Connect with us

Politics

Stateless siblings trapped across a border dispute

Published

on

Stateless siblings trapped across a border dispute


Pakistani and Indian border guards pictured during a flag-lowering ceremony at the Wagah Border Crossing. — Reuters/File
Pakistani and Indian border guards pictured during a flag-lowering ceremony at the Wagah Border Crossing. — Reuters/File

Two sisters living in India’s Kerala state have been left stateless after failing to provide proof that they had renounced their Pakistani citizenship.

The News, citing BBC, reported that the sisters told a court they surrendered their Pakistani passports to the High Commission in New Delhi in 2017.

However, they said renunciation certificates were not issued because they were under 21 at the time — the minimum age required in Pakistan to formally give up citizenship.

They approached the High Commission again after turning 21, but it still refused to grant the certificate without giving any explanation, says the petitioners’ mother, Rasheeda Bano (her daughters didn’t want to speak to the media). She and her son are now Indian citizens but her daughters, she says, have been in limbo for years.

The situation, she says, has severely impacted her daughters’ lives, as they are unable to even apply for passports.

The BBC has reached out to the Pakistani High Commission in India but hasn’t received a response.

Neighbours India and Pakistan share a tense relationship which has often spilled over into hostility, like in May this year, when the countries engaged in a four-day military conflict. But migration is not uncommon, especially among members of families who ended up on different sides of the border when India was partitioned and Pakistan was created in 1947.

Over the past few decades, the process has become harder as there is much higher scrutiny of documents. As of December 2021, citizenship applications of more than 7,000 Pakistani nationals were pending with the government, according to data shared in parliament.

Bano says that when the Pakistani High Commission did not provide the renunciation certificate, she requested them to return her daughters’ passports, but this wasn’t done.

The sisters have in their possession a certificate given by the high commission in 2018 which states that they have submitted their passports and Pakistan has no objection if they are granted Indian citizenship. But Indian authorities have refused to accept this in place of a renunciation certificate, forcing the sisters to move court.

Last year, a single-judge bench of the Kerala High Court ruled in their favour, saying that it was clear that the petitioners wouldn’t be able to produce the document.

“It would be directing them to do the impossible,” the court observed, ordering the Indian government to grant them citizenship. But the federal home ministry appealed against this and on August 23 this year, a two-judge bench of the same court overturned the earlier order.

“For a person to be considered a citizen of India, they must be recognised as such by the Indian state alone, without any competing claims from another country’s government,” it said. “The formal renunciation process is the mechanism that ensures this legal clarity,” the court added. The sisters have the option to appeal against the order in a higher court.

According to Pakistan’s rules, people under the age of 21 cannot renounce their citizenship independently, but their names can be included in the renunciation application filed by their father.

The sisters’ father, Mohammed Maroof, was born in Kerala but was adopted by his grandmother after he was orphaned at the age of nine. When she migrated to Pakistan in 1977, she took him along.

Their mum Bano said her parents were also Indians but they got stuck in Pakistan while visiting relatives in 1971, after borders were shut when the two countries went to war.

Unable to return even after months, they found it easier to apply for Pakistani citizenship. She was born a few years later.

Bano and Maroof, who have four children, moved to India in 2008 on long-term visas to be closer to their “roots”. But Maroof was unable to adjust to life in India and soon returned to Pakistan.

Bano and her son, who was above 21 years of age, were eventually granted Indian citizenship.

She said the family often faced stigma when they produced their Pakistani identity documents, but at least they had something to fall back on — for the sisters even that is not an option anymore.

Simple tasks like getting a mobile phone connection, or enrolling their children in school was difficult for them, she said. Authorities eventually allowed the sisters to get an Aadhaar Card, which acts as an identity document in India. But that’s still not considered proof of citizenship, denying them basic rights.

Bano says her daughters’ lives have also been affected by the lack of passports. The husband of one of them had to leave his job in the Gulf and come to India as she couldn’t travel to him. Meanwhile, her other daughter has a son who needs medical treatment abroad but she is unable to leave India.

“The sisters didn’t get the certificate in 2017 because they were then minors. Now that they are adults, they can’t go back to Pakistan because they have surrendered their passports. So how will they get the certificate?” says their lawyer M Sasindran.

“They are stuck now”.




Originally published in The News





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Why is Trump demolishing part of the White House?

Published

on

Why is Trump demolishing part of the White House?


Heavy machinery tears down a section of the East Wing of the White House as construction begins on President Donald Trump’s planned ballroom, in Washington, DC, on October 20, 2025. — AFP
Heavy machinery tears down a section of the East Wing of the White House as construction begins on President Donald Trump’s planned ballroom, in Washington, DC, on October 20, 2025. — AFP 

Demolition crews were tearing down part of the White House’s storied East Wing on Monday to begin building President Donald Trump’s ballroom, a project he had said would not interfere with the existing landmark.

Large construction equipment was seen picking apart the facade of the building, a part of the White House complex that has housed the first lady’s offices, a theater, and a visitor’s entrance that welcomes foreign dignitaries.

The ballroom project is expected to cost upwards of $250 million, which Trump said in July would be paid by himself and donors.

“It will be beautiful,” Trump said at the time. “It won’t interfere with the current building. It won’t be — it will be near it, but not touching it. And pays total respect to the existing building, which I’m the biggest fan of. It’s my favorite.”Wh

The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Monday about the demolition to the current East Wing building.

Trump announced on Monday that ground had been broken on the project after images of the demolition began circulating in news reports.

“Right behind us, we’re building a ballroom,” Trump told visiting college baseball athletes from Louisiana State University in the nearby White House residence’s East Room. “I didn’t know I’d be standing here right now ’cause right on the other side you have a lot of construction going on, which you might hear periodically.”

Future parties are set to start with cocktails in the East Room before guests are beckoned into what Trump has said will be the “finest” ballroom in the country, with views of the Washington Monument and room for 999 people.

“Completely separate from the White House itself, the East Wing is being fully modernized as part of this process, and will be more beautiful than ever when it is complete!” he said later on Truth Social.

Trump, who was a real estate developer before launching his political career, has made extensive cosmetic changes to the White House, hand-picking gold ornamentation for the Oval Office and redoing the Rose Garden in the style of his golf clubs. He has also taken an interest in the capital city of Washington and surrounding area, proposing an Arc de Triomphe-style monument to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the United States in 2026.

The current East Wing was erected in 1942, during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration and amid World War Two, over a bunker built for the president’s use in case of emergency.

But the complex sometimes strains to hold the number of employees, visitors and guests of the president who wish to attend its events. Several White House state dinners, for instance, have been hosted in a tent erected on the South Lawn.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

US-Australia rare earths agreement signed, Trump promises submarines

Published

on

US-Australia rare earths agreement signed, Trump promises submarines



US President Donald Trump signed a deal on rare earth minerals with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday, pledging that Australia would receive coveted nuclear-powered attack submarines.

The leaders met at the White House to focus on defense and critical minerals cooperation, aiming to counter what both countries see as an increasingly assertive China.

Albanese said the deal would create $8.5 billion in critical minerals projects in Australia and elevate bilateral relations to the “next level.”

Australia’s abundant supply of lithium, cobalt, and manganese essential for semiconductors, defense hardware, electric vehicles, and wind turbines is seen as a way to reduce global dependence on China.

China remains the largest refiner of lithium and nickel and dominates processing of other rare earth elements.

While Australia cannot challenge this monopoly, it offers a smaller, reliable supply that reduces reliance on China.

The US and Australian governments will each invest over $1 billion in the next six months, with the White House citing a combined $3 billion investment.

Trump also confirmed progress on the stalled AUKUS submarine deal, ensuring Australia will receive at least three Virginia-class nuclear attack submarines previously signed under President Joe Biden.

“The submarines that we’re starting to build for Australia are really moving along,” Trump said. “We’ve worked on this long and hard, and the process is moving very rapidly and very well.”

I don’t like you either

The AUKUS deal could cost Canberra up to US$235 billion over the next 30 years. It also includes the technology to build its own vessels in the future.

Australia also had a major bust-up with France after it canceled a multi-billion-dollar deal to buy a fleet of diesel-powered submarines from Paris and go with the AUKUS program instead.

The nuclear-powered vessels lie at the heart of Australia’s strategy of improving its long-range strike capabilities in the Pacific, particularly against China.

But the Trump administration said in June it had put AUKUS under review to ensure it aligned with his “America First agenda,” saying it needed to ensure the United States had enough of the subs.

Albanese meanwhile managed to ride out an awkward confrontation between Trump and Australia’s ambassador to Washington former prime minister Kevin Rudd.

Rudd deleted a series of critical social media posts about Trump following the Republican’s election victory last year.

“I don’t like you either. I don’t. And I probably never will,” Trump said to Rudd when a reporter pointed out that the ex-premier was in the room and asked the US president whether he minded the comments.

Australians have a mostly unfavorable view of the Trump administration, polling shows, though the country relies on the United States to balance China’s expanding military clout in the Pacific region.

China loomed large over both of the key issues in the talks.

Australia has touted itself as a key US ally against China’s territorial assertiveness in the Asia-Pacific region, from Taiwan to the South China Sea.

On China, Australia announced plans for a strategic reserve of critical minerals to provide to “key partners” such as Washington to help relax Beijing’s chokehold.

Trump this month accused China of pressuring trade partners with new rare export curbs and threatened 100-percent tariffs in response.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Japan appoints China hawk Takaichi as its first woman PM

Published

on

Japan appoints China hawk Takaichi as its first woman PM



Japan made history on Tuesday by appointing Sanae Takaichi as its first female prime minister. A China hawk and social conservative, Takaichi secured the position after striking an 11th-hour coalition deal.

She becomes Japan’s fifth premier in as many years and will lead a minority government with a packed agenda, including a scheduled visit by US President Donald Trump next week.

Parliament voted Takaichi into office after she unexpectedly won a majority in the first round. She is set to formally take office following a meeting with the emperor.

Takaichi, a former heavy metal drummer, became head of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) on October 4.

The LDP, which has governed almost continuously for decades, has been losing support, and six days later, the Komeito party left the coalition due to Takaichi’s conservative views and an LDP slush fund scandal.

This prompted Takaichi to form a last-minute alliance with the right-leaning Japan Innovation Party (JIP), which supports lowering the consumption tax on food to zero, abolishing corporate and organizational donations, and reducing the number of MPs.

Takaichi pledged to “make Japan’s economy stronger and reshape the country for future generations.”

“She’s a strong-minded person, regardless of being a woman,” said 76-year-old pensioner Toru Takahashi in Takaichi’s hometown of Nara. “She’s not like Trump, but she’s clear about what’s right and wrong.”

Nordic

Takaichi has promised a cabinet with “Nordic” levels of women, up from two under outgoing premier Shigeru Ishiba.

These could include the right-wing Satsuki Katayama in charge of finances and the half-American Kimi Onoda as economic security minister, local media said.

Japan ranked 118 out of 148 in the World Economic Forum’s 2025 Global Gender Gap Report. Around 15 percent of lower house MPs are women and corporate boardrooms are overwhelmingly male.

Takaichi, 64, has said she hopes to raise awareness about women’s health struggles and has spoken candidly about her own experience with menopause.

But she opposes revising a 19th-century law requiring married couples to share the same surname, and wants the imperial family to stick to male-only succession.

In Nara, company worker Keiko Yoshida, 39, told AFP she hopes Takaichi will “make Japan a more liveable place for women”.

“I’d be happy if we saw more policies from a woman’s perspective: support for childcare, and help for women returning to work after having children,” agreed student Nina Terao, 18.

Abenomics

Details of a trade deal between Washington and Tokyo remain unresolved, and Trump also wants Japan to stop Russian energy imports and boost defence spending.

“I’d like her to be a Prime Minister who can clearly say ‘No’ when needed,” Satoshi Sakamoto, 73, another Nara pensioner, told AFP.

Beyond Trump, Takaichi’s many challenges include reversing the decline of Japan’s population and injecting some vim in the flatlining economy.

Being in a minority in both houses of parliament, the new coalition will need support from other parties to push through legislation.

Takaichi has in the past backed aggressive monetary easing and expanded government spending, echoing her mentor, former premier Shinzo Abe.

Despite walking back on these “Abenomics” calls in the LDP leadership contest, her victory has boosted Japanese stocks to record highs.

She previously said that “Japan is completely looked down on by China”, and that Tokyo must “address the security threat” posed by Beijing.

But she has since toned down her rhetoric on China, and stayed away last week from a festival at the Yasukuni shrine — she has been a regular visitor before — honouring Japan’s war dead.

Takaichi will also be under pressure to restore the fortunes of the LDP after a string of poor election results that cost Ishiba his job.

Smaller parties gaining support include the populist Sanseito, which calls immigration a “silent invasion”.

“Prices have gone up, and it’s tough,” Nara pensioner Satoe Tominaga, 77, told AFP, saying she was “50-50” about Takaichi.

“Honestly, I mostly shop at 100-yen ($0.66) stores now.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending