Connect with us

Business

Few heirs keep their parents’ wealth advisors — most wealthy benefactors don’t mind

Published

on

Few heirs keep their parents’ wealth advisors — most wealthy benefactors don’t mind


Drazen_ | E+ | Getty Images

A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

Over the next 25 years, more than $120 trillion in wealth will be passed down to inheritors, according to Cerulli Associates.

Only 27% of these future beneficiaries — primarily widows and children — plan to keep their benefactor’s wealth advisor, per Cerulli’s survey of investors with at least $250,000 in financial assets. The share drops to 20% for those who have already inherited their riches, according to the report released in September.

However, most heirs aren’t firing their benefactors’ wealth advisors in favor of self-directed investing and digital products. When asked why they chose another route, half of those surveyed said they already had their own advisor. The second-most popular reason, at 28%, was not having a relationship with their benefactors’ advisor. Only 14% said they didn’t want to work with a financial advisor at all, and 10% said the advisor didn’t meet their specific investment needs. Respondents to the survey could pick multiple reasons.

“Keep in mind, if the parents die in their 70s or 80s, the inheritor is between 40 and 60,” said John McKenna, research analyst at Cerulli. “In most of these cases, they have matured into wealth management clients. They have relationships, and they’re just going to be adding incrementally to their existing relationships rather than starting a new one with a legacy advisor.”

For their part, benefactors who are planning to pass their wealth down are largely ambivalent about whether their heirs use the same advisors despite saying they are largely satisfied with their service, Cerulli found. While just over a quarter of those surveyed said they wished their inheritors would keep their advisor, more than half said they were unsure or that it was up to their beneficiaries. Seven percent said they did not want their heirs to use their advisor, with the most popular reason being that the parties didn’t already have a relationship.

The crux of the problem, according to Scott Smith, senior director of advice relationships at Cerulli, is that clients are often reluctant to discuss their estate plans with their families. Even among investors with more than $5 million in financial assets, 20% said they intended for heirs to learn about their wealth after their death. The actual number of procrastinators is likely higher, as 34% of high-net-worth heirs said they were told these details after their benefactor died.

Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

“Benefactors believe that they will talk to their next generation about this stuff before they die,” said Smith. “But when we ask the next generation, these conversations didn’t happen.”

As a result, advisors may have few opportunities to talk to their client’s children and explain what they can offer, Smith said. It’s up to the advisor to encourage clients to stop putting off uncomfortable discussions, he said.

“Reinforce it with the primary contact that it’s important for the survivor to get involved early on so they have their feet securely on the ground and they aren’t panicking as soon as it happens,” he said. “It’s not just that we’re trying to retain the assets. We’re trying to make it easier for your survivor when you pass.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Noel Tata part of 3-1 vote against Srinivasan, Singh at Tata edu trust – The Times of India

Published

on

Noel Tata part of 3-1 vote against Srinivasan, Singh at Tata edu trust – The Times of India


MUMBAI: Noel Tata has voted against the reappointment of Venu Srinivasan and Vijay Singh as trustees of Tata Education and Development Trust (TEDT), the largest corpus trust within Tata Trusts, in a move that widens fault lines within one of India’s most powerful philanthropic structures. It marks the first time Noel has made his opposition to the duo unequivocal.The vote, the last of four cast on the matter, added to a verdict that had already been sealed when Mehli Mistry became the first to oppose the duo’s extension, shortly after the trusteeship renewal circular was issued.Under TEDT’s governance rules, reappointments require unanimous consent among trustees – a threshold that had already been foreclosed by Mehli’s vote. Jehangir Mistry subsequently voted against both men as well. Srinivasan and Singh had each voted for the other. The tally stood at 3-1 against each of them.

Noel’s vote signals widening of Tata Trusts rift since ’25

Their tenures in an influential Tata trust that supports projects in India and abroad, formally expired on Sunday, May 10. Noel Tata voting against Srinivasan and Singh significantly curtails influence of both men within wider Tata Trusts ecosystem, even as they remain vice-chairmen of the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust (SDTT) and Sir Ratan Tata Trust (SRTT) — the two apex trusts that together hold controlling stake in Tata Sons.The rift between Noel and the duo deepened after Srinivasan and Singh publicly backed a listing of Tata Sons, a move Noel opposed. In an email to Tata Trusts CEO, Mehli said “My affidavit in response to the board composition change report for SDTT explains the reasons why I chose to take such a decision.” According to the affidavit, Noel, Srinivasan and Singh had wrongly voted against him at SDTT. He also said that Srinivasan had taken part in the vote even though his term had already ended at SDTT. TEDT, with a corpus of Rs 5,600 crore, has been among the most prominent Indian donors to Ivy League institutions, including Harvard Business School and Cornell University, and owns and operates two cancer hospitals in India while supporting 17 others through grants.Following the board changes, Noel remains chairman and perpetual trustee of TEDT. Mehli continues in his role as perpetual trustee, while Jehangir holds a fixed-term trusteeship. With Srinivasan and Singh’s departure, TEDT now sits at the minimum threshold of three trustees permitted under its deed. An email sent to Noel did not elicit a response. The vote is the latest and most visible expression of a fracture within Tata Trusts that has been widening since late 2025. Established by former Tata Trusts chairman Ratan Tata in 2008, TEDT is perhaps the only trust within Tata Trusts that can support social projects in India and abroad.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

CCI to probe Pernod Ricard, seven others – The Times of India

Published

on

CCI to probe Pernod Ricard, seven others – The Times of India


The Competition Commission of India has ordered a detailed probe into French spirits giant Pernod Ricard and seven other entities for alleged cartelisation in the Indian-made foreign liquor market. The investigation will examine restrictive conduct by Pernod Ricard with retailers and wholesalers, potentially violating competition laws. The CCI’s Director General will lead the inquiry, looking into responsible individuals.

NEW DELHI: The Competition Commission has ordered a detailed probe against French spirits major Pernod Ricard and seven other entities for alleged cartelisation in the Indian-made foreign liquor market.The seven entities that have come under the watchdog’s lens are Indo Spirits, Pathway HR Solutions, Universal Distributors, Khao Gali, Bubbly Beverages, Shiv Associates and Organomix Ecosystems.Ordering the investigation, the regulator said it is of prima-facie view that Pernord Ricard’s restrictive conduct with its retailers/wholesalers, purportedly, to induce brand pushing and achieve higher market share in IMFL market in Delhi, falls within the purview of ‘exclusive dealing agreement’ under the Competition Act. Such conduct violates the Act, according to a 26-page order, dated May 5, by the Competition Commission of India (CCI). The complaint was filed before the CCI in 2024.CCI’s Director General (DG) will carry out the investigation that will also look into the role of the persons/officers who were responsible for the conduct of the activities of such entities as well as individuals whose consent or connivance was involved during the time of the contraventions.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Cost of living crisis sees tradespeople having to chase debt

Published

on

Cost of living crisis sees tradespeople having to chase debt



More than half of tradespeople have seen an increase of late payments compared to a year ago, a survey finds.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending