Connect with us

Business

Let public by war bonds to raise £20bn for defence, say Lib Dems

Published

on

Let public by war bonds to raise £20bn for defence, say Lib Dems


The Liberal Democrats are calling on the government to start issuing “war bonds”, a scheme the party says could raise up to £20bn to bolster the military.

Under the plan, members of the public could loan the government money in the form of a bond which would run over a two-to-three year period and pay out the same interest as standard government bonds.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the bonds would “give ordinary people the opportunity to contribute to Britain’s security”.

A spokesperson for the government said “new debt instruments” were kept under review but that they had to represent “value for money” and “be consistent with wider fiscal objectives”.

Calls to increase defence spending have intensified in recent years, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the election of US President Donald Trump, who has frequently criticised Nato countries for failing to spend enough on their military.

The Labour government has pledged to raise overall defence spending from 2.3% to 2.5% of national income by 2027, at an estimated cost of an additional £6bn a year.

It has also promised to raise levels to 3.5% by 2035, in line with a pledge by Nato members last year.

However, there have been reports in the Times and the Sun that plans to make Britain’s armed forces “war ready” will require £28bn more than has so far been allocated.

The government had been due to publish its defence investment plan last autumn but there are suggestions it has been delayed due to concerns about cost.

Earlier this month, the head of the Armed Forces Sir Richard Knighton said the UK was “not as ready as we need to be for the kind of full-scale conflict we might face”.

Setting out his party’s proposal, Sir Ed said: “Now is the moment to be clear-eyed about the threats facing Britain – Vladimir Putin is waging war in Europe while Donald Trump is tearing up the rules and alliances that keep us safe.

He said Britain and its allies “must rapidly strengthen our defences to deter the likes of Putin… it is much better to invest now in deterring a war than having to fight one”.

The Liberal Democrats said the money raised from issuing bonds would be ring-fenced for defence and the investment would help deliver “growth, jobs and higher revenues” for the government “which would partially offset the cost of additional debt servicing”.

The party added the scheme would need to be accompanied by an overhaul of the Ministry of Defence procurement process, which has previously been criticised as wasteful.

Their proposal, the party says, would be similar to the bonds scheme used during World War One and World War Two.

Individual citizens could lend the government money, which would be paid back in six to 10 years with interest. By the end of 1945, the scheme had raised £1.754m.

Posters encouraging members of the public to buy bonds – or national savings certificates – used slogans including “lend to defend” and “feed the guns with war bonds”.

Dan Coatsworth, head of markets at investors AJ Bell, said: “War bonds are a proven way of raising money to fund national defence spending, but they can burden a government with long-term debt.

“In theory, the public might demand a better rate of interest than they could get on cash in the bank to take up the bonds.

“While some people might think it is their duty to support the country, there will be others who treat such a bond in the same way as any type of investment.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Ads for British beef and milk banned following Chris Packham complaint

Published

on

Ads for British beef and milk banned following Chris Packham complaint



Two ads promoting British beef and milk have been banned after television presenter and environmental campaigner Chris Packham complained that they misled consumers about the products’ carbon footprints.

Both ads for the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board’s (AHDB) Let’s Eat Balanced campaign used the carbon footprint of British beef and milk to promote the products, firstly stating: “British beef not only tastes great, but has a carbon footprint that’s half the global average*.”

The asterisk linked to text that stated: “Full lifecycle emissions of CO2 eq (carbon dioxide equivalent) per kg of beef.”

The ad for milk stated: “British milk not only tastes good, but is also produced to world-class standards, and has a carbon footprint a third lower than the global average.”

Packham complained to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) that the ads, and specifically the carbon footprint claims, were misleading as they did not reflect the full environmental impact of British meat and dairy.

The AHDB said the ads’ mention of carbon emissions would be understood in relation to the environmental impact of beef and milk that occurred between the “cradle-to-retail” stages.

But the ASA said the average consumer “being reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect” would understand the claims to apply beyond the retail stage and include actions such as cooking and wastage.

The ASA said: “While we acknowledged the potential difficulties in producing post-retail emissions data, the claims in the ads suggested those emissions were included and we therefore expected the evidence provided to also include them.

“We therefore concluded that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the full life-cycle claims in the ads, which was how the average consumer was likely to interpret them.

“We reminded AHDB that environmental claims should be based on the full life cycle unless the ad stated otherwise.”

AHDB’s director of communications and market development, Will Jackson, said: “Let’s Eat Balanced is doing what it was designed to do, providing clear, factual, evidence-led information about British food, nutrition and farming standards.

“Since the investigation began, we have conducted independent consumer research which found that the majority of respondents interpreted these adverts as relating to the production phase only, from farm to retail.

“This research provides important insight into consumer understanding and supports our belief that consumers were not misled by the information we shared in these two specific adverts.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gen Z pros embrace ‘portfolio careers’ as side hustles surge – The Times of India

Published

on

Gen Z pros embrace ‘portfolio careers’ as side hustles surge – The Times of India


BENGALURU: India’s Gen Z workforce is embracing what experts describe as “portfolio careers” – balancing multiple professional identities and income streams simultaneously. New research from LinkedIn shows that 75% of Gen Z entrepreneurs in India now manage multiple income streams, significantly higher than the 62% among Gen X entrepreneurs. The findings point to a growing preference among younger professionals for flexibility, autonomy and diversified sources of income. “We’re also seeing the rise of the ‘portfolio era’, with more professionals creating multiple income streams and redefining what a career can look like. This shift is making entrepreneurship more accessible than ever before,” said LinkedIn India country manager Kumaresh Pattabiraman.Rather than depending on a single full-time role, many professionals are simultaneously building businesses, freelancing, consulting, creating online content and monetising specialised skills through digital platforms. The trend comes amid a broader rise in entrepreneurial activity in India. LinkedIn recorded a 104% year-on-year increase in members adding “Founder” to their profiles – the highest growth among all global markets.AI is also emerging as a major enabler of this shift. The report found that 85% of Gen Z entrepreneurs consider AI and digital tools important to their business operations.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk said control of OpenAI should go to his children, Sam Altman tells jury

Published

on

Elon Musk said control of OpenAI should go to his children, Sam Altman tells jury



Sam Altman said Elon Musk tried many times for total control of OpenAI, which he’s now suing.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending