Connect with us

Tech

Anthropic Agrees to Pay Authors at Least $1.5 Billion in AI Copyright Settlement

Published

on

Anthropic Agrees to Pay Authors at Least .5 Billion in AI Copyright Settlement


Anthropic has agreed to pay at least $1.5 billion to settle a lawsuit brought by a group of book authors alleging copyright infringement, an estimated $3,000 per work. In a court motion on Friday, the plaintiffs emphasized that the terms of the settlement are “critical victories” and that going to trial would have been an “enormous” risk.

This is the first class action settlement centered on AI and copyright in the United States, and the outcome may shape how regulators and creative industries approach the legal debate over generative AI and intellectual property. According to the settlement agreement, the class action will apply to approximately 500,000 works, but that number may go up once the list of pirated materials is finalized. For every additional work, the artificial intelligence company will pay an extra $3,000. Plaintiffs plan to deliver a final list of works to the court by October.

“This landmark settlement far surpasses any other known copyright recovery. It is the first of its kind in the AI era. It will provide meaningful compensation for each class work and sets a precedent requiring AI companies to pay copyright owners. This settlement sends a powerful message to AI companies and creators alike that taking copyrighted works from these pirate websites is wrong,” says colead plaintiffs’ counsel Justin Nelson of Susman Godfrey LLP.

Anthropic is not admitting any wrongdoing or liability. “Today’s settlement, if approved, will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims. We remain committed to developing safe AI systems that help people and organizations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery, and solve complex problems,” Anthropic deputy general counsel Aparna Sridhar said in a statement.

The lawsuit, which was originally filed in 2024 in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, was part of a larger ongoing wave of copyright litigation brought against tech companies over the data they used to train artificial intelligence programs. Authors Andrea Bartz, Kirk Wallace Johnson, and Charles Graeber alleged that Anthropic trained its large language models on their work without permission, violating copyright law.

This June, senior district judge William Alsup ruled that Anthropic’s AI training was shielded by the “fair use” doctrine, which allows unauthorized use of copyrighted works under certain conditions. It was a win for the tech company but came with a major caveat. As it gathered materials to train its AI tools, Anthropic had relied on a corpus of books pirated from so-called “shadow libraries,” including the notorious site LibGen, and Alsup determined that the authors should still be able to bring Anthropic to trial in a class action over pirating their work. (Anthropic maintains that it did not actually train its products on the pirated works, instead opting to purchase copies of books.)

“Anthropic downloaded over seven million pirated copies of books, paid nothing, and kept these pirated copies in its library even after deciding it would not use them to train its AI (at all or ever again). Authors argue Anthropic should have paid for these pirated library copies. This order agrees,” Alsup wrote in his summary judgement.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Security News This Week: Oh Crap, Kohler’s Toilet Cameras Aren’t Really End-to-End Encrypted

Published

on

Security News This Week: Oh Crap, Kohler’s Toilet Cameras Aren’t Really End-to-End Encrypted


An AI image creator startup left its database unsecured, exposing more than a million images and videos its users had created—the “overwhelming majority” of which depicted nudes and even nude images of children. A US inspector general report released its official determination that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth put military personnel at risk through his negligence in the SignalGate scandal, but recommended only a compliance review and consideration of new regulations. Cloudflare’s CEO Matthew Prince told WIRED onstage at our Big Interview event in San Francisco this week that his company has blocked more than 400 billion AI bot requests for its customers since July 1.

A new New York law will require retailers to disclose if personal data collected about you results in algorithmic changes to their prices. And we profiled a new cellular carrier aiming to offer the closest thing possible to truly anonymous phone service—and its founder, Nicholas Merrill, who famously spent a decade-plus in court fighting an FBI surveillance order targeted at one of the customers of his internet service provider.

Putting a camera-enabled digital device in your toilet that uploads an analysis of your actual bodily waste to a corporation represents such a laughably bad idea that, 11 years ago, it was the subject of a parody infomercial. In 2025, it’s an actual product—and one whose privacy problems, despite the marketing copy of the company behind it, have turned out to be exactly as bad as any normal human might have imagined.

Security researcher Simon Fondrie-Teitler this week published a blog post revealing that the Dekota, a camera-packing smart device sold by Kohler, does not in fact use “end-to-end encryption” as it claimed. That term typically means that data is encrypted so that only user devices on either “end” of a conversation can decrypt the information therein, not the server that sits in between them and hosts that encrypted communication. But Fondrie-Teitler found that the Dekota only encrypts its data from the device to the server. In other words, according to the company’s definition of end-to-end encryption, one end is essentially—forgive us—your rear end, and the other is Kohler’s backend, where the images of its output are “decrypted and processed to provide our service,” as the company wrote in a statement to Fondrie-Teitler.

In response to his post pointing out that this is generally not what end-to-end encryption means, Kohler has removed all instances of that term from its descriptions of the Dekota.

The cyberespionage campaign known as Salt Typhoon represents one of the biggest counterintelligence debacles in modern US history. State-sponsored Chinese hackers infiltrated virtually every US telecom and gained access to the real-time calls and texts of Americans—including then presidential and vice-presidential candidates Donald Trump and J.D. Vance. But according to the Financial Times, the US government has declined to impose sanctions on China in response to that hacking spree amid the White House’s effort to reach a trade deal with China’s government. That decision has led to criticism that the administration is backing off key national security initiatives in an effort to accommodate Trump’s economic goals. But it’s worth noting that imposing sanctions in response to espionage has always been a controversial move, given that the United States no doubt carries out plenty of espionage-oriented hacking of its own across the world.

As 2025 draws to a close, the nation’s leading cyberdefense agency, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), still has no director. And the nominee to fill that position, once considered a shoo-in, now faces congressional hurdles that may have permanently tanked his chances to run the agency. Sean Plankey’s name was excluded from a Senate vote Thursday on a panel of appointments, suggesting his nomination may be “over,” according to CyberScoop. Plankey’s nomination had faced various opposition from senators on both sides of the aisle with a broad mix of demands: Florida’s Republican senator Rick Scott had placed a hold on his nomination due to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) terminating a Coast Guard contract with a company in his state, while North Carolina’s GOP senators opposed any new DHS nominees until disaster relief funding was allocated to their state. Democratic senator Ron Wyden, meanwhile, has demanded CISA publish a long-awaited report on telecom security prior to his appointment, which still has yet to be released.

The Chinese hacking campaign centered around the malware known as “Brickstorm” first came to light in September, when Google warned that the stealthy spy tool has been infecting dozens of victim organizations since 2022. Now CISA, the National Security Agency, and the Canadian Centre for Cybersecurity jointly added to Google’s warnings this week in an advisory about how to spot the malware. They also cautioned that the hackers behind it appear to be positioned not only for espionage targeting US infrastructure but also potentially disruptive cyberattacks, too. Most disturbing, perhaps, is a particular data point from Google, measuring the average time until the Brickstorm breaches have been discovered in a victim’s network: 393 days.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Top Vimeo Promo Codes and Discounts This Month in 2025

Published

on

Top Vimeo Promo Codes and Discounts This Month in 2025


Remember Vimeo? You probably don’t use it to browse videos the way you might with some other services. But if you landed on this page, there’s a good chance you use it to host your professional portfolio. Or assets for your business. Or your short films. Vimeo has tools other video hosting services simply don’t have, like AI editing tools, on-demand content selling, customizable embeds, and collaborative editing features. And best of all: There are no ads. WIRED has rotating Vimeo promo codes to help you save.

Get 10% Off Annual Plans With This Vimeo Promo Code

No matter what you need for your business or career, when it comes to video, Vimeo’s got multiple plans to suit. And luckily, right now, you can save with a Vimeo promo code—even on the annual plans, which already include 40% in savings. Just use Vimeo coupon code GETVIMEO10 to save 10% on your membership plan.

The Easiest Way to Save 40% on Your Vimeo Plan

Vimeo has a few different membership plans that you can save on. No matter which you go with, the easiest way to save a lot is with an annual membership, which has automatic 40% savings compared to paying monthly. And yes, you can even stack promo codes with the annual billing options.

More on Vimeo Pricing and Membership Plans

So what tier do you need? The Starter plan starts at $12 per month (billed annually) or $20 per month (billed monthly). It comes with 100 gigabytes of storage, plus boosted privacy controls, custom video players, custom URLs, and automatic closed captioning.

Boost your plan to Standard for $25 per month (billed annually) or $41 per month (billed monthly) to upgrade to 2 terabytes of storage, 5 “seats” (which are collaborative team member spots), a brand kit, a teleprompter, text-based video editing, AI script generation, and engagement and social analytics.

Finally, there’s the Advanced plan, which costs $75 per month (billed annually) or $125 per month (billed monthly). You’ll get 10 “seats”, 7 terabytes of storage, AI-generated chapters and text summaries, live chat and poll options, plus streaming and live broadcast capabilities.

Use a Vimeo Coupon Code to Get Savings on Vimeo on Demand

Vimeo on Demand is a new way to stream and download movies online. Through Vimeo on Demand, you can rent, buy and subscribe to the best original films, documentaries and series directly from your favorite small business video creators, including The Talent and Wild Magic.

Vimeo Enterprise Solutions 2025

You may have not heard about Vimeo Enterprise, but it’s probably the most essential program for content creators, videographers, and digital media in the workplace in general. From meeting recordings and AI-driven video creation to compliance and distribution, Vimeo Enterprise helps centralize and manage video workflows.

Does Vimeo Have a Free Trial?

While Vimeo doesn’t have a free trial of its paid plans, it does have a free plan with some basic features. Additionally, paid plans can be canceled anytime–within 14 days for an annual subscription, or 3 days for a monthly subscription. You’ll get a full refund if you decide to cancel within the respective timeframes.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

WIRED Roundup: DOGE Isn’t Dead, Facebook Dating Is Real, and Amazon’s AI Ambitions

Published

on

WIRED Roundup: DOGE Isn’t Dead, Facebook Dating Is Real, and Amazon’s AI Ambitions


Leah Feiger: So it’s a really good question actually, and it’s one that I’ve thought about for quite some time. I think if it’s not annoying, I want to read this quote from Scott Kupor, the director of OPM and the former managing partner at Andreessen Horowitz, to be clear, just to remind everyone where people are coming from in this current administration. He posted this on X late last month, and this was part of Reuter’s reporting. So he posts, “The truth is, DOGE may not have centralized leadership under USDS anymore, but the principles of DOGE remain alive and well, deregulation, eliminating fraud, waste and abuse, reshaping the federal workforce, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.” Which is the exact same, the thing that they’ve been saying this entire time, but it’s all smoke and mirrors, right? It’s like, oh no, no, well, DOGE doesn’t exactly exist anymore. There’s no Elon Musk character leading it, which Elon Musk himself said on the podcast with Joe Rogan last month as well. He’s like, “Yeah, once I left, they weren’t able to pick on anyone, but don’t worry, DOGE is still there.” So it feels wild to watch people fall for this and go like, “DOGE is gone now.” And I’m like, they’re literally telling us that it’s not.

Zoë Schiffer: I think one thing that does feel honestly true is that it is harder and harder to differentiate where DOGE stops and the Trump administration begins because they have infiltrated so many different parts of government and the DOGE ethos, what you’re talking about, deregulation, cost cuttings, zero-based budgeting, those have really become kind of table stakes for the admin, right?

Leah Feiger: I think that’s such a good point. And honestly, by the end of Elon Musk’s reign, something that kept coming up wasn’t necessarily that the Trump administration didn’t agree with DOGE’s ethos at all. It was that they didn’t really agree with how Musk was going about it. They didn’t like that he was stepping on Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and having fights outside of the Oval Office. That was bad optics and that also wasn’t helping the Trump administration even look like they were on top of it.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending