Connect with us

Business

University students like me are happier living at home – here’s why

Published

on

University students like me are happier living at home – here’s why


Iolo CheungBBC Wales and

Ellie CarterBBC Wales

BBC A girl in a white top smiling at the camera BBC

Only two of Kirsty’s coursemates actually live on the university campus

Leaving home to go to university was once considered a rite of passage.

But university student Kirsty Holpin, who lives with her grandmother and drives to lectures each day, says only two of her course mates actually live on campus.

“The rest of us travel in,” says the 23-year-old, who is one of a growing number of students choosing to live at home with family instead of moving into student digs.

UCAS figures suggest the number of students intending to live at home has doubled in the last 20 years, with rising rent cited as a major factor. Other reasons include shifting priorities towards academic study, rather than drinking and socialising.

Now in her third year studying psychology and criminology at the University of South Wales, Kirsty drives 35 minutes from her home in Fochriw, Caerphilly county, to the campus in Treforest, Rhondda Cynon Taf, to attend lectures.

“When we were pricing it up [for halls] it was extortionate,” she said.

“So as a family it was, ‘would you rather stay home, or go and basically work your butt off to make rent?'”

Kirsty admits that the decision did leave her more “isolated” when it came to social opportunities, but doesn’t regret her choice.

‘Not much of a drinker’

Kirsty admits living on campus would have given her a better social life.

“But I’m not much of a social drinker anyway,” she said.

“And I can always travel down to university if I need to for events, and make time for that.

“At home I have a brilliant, supportive environment, so I can get everything done like assignments – if I was at uni halls, I probably wouldn’t have achieved as much as I have.”

She says blended learning has made things easier for her and others, with more lectures now having the option of being attended remotely.

And without the need to be on campus every day, some students are going to extreme lengths.

“There’s a girl I met last year who was travelling from the West Midlands,” says Kirsty.

“She said it’s much easier to book a hotel room and spend £90 a night when she needs to come down, than spend £600 on rent.”

A recent survey by campaign group Save The Student found that 15% of students in the UK now live with parents or guardians – an increase from 12% in 2020 – with average travel times to campus also rising from 21 to 26 minutes.

“It doesn’t sound like a huge change, but if you look at it in terms of the number of students across the UK, that is quite a significant movement,” said spokesperson Tom Allingham.

In Wales, students now spend an average of £473 a month on rent, while in England the average figure is £556 and in Scotland it is £663, according to Save The Student.

“It’s no surprise that we’re seeing this change, because of factors like the availability and cost of housing, and bills,” says Deio Owen, president of the National Union of Students (NUS) in Wales.

“And stories we see all the time about problems in student housing doesn’t help the narrative, it doesn’t entice people to move to student accommodation.”

But priorities may also have shifted, says Mr Owen, with many students not feeling that a campus lifestyle is key to their university experience any more.

“The traditional idea of people going to university to go out drinking and stuff, that’s not necessarily the de facto behaviour of students anymore,” he says.

“People are deciding to stay in, do sober socials, and students’ unions are key for that to work.

“So it’s crucial that any students who decide not to move to a campus-based university, or close by, don’t miss out on that socialising.”

Getty Images A group of students in a lecture theatre, sat down making notesGetty Images

15% of university students now live at home with parents or guardians, according to a recent survey

Isaac Williams, 20, is studying for a Culinary Arts degree at Coleg Llandrillo in Conwy, and says living at his family home and travelling 15 minutes to campus each day “just made sense”.

For him, academic and financial considerations are more important factors than socialising.

“I just want to go to uni so I can get my degree, and have a more successful career,” he says.

“I’ve got a group of friends from other aspects of my life.

“And I have an older brother who’s also staying at home while doing a uni degree. So it just works out well money-wise.”

Isaac, a young man wearing a beige hoodie with a black jumper, with short dark blonde hair, smiles at the camera

Isaac says academic achievement and money are more important factors to him than socialising

‘I was getting crazy fomo’

Research suggests the number of students planning to stay at home has doubled in the last 20 years.

But at the University of South Wales’ freshers event in Cardiff, many students were still keen to embrace the chance to move out of their parents’ house while studying.

“It was just to get the taste of independence, a sort of practice run for living on your own,” said Sophie Davies, 20, from Neath.

Her friend Morgan Lees, 18, from Merthyr Tydfil, added: “Staying at home while being at uni takes away some of the social aspects of it, and that was really important for me.”

Sophie Evans, 20, from Pontypridd, Rhondda Cynon Taf, started off living at home – but only took a month to change her mind and move into university accommodation.

“Everyone else was going out and stuff, I was getting crazy fomo [fear of missing out], and I was booking hotels or staying with people,” she said.

“So I thought it was better if I move away and have that sense of independence, and I did – having to budget by myself and live like a functioning person.”

Joe Williams, 20, from Swansea said the social life had been a key factor in choosing to live on campus.

“Just being around everyone, it was easy,” he said.

“I go back [home] often enough. The costs aren’t too bad, and I was going back home on weekends to work, so it was OK.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Tesco and Sainsbury’s non-loyalty brand prices more expensive than Waitrose

Published

on

Tesco and Sainsbury’s non-loyalty brand prices more expensive than Waitrose



Tesco and Sainsbury’s customers are paying more than Waitrose shoppers for some common branded groceries if they are not using a loyalty scheme, analysis by Which? has found.

The watchdog compared a list of 245 branded items including Heinz, Nescafe and Mr Kipling in February, finding that it was, on average, most expensive for customers at Sainsbury’s and Tesco who were not using the Nectar or Clubcard loyalty schemes.

Which? acknowledged that most shoppers are part of a membership scheme, but said some may be unwilling to sign up to loyalty cards for reasons such as data privacy, while others have no choice because of eligibility criteria.

Tesco customers who are under 18 can not sign up to a Clubcard, although the supermarket has announced it will review this before the end of the year.

The Which? list of items was most expensive at Sainsbury’s for non-Nectar members at £942.66 – 14% more than the cheapest retailer in the study Asda, which cost £823.58.

Tesco followed behind Sainsbury’s, with its non-Clubcard price totalling 11% more than Asda at £916.56.

Which? said it did not include discounters Aldi and Lidl in the study because they did not stock a sufficiently large range of branded goods.

Both Tesco and Sainsbury’s – the UK’s two largest grocers – were more expensive for non-members of their loyalty schemes than Waitrose, which cost £899.05.

Waitrose was 9% more expensive than Asda and emerged as a “more competitive option”, Which? said.

Which? found several products that were cheaper at Waitrose, including Amoy Straight To Wok Noodles, which were on average £1.25 at both Waitrose and Morrisons but most expensive at Sainsbury’s and Tesco without a loyalty card at an average of £2.15 – a 72% difference.

Sea salt and vinegar Ryvita Thins were also cheapest on average at Waitrose at £1.25, but shoppers buying this product at Morrisons, Tesco, and Sainsbury’s without a loyalty card would all have paid an average of £2.30, making them 84% more expensive.

For customers with a Clubcard, Which? found that the same list of groceries at Tesco fell to £837.43 on average – just 2% more expensive than Asda.

Which? found various instances of branded products where the Tesco Clubcard price was the cheapest on average.

Carex Hand Wash was 95p at Tesco with a Clubcard but £1.70 at Waitrose where it was the most expensive.

Another example showed Kellogg’s Crunchy Nut cornflakes was £1.55 on average in February, while the highest average price among the supermarkets was at Waitrose where it cost £2.50.

Which? said the figures showed the “dramatic price gulf” created by loyalty pricing.

In one example at Tesco, Which? found a 200ml bottle of L’Oreal Paris Elvive Bond Repair Shampoo was double the price on average for shoppers without a Clubcard – at £13 compared to £6.50.

The higher price was also found at both Morrisons and Sainsbury’s.

Which? found that a 200g jar of Kenco Smooth coffee cost shoppers at Tesco and Sainsbury’s without a loyalty card £8.35 – the highest price on the market.

In contrast, the same jar was £7 at Waitrose and £6.32 at Asda, on average.

Similarly, Waitrose had the cheapest average price for Nescafe Gold Blend at £6.25, while non-members at Sainsbury’s were asked to pay £8.35.

Meanwhile, Which? found customers who used a Nectar card at Sainsbury’s could expect to pay only 3% more than Asda at £848.56 for the entire list of items.

Morrisons averaged 4% more expensive than Asda when using a More card and 5% more expensive without one.

Ocado was also 5% more expensive than Asda.

Which? retail editor Reena Sewraz said: “Our analysis reveals a shocking truth and shows the impact loyalty schemes have had on grocery pricing.

“Branded favourites can actually be cheaper at Waitrose than at the UK’s biggest supermarkets for shoppers who don’t use a loyalty card – something that would have seemed unthinkable until a few years ago.

“If you’ve got your heart set on specific brands, your best bet is to shop around, keep a close eye on the unit price, and stock up whenever you see a good deal – otherwise, you’re likely to end up paying way over the odds.

“While loyalty cards definitely offer some savings, if you don’t use one you’re better off heading to Asda, where the pricing is usually cheaper on a range of branded goods.”

A Sainsbury’s spokesman said: “We have invested over £1 billion in recent years to help keep prices low and we know more customers are choosing to do their shop at Sainsbury’s.

“We are committed to helping customers access great quality at lower prices and remain focused on offering outstanding value across thousands of products through our Aldi price match scheme, Nectar prices, Your Nectar Prices and our own-brand value lines.”

A spokesman for Tesco said: “It’s no secret that Tesco Clubcard unlocks exceptional savings for the 24 million UK households who have one.

“More than 80% of our sales are made with a Clubcard – but it’s just one of the ways our customers get great value.

“Though everyday low prices we keep prices consistently low on thousands of branded products, and our Aldi price match ensures shoppers can be confident they’re getting competitive prices.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

MLB faces a historic shift as potential lockout, media rights and other league changes loom

Published

on

MLB faces a historic shift as potential lockout, media rights and other league changes loom


Thursday’s Opening Day may be the calm before the storm for Major League Baseball.

The league’s collective bargaining agreement with its players expires at the end of this season. Owners, with the commissioner’s backing, are almost sure to push for a salary cap (which would likely come with a salary floor to get players to the negotiating table).

MLB owners have never been able to get a cap passed by the players union. It’s unclear if the end of the 2026 season will lead to a different result, but MLB Players Association Interim Executive Director Bruce Meyer told ESPN last month he expects a lockout is “all but guaranteed.”

In addition to the CBA’s expiration, there are major shifts underway for baseball media rights. One-third of the league’s teams didn’t have local TV deals in place for this season until this week. 

Nine MLB teams – the Washington Nationals, Seattle Mariners, Milwaukee Brewers, St. Louis Cardinals, Miami Marlins, Tampa Bay Rays, Cincinnati Reds, Kansas City Royals, and Detroit Tigers – announced Wednesday their brand new MLB-operated team channels will be carried by DirecTV.

Most of those teams had previously been part of Main Street Sports (previously Diamond Sports Group), which operates FanDuel Sports Networks (previously Bally Sports). That entity has been teetering with liquidation, and the teams terminated their contracts with the company due to missed payments earlier this year.

Get the CNBC Sport newsletter directly to your inbox

The CNBC Sport newsletter with Alex Sherman brings you the biggest news and exclusive interviews from the worlds of sports business and media, delivered weekly to your inbox.

Subscribe here to get access today.

A 10th team, the Atlanta Braves, is launching a new network called BravesVision. The Braves and Charter’s Spectrum announced a multiyear distribution agreement earlier this week

MLB ideally wants the rights to all 30 teams in its control by the end of the 2028 season so that it can sell the in-market local games as a national package to a streamer. That would become the modern replacement to regional sports networks, and it would likely be a new, coveted package for streaming services such as ESPN and Amazon Prime Video.

Also at the end of the 2028 season, MLB’s national media rights for all of its packages will expire, allowing the league to redistribute games to its partners and potentially select new ones. 

NBC, ESPN, Fox and a combined CBS/Turner have dominated national rights for the past few decades.

“The key in media negotiations now is having all of your rights available,” MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred told me last year. “If you have all of your content – all of your playoffs, all of your regular season – available, there will be buyers, and I’m confident there will be buyers at a higher price for us.”

Manfred has even floated the idea of expanding to 32 teams and realigning the league geographically, upending or even eliminating the American and National leagues that have existed for more than 100 years. 

Soaring TV ratings

Rob Manfred, Commissioner of the MLB, attends the annual Allen and Co. Sun Valley Media and Technology Conference at the Sun Valley Resort in Sun Valley, Idaho, U.S., on July 9, 2025.

David A. Grogan | CNBC

More than 50 million people in the U.S., Canada and Japan watched Game Seven of the World Series last year – the most-watched baseball game in 34 years. MLB recently wrapped up the World Baseball Classic – a global preseason tournament – which captured nearly 11 million viewers on Fox and Fox Deportes for its final game.

MLB team valuations rose 13% from last year. The average MLB team is now worth $2.95 billion, according to CNBC Sport data.

Still, the profitability of the league is in far worse shape than it is for the NFL, NBA and NHL, according to CNBC’s calculations. In 2025, MLB’s 30 teams had an EBITDA — earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization — margin of under 2%. Team average revenue was $426 million with average EBITDA of $7 million, including non-MLB ballpark events. In contrast, the comparable margin for the NFL was 20%; the NBA, 21% and the NHL, 22%, according to CNBC’s most recent valuations.

The new CBA at the end of this season could be the first significant step toward a very different MLB. But, similar to the WNBA, which announced its new CBA earlier this week, MLB must ensure negotiations to get a new labor agreement don’t jeopardize a wave of positive momentum.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

JLR temporarily halts production at Solihull plant

Published

on

JLR temporarily halts production at Solihull plant


A JLR spokesperson said: “Due to a part supply challenge with a supplier, we are temporarily pausing production on certain vehicle lines at our Solihull manufacturing facility. We are working closely with that supplier to resolve the issue as quickly as possible and minimise any impact on our clients or our operations.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending