy drone and missile fire from Iran over the past week.
Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed on the first day of the war. Tehran responded by hitting Israel and Gulf Arab states hosting US military installations, and Israel has attacked Lebanon’s Iran-backed Hezbollah armed group.
Araqchi said in an interview on Saturday that he remained in constant contact with his Saudi counterpart and other Saudi officials, adding that Riyadh had assured Tehran it was fully committed to not allowing its territory, waters or airspace to be used for attacks against Iran.
Pezeshkian said Iran’s temporary leadership council had approved suspending attacks on nearby countries – unless an attack on Iran came from those nations.
“I personally apologise to neighbouring countries that were affected by Iran’s actions,” he said.
To what extent Pezeshkian’s remarks signal a change is unclear. There were further reports of strikes directed at Gulf states on Saturday.
Also, in a sign of possible divisions within Iran’s leadership, Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters – the unified combatant command of the Iranian armed forces – said in a statement afterwards that US and Israeli bases and interests across the region would remain targets.
The command said Iran’s armed forces respected the sovereignty and interests of neighbouring states and had not taken action against them so far. But it said US and Israeli military bases and assets on land, at sea and in the air across the region would be treated as primary targets and face “powerful and heavy” strikes by Iran’s forces.
US President Donald Trump said in a social media post that Iran had “apologised and surrendered to its Middle East neighbours, and promised that it will not shoot at them anymore. This promise was only made because of the relentless US and Israeli attack.”
Two Iranian sources confirmed that a call had taken place in which Riyadh warned Tehran to halt attacks on Saudi Arabia and neighbouring Gulf states. Iran, they said, reiterated its position that the strikes were not aimed at Gulf countries themselves but at US interests and military bases hosted on their territory.
One Iranian source said that Tehran had, in response, demanded that US bases in the region be closed and that some Gulf states stop sharing intelligence with Washington that Iran believes is being used to carry out attacks against it.
Another Iranian source said some military commanders were pressing to continue the strikes, accusing the US of using bases in Gulf states and these countries’ airspace to conduct operations against Iran.
Iran had in recent years mended fences with its Gulf neighbours, including former regional arch-rival Saudi Arabia. The diplomatic campaign imploded in the blitz of drones and missiles launched by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards in the past week.
Politics
Iran Assures Neighbours of Non-Aggression Amid Regional Tensions

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has issued a significant statement aimed at easing regional tensions, assuring that Iran will not launch missile strikes or take aggressive action against neighbouring countries.
The president said the decision was taken with the approval of the Interim Leadership Council, stressing that Iran’s policy of non-aggression will remain in place as long as no attacks are carried out on Iranian territory.
Commitment to Peace
In a message shared on social media, Pezeshkian said Iran harbours no hostility toward regional countries and expressed regret over the recent tensions affecting neighbouring states.
“We harbor no hostility toward regional countries and apologize for the recent situation with our neighbors,” the president said.
Sovereignty Will Be Protected
While calling for peace, Pezeshkian also emphasized that Iran’s sovereignty and national security would not be compromised.
He added that diplomatic efforts and mediation aimed at ending the ongoing conflict should be led by the countries that initiated the confrontation.
Regional De-escalation Efforts
The statement comes amid rising tensions in the Middle East following military exchanges involving Iran, Israel, and the United States, prompting calls from several countries for de-escalation and dialogue to restore regional stability.
Politics
Dubai introduces new public safety laws, fines up to AED2m

DUBAI: Dubai has announced the implementation of a new public safety law introducing stricter regulations for public spaces and events, with fines ranging from AED500 ($136) to AED1 million ($272,000), authorities said.
Under the legislation, repeat violations within one year could result in fines of up to AED2 million, officials added.
The new law, which takes effect across the emirate on June 1, sets out enhanced safety requirements for public venues and gatherings.
The rules were issued by Dubai’s Ruler, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum.
According to the regulations, public venues and events must ensure safe entry and exit routes, adequate lighting, and capacity limits to prevent overcrowding.
Event organisers will be required to provide firefighting equipment, emergency evacuation plans, first aid facilities, and trained security personnel.
Compliance with safety instructions at public venues has been made mandatory.
The law also requires adherence to designated swimming times at beaches and prohibits access to restricted areas.
Possession of explosives or fireworks without a permit is banned, as is the use and transport of hazardous or flammable materials.
-
Sports1 week agoLPGA legend shares her feelings about US women’s Olympic wins: ‘Gets me really emotional’
-
Business1 week agoIndia Us Trade Deal: Fresh look at India-US trade deal? May be ‘rebalanced’ if circumstances change, says Piyush Goyal – The Times of India
-
Fashion1 week agoSouth Korea’s Misto Holdings completes planned leadership transition
-
Entertainment1 week agoPakistan’s semi-final qualification scenario after England defeat New Zealand
-
Entertainment1 week agoBobby J. Brown, “The Wire” and “Law & Order: SUV” actor, dies of smoke inhalation after reported fire
-
Business1 week agoCNBC To Merge TV And Digital News Operations, Nearly A Dozen Jobs To Be Cut: Report
-
Fashion1 week agoTexwin Spinning showcasing premium cotton yarn range at VIATT 2026
-
Business1 week agoGreggs to reveal trading amid pressure from cost of living and weight loss drugs
