Business
Andrew fixed palace visit for firm with £1.4m deal with ex-wife
Billy Kenber,politics investigations correspondent and
Phil Kemp,political reporter
Getty ImagesAndrew Mountbatten Windsor arranged a private tour of Buckingham Palace while the late Queen was in residence, for businessmen from a cryptocurrency mining firm which agreed to pay his ex-wife up to £1.4m, the BBC can reveal.
Jay Bloom and his colleague Michael Evers were driven through the palace gates in the former prince’s own car after being collected from their five-star Knightsbridge hotel for the visit in June 2019.
Their company, Pegasus Group Holdings, which Mr Bloom co-founded, employed Sarah Ferguson as a “brand ambassador” for a crypto-mining scheme which would lose investors millions when it failed less than a year later.
Mr Bloom, an entrepreneur who had previously set up a failed Mafia-themed museum in Las Vegas, and Mr Evers, a former actor, were met by a greeter and escorted inside the palace.
Mr Evers told the BBC they then met the Queen, although Mr Bloom disputed this.
Both Mr Evers and Mr Bloom were invited by the then-prince to his Pitch@Palace event – a Dragons’ Den-style business pitching competition – at nearby St James’s Palace later that day, and they dined that evening with Andrew, Ms Ferguson and their daughter Princess Beatrice.
Ms Ferguson was working with Pegasus Group Holdings at the time of the palace visit, while she was Duchess of York, to promote plans to use thousands of solar power generators to mine Bitcoin at a remote site in the Arizona desert.
But the project ultimately failed with only 615 of the planned 16,000 generators acquired and just $33,779 (about £25,000) in cryptocurrency mined.
In April 2021, some investors took legal action, claiming millions of dollars of investor funds were unaccounted for. A tribunal awarded the investors $4.1m, but Mr Bloom is seeking permission to appeal.
The revelations add to growing questions about how Andrew and his former wife have funded their lifestyle, as well as long-standing concerns about their business connections and that the then-prince may have used his royal titles and connections for private gain.
On Thursday evening, Buckingham Palace announced that it was starting the formal process of stripping Andrew of his royal titles and that he would be losing his Windsor mansion, following intense criticism of his links with the billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Andrew and Ms Ferguson did not respond to a detailed list of questions about their involvement with Mr Bloom and the crypto-mining venture.
FacebookSarah Ferguson was paid more than £200,000 for her work for the company and a leaked contract reveals she was in line for a separate bonus worth £1.2m.
She also received a stake in the business, which proposed using solar generators to reduce the cost of the energy-intensive computer calculations needed to generate or “mine” the digital currency Bitcoin.
Her contract stipulated that she required first-class travel, five-star hotels and the services of a professional hairdresser and make-up artist for the maximum of four “networking events” she would attend on the company’s behalf.
It said she did not “hold herself out as an expert on the solar industry” and therefore accepted no responsibility for “industry-related information or commercial assessments” used as the basis for her statements promoting the company.
A royal friendship
Sarah Ferguson first met the Las Vegas businessman Jay Bloom in May 2018 when she was at a convention in the city to promote one of her children’s books.
The pair struck up a friendship and business relationship.
Pegasus documents would subsequently describe her role as to “engage with the company’s clients, investors and strategic relationships” as well as involvement with the company’s planned “philanthropic activities”.
For Mr Bloom, it was an introduction to royal circles which would lead to visits to Buckingham Palace and St James’s Palace, a tour of Ms Ferguson and Andrew’s home, the Royal Lodge in Windsor, and dinners with her and her family in at least four different countries.
Eight years before the duchess signed up to be a brand ambassador for Pegasus, Mr Bloom had hit the Las Vegas headlines, accused of missing payments and deceiving investors in connection with a “mob experience” exhibition in the city. Mr Bloom denied wrongdoing, fought investors’ lawsuits and vowed to repay them.

He now had a new company, Pegasus, and ambitions to build a hotel and casino in Greece.
It was there in July 2018, while considering investing in the company, that Michael Evers, a former actor and reality TV star who had made money from cryptocurrency investments, first met Ms Ferguson.
The hotel and casino did not get built, but Mr Bloom had soon pivoted Pegasus to a new idea, one that was inspired by seeing a mobile solar power generator in use at the Las Vegas motor speedway in early 2019, according to filings in the later legal action brought by investors.
Mr Bloom and his co-founders hit upon a plan to use vast banks of these units to power a crypto-mining operation. The endeavour, the company estimated, would generate millions of dollars a month.
In March 2019, Ms Ferguson had dinner with Mr Bloom in Los Angeles. They had lunch at the Beverly Hills Hotel a few days later as she helped him try to close a deal for Pegasus. One of her daughters stopped by during the meal.
Mr Evers was now working for Pegasus as well as being an investor. He said he and Mr Bloom were regularly in London over the following months as they explored taking Pegasus public on the AIM market – part of the London Stock Exchange for growing companies.
FacebookHe said he got to know Ms Ferguson and her family and “through all that, I met Prince Andrew [and] Princess Beatrice and a lot of their family” who he described as “really great people, really friendly”.
“We were there once a month for a week to two weeks at a time and every time the relationships just kind of grew stronger and stronger and they started offering tours of different places, I guess like behind the scenes or I don’t know what you’d call it,” Mr Evers said. “And just wanting to introduce us to more and more people.”
As well as a tour of the Royal Lodge, Andrew and his ex-wife arranged for the pair to visit Buckingham Palace on a day in June 2019 when it was closed to the public.
They were picked up from their Knightsbridge hotel by an official driver in a dark blue Range Rover used by Andrew and driven through the palace gates in the early afternoon.
Once inside they were taken through to the inner courtyard, where a female greeter was waiting to meet them. A video taken by the men from inside the car captured their arrival.
A former Royal Household employee, who reviewed the footage, told BBC News that it was clear that palace security staff on the gate were expecting the vehicle.
“The ramp was dropped before they came out to speak to the driver,” they said. “That was the reception we’d expect if we were carrying a member of the Royal Family.”
What happened once they went inside is disputed by the two men.
Mr Evers said they had been told in advance that there would be an opportunity to meet the Queen. But once there, he said staff told him he was not allowed to take photos.
“They didn’t want anyone knowing that we were meeting Elizabeth. And it was very, very brief, she was not doing super well, so it was more just like a hello and in passing. No touching or anything,” he said.
He said it wasn’t a formal meeting, “it was just like a quick, ‘hello, goodbye'”.
The Queen was in residence that day, with her published schedule including her regular weekly audience with the prime minister. The Palace was unable to confirm or deny whether the introduction with the two men took place.
Responding to questions by email, Mr Bloom initially said he had decided just to visit the palace as a tourist. He subsequently said the only person he met at the palace was a “staffer”.
Getty ImagesWhen challenged and presented with evidence from his own social media, which included footage of him being driven into the palace, and comments about spending time with Andrew, and there being “pictures I can post, the pictures I can’t, and then the stuff I couldn’t take pictures of… lol”, Mr Bloom said he had misremembered.
He then admitted that he “was in fact shown to Andrews [sic] office and did thank him for the car and for him and Sarah arranging the tour”.
He denied ever having met or been in the same room as the late Queen.
Mr Bloom made a second visit to Buckingham Palace in July 2019, photos show. On social media he made an apparently joking reference to “meeting HRH”.
Helicopters and guns in the desert
Two months later, Ms Ferguson was one of two celebrity guests – alongside the motivational speaker Tony Robbins, who says he has coached figures such as Serena Williams and Hugh Jackman – at a “ground breaking” for Pegasus’s energy project launch in the Arizona desert.
They were flown in, with Mr Bloom, Mr Evers and others, in two black-and-gold helicopters and posed with gold-coloured spades and construction hats at the remote site of what Pegasus promised would become a multi-billion-dollar off-grid data centre.
With armed guards with AR-15 rifles and pistols standing nearby, Mr Bloom introduced Ms Ferguson at a press conference as a “personal friend”.
In the short speech that followed, Ms Ferguson praised the company, saying she was “so proud to be here” and touted the potential philanthropic uses of the technology in Africa.
InstagramThat October, a month before Andrew’s fateful BBC Newsnight interview where he disastrously attempted to explain his connections to Mr Epstein, Ms Ferguson signed a contract agreeing to provide specific services for Pegasus.
For reasons that remain unexplained, the contract itself was with Alphabet Capital, a British company whose owner, Adrian Gleave, ran a number of caravan and holiday parks.
A High Court ruling in London in 2024 has previously revealed that Ms Ferguson received more than £200,000 for her work for Pegasus from Alphabet Capital.
Andrew has also received money from Alphabet, including £60,500 traced to Mr Gleave and his businesses, according to court documents previously reported by the BBC.
Neither Andrew nor Mr Gleave have explained why this money was paid.
Mr Bloom said he has never heard of Alphabet or Mr Gleave and there was no connection with Pegasus.
Lawsuits and recriminations
A year after investing millions of dollars in the crypto solar scheme, some of its main investors became concerned about progress and began legal proceedings.
In 2023, judges from the Commercial Arbitration Tribunal in the US found in the investors’ favour awarding them millions of dollars.
Jay Bloom has since mounted a number of legal challenges over the award in the Nevada courts.
Mr Bloom told BBC News that Pegasus emphatically disputed “any allegations of misconduct” and said they were “addressing the clearly flawed arbitral findings through established legal processes”.
Andrew and Ms Ferguson did not respond to the BBC’s questions, including whether Ms Ferguson planned to repay money received for her Pegasus work to the company’s investors.
Mr Evers said he regretted being involved with Pegasus. He said Mr Bloom was “working very, very hard to get all the investors paid back” but that he was frustrated to still be owed money himself several years later.
- If you have any information on stories you would like to share with the BBC Politics Investigations team, please get in touch at politicsinvestigations@bbc.co.uk
Business
China to ease chip export ban in new trade deal, White House says
China will begin easing an export ban on automotive computer chips vital to production of cars across the world as part of a trade deal struck between the US and China, the White House has said.
The White House confirmed details of the deal in a new fact sheet after Xi Jinping and Donald Trump met in South Korea this week.
The nations also reached agreements on US soybean exports, the supply of rare earth minerals, and the materials used in production of the drug fentanyl.
The deal de-escalates a trade war between the world’s two largest economies after Trump hit China with tariffs after he entered office this year, leading to rounds of retaliatory tariffs and global business uncertainty.
Chinese Embassy in Washington spokesman Liu Pengyu told the BBC in a statement that details of the agreements reached had been shared by “competent authorities”.
“China-US economic and trade relations are mutually beneficial in nature,” he said.
“As President Xi Jinping noted, the business relationship should continue to serve as the anchor and driving force for China-US relations, not a stumbling block or a point of friction.”
Speaking on Sunday following the release of the deal details, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN: “We don’t want to decouple from China… (But) they’ve shown themselves to be an unreliable partner.”
Much of what is in Saturday’s fact sheet was announced by Trump and other officials following the meeting between the two leaders.
Trump had described the talks, held in South Korea, as “amazing”, while Beijing had said they had reached a consensus to resolve “major trade issues”.
One of the issues addressed in the deal was the export of automotive computer chips. There had been concern that a lack of chips from Nexperia, which has production facilities in China, could create global supply chain issues.
Nexperia is a Chinese-owned company, but is based in the Netherlands. About 70% of Nexperia chips made in Europe are sent to China to be completed and re-exported to other countries.
The fact sheet states that China will “take appropriate measures to ensure the resumption of trade from Nexperia’s facilities in China, allowing production of critical legacy chips to flow to the rest of the world”.
It follows Beijing saying on Saturday that it was considering exempting some firms from the ban.
Last month, the likes of Volvo Cars and Volkswagen warned a chip shortage could lead to temporary shutdowns at their plants, and Jaguar Land Rover said the lack of chips posed a threat to their business.
On other key issues, Beijing will now pause export controls it brought in last month on rare earth minerals – vital in the production of cars, planes and weapons – for a year.
The White House also said it would lower tariffs brought in to curb the import of fentanyl into the US, with China agreeing to take “significant measures” to deal with the issue.
Fentanyl is a synthetic drug manufactured from a combination of chemicals, and while it is approved for medical use in the US, the powerful and highly-addictive substance has since become the main drug responsible for opioid overdose deaths in the US.
The chemicals used in its manufacturing, some of which have legitimate uses, are mostly sourced from China.
On soybeans, China has committed to buying 12 million tonnes of US soybeans in the last two months of 2025, and 25 million metric tonnes in each of the following three years – which is roughly the level they were previously at.
China’s decision to stop purchasing soybeans from the US earlier this year denied American farmers access to their largest export market.
In response, Trump revived a bailout for farmers which was in place during his first term in office.
Business
Competition law vs patent rights: NCLAT rules CCI has no power to probe patented product disputes; upholds case against Swiss drugmaker Vifor – The Times of India
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has ruled that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) does not have the power to investigate disputes related to patented products, holding that the Patent Act takes precedence over the Competition Act in such cases, PTI reported.Dismissing an appeal against a CCI order that had closed a complaint against Swiss pharma major Vifor International (AG), a two-member NCLAT bench said that the fair trade regulator lacks jurisdiction to examine such matters, PTI reported.“Considering the judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) and the Supreme Court in SLP No. 25026/2023, it is apparent that the CCI lacks the power to examine the allegations made against Vifor International (AG),” the tribunal observed.Vifor International held the patent for Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) injection, a drug used to treat Iron Deficiency Anaemia (IDA). The tribunal stated: “The Patent Act will prevail over the Competition Act in the facts of this case, as the subject matter of contention is FCM, which was developed and patented by Respondent No. 2 (Vifor International).”NCLAT noted that Section 3(5) of the Competition Act provides specific protection to patent holders to restrain infringement or impose reasonable conditions to safeguard their rights. “The Competition Act, in Section 3(5), has laid down that the Act will not restrict the right of any person in protecting his rights under the Patent Act,” it said.The appeal was filed by Swapan Dey, CEO of a hospital offering free dialysis services under the Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme (PMNDP). Dey alleged that Vifor’s “anti-competitive and abusive conduct” had made FCM injections unaffordable and inaccessible to patients.However, the CCI had closed the case in its October 25, 2022 order, finding no prima facie contravention under Sections 3(4) or 4 of the Competition Act. Dey then challenged the order before NCLAT, arguing that the CCI failed to properly define the relevant market or assess Vifor’s dominance.Vifor countered the claim, asserting that the CCI lacked jurisdiction since the matter involved a patented molecule governed by the Patent Act. The company also informed the tribunal that its patent for FCM, granted on June 25, 2008, had expired on October 21, 2023, making it freely available for manufacturing and sale.NCLAT held that while the patent’s expiry meant the drug had entered the public domain, the key question was jurisdiction—whether CCI could have examined the issue when the product was still under patent protection.Citing the Delhi High Court’s earlier decision in Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL), which held that the Patent Act overrides the Competition Act, the tribunal noted that the Supreme Court had upheld that position by dismissing CCI’s appeal on September 2, 2025.“Following the judicial guidance as noted above, we hold that there is no merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed,” NCLAT concluded.
Business
US tariffs hit India’s export engine: GTRI report shows 37.5% slump across key sectors; smartphones, pharma, gems among worst hit – The Times of India
India’s exports to the US plunged 37.5% between May and September 2025 as sweeping tariff hikes by the Trump administration squeezed margins across major sectors, according to a report by India-based trade think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), ANI reported.The US, India’s largest export market, saw shipments fall from $8.8 billion to $5.5 billion over the five-month period, marking one of the steepest short-term declines in recent years, GTRI said in its analysis. The study assessed India’s export performance from May to September 2025 to gauge the fallout from US tariffs imposed starting April 2.
According to GTRI, the duties began at 10%, rose to 25% by August 7, and hit 50% by late August for Indian products. Tariff-free goods—making up nearly one-third of India’s total shipments—saw the steepest contraction, plunging 47% from $3.4 billion in May to $1.8 billion in September.“Smartphones and pharmaceuticals were the biggest casualties,” GTRI said. Smartphone exports, which had surged 197% in the same period a year earlier, crashed 58% from $2.29 billion in May to $884.6 million in September. Shipments fell consistently each month, and GTRI noted, “The reasons for decline are not known and need examination.”Pharmaceutical exports dropped 15.7%, from $745.6 million to $628.3 million, while industrial metals and auto parts—subject to uniform tariffs globally—recorded a milder 16.7% dip. Within that category, aluminium exports fell 37%, copper 25%, auto parts 12%, and iron and steel 8%.“Because all global suppliers faced similar duties, the dip appears linked more to a slowdown in US industrial activity than to any loss in Indian competitiveness,” GTRI said.Labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, gems and jewellery, chemicals, agri-foods, and machinery—which together make up nearly 60% of India’s US exports—recorded a 33% fall, from $4.8 billion in May to $3.2 billion in September. Gems and jewellery exports plunged 59.5%, from $500.2 million to $202.8 million, as Thailand and Vietnam captured lost US orders.Solar panel exports fell 60.8%, from $202.6 million to $79.4 million, undermining India’s renewable energy export edge. “With China facing only 30% tariffs and Vietnam 20%, India’s competitiveness has sharply deteriorated,” GTRI noted.The report also pointed to declines in chemicals, marine and seafood, textiles, and agri and processed food exports. “Exporters are urging the government to respond swiftly,” it added, suggesting priority measures such as enhanced interest-equalisation support, faster duty remission, and emergency credit lines for MSME exporters.Without urgent policy intervention, GTRI warned, India risks losing market share to Vietnam, Mexico, and China even in sectors where it previously held a strong position. “The latest data make one point clear: tariffs have not only squeezed India’s trade margins but also exposed structural vulnerabilities across key export industries,” the think tank concluded.
-
Politics1 week agoTrump slams ‘dirty’ Canada despite withdrawal of Reagan ad
-
Tech1 week agoWhy electricity costs so much in the UK (it’s not all about the weather)
-
Business1 week agoOne in three Manhattan condo owners lost money when they sold in the last year
-
Fashion1 week agoIndia’s exports to US drop, to non-US markets expand in Sep: Crisil
-
Politics1 week agoStates, world leaders must act to end impunity for crimes against journalists: IPI
-
Business1 week ago‘I left Wales and moved to England for free childcare’
-
Sports1 week agoTransfer rumors, news: Bournemouth ask clubs for £75m to sign Semenyo
-
Business1 week agoFrom Budgeting To Investing: A Complete Guide To Managing Money In Your 20s

