Business
Food prices push yearly SPI to 35-week high | The Express Tribune
KARACHI:
Pakistan’s weekly inflation, measured by the Sensitive Price Indicator (SPI), week ending Sep 04, 2025, increased by 1.29% week on week (WoW) and up 5.07% year on year (YoY), which is the highest YoY after 35 weeks.
Major increase was observed in the prices of tomatoes, wheat flour, onions, rice basmati broken, garlic, potatoes.
“Pakistan’s Weekly SPI for the period ending Sep 04, 2025, increased by 1.29% WoW while up 5.07% YoY, which is the highest YoY after 35 weeks,” noted Topline Securities.
The SPI rose by 1.29% for the combined consumption groups during the week ended September 4, 2025, according to data released by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS). The SPI was recorded at 335.41 points compared to 331.14 points in the previous week. On a year-on-year basis, the SPI registered an increase of 5.07%, the highest annual rise in 35 weeks, reflecting renewed price pressures in essential commodities.
The PBS noted that the inflationary burden was more pronounced for lower-income households. For the lowest consumption group with monthly expenditure by 2.01% to 327.73 points, while other quintiles recorded weekly rises of 1.90%, 1.61%, 1.48%, and 0.99% respectively. This indicates that households in the lower-income brackets continue to bear the brunt of price hikes, particularly in food essentials that form a larger share of their consumption basket.
Out of the 51 essential items monitored, the prices of 23 items or 45.10% increased, 4 items or 7.84% declined, while 24 items or 47.06% remained stable during the week under review. The steepest weekly increases were observed in the prices of tomatoes, which soared 46.03%, followed by wheat flour at 25.41%and onions at 8.57%. Other notable increases included rice basmati broken at 2.62%, garlic at 2.04%, potatoes at 1.38%, pulse moong at 1.29%, and bread at 1.19%. Non-food categories also saw moderate increases, with LPG rising by 0.88%, shirting by 0.27%, long cloth by 0.17%, and lawn printed by 0.07%. In contrast, bananas declined by 3.86%, diesel by 0.91%, sugar by 0.13%, and mustard oil by 0.10%, offering limited relief.
On a yearly basis, several items remained significantly higher than last year. Tomatoes registered the steepest jump at 83.45%, followed by ladies’ sandals at 55.62%, wheat flour at 30.27%, and gas charges for Q1 at 29.85%. Prices of sugar rose 27.43%, while gur, beef, pulse moong, firewood, vegetable ghee, and chicken all recorded double-digit increases. Lawn printed also edged higher by 7.72%, adding to household expenses. On the other hand, major yearly declines were recorded in onions, which fell 47%, garlic at 25.50%, pulse mash at 22.93%, potatoes at 19.25%, and pulse gram at 19.04%. Other notable declines included electricity charges for Q1 at 18.12%, tea packet at 17.93%, pulse masoor at 6.07%, rice IRRI-6/9 at 4.60%, and LPG at 3.71%.
Analysts point out that while weekly inflation is largely being driven by volatility in perishable food items such as tomatoes and wheat flour, the broader year-on-year jump raises concerns about persistent cost-of-living pressures. With inflation hitting its highest yearly spike in over eight months, the government faces a growing challenge in protecting lower-income households from food price shocks.
Business
Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews
Food delivery giant Just Eat, funeral firm Dignity and motor platform Autotrader are among five firms under investigation by the UK’s competition watchdog as part of its crackdown on fake and misleading online reviews.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it had launched probes against the companies – also including customer review and feedback firm Feefo and Pasta Evangelists – to see whether consumer laws have been broken.
Since April last year, companies have been banned from certain tactics around online reviews under law, such as fake posts, paid-for reviews that are not clearly marked as incentivised, as well as for hiding negative feedback.
Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said: “Fake reviews strike at the heart of consumer trust – with many of us worrying about misleading content when looking at reviews online.
“With household budgets under pressure, people need to know they’re getting genuine information – not reviews or star ratings that have been manipulated to push them towards the wrong choice.
“We’ve given businesses the time to get things right. Now we’re deploying our new powers to tackle some of the most harmful practices head on.”
The CMA said it was looking into whether Just Eat’s ratings system had inflated some restaurant and grocer star ratings, giving a misleading picture of quality.
For Autotrader and Feefo, the CMA is investigating whether a number of one-star reviews – moderated by Feefo, which handles reviews for the new and used car site – were hidden on the platform and did not count towards the star ratings.
Dignity is under investigation by the CMA into whether it asked staff to write positive reviews about the firm’s crematoria services.
And artisan fresh pasta chain Pasta Evangelists is being probed over allegations it offered customers discounts for leaving five-star reviews on delivery apps without this being disclosed.
If the CMA finds the firms have broken the law, it can order them to change their practices and fine them up to 10% of their annual global sales.
An Autotrader spokesperson said: “We endeavour always to operate as a responsible and compliant business and will co-operate fully with the CMA’s investigation.”
It comes after the CMA recently secured commitments from Google and Amazon to beef up their systems to identify and remove fake reviews.
Amazon last June agreed to put in place “robust processes” to quickly detect and remove fake reviews alongside sanctions for rogue sellers and businesses after an investigation by the CMA to curb the customer hazard.
The tech giant said it would sanction businesses that boost their star ratings via bogus reviews or catalogue abuse, including bans from selling on the website, while users could also be banned for posting fake reviews.
Consumer group Which? welcomed the investigations and said the CMA must “get tough” on firms found to be breaking the law with reviews.
Sue Davies, head of consumer rights policy at Which?, said: “Investigations are a welcome first step, but enforcement will be key – the regulator must be prepared to get tough, use its powers and issue serious fines if these companies aren’t playing by the rules.”
The CMA said it swept more than 100 review publishers as part of the clampdown and sent advisory letters to 54 firms to improve their compliance with the law, with 90% having made changes in response and 75% telling the watchdog they better understood the rules.
Business
Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply
Anthony Albanese says nation’s supply remains “secure” amid reports of panic buying and shortages.
Source link
Business
Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial
A woman has been awarded $6m in a verdict that could have implications for hundreds of other cases in the US.
Source link
-
Fashion1 week agoSales at US apparel, clothing accessories stores up 4% YoY in Jan 2026
-
Entertainment1 week agoVal Kilmer revived 1 year after death through AI
-
Fashion1 week agoUS’ G-III Apparel’s FY26 sales fall 7% to $2.96 bn
-
Sports1 week agoMarch Madness 2026 – How to watch in SA, start time, schedule, TV channel for NCAA championship basketball tournament
-
Business1 week agoBrits cashing in jewellery as gold price hits record high
-
Fashion6 days agoChina’s textile & apparel exports surge 17% to $50 bn in Jan-Feb 2026
-
Business1 week agoVideo: The Effects of High Oil Prices
-
Business6 days agoFlipkart group CFO to leave co amid IPO plans – The Times of India
