Connect with us

Politics

India’s Election Commission under fire from opposition

Published

on

India’s Election Commission under fire from opposition


Indias Opposition Leader Rahul Gandhi is stopped by police along with other lawmakers during a protest against what they say are electoral malpractices, in New Delhi, India on August 11, 2025.
India’s Opposition Leader Rahul Gandhi is stopped by police along with other lawmakers during a protest against what they say are electoral malpractices, in New Delhi, India on August 11, 2025. 
  • Opposition, critics allege large-scale rigging impacting polls results.
  • Election Commission of India denies charges — first ever in history.
  • Rahul Gandhi demands ECI to release digital voter rolls for audit.

NEW DELHI: The Election Commission of India, long regarded as the impartial guardian of the world’s largest democracy, is facing unprecedented scrutiny over its credibility and independence.

Opposition leaders and critics have alleged that large-scale rigging of elections is impacting the overall results of the vote. The ECI has denied all charges, the first against it in India’s history.

Heading the charge is the leader of the opposition in New Delhi’s parliament, Rahul Gandhi of the Congress party, who previously alleged that India’s electronic voting machines are flawed.

Now Gandhi has accused the ECI of refusing to share digital voter records, detailing what he said was a list of errors after his supporters spent weeks combing through vast piles of registration lists by hand.

Allegations

Gandhi, 55, said his party lost dozens of seats in the 2024 parliamentary elections because of vote rigging.

The largest democratic exercise in human history across the country of 1.4 billion people was staggered over six weeks.

Gandhi claimed that the ECI manipulated voter rolls to favour Prime Minister Narendra Modi´s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Modi, 74, won a historic third term last year but fell short of a majority.

The alleged rigging involved a string of tactics, according to Gandhi.

He said some people voted multiple times, citing bulk registrations from one dwelling and seemingly bogus addresses.

In a presentation to reporters on August 7, Gandhi pointed to a parliamentary constituency his party narrowly lost as an “open and shut” example of the alleged irregularities.

Over 100,000 “fake” votes were cast in the constituency, he said, courtesy of duplicate voters.

His Congress party lost the seat by just over 30,000 votes.

“Our demand from the ECI is clear — be transparent and release digital voter rolls so that people and parties can audit them,” Gandhi said.

ECI’s stance

The ECI has called Gandhi’s accusation “false and misleading”.

India’s chief election commissioner said they would “never” back down from their constitutional duties.

“Politics is being done using the Election Commission… as a tool to target India’s voters,” Gyanesh Kumar told a news conference this month.

“The Election Commission wants to make it clear that it fearlessly stands rock-solid with all voters […] without any discrimination and will continue to do so.”

Kumar also said those alleging fraud either need to furnish proof under oath or apologise.

“An affidavit must be submitted or an apology to the nation must be made — there is no third option.”

Why now?

Gandhi launched a month-long “voter rights” rally in the key battleground state of Bihar on August 17, receiving enthusiastic public response.

The allegations come ahead of elections in Bihar in October or November. The opposition alleged the ECI had embarked on a “mass disenfranchisement” exercise, after it gave voters in the state just weeks to prove their citizenship, requiring documents that few possess in a registration revamp.

India’s top court stepped in last week, allowing a biometric ID most residents possess to be accepted in Bihar’s voter registration.

The “Special Intensive Revision” (SIR) of voter registration is set to be replicated across India.

Gandhi called the exercise in Bihar the “final conspiracy”.

Activists have reported finding numerous living voters declared dead by election officials, and entire families struck off draft lists. Voter verification in Bihar is scheduled to be completed by September 25, with the final list released five days later.

“They aim to steal the elections by adding new voters under the guise of SIR and removing existing voters,” Gandhi said.

The ECI has defended the registration revision, saying it is in part to avoid “foreign illegal immigrants” from voting.

Members of Modi’s BJP have long claimed that large numbers of undocumented Muslim migrants from neighbouring Bangladesh have fraudulently entered India’s electoral rolls.

Criticism mounted after the ECI replaced Bihar’s machine-readable voter records with scanned image files that do not allow text searches.

Critics said the changes made detecting anomalies more time-consuming and prone to error.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

South Korean ex-leader jailed for 5 years in first martial law verdict

Published

on

South Korean ex-leader jailed for 5 years in first martial law verdict


South Koreas former president Yoon Suk Yeol attends the third session of the G20 Leaders Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on November 19, 2024. — AFP
South Korea’s former president Yoon Suk Yeol attends the third session of the G20 Leaders’ Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on November 19, 2024. — AFP
  • Judge finds Yoon guilty of obstructing justice and other crimes.
  • Separate insurrection verdict is scheduled for February 19.
  • Yoon faces another trial over alleged drone flights to North Korea.

SEOUL: A South Korean judge sentenced former president Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday to five years in prison for obstructing justice and other crimes linked to his disastrous martial law declaration and in its chaotic aftermath.

It is the first in a series of verdicts for the disgraced ex-leader, whose brief suspension of civilian rule in South Korea on December 3, 2024 prompted massive protests and a showdown in parliament.

Now ousted from power, he faces multiple trials for actions taken during that debacle and in the turmoil that followed.

On Friday Judge Baek Dae-hyun at Seoul’s Central District Court said he found Yoon guilty of obstruction of justice by blocking investigators from detaining him.

Yoon was also found guilty of excluding cabinet members from a martial law planning meeting.

“Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the… Constitution,” Baek said.

“The defendant’s culpability is extremely grave,” he said.

But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.

Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.

Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.

Yoon defiant

It comes days after prosecutors in a separate case demanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the “ringleader of an insurrection” in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.

A large screen shows an image of impeached South Korea president Yoon Suk Yeol as light sticks held by his supporters are seen during a rally near his residence in Seoul on January 7, 2025. — AFP
A large screen shows an image of impeached South Korea president Yoon Suk Yeol as light sticks held by his supporters are seen during a rally near his residence in Seoul on January 7, 2025. — AFP 

They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown “no remorse” for actions that threatened “constitutional order and democracy”.

If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.

Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.

And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.

In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the “exercise of a president’s constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection”.

He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an “unconstitutional dictatorship” through their control of the legislature.

“There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign.”

The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.

Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump accepts Nobel medal from Venezuelan opposition leader Machado

Published

on

Trump accepts Nobel medal from Venezuelan opposition leader Machado


President Trump meets Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado in the Oval Office on Jan 15, 2026. — White House
President Trump meets Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado in the Oval Office on Jan 15, 2026. — White House
  • Machado says meeting was ‘excellent,’ but did not elaborate.
  • Encounter comes as Trump has praised Caracas’ interim leader.
  • Trump has prioritised securing access to Venezuelan oil.

WASHINGTON: Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado gave her Nobel Peace Prize medal to US President Donald Trump on Thursday during a White House meeting, as she tries to gain some influence over how the president shapes the South American country’s political future.

A White House official confirmed that Trump intends to keep the medal.

In a social media post on Thursday evening, Trump wrote: “Maria presented me with her Nobel Peace Prize for the work I have done. Such a wonderful gesture of mutual respect. Thank you Maria!”

Machado, who described the meeting as “excellent,” said the gift was in recognition of what she called his commitment to the freedom of the Venezuelan people.

Machado’s attempt to sway Trump came after he dismissed the idea of installing her as Venezuela’s leader to replace the deposed Nicolas Maduro. Trump openly campaigned for the prize before Machado was awarded it last month and complained bitterly when he was snubbed.

Though Machado gave Trump the gold medal that honorees receive with the prize, the honor remains hers; the Norwegian Nobel Institute has said the prize cannot be transferred, shared or revoked.

Asked on Wednesday if he wanted Machado to give him the prize, Trump told Reuters: “No, I didn’t say that. She won the Nobel Peace Prize.”

The Republican president long expressed interest in winning the prize and has at times linked it to diplomatic achievements.

The lunch meeting, which appeared to last slightly over an hour, marked the first time the two have met in person. Machado then met with more than a dozen senators, both Republican and Democratic, on Capitol Hill, where she has generally found more enthusiastic allies.

While the visit was ongoing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump had been looking forward to meeting Machado, but that he stood by his “realistic” assessment that she did not currently have the support needed to lead the country in the short term.

Machado, who fled Venezuela in a daring seaborne escape in December, is competing for Trump’s ear with members of Venezuela’s government and seeking to ensure she has a role in governing the nation going forward.

After the US captured Maduro in a snatch-and-grab operation this month, various opposition figures, members of Venezuela’s diaspora and politicians throughout the US and Latin America have expressed hope that Venezuela will begin the process of democratisation.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump threatens military action over Minnesota protests

Published

on

Trump threatens military action over Minnesota protests


People gather for a protest against deportation flights at King County International Airport, which is used by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in Seattle, Washington, US, January 15, 2026. — Reuters
People gather for a protest against deportation flights at King County International Airport, which is used by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in Seattle, Washington, US, January 15, 2026. — Reuters 
  • Trump issues threat after ICE officer shot Venezuelan man.
  • Says he may deploy military force in Minnesota.
  • Minnesota leaders say ICE actions are ‘disgusting and intolerable.

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy military forces in Minnesota after days of angry protests over a surge in immigration agents on the streets of Minneapolis.

Confrontations between residents and federal officers have become increasingly tense after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent fatally shot a US citizen, Renee Good, in a car eight days ago in Minneapolis, and the protests have spread to other cities. Trump’s latest threat came a few hours after an immigration officer shot a Venezuelan man who the government said was fleeing after agents tried to stop his vehicle in Minneapolis. The man was wounded in the leg.

“If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of ICE, who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT,” Trump wrote on social media.

Trump, a Republican, has for weeks derided the state’s Democratic leaders and called people of Somali origin there “garbage” who should be “thrown out” of the country.

He has already sent nearly 3,000 federal officers into the Minneapolis area, who have carried guns through the city’s icy streets, wearing military-style camouflage gear and masks that hide their faces.

They have been met day and night by loud, often angry protests by residents, some blowing whistles or banging tambourines. On Wednesday night, crowds of nearby residents gathered near the area where the Venezuelan man was shot. Some shouted in protest, and federal officers ignited flash-bang grenades and released clouds of tear gas.

Later, after most of the residents had been dispersed, a small group vandalised a car they believed belonged to the federal officers, one person daubing it with red graffiti saying: “Hang Kristi Noem,” in reference to the Homeland Security secretary who oversees ICE.

Since the surge began, agents have arrested both immigrants and protesters, at times smashing windows and pulling people from their cars, and have been shouted at for stopping Black and Latino US citizens to demand identification.

‘Disgusting and intolerable’

The US Department of Homeland Security, which is overseeing Trump’s immigration crackdown, identified the man its officer shot as Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis. He had been allowed into the US by the administration of Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden, in 2022 through the government’s humanitarian parole programme. The Trump administration has since revoked the parole granted to Venezuelans and others admitted under Biden.

In its statement, DHS called him a convicted criminal under Minnesota law after being caught driving without a licence and giving a false name to a police officer. Court records of those cases reviewed by Reuters show he was only convicted of “petty misdemeanours”, which Minnesota state law says do “not constitute a crime”, and for which the maximum punishment is a $300 fine.

According to the DHS account, federal officers tried to stop Sosa-Celis in his vehicle. He fled the scene in his vehicle, crashed into a parked car, and then ran away on foot, the DHS said.

One officer caught him and while the two were “in a struggle on the ground”, two other Venezuelan men came out of a nearby apartment and “attacked the law enforcement officer with a snow shovel and broom handle”, the statement said.

Sosa-Celis got loose and began hitting the officer with “a shovel or a broomstick”, and so the officer “fired defensive shots to defend his life”, the DHS statement said.

Reuters was not able to verify the account given by DHS. The men fled into the apartment and all three were arrested after officers went in, DHS said. Sosa-Celis and the officer were recovering in hospital from injuries, according to the department and city officials.

The Trump administration and Minnesota leaders have each blamed the other for stoking anger and violence.

In a late-night press conference, Mayor Jacob Frey called the ICE surge an invasion and said he had seen “conduct from ICE that is disgusting and is intolerable”.

“We cannot be at a place right now in America where we have two governmental entities that are literally fighting one another,” Frey said, calling for peace.

Trump supporters divided over immigration enforcement

The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a law allowing the president to deploy the military or federalise soldiers in a state’s National Guard to quell rebellion, an exception to laws that prohibit soldiers being used in civil or criminal law enforcement.

It has been used 30 times in US history, according to New York University’s Brennan Centre for Justice. The Supreme Court has ruled that the president alone can determine if the act’s conditions have been met.

Trump has already taken the unusual step of federalising National Guard soldiers to help with immigration law enforcement in Democrat-run cities over the objections of state governors, including in Los Angeles last year, which a judge ruled in December was unconstitutional.

Trump’s aggressive moves in Minnesota have divided his supporters: 59% of Republicans favoured a policy prioritising arrests by immigration officers even if people get hurt, while 39% said officers should focus on not harming people even if it means fewer arrests, according to a Reuters/Ipsos survey released on Thursday.

If Trump sends soldiers to Minnesota, he would almost certainly face legal challenges by the state. The Minnesota attorney general’s office has already sued the Trump administration this week, saying ICE agents were engaged in a “pattern of unlawful, violent conduct”, including racial profiling and forced entry into residents’ homes without warrants. The American Civil Liberties Union also filed a similar lawsuit against the Trump administration on Thursday.

At a brief hearing on Wednesday, Minnesota asked US District Judge Kate Menendez to issue a temporary order restraining the ICE surge.

Menendez ordered the Trump administration to respond by Monday, saying she would rule after that, calling the issues raised by Minnesota’s lawsuit “enormously important”.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending