Business
Contactless card payments could become unlimited under new plans

Kevin PeacheyCost of living correspondent, BBC News

Contactless card payments are set to exceed £100 and potentially become unlimited under new proposals to allow banks and other providers to set limits.
The proposals from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) mean entering a four-digit PIN to make a card payment could become even more of a rarity for shoppers.
If approved, purchases which can cost more than £100 – such as a big supermarket shop, or large family meal in a restaurant – could be made with a tap of a card.
The move would bring cards in line with payments made through digital wallets on smartphones which have no restriction, and reflects the ongoing changes in the way people pay.
When contactless card payments were introduced in 2007, the transaction limit was set at £10. The limit was raised gradually, to £15 in 2010, to £20 in 2012, then to £30 in 2015, before the Covid pandemic prompted a jump to £45 in 2020, then to £100 in October 2021.
If approved, the latest plan could be put in place early next year.
Every rise has been met with concerns about theft and fraud, and the FCA said card providers would only permit higher-value contactless payments for low-risk transactions and would carry the burden if things went wrong.
However, the freedom for banks to raise or even scrap the contactless limit suggests the four-digit PIN could soon become relatively redundant.
The FCA has proposed the changes, despite the majority of consumers and industry respondents to a consultation favouring the current rules.
Some 78% of consumers who responded said they did not want any change to the limits.
The FCA said it did not expect any quick changes, but providers would welcome the flexibility over time when prices rise and technology advances. They could also give customers the option to set their own limits.
Fraud and theft fears
The idea of high-value payments being made with a tap of a card will raise concern that thieves and fraudsters will target cards.
Various protections are already in place. In addition to the £100 single payment limit, consumers are often required to enter a PIN if a series of contactless transactions totals more than £300, or five consecutive contactless payments are made.
The FCA’s own analysis suggests raising the limits would increase fraud losses, but said detection was improving and would continue to get better.
It said any change would be reliant on providers ensuring payments were low-risk, through their fraud prevention systems.
Consumers would still get their money back if money was stolen by fraudsters, according to David Geale, from the FCA.
“People are still protected. Even with contactless, firms will refund your money if your card is used fraudulently,” he said.
Many banks already allow cardholders to set a contactless limit of lower than £100, or switch it off completely, and the FCA expected this option to be made widely available.
It argued that time savings, less “payment friction”, and a reflection of rising prices over time would make changes in the limits worthwhile.
Payment terminals would also need to be altered, as most are programmed to automatically refuse payments of more than £100 by card.
‘I only use my phone to pay’
Smartphones already have an extra layer of security, through thumbprints or face ID. That allows people to pay without limits.
Nearly three-quarters of 16 to 24-year-olds regularly use mobile payments, according to industry research.
Near the appropriately named Bank Street in Sevenoaks, 24-year-old Demi Grady said she rarely bothered carrying her cards around anymore because she used her phone for everything.
“I was in London the other day, my phone died and I couldn’t pay for stuff because I couldn’t remember my card details,” she said.
Her mum, Carrie, in contrast, uses her card when shopping.
“It would worry me more than be of benefit if they were to lose the limit of £100,” she said.

Robert Ryan, who had just bought a “winter-ish jacket” at a Harveys Menswear on Bank Street said he did not regard entering a four-digit number when paying as a hassle. Instead it could be a useful budgeting tool.
“I feel more secure in what I’m buying and it does give me a bit of a prompt to make sure I’m not overspending on my tap-and-go,” he said.
Richard Staplehurst, the owner of the store, said the majority of his customers were paying via a device.
He said that removing any obstacles to payment was great, but he did not want to be landed with a bill if a card was used fraudulently.
Stimulating the UK economy
The idea of removing the contactless limit was highlighted as one way the FCA was responding to the prime minister’s call to regulators to remove restrictions to create more economic growth.
The government has been striving to improve the UK’s economic performance, which has been slow for some time.
Other countries, such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand allow industry to set contactless card limits.
The FCA will consult on its proposals until 15 October.
Business
AI Gold Rush Breeds Harsh 996 Work Routine In Silicon Valley

Last Updated:
Silicon Valley tech giants battle for AI dominance, offering huge pay and adopting the 9-9-6 culture in San Francisco startups.

AI Boom, Human Cost: San Francisco Startups Push 9-9-6 Work Schedule
The race for AI heats up, with tech companies in Silicon Valley pouring billions into overpowering others and grabbing the largest pie in the emerging market. Companies have reportedly begun poaching human resources by offering millions of dollars in a pay package. No one wishes to lag behind when things are high at stake. Everyone is ready to pour sweat and blood, literal and metaphorical.
At the center of this heated race, a new culture called 9-9-6 has emerged in the startups of San Francisco, USA.
What Is 9-9-6 Culture?
It means employees of these startups work from 9 in the morning to 9 in the evening, Monday through Saturday. It translates to 72 hours of work weekly, going away from 4 or 5 day work week culture being promoted across Europe, particularly Nordic countries for more leisure time.
An X handle named TBPN in the post said that they checked the receipts and found that the claims are “true” – Saturdays have become a workday. “The great lock-in is in full effect,” it added.
Many San Francisco startups claim they practice 9-9-6, so we checked the receipts.We worked with Ramp to look at the data and it’s true – Saturdays have become a workday.
The great lock-in is in full effect. pic.twitter.com/MbwAICe3Dy
— TBPN (@tbpn) September 8, 2025
AI War Among Tech Titans
Several big tech giants, including Meta, Google, Microsoft and Amazon, have poached the startup founders with a high paycheck to work with their teams building the smartest Large Language Models (LLMs) and improving the hot application-based technology. For instance, Meta shocked the tech industry when it announced to invest a $14.3 billion in data labelling startup Scale AI. As part of the agreement, Meta took a 49% stake in the company, hired its CEO Alexandr Wang to lead a new superintelligence lab and said it would deepen the work it does with Scale.
Since the inception of ChatGPT by OpenAI in late 2020, the official age of AI has begun. Two years after the trailblazing technology, there’s no official winner, but a sudden push to have everything as AI-laced.
A team of writers and reporters decodes vast terms of personal finance and making money matters simpler for you. From latest initial public offerings (IPOs) in the market to best investment options, we cover al…Read More
A team of writers and reporters decodes vast terms of personal finance and making money matters simpler for you. From latest initial public offerings (IPOs) in the market to best investment options, we cover al… Read More
September 10, 2025, 10:22 IST
Read More
Business
Donald Trump’s tariff battle: US Supreme Court fast-tracks review; presidential power limits questioned – The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to take up a fast-track review of the Trump administration’s sweeping global tariffs, setting a November hearing that could decide the fate of one of US President Donald Trump’s most significant economic policies. The justices approved an unusually brisk schedule after a federal appeals court last month struck down much of the program, ruling in a 7-4 decision that Trump unlawfully invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose steep import taxes on major US trading partners. The tariffs, however, will remain in effect during the litigation. Five small businesses and a dozen states had challenged the duties, arguing that Congress — not the president — holds the power to levy taxes. “Congress, not the President alone, has the power to impose tariffs,” said Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center, representing affected enterprises that warn of near-bankruptcy under the duties. The administration countered that the 1977 emergency law gives the president broad authority to regulate imports when national security or the economy is threatened. Solicitor General D. John Sauer warned that the appeals court ruling “casts a pall of uncertainty upon ongoing foreign negotiations that the president has been pursuing through tariffs … jeopardizing both already negotiated framework deals and ongoing negotiations,” as quoted by NYT. The stakes are high: Trump has used tariffs both as leverage in trade talks and as a revenue source, with collections reaching £159 billion by late August — more than double last year’s figure. Officials also cautioned that overturning the tariffs could force the Treasury to refund billions, potentially affecting resources earmarked for fentanyl control and support for Ukraine in its war with Russia. The case marks the first time the Supreme Court will hear full arguments on Trump’s expansive use of emergency powers, after previously granting temporary approvals for other policies. With a conservative majority that includes three Trump appointees, the court will now weigh whether presidential authority under IEEPA extends to such far-reaching trade actions — or whether Congress must reclaim the power to tax.
Business
Trump meets Scottish First Minister John Swinney to discuss whisky tariffs

First Minister John Swinney has met President Donald Trump in the Oval Office to discuss whisky tariffs.
The meeting took place in the Oval Office, where the President was accompanied by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Mr Swinney says he discussed the possibility for a better tariff deal for Scotch whisky.
A 50-minute meeting took place ahead of the US President’s State Visit to the United Kingdom next week.
The First Minister confirmed to Mr Trump he would attend the State Banquet at Windsor Palace.
He said: “With the US state visit to the UK just days away, we are now entering the critical days on which hopes of a better tariff deal for Scotch whisky rest. Scotch whisky holds a unique position, as it can only legally be produced in Scotland.
“During my discussions with President Trump, I made the case to reduce the tariffs on the Scotch whisky industry – something the US industry supports.
“The United States is the largest market for Scotch whisky but Scottish distillers also spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year buying Bourbon casks from Kentucky.
“The negotiations themselves are, of course, for the UK negotiating team but given whisky exports to the US were worth almost £1 billion in 2024, its importance to the Scottish economy cannot be underestimated and I am determined to do all that I can to protect and safeguard this iconic Scottish product.”
The First Minister also raised the international situation including the ongoing conflict in Gaza and Qatar.
Mr Swinney is in the United States to undertake a series of trade and political meetings involving both main US political parties.
In a video posted to X, he confirmed he had met Mr Trump and discussed whisky tariffs, in particular, the possibility of no tariffs on Scotch whisky.
He said: “I wanted to share an update on my visit to Washington, DC. I spent the morning with representatives of the whisky industry from Scotland and the United States and we discussed the zero-for-zero approach on tariffs, which would help the industry to flourish on both sides of the pond.
“I’ve now taken those arguments to the Oval Office to President Trump, and we’ve had a constructive discussion about the reasons why Scotch whisky would benefit from no tariffs.
“It’s all part of my job to make sure that Scotland’s interests are promoted at all times, and that’s what I’ll always do as First Minister.”
The meeting at the White House was scheduled to last around 30 minutes and took place at 7pm UK time.
Prior to the meeting at the White House, the First Minister met representatives and member companies of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (Discus) and the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) at Mount Vernon, the home of US founding father George Washington and the site of a whisky distillery he opened in 1798 which was operated by his Scottish farm hand, James Anderson.
The First Minister flew to Washington DC on Tuesday, saying he would be “pressing the case” for a better tariff deal for Scotch whisky in key talks in the United States.
-
Tech1 week ago
Latam-GPT: The Free, Open Source, and Collaborative AI of Latin America
-
Tech1 week ago
The 50 Best Shows on HBO Max Right Now
-
Tech1 week ago
Should I Take Magnesium Supplements? Everything You Need to Know
-
Tech5 days ago
New non-volatile memory platform built with covalent organic frameworks
-
Tech1 week ago
Join Us for WIRED’s “Uncanny Valley” Live
-
Tech6 days ago
This Robot Only Needs a Single AI Model to Master Humanlike Movements
-
Entertainment6 days ago
James Patterson offers new writers up to $50,000 to finish their books
-
Tech1 week ago
Anthropic valued at $183 bn in new funding round