Business
Most of Elon Musk’s fortune now comes from his private companies
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk arrives to the inauguration of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 20, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla | Via Reuters
A version of this article appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.
Tesla said it needed to incentivize CEO Elon Musk with a record-breaking pay package in order to compete with his private companies, according to a proxy the company filed last week.
The filing outlines a share award that could be worth $1 trillion if it all pays out. Tesla also said Musk’s other companies — mainly SpaceX and xAI Holdings — now account for most of his wealth and therefore will command most of his attention unless Tesla pays him more.
“A majority of Mr. Musk’s wealth is now derived from other business ventures outside of Tesla, and he has more attractive options today than ever before,” the proxy said. The pay package of up to 423 million shares is necessary, it added, to prevent Musk from “prioritizing other ventures.”
It will be up to shareholders to approve the package, of course. But the proxy highlights the surging valuations of Musk’s private companies and the competing interests of xAI, SpaceX and Tesla.
Until last year, the vast majority of Musk’s wealth came from his Tesla stock. The Bloomberg Billionaires Index pegs Musk’s wealth at about $385 billion, while Forbes estimates his wealth is at $436 billion. The difference is likely tied to his 2018 pay package, which is still in dispute and is valued at between $60 billion and $100 billion. If the compensation plan is restored, and/or he receives an interim comp package proposed in the proxy, Musk’s net worth is closer to $436 billion.
Today, less than half of that fortune comes from Tesla stock.
Based on his current ownership of 13% of the company, Musk’s Tesla shares are worth about $140 billion. Musk has argued that he needs at least 25% of voting control of Tesla to prevent the company from being taken over as it develops highly sensitive and powerful artificial intelligence technology and robots.
At SpaceX and xAI, he has more voting control, with 42% of SpaceX and a majority stake in xAI. SpaceX is planning an insider share sale that would reportedly value the company at $400 billion, nearly double its valuation last year. At the $400 billion valuation, Musk’s stake would be worth about $170 billion — more than the value of his current Tesla stake.
xAI’s valuation has grown even faster, from $80 billion at the start of the year to a potential $200 billion in a new fundraising round. Musk owns more than 50% of the company, putting his stake well over $100 billion.
Together, Musk’s stake in xAI and SpaceX are now worth nearly twice as much as his Tesla shares. Added to his stakes in Neuralink — valued at around $9 billion — and his other companies, his private company wealth eclipses his Tesla wealth.
Of course, that may not be for long. If he is awarded the 423.7 million shares of restricted stock in the new 2025 compensation plan, and if Tesla hits its target valuation of $8.5 trillion, Musk’s Tesla shares would be worth over $2 trillion.
Business
Tariff jitters: US consumer confidence slips in December; inflation and jobs worries deepen – The Times of India
US consumer confidence weakened in December, sliding to its lowest level since President Donald Trump rolled out sweeping tariffs earlier this year, as households grew more anxious about high prices, trade levies and job prospects, according to a survey by the Conference Board.The Conference Board said its consumer confidence index fell 3.8 points to 89.1 in December from an upwardly revised 92.9 in November, AP reported. The reading is close to the 85.7 level recorded in April, when the Trump administration introduced import taxes on key US trading partners, AP reported.Consumers’ assessment of current economic conditions saw a sharper drop. The present situation index fell 9.5 points to 116.8, reflecting growing unease about inflation and employment conditions. Write-in responses to the survey showed that prices and inflation remained the biggest concern for consumers, alongside tariffs.Short-term expectations for income, business conditions and the labour market were little changed at 70.7, but remained well below 80 — a threshold that can signal a recession ahead. This was the 11th straight month that expectations stayed under that level.Perceptions of the job market also weakened. The share of consumers who said jobs were “plentiful” fell to 26.7% in December from 28.2% in November, while those who said jobs were “hard to get” rose to 20.8% from 20.1%.The softer sentiment follows recent labour market data showing mixed signals. Government figures released last week showed the US economy added 64,000 jobs in November after losing 105,000 jobs in October. The unemployment rate climbed to 4.6% last month, its highest level since 2021.Economists say the labour market is stuck in a “low hire, low fire” phase, as companies remain cautious amid uncertainty over tariffs and the lingering effects of high interest rates. Since March, average monthly job creation has slowed to about 35,000, down from 71,000 in the year ended March. Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell has said he suspects those figures could be revised even lower, AP reported.
Business
Government waters down farm inheritance tax plan
Kate WhannelPolitical reporter
PA MediaGovernment proposals to tax inherited farmland have been watered down, with the planned threshold increasing from £1m to £2.5m.
The climbdown follows months of protests by farmers and concern from some Labour backbenchers.
At last year’s Budget, ministers said they would start imposing a 20% tax on inherited agricultural assets worth more than £1m from April 2026, ending the 100% tax relief that had been in place since the 1980s.
In an announcement put out after MPs had left Parliament for the Christmas recess, Environment Secretary Emma Reynolds said: “We have listened closely to farmers across the country and we are making changes today to protect more ordinary family farms.”
“It’s only right that larger estates contribute more, while we back the farms and trading businesses that are the backbone of Britain’s rural communities, ” she said.
Head of the National Farmers’ Union Tom Bradshaw welcomed the change, telling BBC Radio 5 Live it “takes out many family farms from the eye of a pernicious storm”.
Gavin Lane, president of the Country Land and Business Association, said: “The government deserves credit for recognising the flaws in the original policy and changing course.
“However, this announcement only limits the damage – it doesn’t eradicate it entirely.
“Many family businesses will own enough expensive machinery and land to be valued above the threshold, yet still operate on such narrow profit margins that this tax burden remains unaffordable.”
Ben Ardern, a farmer from Derbyshire, told the BBC said it was “a step in the right direction”.
He said the government should “drop it [the tax] for family farms… and just tax the people who have got the money to tax.
“The big corporations who have just buried money into land – they’re not farmers, they have just done it to avoid tax. Farmers haven’t bought land to avoid tax, we’ve bought land to farm it and grow food.”

In the 14 months since the initial proposal was announced, there have been regular protests by farmers outside Parliament.
Some Labour MPs in rural areas have also expressed concern. At a recent parliamentary vote on the plan, a dozen backbenchers abstained and one, Markus Campbell-Savours, voted against.
Campbell-Savours was subsequently suspended for voting against the government, meaning he now sits as an independent MP.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said in a post on social media: “This fight isn’t finished.
“Other family businesses are still affected by Labour’s tax raid, and we will keep pushing until the tax is lifted from them too.”
Liberal Democrat spokesperson Tim Farron MP said: “It is utterly inexcusable that family farmers have been put through over a year of uncertainty and anguish since the government first announced these changes.
“We demand that the government scraps this unfair tax in full and if they refuse to, Liberal Democrats will submit amendments in the new year to bring it down.”
Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said: “This cynical climbdown – whilst better than nothing – does little to address the year of anxiety that farmers have faced in planning to protect their livelihoods… with British agriculture hanging by a thread, the government must go further and abolish this callous farms tax.”
In her first Budget in 2024, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced she would be reversing the 100% inheritance tax relief on agricultural assets that had been in place since the 1980s.
The move would have seen inherited agricultural assets worth over £1m taxed at 20%, half the standard inheritance tax rate, raising an estimated £520m annually by 2029.
The government had argued that the change would protect smaller farms while stopping wealthy investors from buying farmland as a tax loophole.
However, it has now stepped back from the original proposal raising the threshold level to £2.5m.
Coupled with an exemption which allows farmers to pass on assets to their spouses tax-free, this new government concession means a couple could pass on up to £5m in qualifying assets, without paying tax.
Above the threshold, a 50% relief will be applied to the remaining assets.
According to the government, the number of estates in the UK expected to pay more inheritance tax in 2026/27 will be reduced from around 2,000 under the original plans to 1,100 under the new proposal.
The climbdown is the latest in a series of U-turns the government has made since being elected in July 2024.
Earlier this year the government eased cuts to winter fuel payments and backtracked on plans to make £5bn of cuts to the welfare bill.
Business
US economy grows at fastest pace in two years
The US economy picked up speed over the three months to September, as consumer spending jumped and exports increased.
The world’s largest economy expanded at an annual rate of 4.3%, up from 3.8% in the previous quarter. That was better than expected, and marked the strongest growth in two years.
The figures offer a clearer picture of the state of the US economy heading into the end of the year, after data collection had been delayed by the US government shutdown.
The report showed consumer spending rising by 3.5%, compared with 2.5% in the previous quarter.
-
Business1 week agoStudying Abroad Is Costly, But Not Impossible: Experts On Smarter Financial Planning
-
Fashion5 days agoIndonesia’s thrift surge fuels waste and textile industry woes
-
Business1 week agoKSE-100 index gains 876 points amid cut in policy rate | The Express Tribune
-
Sports1 week agoJets defensive lineman rips NFL officials after ejection vs Jaguars
-
Business5 days agoBP names new boss as current CEO leaves after less than two years
-
Tech6 days agoT-Mobile Business Internet and Phone Deals
-
Entertainment1 week agoPrince Harry, Meghan Markle’s 2025 Christmas card: A shift in strategy
-
Sports5 days agoPKF summons meeting after Pakistani player represents India in kabaddi tournament

