Connect with us

Business

Contactless card payments could become unlimited under new plans

Published

on

Contactless card payments could become unlimited under new plans


Kevin PeacheyCost of living correspondent, BBC News

Getty Images Person holds a payment card to a reader Getty Images

Contactless card payments are set to exceed £100 and potentially become unlimited under new proposals to allow banks and other providers to set limits.

The proposals from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) mean entering a four-digit PIN to make a card payment could become even more of a rarity for shoppers.

If approved, purchases which can cost more than £100 – such as a big supermarket shop, or large family meal in a restaurant – could be made with a tap of a card.

The move would bring cards in line with payments made through digital wallets on smartphones which have no restriction, and reflects the ongoing changes in the way people pay.

When contactless card payments were introduced in 2007, the transaction limit was set at £10. The limit was raised gradually, to £15 in 2010, to £20 in 2012, then to £30 in 2015, before the Covid pandemic prompted a jump to £45 in 2020, then to £100 in October 2021.

If approved, the latest plan could be put in place early next year.

Every rise has been met with concerns about theft and fraud, and the FCA said card providers would only permit higher-value contactless payments for low-risk transactions and would carry the burden if things went wrong.

However, the freedom for banks to raise or even scrap the contactless limit suggests the four-digit PIN could soon become relatively redundant.

The FCA has proposed the changes, despite the majority of consumers and industry respondents to a consultation favouring the current rules.

Some 78% of consumers who responded said they did not want any change to the limits.

The FCA said it did not expect any quick changes, but providers would welcome the flexibility over time when prices rise and technology advances. They could also give customers the option to set their own limits.

Fraud and theft fears

The idea of high-value payments being made with a tap of a card will raise concern that thieves and fraudsters will target cards.

Various protections are already in place. In addition to the £100 single payment limit, consumers are often required to enter a PIN if a series of contactless transactions totals more than £300, or five consecutive contactless payments are made.

The FCA’s own analysis suggests raising the limits would increase fraud losses, but said detection was improving and would continue to get better.

It said any change would be reliant on providers ensuring payments were low-risk, through their fraud prevention systems.

Consumers would still get their money back if money was stolen by fraudsters, according to David Geale, from the FCA.

“People are still protected. Even with contactless, firms will refund your money if your card is used fraudulently,” he said.

Many banks already allow cardholders to set a contactless limit of lower than £100, or switch it off completely, and the FCA expected this option to be made widely available.

It argued that time savings, less “payment friction”, and a reflection of rising prices over time would make changes in the limits worthwhile.

Payment terminals would also need to be altered, as most are programmed to automatically refuse payments of more than £100 by card.

‘I only use my phone to pay’

Smartphones already have an extra layer of security, through thumbprints or face ID. That allows people to pay without limits.

Nearly three-quarters of 16 to 24-year-olds regularly use mobile payments, according to industry research.

Near the appropriately named Bank Street in Sevenoaks, 24-year-old Demi Grady said she rarely bothered carrying her cards around anymore because she used her phone for everything.

“I was in London the other day, my phone died and I couldn’t pay for stuff because I couldn’t remember my card details,” she said.

Her mum, Carrie, in contrast, uses her card when shopping.

“It would worry me more than be of benefit if they were to lose the limit of £100,” she said.

Robert Ryan in a menswear shop with coats and tops on hangers and shelves behind him.

Robert says the contactless limit can be a useful budgeting reminder

Robert Ryan, who had just bought a “winter-ish jacket” at a Harveys Menswear on Bank Street said he did not regard entering a four-digit number when paying as a hassle. Instead it could be a useful budgeting tool.

“I feel more secure in what I’m buying and it does give me a bit of a prompt to make sure I’m not overspending on my tap-and-go,” he said.

Richard Staplehurst, the owner of the store, said the majority of his customers were paying via a device.

He said that removing any obstacles to payment was great, but he did not want to be landed with a bill if a card was used fraudulently.

Stimulating the UK economy

The idea of removing the contactless limit was highlighted as one way the FCA was responding to the prime minister’s call to regulators to remove restrictions to create more economic growth.

The government has been striving to improve the UK’s economic performance, which has been slow for some time.

Other countries, such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand allow industry to set contactless card limits.

The FCA will consult on its proposals until 15 October.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Petrofac files for administration putting 2,000 jobs at risk

Published

on

Petrofac files for administration putting 2,000 jobs at risk



Oil and gas services firm Petrofac has filed for administration, putting around 2,000 Scottish jobs at risk.

The company is tumbling into insolvency after recent restructuring plans collapsed in the wake of a failed renewables contract in the Netherlands.

On Monday, Petrofac told investors that it has applied to the High Court to appoint administrators.

The firm employs more than 7,000 workers globally.

This includes around 2,000 employees from its UK base in Aberdeen, with around 1,200 of these offshore and a further 800 onshore in training and operational roles.

Petrofac said it will now enter insolvency after Dutch electricity grid TenneT terminated a major contract to build windfarms.

The company stressed that the administration will affect the group’s main holding company.

It will continue to trade and assess options for an alternative restructuring, with different merger and acquisition options also being explored with its key creditors.

Advisers at corporate finance firm Teneo are expected to advise over the administration.

“When appointed, administrators will work alongside executive management to preserve value, operational capability and ongoing delivery across the group’s operating and trading entities,” the company said.

Petrofac’s UK business is based in Aberdeen and is involved in the operation of North Sea oil platforms for firms including BP and Shell.

It also has smaller offices in London, Woking and Great Yarmouth.

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has stressed the Government will work with Petrofac after the oil and gas services group filed for administration.

A DESNZ spokeswoman said: “The UK arm of Petrofac has not entered administration and is continuing to operate as normal, as an in-demand business with a highly-skilled workforce and many successful contracts.

“Petrofac’s administration is a product of longstanding issues in their global business.

“The Government will continue to work with the UK company as it focuses on its long-term future.

“Ministers are working across all parts of government led by DESNZ in support of this.”

The company was worth around £6 billion at its peak in 2012 but has slumped in recent years.

It was worth around £20 million when its shares were suspended in May after being severely impacted by an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office and volatile energy prices.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

‘Flawed’ HMRC system stops hundreds of NI families’ child benefit

Published

on

‘Flawed’ HMRC system stops hundreds of NI families’ child benefit


PA Media Dáire Hughes speaking at a microphone. He has dark hair and is wearing glasses. He has a navy suit and black tie.PA Media

Sinn Féin MP Dáire Hughes, who is representing 14 of the families affected, called the system “flawed”

Hundreds of families have had their child benefit payments stopped because they returned to Northern Ireland via Dublin airport.

It follows the introduction of a new government anti-fraud system designed to track those who leave the country but do not come back after eight weeks, raising a red flag at HMRC for possible emigration.

Sinn Féin MP Dáire Hughes, who is representing 14 of the families affected, called the system “flawed”.

As first reported in The Detail, HMRC have apologised for the mistake and said they were “working at pace” to reinstate claims so families are “not left out of pocket”.

PA Media Three Bank of England bank notes. One is a blue five pound note with King Charles III on it, in the middle is an orange ten pound note with King Charles III on it and lastly is a purple twenty pound note with King Charles III on it.PA Media

HMRC have said they have reinstated 134 payments

The government crackdown on alleged benefit fraud compares HMRC records with Home Office international travel data.

That means families returning to Northern Ireland through Dublin Airport were mistakenly flagged as having gone abroad and were therefore fraudulently claiming benefits.

In one instance a person flew out from Belfast and back through Dublin, while in another a family had travelled to England and back again via Dublin because it was cheaper.

UK and Irish citizens can travel freely into each other’s countries under the Common Travel Area arrangement (CTA).

There are no routine passport checks when travelling through the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, meaning the UK government has no data to show that someone may have returned to Northern Ireland.

HMRC said it would be introducing an “upfront check” to identify Northern Ireland customers whose exit from the UK was to the Republic of Ireland and will not suspend their payments without first clarifying their residency.

‘Simply appalling’

Hughes, who is the MP for Newry and Armagh, told BBC Radio Ulster’s Good Morning Ulster programme that the policy was being “created in a context of being completely oblivious to the realities of life on this island”.

He said that people from Northern Ireland use Dublin Airport for a variety of reasons and it is “just as handy” to them as either airport in Belfast.

“It is quite patently a ridiculous set up, where months and months, in some cases years after returning to the north, a letter arrives at peoples doors informing them that their child benefits have been suspended and in order to get them reinstated there are extensive hoops to jump through,” he added.

“It’s simply appalling.”

He said he has received a “number of confirmations that payments have been reinstated” to some of the families he represents.

Hughes welcomed the news and added that HMRC had to ensure it did not happen again.

‘Protect taxpayers’ money’ – HMRC

HMRC said it had involved a “small number of customers in Northern Ireland”.

As of 17 October 2025, HMRC said they had had sent enquiry letters to 346 customers from Northern Ireland. This is out of 219,255 customers claiming child benefit in Northern Ireland.

HMRC also said they have reinstated payments and closed enquires to 134 people after carrying out employment checks.

There are 46 cases which are currently undergoing these checks and HMRC confirmed they will reinstate payments once they are complete.

Child benefit is paid to more 6.9 million families, supporting 11.9 million children. It is one of the most widely accessed forms of benefit in the UK.

HMRC said a successful pilot scheme focusing on those who left the UK but carried on claiming, had already prevented £17m in wrongful payments by removing them from the system.

“It’s crucial that we undertake this work to protect taxpayers’ money,” HMRC added.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

North Sea oil and gas firm Petrofac files for administration

Published

on

North Sea oil and gas firm Petrofac files for administration


Energy services firm Petrofac has filed for administration.

The company, which employs about 2,000 people in Scotland, said its North Sea business would continue to operate as normal.

In a statement, Petrofac said it had applied to appoint administrators for its holding company, but that alternative restructuring options were being explored.

It added that administrators would work to “preserve value, operational capability and ongoing delivery”.

The decision comes after Dutch grid operator TenneT terminated a major offshore wind contract with Petrofac, scuppering a planned financial restructuring.

The firm, which has UK offices in Aberdeen, London, Woking and Great Yarmouth, said further information on the administration process would be provided in due course.

Founded in Texas in 1981, Petrofac designs and builds facilities for oil, gas and renewables projects, as well as providing engineering, project management and logistical services.

It has been involved in the operation of North Sea oil platforms for firms including BP and Shell.

Once a FTSE 100 firm, the company was worth around £6bn at its peak in 2012 but it has slumped in recent years following a Serious Fraud Office investigation and a series of profit warnings.

Petrofac was worth around £20m when its shares were suspended in May. The firm has cited delays in contract payments and rising operating costs.

A spokesperson for the UK Department of Energy Security and Net Zero said: “The UK arm of Petrofac has not entered administration and is continuing to operate as normal, as an in-demand business with a highly skilled workforce and many successful contracts.”

They said the administration process was a result of “long-standing issues” in the firm’s worldwide operations.

The spokesperson added: “The government will continue to work with the UK company as it focuses on its long-term future.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending