Business
BlackRock Stock Drops 7% After $26 Billion Private Credit Fund Limits Investor Withdrawals. Here’s Why
Last Updated:
BlackRock defended the move as consistent with how it has long managed liquidity in the flagship direct lending product, known as HLEND.
BlackRock shares fell more than 7% in New York trading, mirroring steep declines at rival alternative asset managers.
BlackRock Inc. moved to restrict withdrawals from one of the private credit industry’s largest funds after client redemption requests surged well beyond permitted levels.
The firm’s $26 billion HPS Corporate Lending Fund- a non-traded business development company and one of the biggest of its kind- disclosed that shareholders had requested to redeem 9.3% of their shares. Management elected to cap repurchases at 5%, roughly half of what investors sought. The fund held approximately $1.2 billion in eligible shares at year-end, meaning investors will receive back around $620 million rather than the full amount they requested, Bloomberg reported.
BlackRock shares fell more than 7% in New York trading, mirroring steep declines at rival alternative asset managers including KKR & Co. and Ares Management Corp., both of which have had their worst start to a year in a decade.
Why Did BlackRock Impose The Cap?
BlackRock defended the move as consistent with how it has long managed liquidity in the flagship direct lending product, known as HLEND, calling the restriction a “foundational” feature of the investment structure.
“Without it, there would be a structural mismatch between investor capital and the expected duration of the private credit loans in which HLEND invests,” the fund said in a statement.
HPS executives added that the constraint would position the fund to capitalize on “compelling investment opportunities” during a period of elevated uncertainty.
Is This Part Of A Broader Industry Trend?
The decision marks the most prominent instance of gating investor withdrawals among major private credit funds in months. In the prior period, the fund faced withdrawal requests of about 4.1%- well within the standard 5% tender threshold that non-traded BDCs typically offer on a quarterly basis.
Are BlackRock’s Other Funds Also Affected?
A separate, smaller BlackRock vehicle- the BlackRock Private Credit Fund, which held roughly $2.2 billion in assets at year-end- also reported that investors had sought to redeem 4.5% of shares. Unlike HLEND, that fund said it would fulfill all redemption requests in full. Earlier this week, Blackstone Inc.’s flagship private credit fund fulfilled a record tender request of 7.9% of shares, in part by having firm employees invest their own capital to offset the shortfall. In January, Blue Owl Capital Inc. allowed investors in one of its technology-focused funds to redeem roughly $527 million- approximately 15% of net assets- without restriction.
Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google.
Follow News18 on Google. Join the fun, play games on News18. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated.
Washington D.C., United States of America (USA)
March 06, 2026, 23:35 IST
Read More
People walk past a Nike store in New York City, on April 2, 2025.
Kylie Cooper | Reuters
Nike announced a new round of layoffs Thursday affecting approximately 1,400 employees across the organization, mostly concentrated in its technology department.
In a note from COO Venkatesh Alagirisamy, the company said the layoffs were part of Nike’s broader “Win Now” turnaround strategy aiming to reshape its technology team, modernize its Air manufacturing, move some of its Converse Footwear operations and integrate its materials supply chain work into its footwear and apparel supply chain teams.
“Collectively, these changes will result in a reduction of approximately 1,400 roles in global operations, with the majority in technology,” Alagirisamy wrote. “These reductions are very hard for the teammates directly affected and for the teams around them, too.”
A Nike spokesperson said the layoffs are about better positioning the organization for the current pace of sports and accelerating its growth. The layoffs affect employees across North America, Asia and Europe and represent less than 2% of the company’s total global head count.
“This is not a new direction,” Alagirisamy wrote. “It is the next phase of the work already underway.”
Affected employees will be notified beginning Thursday, Nike added.
CEO Elliott Hill has been working to turn Nike around after years of slumping sales. While Hill has made some initial progress, it’s come with some bumps in the road.
Nike announced 775 job cuts in January, primarily at its U.S.-based distribution centers, due to the company’s work in accelerating its use of automation. At the time, the company said the cuts are part of Nike’s goal to return to “long-term, profitable growth.”
Those layoffs came on top of a round of cuts last summer that affected less than 1% of Nike’s corporate staff as part of the company’s efforts to realign the business.
In its third fiscal quarter earnings report last month, the retailer warned that sales will continue to fall for the rest of the year, primarily led by an anticipated 20% decline in China during the current quarter.
— CNBC’s Jessica Golden contributed to this report.
A key reason for the layoffs is Meta’s increased spending in other areas of the company, including AI, for which it will this year spend $135bn (£100bn). This is roughly equal to the amount it has spent on AI in the previous three years combined, according to a person who viewed the memo.
The Government has been urged to stick to its pledge to ban ticket touting amid concerns the policy will be left out of next month’s King’s Speech.
In November, the Government announced that new rules making it illegal to resell tickets for live events for profit would end the “industrial-scale” touting that has caused misery for millions of fans.
Ministers confirmed plans to make it illegal for tickets to concerts, theatre, comedy, sport and other live events to be resold for more than their original cost.
The Labour manifesto promised stronger protections to stop consumers being scammed or priced out of events by touts, who frequently use bots to buy tickets in bulk the moment they go on sale, which they can then sell on for huge mark-ups on secondary ticketing websites.
The proposed rules make it illegal for tickets to be sold at a price above the face value – defined as the original price plus unavoidable fees including service charges.
Service fees will be capped to prevent the price limit being undermined by platforms, which will have a legal duty to monitor and enforce compliance, and individuals will be banned from reselling more tickets than they were entitled to buy in the initial sale.
A host of globally renowned artists have backed the plan, including Radiohead, Dua Lipa and Coldplay.
Following a report in the Guardian that the minister responsible for the policy, Ian Murray, had told music industry groups not to worry if the measure was not part of the King’s Speech on May 13, the Government said it required new primary legislation that it was working to deliver at the earliest opportunity.
A Government spokeswoman said: “Ticket touts are a blight on the live events industry, causing misery for millions of fans.
“We set out decisive plans last year to stamp out touting once and for all, and we are committed to delivering on these for the benefit of fans and industry.”
The music industry and Which? raised concerns about the suggestion of any delay, as sites appeared to show touts selling tickets for the Radio 1 Big Weekend in Sunderland well above the two-ticket limit for buyers and at vastly inflated prices.
Annabella Coldrick, chief executive of the Music Managers Forum, said: “2026 was supposed to mark this Government moving ‘from announcements to action’ but we have little evidence of this to date.
“A ban on ticket touting was one of only two music-related commitments in the Labour manifesto, alongside fixing EU touring.
“These are widely supported, pro-growth measures that will deliver tangible benefits to the British public. However, if ticket resale legislation is not presented in the King’s Speech, it will have the opposite effect and continue to cost those constituents hundreds of millions of pounds a year.
“This Government needs to stand by its promises and get it done.”
Adam Webb, campaign manager at FanFair Alliance, said: “The Government has a big decision to make: will they ‘put fans first’ or not?
“Last November, ministers committed to ‘bold new measures’ to ban online ticket touting and support consumers.
“Enacting these measures should be a no-brainer but, if legislation is not presented in the upcoming King’s Speech, the cycle of industrial-scale exploitation will continue.”
Lisa Webb, consumer law expert at Which?, said: “The Government has promised to put fans first but, if this legislation is not included in the King’s Speech, the only ones celebrating will be the rip-off secondary ticketing websites and online touts.”
Yankees owner Hal Steinbrenner considering factors before debuting new alternate uniforms: report
Nike cuts 1,400 roles in second round of layoffs this year
Rednote Draws a Line Between China and the World
-
Fashion1 week agoFrance’s LVMH Q1 revenue falls 6%, shows resilience amid Iran war
-
Entertainment1 week agoIs Claude down? Here’s why users are seeing errors
-
Tech1 week agoThe Deepfake Nudes Crisis in Schools Is Much Worse Than You Thought
-
Sports1 week agoPSL 11: Peshawar Zalmi win toss, opt to field first against Quetta Gladiators
-
Business1 week agoStandard Life buys rival in £2b deal to create savings giant
-
Tech1 week agoCYBERUK ’26: UK lagging on legal protections for cyber pros | Computer Weekly
-
Fashion1 week agoRaymond unveils luxury Chairman’s Collection Store in Mumbai
-
Business1 week agoPepsiCo earnings beat estimates as North American food business improves