Connect with us

Sports

Giants-Eagles rivalry and the NFL punt that lives in infamy

Published

on

Giants-Eagles rivalry and the NFL punt that lives in infamy


Just last weekend, the New York Giants allowed 33 fourth-quarter points against the Denver Broncos to lose a game in which it seemed impossible for them to do anything other than win. How wild was it? In the 1,602 previous instances of an NFL team leading by 18 or more points with six minutes left, all 1,602 teams that were ahead finished with a victory. The Giants, who had a 26-8 lead late, somehow didn’t.

It was stunning, astounding, confounding. It seemed unprecedented. Sadly, Giants fans knew it wasn’t.

“This ranks up there with the ’02 [playoff] loss to San Francisco,” Bob Papa, the Giants’ longtime radio announcer, said afterward. “And of course,” he added, “with 2010.”

Of course — 2010.

Now, as the Giants attempt to recover from the Broncos disaster and prepare to face the rival Philadelphia Eagles on Sunday (1 p.m. ET, Fox), it seems fitting (albeit a little cruel) to commemorate the 15-year anniversary of what many who live for the Giants or work for the Giants or love the Giants consider to be the absolute biggest gut punch in franchise history.

Dec. 19, 2010. A game that meant, and still means, so much to so many. This is the oral history of a moment known to some as “The Miracle at the New Meadowlands.” And to others, more simply, as “The Punt.”

Part 1: The buildup

The 2010 Giants had high expectations for their first season in the new Meadowlands Stadium: In addition to quarterback Eli Manning, the team had stars such as Osi Umenyiora and Justin Tuck anchoring the defense, as well as Ahmad Bradshaw, Brandon Jacobs, Mario Manningham and Hakeem Nicks on offense. Tom Coughlin was in his seventh season as the coach.

After losing two of their first three games, the Giants reeled off eight wins in their next 10. With a victory in Week 15 against Michael Vick and the Eagles, the Giants would be in a commanding position to claim the NFC East and set up a playoff run.

On a cold day in New Jersey, they couldn’t have looked any better, either. For most of the afternoon, the stadium felt like a party as the Giants dominated the Eagles.

DeSean Jackson, Eagles wide receiver/kick returner: I could remember that like it was yesterday, man. It was a game where we were struggling in the first half. (Laughs.) Nothing could seem to go our way. I think it was, you know, 3-24 when we went into halftime.

Tom Coughlin, Giants coach: They were excited at halftime. Everybody was talking about just finishing the game — [as if it were] nothing-nothing, 30 minutes to go.

Kobe Bryant, Los Angeles Lakers guard/Lower Merion High School (Pa.) basketball legend (in 2019 to NFL Films): We’d just finished a game [against the Toronto Raptors]. I had a team that was pretty much full of Cowboys fans, and they liked to enjoy the Eagles’ misery. And that was looking like one of them. We’re on the bus and we’re trying to watch it.

Michael Vick, Eagles quarterback: We got down … whatever number of points we were down. I lost track.

Andy Reid, Eagles coach: We weren’t very good that first half. But nobody was down. They were frustrated, but they weren’t down.

Bob Papa, Giants radio announcer: Eli Manning throws the short touchdown pass to Kevin Boss six minutes into the fourth quarter, and it’s 31-10. And I remember just watching people in green get up and start walking out of the stadium. I’ll never forget turning to [analyst] Carl Banks — we were talking during the commercial break, and he’s like, “This is what Bill Belichick would always preach to us: Just keep everything in front of you. Keep everything in front of you.” And, you know, that’s exactly what they didn’t do.

The unspooling happened in a flash. First, Vick hit Brent Celek for a 65-yard touchdown pass to make it 31-17 with 7:28 remaining. Then the Eagles recovered a surprise onside kick and scored again, with Vick scrambling 35 yards to set up a sneak into the end zone. Suddenly, it was 31-24 with 5:28 to go.

Coughlin: I think there was very much a concern on my part as to how fast they went down the field. That’s not what the intent was.

Vick: I think once we made some plays downfield, I seen the momentum shift.

Jackson: It was just a few plays that clicked our way.

Papa: The team that was leading felt like they were trailing.

The Giants’ offense stalled again, and the Eagles surged once more. Vick to Jeremy Maclin from 13 yards out tied the game at 31 with 76 seconds left. The Giants were reeling, but bad as it had been, they still had a shot at a winning field goal or, worst case (they imagined), they’d go to overtime.

Matt Dodge, Giants punter: I thought we were going to get the ball back, drive down, kick a field goal. If we got a first down, we’re either going to go to overtime or go kick a field goal. But we had a couple incompletions and we weren’t moving the ball. I’m, like, “Oh man, we’re going to have to kick. We’re going to have to punt.” Which is fine. I mean, that’s what you practice for.

Bryant (in 2019): I was in shock watching it and just hoping.

Jackson: I knew in any situation where we needed a big return or we were losing that I was going to get my number called. And that’s kind of what happened. Coach was like, “How you feelin’? You ready?” I’m like, “Man, don’t ask me that. You know I’m ready. I’m always ready for the moment.”

Part 2: The play

Jeff Feagles, a two-time Pro Bowler, had punted for the Giants for the previous seven seasons. But after Feagles retired in the spring of 2010, the Giants drafted Dodge in the seventh round out of East Carolina.

Dodge’s rookie season had been admittedly up-and-down, but as he said, “That’s kind of how I was as a punter. I always had pretty high averages — I could average 40 [yards] for a game and that might include a 60-yarder and 20-yard shank.” As he jogged onto the field against the Eagles with 14 seconds left and the game tied, his task seemed as straightforward as it comes.

Coughlin: You’re going to punt the ball out of bounds, you’re going to get one play, and you defend the one play, and you go into overtime.

Jackson: And they purposely called timeout. It was like, “Man, do not punt this ball to this man.” I thought he was going to, like, punt it out the stadium.

Dodge: They called the play “Kick It Out of Bounds.” (Laughs.) That’s probably the name of the play. And if I forgot, like, the guy selling hot dogs told me to kick it out of bounds. Everyone knew. So, yes, to answer the question: I was trying to kick it out of bounds. But I caught it a little bit inside. And it just wasn’t close enough to the sideline.

Papa: Unfortunately for Matt Dodge, he choked in a big moment. I mean, before [Jackson] even caught it, I was expecting doom.

Vick: When he first kicked it and I seen the low trajectory on the kick, I was saying to myself, “Why would he kick it to DeSean?” And they was on their own from there. I knew what he could do.

Reid: I think it went off his foot wrong. Because I saw it was a line drive, which is double-trouble: If you’re going to kick it to [Jackson], you definitely want some hang time. I’m thinking, “This is a beautiful thing.”

Jackson: It was really one of those things where I was shocked and I was like, “Wow, he did kick it to me.” I dropped the ball, which, you know, I tell people was on purpose, right? (Smiling.) I dropped the ball on purpose.

Papa: People kind of got out of their lanes because now they see the ball is on the ground. I always wonder if he caught it cleanly, like, would everybody have kind of just kept their lanes and would he have been tackled?

Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania House of Representatives (153rd District)/”Josh from Juniata” as a caller to Philly sports radio: How did he keep his wits about him? You got these guys streaking down the field ready to smash you as hard as they can, and you managed to drop the ball, stay calm, pick it up, get your head up and then just took off. Like, how did he keep his wits about him through all that?

Jackson: When I go down and get the ball, I just see, like, a huge void in their punt team. And I just stuck my foot in the ground and like a bat out of you-know-what, man, I just shot right through that hole. There was a few guys I had to make miss.

Dodge: I dove and I missed him. I think there’s a picture of me, like, with all the rubber pellets shooting up in my mouth and stuff.

Jason Avant, Eagles receiver/punt return team (in 2023 podcast): I couldn’t get to the punt block, but I saw him drop the ball. And as soon as he dropped the ball, Omar Gaither knocks down three dudes with one block. So, DeSean hits that hole and I see one dude left, and it’s me and the snapper.

Jackson: [Long-snapper Zak DeOssie] was, like, the last line of defense, and then Jason Avant just came and de-cleated the guy.

Zak DeOssie, Giants long-snapper: I thought I had a great angle, thought I was going to stop him, but I don’t have eyes in the back of my head. I got there and got blindsided, got me in the side of the helmet pretty good. I couldn’t move after that.

Avant: I tried to go in with good technique, but I was so excited I went in high and knocked both of us out. Worst technique ever, but it was the game-winning block. I’ll take it.

After bursting into the clear, Jackson broke off and ran parallel to the goal line for several steps — as if to extend the play a bit longer — before completing his 65-yard game-winning return and firing the ball up into the stands.

Bryant (in 2019): Holy s—! Ridiculous.

Jackson: I was just holding the ball up and kind of showboating at the end, just making sure the time ran out.

Papa: I did say something [on the broadcast] about rubbing it in as he was running along the 1-yard line. Older DeSean Jackson may tell you that he was doing it to finish out the clock, but if you go back in time to that DeSean Jackson, my guess is he was also making every Giants fan feel the knife twist even more.

Jackson: I regret throwing that football in the stands. I always ask people, man, if somebody got that ball, I would love to get it back.

Dodge: I would say it was more shock. Not fear or anything, but it’s kind of like if someone’s been in a car accident and they walk out of it and they’re like, “What the hell just happened?” That’s how it felt. I immediately got up, ran straight to Coach Coughlin. You know, if you’re going to get your ass chewed, you might as well get it out of the way early.

Jackson: I seen [Coughlin] throw his playcall sheet down. He threw his headset down. Came on the field and probably cussed out Matt Dodge. He was frightening. He was pissed off.

Dodge: There’s not much he can say at that point. It’s not, like, “All right, next time make sure you get it out of bounds.” I mean, there was no next time.

Reid: My heart’s a little weaker after this one.

Jackson: I remember [hearing that] Kobe Bryant was watching it, I think, on his phone and he was, like, mesmerized about that punt return. I couldn’t believe Kobe Bryant was talking about DeSean Jackson.

Bryant (in 2019): Best. Bus ride. Ever.

Part 3: The aftermath

To his credit, Dodge faced up to all the hard questions after the game, blaming nobody but himself. The New York media was merciless, but with Christmas only a week away, Dodge had family and friends in town to see the game, meaning that he didn’t go back to an empty apartment once he finished at the stadium.

Dodge: I was in a bad place, you know? Just kind of pissed at the world. But I remember they jumped in the car with me. And so that night was actually one of the best nights ever. We opened gifts. I was in a weird head space ’cause part of me wanted to go turn emo real quick in my room, you know? But the other half was like, I got people that have traveled here that are excited. They haven’t even talked about the game. They’re like, “Man, pizza’s here, let’s get some pizza.” So, it was a weird kind of dichotomy, I guess you could say.

Dodge spent that evening with his guests, not on his phone, which was very much a good thing. Death threats, insults and all kinds of vitriol were directed at him on Twitter and other social platforms, though not all the hate actually reached its intended target.

Matt Dodge, writer, Portland (Maine) Sun: I was pretty freshly out of college. I was going to a lot of shows, writing about a lot of local culture, arts and stuff like that. [A friend] pretty much forced me to get on Twitter. Everyone was into FourSquare and I never got into that, but Twitter, he was like, “Listen, you’ve got to do it,” and I was very active on it. And because I was adopting it so early, I was able to land that handle: @MattDodge.

Matt Dodge, punter: That was a tough night to have that name.

Matt Dodge, writer: I think I had the BlackBerry still. I just remember I’m, like, sitting in my room and my phone starts buzzing with notifications, just like a flurry of notifications coming in. And, you know, I thought there had been some emergency, like a bunch of friends were texting me about something, and I go to pull it up and it’s just, you know, more mentions on Twitter in the course of four minutes than I’d had in the 18 months I had been on Twitter before that, basically. So I knew something was up and pretty quickly managed to figure out what was going on.

Matt Dodge, punter: I was telling people, “No, that actually is him! He’s lying! He’s scared!” (Laughs.)

Dodge the writer wrote a humorous essay for The Awl titled, “An Open Letter to Matt Dodge (From Matt Dodge)” in which he called out some of the more printable comments he received, including one from a user who said he was organizing a “lynching mob” and another who said Dodge better “go into witness protection” immediately. Dodge the writer also offered to sell Dodge the punter his Twitter handle for “a fair price.”

Matt Dodge, punter: I read the piece — it was good. You learn how common a name Matt Dodge is, apparently.

Matt Dodge, writer: On a serious note, I do realize there’s, like, a real person on the other end of this. And my heart goes out to the man. I cannot imagine having such a career-imploding moment on such a public stage like that.

Dodge the punter wasn’t cut immediately; he kicked in the final two games as the Giants missed the playoffs, then was waived during training camp ahead of the 2011 season. Dodge remembers then-GM Jerry Reese telling him, “We’re probably going to be playing [against] you for years to come” in the process of releasing him, and while Dodge did go on to have numerous tryouts with other teams, none signed him. Dodge’s rookie season was his only one in the NFL.

Dodge: It’s like you dated a supermodel, like, the hottest chick ever for a summer, and then she broke up with you. And then everyone you talk to is like, “Man, what was she like? She’s beautiful.” And she’s only getting hotter and hotter, but now she’s not with you anymore, but that’s still what you’re known for.

Jackson: It was the end of his football career, man. It’s just unfortunate that one play could, you know, determine your career.

Papa: I guess that whole thing probably scarred him, and it probably made teams nervous. This guy was told to kick the ball out of bounds, and instead he shanks it down the middle. Like, “Can we ever really trust this guy?”

Dodge: I know to the outside looking in, that’s how I’m remembered. That’s not going away. And as I’ve gotten older, you know, I used to curse it, I’d be pissed. But I’ve made peace with it.

Dodge moved back home to eastern North Carolina and has worked for years as a financial planner — most recently, in an odd twist, for a company named Market Street Wealth Management, which is based outside Philadelphia. Jackson played 12 more years in the NFL, retiring in 2022. He is now the coach of Delaware State, an FCS program filled with players from New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania — many of whom remember watching him pull off a certain play on television.

Jackson: They always talk about it. They ask, “Coach, why did you run along the goal line?” One of my players actually did it this past week when he scored a touchdown. He was like, “Coach, I studied!”

Dodge: We actually have an office up West Chester, Pa., which is Philly territory. It’s just Eagles everywhere. And you know, I kind of found myself rooting for the Eagles a little bit. I’m meeting with clients that are all Eagles fans, and they’re usually more likely to invest when they’re happy.

Jackson: There’s nowhere I go where people don’t say, “Oh, the punt return against the New York Giants!” I get the most feedback from that punt return.

Shapiro: Six months ago or so, I saw DeSean at the NFC Championship Game and we were chatting about the Miracle at the Meadowlands. It goes down in Eagles lore. Anytime you’re beating the Cowboys or the Giants, there’s something special about it.

Dodge: A punter that they remember? It’s not usually for a good thing. But it taught me something: That was, essentially, a really bad day at work. It just happened to have 80,000 people watching, untold millions watching on TV, not to mention the clip getting millions and millions of views. So, if I can make it through that and I didn’t spontaneously combust or get shot and killed, I mean, I’m probably going to be fine, right? Yeah, I’m probably going to be fine.

Some interviews have been lightly edited for clarity. Titles and descriptors are based on a person’s position at the time of the game in 2010.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

What’s going on with Premier League’s 115 charges against Man City?

Published

on

What’s going on with Premier League’s 115 charges against Man City?


Over three years have passed since the Premier League announced it was charging Manchester City for breaching a long list of rules related to alleged wrongdoing. Most of them relate to actions taken to circumvent financial regulation, from false accounting to making payments off the books to failing to cooperate with investigators. City deny the charges.

Depending on the number of charges on which they are found guilty (if any) City could face a range of sanctions, from fines and points deductions to being stripped of titles to outright expulsion from the Premier League. If they’re found guilty — depending on the nature and number of the charges — they also run the risk of having to pay damages via the league’s arbitration process as other clubs could seek compensation for lost revenue. A three-person independent panel is tasked with issuing a verdict.

“While the complexity of the Manchester City case is undeniable — and unique in a sporting context — similar commercial cases have reached decisions in far less time than the 15 months we’ve seen here,” Stefan Borson, head of sport at London-based law firm McCarthy Denning, tells ESPN. “There are few legitimate excuses, and there is an urgent need for progress.”

Let’s start with the obvious: Why is this taking so long?

To some degree, we can only speculate because the whole process is shrouded in secrecy. This is partly due to the fact that the Premier League’s own rules allow defendants to request confidential hearings, and partly due to British law and safeguards that protect defendants in certain situations.

One example illustrates this well. The investigation into City began in Dec. 2018 following the publication of the “Football Leaks” documents by the German magazine “Der Spiegel.” But we only found out that there even was an investigation in March 2021 after a High Court judgement ruled against City, who had tried to block investigators’ access to documents. The start date of the investigation was later confirmed in official documents, but there wasn’t even confirmation from the Premier League that City were even under scrutiny.

It’s a similar story with the hearings themselves, which are confidential and held in private. We know they started on Sept. 16, 2024, at the International Dispute Resolution Centre in London because this was leaked, and media photographed lawyers for both sides arriving and leaving the venue. We know the hearing concluded in Dec. 2024 because Manchester City mention it in their 2024-25 annual report and because, in Feb. 2025, Pep Guardiola, the City coach, said the verdict would come out “in one month.”

One month? Wow, it’s been 12 months and counting…

Yes, and that tells you the degree to which everybody’s lips have been sealed in this process. There is so little that we know about it, other than the charges. For example, we don’t even know for certain the identity of the three members of the independent commission that will sit in judgement. The trio was assembled by Murray Rosen, chair of the Premier League’s judicial panel at the time. Some reports suggest Rosen named himself to the panel, but that is unconfirmed.

Anyway, if the hearing concluded in Dec. 2024, why it is taking so long for the panel to issue a verdict?

Correct.

We’re in the realm of speculation here, but there are several reasons cited by sports lawyers.

The first is that this is a massive, hugely complicated case. We’re not even certain of the exact number of charges. It came to be known as the “115 charges” case because that’s the number of bullet points in the original document, but according to multiple reports, the number of individual rule breaches in the document is 130, though it’s possible that some are overlapping (i.e. one action violates multiple rules).

It’s also possible, as some reports have suggested, that since the original document was issued, more charges were added, most likely relating to failure to cooperate. Whatever the number, each of the charges must be proved individually with specific evidence.

Furthermore, many of the charges in practice allege deliberate intent to mislead regulators and/or obstruct investigators. The panel isn’t just deciding whether City breached spending regulations, but whether they intentionally breached them and then covered it up to violate the spirit of the rules and, later, knowingly withheld evidence. To make an analogy, it’s the difference between speeding on the highway and speeding on the highway while remotely manipulating the police officer’s radar gun and then spewing a bunch of sovereign citizen nonsense to intentionally screw up your traffic stop. The burden of proof is far higher in the latter case.

Bear in mind that the panel won’t just be issuing a verdict and a sentence. It will be issuing what are known as “written reasons” detailing how it arrived at its conclusions. These “written reasons” could form the basis of any appeal — whether by City or by the Premier League — and therefore need to be “bullet-proof” when it comes to scrutiny.

Still… They’ve had more than a year to issue a verdict since the hearing concluded in Dec. 2024 and, presumably, they have staff to help them…

That’s where another factor comes in. It’s highly likely that the panel members aren’t working on this full-time. You’d assume all three have day jobs and other commitments; presumably, the panel allocated a certain amount of time to hear and deliberate on the case, but it proved to be far more complex than anticipated, and so they members have had to work around their calendars, finding time as and when.

“The members of the independent commission have undoubtedly had other commitments since the hearing ended and they will be acutely aware of making the decision as robust against appeal as possible, given the unprecedented scrutiny this ruling will attract,” said Borson.

Why wouldn’t more time have been allocated to the deliberations?

That’s another mystery. I guess if you want top-notch legal and financial experts to deliberate, you have to accept that they will be in demand elsewhere. This isn’t a jury that’s being sequestered in a room; these are senior figures who handle very important cases in their everyday lives. They can’t just check out indefinitely.

There’s another potential explanation here. While it’s a remote possibility, it would help explain a number of the mysteries surrounding this case.

What’s that?

What if, separate from the arbitration proceedings, the Premier League and City are trying to hammer out some sort of settlement deal? After all, the Premier League is nothing more than its 20 member clubs. If they all agree on an outcome, that’s that. Now, I think it’s unlikely, partly because clubs are notoriously leaky (and there hasn’t been a peep) and partly because it would be extremely difficult to agree to something all sides could accept.

What might it look like? City would need to admit to some level of wrongdoing and take some level of punishment, while rival clubs would need to drop threats of legal action to recover damages.

How would one even do this? Maybe by dumping the blame on the people running the club and arguing that City’s owners were entirely unaware and were, in fact, duped by the folks they employed. And then negotiating a sanction severe enough — massive fine? Some vacated titles? — that the “victim clubs” accept it, but not so severe that it ruins City’s chance of being competitive in the medium term. Why? Because otherwise, they’re not going to accept it and will take their chances with the commission and, possibly, the appeal.

Again, I think it’s highly unlikely, but it would explain why deliberations are taking so long. And it would give the Premier League closure and allow it to move on. Because even when the verdict does come in, it’s highly likely that the losing side will appeal. And this will only drag the process out further, which is not good for the Premier League.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Vinícius Jr. seals Real Madrid progress amid Benfica boos

Published

on

Vinícius Jr. seals Real Madrid progress amid Benfica boos


After being loudly booed, Vinícius Júnior danced again. This time in front of Real Madrid supporters while leading his team to the round of 16 of the Champions League, a week after accusing a Benfica opponent of racially insulting him.

The Brazilian scored in the 80th minute to clinch a 2-1 victory for the record 15-time European champions in the second leg of their playoff tie to progress 3-1 on aggregate.

Vinícius celebrated by dancing by the corner flag just like in the first leg — then in front of Benfica fans — which ignited a confrontation with the Portuguese team’s players and the accusation that Gianluca Prestianni called him a racist slur.

“I’m glad Vini dances and keeps dancing, that means he’s scoring goals,” said Madrid goalkeeper Thibaut Courtois.

“That’s our Vinícius,” added midfielder Aurélien Tchouaméni, who scored Madrid’s first goal in the 16th, a couple of minutes after Benfica had taken the lead through Rafa Silva.

Prestianni, who has denied racially insulting Vinícius and has been defended by Benfica, was provisionally suspended one match by UEFA and did not play Wednesday even though the Argentine traveled to the Spanish capital. UEFA earlier Wednesday rejected Benfica’s last-minute appeal against the provisional suspension.

Last week’s match was halted for nearly 10 minutes after the referee installed the anti-racism protocol following Vinícius’ complaint to him.

On Wednesday, Vinícius scored on a breakaway, calmly sending a low shot past the goalkeeper for his sixth goal in his past five matches for Madrid.

The more than 3,000 Benfica fans at the Bernabéu jeered nearly every time Vinícius touched the ball. They celebrated when he lost control of the ball early in the game. The Benfica supporters also booed emphatically when the name of the Brazilian player was announced in the starting lineup ahead of the match.

The boos gradually lost force as the match went on and Madrid took control of the game.

Vinícius also participated in the buildup of what would have been Madrid’s second goal, but it was disallowed for offside.

Before Wednesday’s match, Madrid fans displayed a banner saying “No To Racism.” A “respect” banner also was shown behind one of the goals at the Bernabéu.

Real Madrid said in a statement after the match it “urgently requested” the club’s disciplinary committee to open a procedure to expel a fan who was caught by television cameras performing a Nazi salute before the match.

Madrid said the supporter appeared to be part of its organized fan group behind one of the goals at the Bernabeu.

“This member was identified by the club’s security staff moments after appearing on the broadcast and was immediately expelled from the Santiago Bernabeu Stadium,” the club said. “Real Madrid condemns this type of gesture and expression that incites violence and hatred in sports and society.”

Madrid fans also jeered when Benfica central defender Nicolás Otamendi touched the ball. Otamendi, who is also Argentine, was one of the players that confronted Vinícius after the Brazilian’s celebration by the Benfica flag.

Also missing for Benfica was coach José Mourinho, the former Madrid coach who was sent off late in the first leg for complaining to the referee. Mourinho did not participate in the pregame news conference Tuesday and was expected to watch the match from the stands at the Bernabéu.

Madrid defender Raúl Asencio had to be carried off the field on a stretcher and taken to a local hospital for tests after a hard collision with teammate Eduardo Camavinga in the second half.

The central defender hit the ground hard and had to be attended to for a few minutes on the field. The medical staff immobilized him before taking him off the field.

Madrid coach Álvaro Arbeloa said Asencio apparently injured his neck but “it wasn’t serious.”

Madrid were already without France forward Kylian Mbappé, who missed Wednesday’s game with a knee injury.

“I hope it’s not serious, and he can come back in a few days or weeks,” Arbeloa said.

“Without Kylian, we need [Vini] even more. … He has to be our leader.”

ESPN’s Alex Kirkland and The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

T20 World Cup: India eliminate Zimbabwe to stay alive in semi-final race

Published

on

T20 World Cup: India eliminate Zimbabwe to stay alive in semi-final race


India’s Axar Patel celebrates with teammates after taking the wicket of Zimbabwe’s Tadiwanashe Marumani, caught out by Ishan Kishan in the ICC T20 World Cup Super Eight clash on February 26, 2025. — Reuters
  • India beat Zimbabwe by 72 runs in Super Eight clash.
  • Zimbabwe scored 184/6 while chasing 257-run target.
  • Hardik Pandya bags Player of the Match award.

Blistering fifties from Abhishek Sharma and Hardik Pandya, complemented by a clinical bowling performance, steered India to a dominant 72-run triumph over Zimbabwe in their crucial Super Eights encounter of the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup at the MA Chidambaram Stadium on Thursday.

The victory marked India’s first win in the Super Eights stage and kept them in contention to qualify for the semi-finals.

Furthermore, the outcome of the crucial Group 1 fixture also marked Zimbabwe’s exit, confirming South Africa’s qualification into the knockouts.

Consequently, India’s remaining Super Eights match, scheduled to be played against West Indies in Kolkata on Sunday, has now become a virtual quarter-final as both teams have two points in as many games.

Set to chase a daunting 257-run target, the Chevrons’ batting unit could accumulate 184/6 in their 20 overs despite Brian Bennett’s unbeaten half-century.

The right-handed opener waged a lone battle for Zimbabwe against the home side, top-scoring with 97 not out from just 59 deliveries, featuring eight fours and six sixes.

He also shared crucial partnerships with fellow opener Tadiwanashe Marumani and skipper Sikandar Raza, who remained the other notable run-getters for Zimbabwe, scoring 20 and 31, respectively.

Left-arm pacer Arshdeep Singh was the standout bowler for India as he took three wickets for 24 runs in his four overs, while Varun Chakravarthy, Shivam Dube and Axar Patel chipped in with one apiece.

Zimbabwe captain Sikandar Raza’s decision to field first backfired as his team’s bowling unit conceded 256/4 in their 20 overs.

The home side got off to a decent start to their innings as their new opening pair of Sanju Samson and Sharma put together 48 runs at a blazing pace until Blessing Muzarabani got rid of the former in the fourth over.

Samson, who played his second match of the tournament, made a 15-ball 24, laced with two sixes and a four.

Following his dismissal, Sharma was joined by in-form top-order batter Ishan Kishan in the middle, and the duo further strengthened India’s command by knitting a 72-run partnership.

Zimbabwe captain Sikandar Raza eventually broke the threatening partnership in the 11th over by dismissing Kishan, who walked back after scoring 38 off 24 deliveries with the help of four fours and a six.

Sharma was then involved in a brief 30-run partnership with captain Suryakumar Yadav until eventually falling victim to Tinotenda Maposa in the 13th over.

The left-handed opener, who registered ducks in each of his first three T20 World Cup 2026 matches, remained the top-scorer for India with a 30-ball 55, studded with four sixes and as many fours.

Yadav followed suit 11 balls later and walked back after a blazing 33-run cameo, which came off just 13 deliveries, and featured five boundaries, including three sixes.

Tilak Varma and Hardik Pandya then ensured an equally dominant finish with the bat for India as they raised an unbeaten 84-run partnership for the fifth wicket.

Pandya was the core aggressor of the quickfire stand and made an unbeaten 50 off just 23 deliveries, smashing four sixes and two fours.

Varma, on the other hand, was equally impressive, scoring a 16-ball 44 not out, comprising four sixes and three fours.

For Zimbabwe, Richard Ngarava, Maposa, Muzarabani and skipper Raza could pick up a wicket apiece.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending