Tech
European court upholds EU-US Data Privacy Framework data-sharing agreement | Computer Weekly
Europe’s General Court has upheld the lawfulness of the data-sharing agreement between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) following a legal challenge.
The court today dismissed legal action brought by a French MP to annul the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (DPF).
It found that the framework, which businesses rely on to transfer data between the EU and the US, ensured “an adequate level” of protection for personal data passing between the EU and the US.
The decision provides certainty for organisations and businesses that rely on the DPF to exchange data between the EU and the US.
However, the court’s ruling on 3 September could still be subject to a further appeal to the European Court of Justice, which has struck out two previous data-sharing agreements between the EU and the US.
French MP Philippe Latombe challenged the lawfulness of the EU-US Data Privacy Framework on the grounds that US intelligence services collect data in transit from the EU in bulk without adequate safeguards for the privacy of EU citizens.
He argued that the US Data Protection Review Court (DPRC), set up to hear complaints from EU citizens who believe their privacy rights have been breached by US intelligence agencies, was neither impartial nor independent of the US executive.
The Luxembourg court dismissed both claims, finding that there was nothing in European case law – established in the Schrems II case in 2020 – that requires US intelligence agencies to seek prior authorisation before intercepting bulk data from the EU.
The court found that it was sufficient that the US intelligence agencies were subject to judicial oversight by the DPRC. It found that the US court had safeguards in place to ensure the independence of its members from the executive.
The DPRC’s judges can only be dismissed by the attorney general, and then only for cause, and intelligence agencies may not hinder or improperly influence their work, the court found.
“Therefore, the General Court finds that it cannot be considered that the bulk collection of personal data by American intelligence agencies falls short of the requirements arising from Schrems II … or that US law fails to ensure a level of legal protection that is essentially equivalent to that guaranteed by EU law,” the court said in a statement.
Schrems considering appeal
The latest challenge to the EU-US data-sharing agreement follows two earlier challenges brought by Austrian lawyer Max Schrems.
The European Court of Justice struck down the EU-US Safe Harbour agreement in October 2015, in a case that became known as Schrems I.
In July 2020, in Schrems II, the court struck down a successor agreement, Privacy Shield, on the grounds that it did not provide European citizens with adequate right of redress when data is collected by US intelligence services.
The US adopted Executive Order 14086 in 2022 to strengthen protections for individuals under surveillance by US intelligence agencies. An order from the attorney general in the same year led to the creation of the Data Protection Review Court.
Schrems, honorary chairman of nyob, a non-profit organisation that campaigns on data protection and privacy, said he was considering appealing the General Court’s decision to endorse the Data Protection Framework.
He said the General Court appeared to have “massively departed” from the ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Schrems II, which struck down the predecessor agreement to the Data Privacy Framework in 2020.
Schrems said actions by President Trump in the US, who has threatened to remove the independent heads of the Federal Reserve and the Federal Trade Commission, show that the independence of the Data Protection Review Court cannot be guaranteed.
“The court in question is not even established by law, but just by an executive order of the president – and can hence be removed in a second. It is very surprising that the EU court would find that sufficient,” he said.
EU-US data transfers protected for ‘some time’
Joe Jones, director of research and insights at the International Association of Privacy Professionals, said the court’s decision would keep EU-US data transfers “on an even keel” for some time, and would support a “significant chunk” of transatlantic trade.
“Many eyes will now turn to whether the case will be appealed to the Court of Justice, which has traditionally taken a more expansive approach to data protection cases, and has a two out of two strike rate against EU-US data adequacy decisions,” he added.
The Business Software Alliance, a trade body for the software industry, said the decision provided stability for businesses and consumers in the EU and the US that rely on cross-border data flows.
The EU-US Data Privacy Framework is essential for the digital economy and helps companies adopt technologies that drive growth and competitiveness.
“The safeguards built into the framework assure a high level of privacy protection,” a spokesperson added.
The European Commission opposed Latombe’s legal challenge, supported by Ireland and the US.
Tech
Security News This Week: Oh Crap, Kohler’s Toilet Cameras Aren’t Really End-to-End Encrypted
An AI image creator startup left its database unsecured, exposing more than a million images and videos its users had created—the “overwhelming majority” of which depicted nudes and even nude images of children. A US inspector general report released its official determination that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth put military personnel at risk through his negligence in the SignalGate scandal, but recommended only a compliance review and consideration of new regulations. Cloudflare’s CEO Matthew Prince told WIRED onstage at our Big Interview event in San Francisco this week that his company has blocked more than 400 billion AI bot requests for its customers since July 1.
A new New York law will require retailers to disclose if personal data collected about you results in algorithmic changes to their prices. And we profiled a new cellular carrier aiming to offer the closest thing possible to truly anonymous phone service—and its founder, Nicholas Merrill, who famously spent a decade-plus in court fighting an FBI surveillance order targeted at one of the customers of his internet service provider.
Putting a camera-enabled digital device in your toilet that uploads an analysis of your actual bodily waste to a corporation represents such a laughably bad idea that, 11 years ago, it was the subject of a parody infomercial. In 2025, it’s an actual product—and one whose privacy problems, despite the marketing copy of the company behind it, have turned out to be exactly as bad as any normal human might have imagined.
Security researcher Simon Fondrie-Teitler this week published a blog post revealing that the Dekota, a camera-packing smart device sold by Kohler, does not in fact use “end-to-end encryption” as it claimed. That term typically means that data is encrypted so that only user devices on either “end” of a conversation can decrypt the information therein, not the server that sits in between them and hosts that encrypted communication. But Fondrie-Teitler found that the Dekota only encrypts its data from the device to the server. In other words, according to the company’s definition of end-to-end encryption, one end is essentially—forgive us—your rear end, and the other is Kohler’s backend, where the images of its output are “decrypted and processed to provide our service,” as the company wrote in a statement to Fondrie-Teitler.
In response to his post pointing out that this is generally not what end-to-end encryption means, Kohler has removed all instances of that term from its descriptions of the Dekota.
The cyberespionage campaign known as Salt Typhoon represents one of the biggest counterintelligence debacles in modern US history. State-sponsored Chinese hackers infiltrated virtually every US telecom and gained access to the real-time calls and texts of Americans—including then presidential and vice-presidential candidates Donald Trump and J.D. Vance. But according to the Financial Times, the US government has declined to impose sanctions on China in response to that hacking spree amid the White House’s effort to reach a trade deal with China’s government. That decision has led to criticism that the administration is backing off key national security initiatives in an effort to accommodate Trump’s economic goals. But it’s worth noting that imposing sanctions in response to espionage has always been a controversial move, given that the United States no doubt carries out plenty of espionage-oriented hacking of its own across the world.
As 2025 draws to a close, the nation’s leading cyberdefense agency, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), still has no director. And the nominee to fill that position, once considered a shoo-in, now faces congressional hurdles that may have permanently tanked his chances to run the agency. Sean Plankey’s name was excluded from a Senate vote Thursday on a panel of appointments, suggesting his nomination may be “over,” according to CyberScoop. Plankey’s nomination had faced various opposition from senators on both sides of the aisle with a broad mix of demands: Florida’s Republican senator Rick Scott had placed a hold on his nomination due to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) terminating a Coast Guard contract with a company in his state, while North Carolina’s GOP senators opposed any new DHS nominees until disaster relief funding was allocated to their state. Democratic senator Ron Wyden, meanwhile, has demanded CISA publish a long-awaited report on telecom security prior to his appointment, which still has yet to be released.
The Chinese hacking campaign centered around the malware known as “Brickstorm” first came to light in September, when Google warned that the stealthy spy tool has been infecting dozens of victim organizations since 2022. Now CISA, the National Security Agency, and the Canadian Centre for Cybersecurity jointly added to Google’s warnings this week in an advisory about how to spot the malware. They also cautioned that the hackers behind it appear to be positioned not only for espionage targeting US infrastructure but also potentially disruptive cyberattacks, too. Most disturbing, perhaps, is a particular data point from Google, measuring the average time until the Brickstorm breaches have been discovered in a victim’s network: 393 days.
Tech
Top Vimeo Promo Codes and Discounts This Month in 2025
Remember Vimeo? You probably don’t use it to browse videos the way you might with some other services. But if you landed on this page, there’s a good chance you use it to host your professional portfolio. Or assets for your business. Or your short films. Vimeo has tools other video hosting services simply don’t have, like AI editing tools, on-demand content selling, customizable embeds, and collaborative editing features. And best of all: There are no ads. WIRED has rotating Vimeo promo codes to help you save.
Get 10% Off Annual Plans With This Vimeo Promo Code
No matter what you need for your business or career, when it comes to video, Vimeo’s got multiple plans to suit. And luckily, right now, you can save with a Vimeo promo code—even on the annual plans, which already include 40% in savings. Just use Vimeo coupon code GETVIMEO10 to save 10% on your membership plan.
The Easiest Way to Save 40% on Your Vimeo Plan
Vimeo has a few different membership plans that you can save on. No matter which you go with, the easiest way to save a lot is with an annual membership, which has automatic 40% savings compared to paying monthly. And yes, you can even stack promo codes with the annual billing options.
More on Vimeo Pricing and Membership Plans
So what tier do you need? The Starter plan starts at $12 per month (billed annually) or $20 per month (billed monthly). It comes with 100 gigabytes of storage, plus boosted privacy controls, custom video players, custom URLs, and automatic closed captioning.
Boost your plan to Standard for $25 per month (billed annually) or $41 per month (billed monthly) to upgrade to 2 terabytes of storage, 5 “seats” (which are collaborative team member spots), a brand kit, a teleprompter, text-based video editing, AI script generation, and engagement and social analytics.
Finally, there’s the Advanced plan, which costs $75 per month (billed annually) or $125 per month (billed monthly). You’ll get 10 “seats”, 7 terabytes of storage, AI-generated chapters and text summaries, live chat and poll options, plus streaming and live broadcast capabilities.
Use a Vimeo Coupon Code to Get Savings on Vimeo on Demand
Vimeo on Demand is a new way to stream and download movies online. Through Vimeo on Demand, you can rent, buy and subscribe to the best original films, documentaries and series directly from your favorite small business video creators, including The Talent and Wild Magic.
Vimeo Enterprise Solutions 2025
You may have not heard about Vimeo Enterprise, but it’s probably the most essential program for content creators, videographers, and digital media in the workplace in general. From meeting recordings and AI-driven video creation to compliance and distribution, Vimeo Enterprise helps centralize and manage video workflows.
Does Vimeo Have a Free Trial?
While Vimeo doesn’t have a free trial of its paid plans, it does have a free plan with some basic features. Additionally, paid plans can be canceled anytime–within 14 days for an annual subscription, or 3 days for a monthly subscription. You’ll get a full refund if you decide to cancel within the respective timeframes.
Tech
WIRED Roundup: DOGE Isn’t Dead, Facebook Dating Is Real, and Amazon’s AI Ambitions
Leah Feiger: So it’s a really good question actually, and it’s one that I’ve thought about for quite some time. I think if it’s not annoying, I want to read this quote from Scott Kupor, the director of OPM and the former managing partner at Andreessen Horowitz, to be clear, just to remind everyone where people are coming from in this current administration. He posted this on X late last month, and this was part of Reuter’s reporting. So he posts, “The truth is, DOGE may not have centralized leadership under USDS anymore, but the principles of DOGE remain alive and well, deregulation, eliminating fraud, waste and abuse, reshaping the federal workforce, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.” Which is the exact same, the thing that they’ve been saying this entire time, but it’s all smoke and mirrors, right? It’s like, oh no, no, well, DOGE doesn’t exactly exist anymore. There’s no Elon Musk character leading it, which Elon Musk himself said on the podcast with Joe Rogan last month as well. He’s like, “Yeah, once I left, they weren’t able to pick on anyone, but don’t worry, DOGE is still there.” So it feels wild to watch people fall for this and go like, “DOGE is gone now.” And I’m like, they’re literally telling us that it’s not.
Zoë Schiffer: I think one thing that does feel honestly true is that it is harder and harder to differentiate where DOGE stops and the Trump administration begins because they have infiltrated so many different parts of government and the DOGE ethos, what you’re talking about, deregulation, cost cuttings, zero-based budgeting, those have really become kind of table stakes for the admin, right?
Leah Feiger: I think that’s such a good point. And honestly, by the end of Elon Musk’s reign, something that kept coming up wasn’t necessarily that the Trump administration didn’t agree with DOGE’s ethos at all. It was that they didn’t really agree with how Musk was going about it. They didn’t like that he was stepping on Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and having fights outside of the Oval Office. That was bad optics and that also wasn’t helping the Trump administration even look like they were on top of it.
-
Tech6 days agoGet Your Steps In From Your Home Office With This Walking Pad—On Sale This Week
-
Sports6 days agoIndia Triumphs Over South Africa in First ODI Thanks to Kohli’s Heroics – SUCH TV
-
Entertainment6 days agoSadie Sink talks about the future of Max in ‘Stranger Things’
-
Fashion6 days agoResults are in: US Black Friday store visits down, e-visits up, apparel shines
-
Politics6 days agoElon Musk reveals partner’s half-Indian roots, son’s middle name ‘Sekhar’
-
Tech6 days agoPrague’s City Center Sparkles, Buzzes, and Burns at the Signal Festival
-
Sports6 days agoBroncos secure thrilling OT victory over Commanders behind clutch performances
-
Sports6 days agoF1 set for final-race showdown as Verstappen exploits McLaren blunder | The Express Tribune
