Connect with us

Business

Trump tariffs on India’s software exports? Why IT sector is worried – double taxation, visa tightening may deal a blow – The Times of India

Published

on

Trump tariffs on India’s software exports? Why IT sector is worried – double taxation, visa tightening may deal a blow – The Times of India


The Indian technology services outsourcing sector, valued at $283 billion, derives over 60% of its earnings from US. (AI image)

India’s IT sector is worried about the possible imposition of tariffs on software exports to the US by the Donald Trump administration. The IT sector is already experiencing challenges due to worldwide economic uncertainties and the increasing adoption of AI-based automation, according to industry specialists.The US government’s potential consideration of extending tariffs to software exports has created significant concern within India’s information technology industry, as this could severely impact their operations in their main market.

Trump tariff fears: Why is Indian IT sector worried?

The implementation of tariffs on services exports by the US administration could result in dual taxation, as Indian software companies already contribute substantial tax payments in the United States, according to an ET report.Additional restrictions on visa regulations might lead to increased operational costs due to necessary local recruitment in the US or neighbouring regions.

Tech in trouble?

Tech in trouble?

The Indian technology services outsourcing sector, valued at $283 billion and including companies such as Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, HCLTech and Wipro, derives over 60% of its earnings from the United States, whilst maintaining its primary workforce in India.However, the US administration has not yet formally announced or indicated any such intentions. Concerns arose after Peter Navarro, the US President’s senior advisor for trade, shared a social media post on X suggesting the application of tariffs on all outsourcing and foreign remote workers.A US conservative commentator Jack Posobiec posted: “Countries must pay for the privilege of providing services remotely to the US the same way as goods. Apply across industries, levelled as necessary per country.”Such implementation would affect all technology service recipients who utilise services from India and similar nations.

Will Trump impose tariffs on IT?

Phil Fersht, CEO and chief analyst at HFS group, suggests that discussions about tariffs on India’s outsourcing sector represent more political messaging than actual policy intentions. Nevertheless, any outsourcing penalties would generate immediate uncertainty, increase operational costs and affect profit margins during an already challenging demand period, the ET report said.“Imposing duties on digital labour flows is far more complex than taxing goods crossing borders. The US depends heavily on India’s IT and engineering talent, whether onsite through H-1B visas or offshore through remote delivery, to keep its own technology economy competitive,” Fersht said.“In addition, several tech billionaire leaders exert significant influence over the Trump administration, and many of them are strongly pro-India because their global businesses depend heavily on Indian engineering talent, delivery capability and market access.”Yugal Joshi, partner at US-based technology consultancy and analyst firm Everest Group, was quoted as saying: “These companies pay significant taxes in the US and therefore, the tariff will be double taxation… It will further harm growth of India-based service providers and even GCCs, if they are tariffed too.”





Source link

Business

UK borrowing costs rise and pound falls as leadership drama continues

Published

on

UK borrowing costs rise and pound falls as leadership drama continues


“Overall, UK politics is a mess, there are already signs that foreign buyers are ditching the gilt market. If there is a major rout in the pound and/or gilts in the coming days, prospective candidates may need to assess whether now was a wise time to make a move against the PM,” she said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump Might Welcome Chinese Investment, but America Is Wary

Published

on

Trump Might Welcome Chinese Investment, but America Is Wary


A hallmark of President Trump’s second term has been his penchant for negotiating economic deals with countries that pledge to invest trillions of dollars in the United States

“It’s now pouring in from all parts of the world,” Mr. Trump said during a speech last fall in which he boasted of nearly $20 trillion of foreign investment.

The meetings this week between Mr. Trump and China’s leader, Xi Jinping, in Beijing are expected to include talks over purchases of American farm products and planes and the possibility of expanding access for American companies into China’s vast consumer market.

There has also been speculation that Mr. Trump and his advisers are seeking a major investment from China. But such a pledge could be complicated by deep distrust in the United States toward Chinese firms, which many workers blame for the hollowing out of American manufacturing.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent acknowledged the challenge in an interview on CNBC on Thursday, explaining that the United States and China were working to develop an investment board that would determine what sectors were acceptable for Chinese investment. That would essentially provide China with guidance on how to invest in the United States without its transactions being blocked by the Committee on Foreign Investment, an interagency group that reviews foreign investment and is led by Mr. Bessent.

“Look, there are plenty of things that the Chinese could invest in in the U.S.,” said Mr. Bessent, who is in Beijing with Mr. Trump.

Chinese investment in the United States has declined sharply in recent years amid tougher investment screening standards nationally and at the state level.

That sentiment could ultimately clash with Mr. Trump’s transactional instincts and his desire to return home with a big-ticket win.

“If Trump were to be committed to a major investment deal with China, there’s still a challenge of implementation,” said Kyle Jaros, an expert on U.S.-China ties at the University of Notre Dame. “It would take real follow-through to overcome a lot of the political and regulatory barriers that are in place right now.”

According to a report published last month by the research firm Rhodium Group, less than $3 billion of Chinese investment in the United States was announced in 2025. That was the lowest on record, with investment peaking at around $45 billion in 2016.

The United States has imposed tight restrictions on Chinese investment out of national security concerns, making it difficult for Chinese firms to build factories near military facilities. Some states also have enacted restrictions on Chinese purchases of real estate and farmland.

China’s clean energy technology, such as electric vehicles and batteries, has also faced challenges in the United States because of political backlash. There was a surge of Chinese investment in those sectors after clean energy and tax legislation was passed under the Biden administration in 2022, but according to Rhodium, more than half of those investments have been canceled, paused or delayed.

A $2.4 billion electric vehicle battery factory that the Chinese company Gotion was building in Michigan was canceled last year after the community there protested and mounted legal challenges to stop the project.

Other types of Chinese investment have also stirred controversy. That includes the recent purchase by Nongfu Spring, a Chinese bottled water company, of a warehouse in New Hampshire that it wants to turn into a bottling facility. The purchase was reviewed last year by the state’s attorney general.

After the inquiry found that there was no wrongdoing associated with the transaction, Gov. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire issued executive orders to block China, Russia and Iran from getting access to data or purchasing land or property in the state. “Foreign adversaries like China should not be doing business in New Hampshire,” said Ms. Ayotte, a Republican.

There continues to be deep skepticism within the U.S. automobile industry about competition from China. Last month, a group of American steel associations sent a letter to top Trump administration officials urging them to keep Chinese car manufacturers out of the United States.

“As representatives of our nation’s manufacturing sector, we urge you to ensure American competitiveness by not surrendering access to the U.S. auto market to the Chinese Communist Party,” they wrote. “Additionally, allowing Chinese companies and Chinese autos into the U.S. would create consequential, unacceptable national security risks.”

Agriculture also remains a contentious issue. The chairman of the House select committee on China, Representative John Moolenaar, a Republican from Michigan, introduced new legislation this month that would ban China from acquiring U.S. farmland.

“Food security is national security, and we cannot allow foreign adversaries like China to buy up American farmland near our most sensitive military and critical infrastructure sites,” Mr. Moolenaar said.

The bipartisan bill would create a requirement for the federal government to review Chinese deals involving ports and telecommunications infrastructure. It would also apply to purchases made by investors from Russia, Iran and North Korea

Michael Pillsbury, a China scholar who has served as an outside adviser to the Trump administration, said that the president’s advisers were concerned about Chinese investments in sensitive sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, aerospace and critical minerals. It has been a challenge, he said, to come up with a “white list” of sectors that could be considered safe.

“The red lines have moved back and forth as the nature of technology has changed,” Mr. Pillsbury said.

He added that while Mr. Trump is eager to announce a $1 trillion Chinese investment pledge, he is mindful not to incite political backlash.

“I think there’s been an effort by the administration to avoid getting into a fight with the China hawks,” Mr. Pillsbury added.

Ahead of Mr. Trump’s trip to China, a White House official downplayed the idea that the administration was seeking to create a new $1 trillion Chinese investment program. The White House continues to be focused on pushing China to increase its purchases of American farm goods, which it boycotted for much of last year when trade tensions flared.

Despite the anticipation of a Chinese investment pledge, the details and follow-through will be important.

While Mr. Trump has said that foreign investments have topped $20 trillion, according to the White House’s own investment tracker, U.S. and foreign investment pledges made during Mr. Trump’s second term total $10.6 trillion. Foreign leaders appear to have learned that they can win favor with Mr. Trump by promising whopping investment pledges that they might not fulfill.

“The devil is in the details,” said Philip Ludvigson, a partner in King & Spalding who specializes in national security risks and foreign investment, “about not only where the investment goes but also whether it happens at all.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

‘Cheaper’ funeral option left Somerset man unable to say goodbye

Published

on

‘Cheaper’ funeral option left Somerset man unable to say goodbye



Ed Cullen says his mum had an unattended cremation which saved money but was “devastating” for him.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending