• Tyler Robinson had enrolled in electrical apprenticeship.
• Governor credits suspect’s family with bringing him to justice.
• Republicans, Democrats point fingers across partisan divide. 

The Utah trade school student jailed on suspicion of fatally shooting conservative activist Charlie Kirk faces formal charges next week, according to the governor, following an act of violence widely seen as a foreboding inflection point in US politics.

Tyler Robinson, 22, was arrested on Thursday night after relatives and a family friend alerted authorities that he had implicated himself in the crime, Governor Spencer Cox said on Friday, opening a press conference with the words, “We got him.”

The arrest capped a 33-hour manhunt for the lone suspect in Wednesday’s killing, which President Donald Trump has called a “heinous assassination.”

Kirk, co-founder of the conservative student group Turning Point USA and a staunch Trump ally, was gunned down by a single rifle shot fired from a rooftop during an outdoor event attended by 3,000 people at Utah Valley University in Orem, about 40 miles south (65km) of Salt Lake City.

The sniper made his getaway in the ensuing pandemonium, captured in graphic detail in video clips that circulated widely on the internet and television news reports.

A bolt-action rifle believed to be the murder weapon was found nearby, and police released images from surveillance cameras showing a “person of interest” wearing dark clothing and sunglasses.

A break in the case came when a relative and a family friend alerted the local sheriff’s office that he had “confessed to them or implied that he had committed” the murder, Cox said.

“I want to thank the family members of Tyler Robinson, who did the right thing in this case and were able to bring him into law enforcement,” the governor said.

Security camera footage and evidence gathered from the suspect’s profile on the chat and streaming platform Discord also helped investigators link him to the crime, Cox said.

Robinson, a third-year student in the electrical apprenticeship program at Dixie Technical College, part of Utah’s public university system, was taken into custody at his parents’ house, about 260 miles (420 km) southwest of the crime scene.

Investigators on Friday evening collected additional forensic evidence from Robinson’s apartment in St George, about 5 miles (8 km) from his parents’ home near the Arizona border.

He was held on suspicion of aggravated murder and other charges that were expected to be formally filed in court early next week, the governor said.

‘Watershed in American history’

The killing has stirred outrage among Kirk’s supporters and condemnation of political violence from across the ideological spectrum.

“It is an attack on all of us,” Governor Cox said, calling Kirk’s murder a “watershed in American history” and comparing it to the rash of US political assassinations of the 1960s.

Cox declined to discuss possible motives for the killing. But in describing inscriptions investigators found on ammunition recovered from the scene, he said one of the casings bore the message: “Here fascist! CATCH!”

“I think that speaks for itself,” he said in response to reporters’ questions.

State records show Robinson was a registered voter but not affiliated with any political party. But a relative told investigators that Robinson had grown more political in recent years and had once discussed with another family member their dislike for Kirk and his viewpoints, according to an arrest warrant affidavit.

Many Republicans, including Trump, have been quick to lash out at the political left, accusing liberals of fomenting anti-conservative vitriol that would encourage a kindred spirit to cross the line into violence.

Democrats, decrying political violence more generally while calling for stronger gun laws, have countered that Trump himself routinely uses inflammatory rhetoric to demonise his political foes, judges and the mainstream media.

Rachel Kleinfeld, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the symbology found on the bullet casings suggests the shooter was part of the so-called Groyper movement, associated with far-right activist and commentator Nick Fuentes.

Right, left or crazy?

“It’s an eclectic ideological movement marked by video game memes, anti-gay, Nick Fuentes white supremacy, irony,” she said. “It certainly leans right, but it is quite eclectic.”

She added: “In a way, the ideological beliefs of the shooter don’t matter. What matters is how they’re taken by society. And if our society chooses to keep pointing fingers, whether the person turns out to be right, left or just unstable, then the violence will grow from the pointing of fingers, regardless of the act itself.”

Kleinfeld said most perpetrators of political violence were not clearly on one ideological side or another, but typically driven by “a hodgepodge of conspiracy beliefs and mental illness.”

“So it wouldn’t be surprising at all if this person was a person of the far right, if this person was a person who held a variety of different beliefs and was sort of unclassifiable,” she added.

Kirk’s murder comes amid the most sustained period of US political violence in decades. Reuters has documented more than 300 cases of politically motivated violent acts across the ideological spectrum since Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Trump himself has survived two attempts on his life, one that left him with a grazed ear during a campaign event in July 2024 and another two months later foiled by federal agents.

Democrats have fallen victim, too. In April, an arsonist broke into Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro’s residence and set it on fire while the family was inside.

Earlier this year, a gunman posing as a police officer in Minnesota murdered Democratic state lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband and shot Democratic state Senator John Hoffman and his wife.

In her first public comments since her spouse was slain, Erika Kirk vowed in a tearful but defiant video message on Friday evening that “the movement built by my husband will not die” but grow stronger.

Speaking from the studio of his radio-podcast show, she urged young people to join Turning Point, exalting her husband as a fallen political hero who “now and for all eternity will stand at his savior’s side wearing the glorious crown of a martyr”.

WASHINGTON: Group of Seven nations’ finance ministers discussed in a call on Friday further sanctions on Russia and possible tariffs on countries that they consider “enabling” its war in Ukraine, as the US called on its allies to impose tariffs on purchasers of Russian oil.

Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne chaired the G7 meeting, which was held to discuss further measures to increase pressure on Russia to end its war against Ukraine, according to a statement from Canada, the head of the rolling G7 presidency.

The ministers agreed to speed up discussions to use frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine’s defense, and discussed a “wide range of possible economic measures to increase pressure on Russia, including further sanctions and trade measures, such as tariffs, on those enabling Russia’s war effort,” the statement said.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told finance ministers during the call that they should join the US in imposing tariffs on countries that purchase oil from Russia, Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a separate statement following the meeting.

“Only with a unified effort that cuts off the revenues funding Putin’s war machine at the source will we be able to apply sufficient economic pressure to end the senseless killing,” Bessent and Greer said.

Bessent and Greer welcomed commitments made during the call to increase sanctions pressure and explore using immobilised Russian sovereign assets to benefit Ukraine’s defence, according to the joint statement.

Earlier in the day, a US Treasury spokesperson called on G7 and European Union allies to impose “meaningful tariffs” on goods from China and India to pressure them to halt their purchases of Russian oil.

President Donald Trump has imposed an extra 25% tariff on imports from India to pressure New Delhi to halt its purchases of discounted Russian crude oil, bringing total punitive duties on Indian goods to 50% and souring trade negotiations between the two democracies.

But Trump has refrained from imposing additional tariffs on Chinese imports over China’s purchases of Russian oil, as his administration navigates a delicate trade truce with Beijing.

Bessent is due to travel to Madrid on Friday for another round of talks with his Chinese counterpart, Vice Premier He Lifeng, that will cover trade issues, Washington’s demands for Chinese-owned TikTok to divest its US operations, and anti-money laundering issues.

Trump earlier on Friday said that his patience with Russian President Vladimir Putin was running out, but stopped short of threatening new sanctions during a Fox News interview.

Trump expressed frustration about Putin’s failure to halt the war. He said sanctions on banks and oil were an option to increase pressure on Russia, but added that European countries also needed to participate.

“We’re going to have to come down very, very strong,” Trump said.

China put energy co-operation centre stage at the recent Shanghai Co-operation Organisation (SCO) meetings in Tianjin. President Xi Jinping announced that China will invest in building 10 gigawatts (GW) of solar and 10 GW of wind power across SCO member countries over the next five years.

What is the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation?

This represents a large increase on the 1 GW of solar and 0.3 GW of wind China has invested in SCO states since 2019. At the same time, tacit support was given to the Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline, which if built could push the Russian share of China’s gas imports up to a third by the 2030s.

So how will China’s energy investments influence the energy transitions of SCO member states? And does China’s co-operation with Central Asian countries and energy giant Russia signal a profound shift in the global energy landscape?

To answer these questions, Dialogue Earth spoke with experts from China, India, Pakistan and Finland.

Lauri Myllyvirta: China’s recent pledge to develop 10 GW of wind and 10 GW of solar power projects across SCO countries represents a potentially important step forward in its overseas energy engagement.

Chinese manufacturers have long dominated global solar power equipment supply, but the vast majority of the equipment is used in projects with no Chinese involvement in project development or financing. The pledge could serve as an opportunity for Chinese power companies and project developers to extend their presence beyond equipment exports. It could help them accelerate renewable-energy deployment abroad by drawing on the expertise they have built in scaling up clean energy at home.

At present, China’s involvement in overseas clean energy remains largely confined to bidding for projects already included in host-country energy plans. The new pledge could create an opening for China to engage more deeply in dialogue with partner governments beyond discrete projects.

This dialogue could shape broader national energy planning by combining renewable generation with storage, transmission and equipment manufacturing. Such a shift would not only strengthen the position of Chinese developers internationally, but also help partner countries to raise their ambitions for renewable-energy deployment.

Since 2019, China has invested in 10.4 GW of solar and 7.6 GW of wind overseas. Within SCO countries, however, investment has been far more modest, just 1.0 GW of solar and 0.3 GW of wind over the same period. This suggests both the relatively limited scale so far and the significant potential for Chinese investors to expand clean energy deployment in these markets.

In 2024, Pakistan imported 17 GW of solar panels. India added roughly 28 GW of wind and solar, and even Uzbekistan brought online about 1.8 GW of solar. Given these countries’ rapidly growing energy needs, a collective target of 10 GW each for solar and wind across all SCO countries over five years represents only a small fraction of their overall demand.

One caveat is that investing in Russia, a member of the SCO, while it continues its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine would carry serious reputational, diplomatic and ethical risks. Pursuing clean-energy co-operation in other SCO member states — many of which have pressing needs to diversify their energy mix, improve energy security and lower emissions — would both reinforce China’s clean-energy leadership and demonstrate alignment with global climate goals.

In sum, the 10+10 GW initiative can move Chinese overseas engagement from equipment export and project bidding towards systemic co-operation and energy planning. This way, it could meaningfully advance clean-energy transitions in SCO countries while strengthening China’s role as a global clean-energy partner.

Xie Cheng Kai: The SCO summit saw new “energy and green-industry” platforms announced and a new development bank floated. While these initiatives are still at an early stage, the more substantive progress is evident in gas pipeline projects and financial integration. These reflect China’s long-term efforts to diversify and strengthen its position in global energy and finance.

The revival of the Power of Siberia-2 pipeline is the clearest example. Gazprom’s CEO said a memorandum of understanding (MoU) has been signed, though China has not confirmed this. The Chinese foreign ministry spoke only of “actively promoting cross-border infrastructure and energy projects” with Russia and Mongolia. No contract price, timeline or precise volume has been disclosed. Yet symbolism matters.

Like Power of Siberia-1, which gained political momentum years before terms were finalised, the second iteration has shifted from stagnation to motion.

If realised, it could deliver 50 billion cubic metres annually and push Russia’s share of China’s gas imports to a third by the 2030s. For now, the pipeline is best read as a geopolitical signal rather than a commercial certainty. Whether it moves from MoU to reality will depend much on the terms China can extract and Moscow can accept.

Unlike in oil, where China has avoided heavy dependence on one supplier, in gas it appears willing to accept concentration because it delivers options in a world where the United States remains the largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter. Overland Russian supply could offer China a useful hedge against over-reliance on US LNG and the Western financial architecture that underpins it.

India, too, continues buying discounted Russian crude despite new US tariffs, as highlighted by the warm optics of Putin’s recent meeting with Modi in China. The message is that China is not isolated. Others in Asia are also resisting US pressure.

Finance is the parallel frontier. According to the Financial Times, Chinese regulators told Russian energy firms they can issue renminbi-denominated “panda bonds” in China’s domestic market – the first such issuance since 2017. Coupled with the fact that more than 90% of bilateral trade already settles in roubles and renminbi, this deepens Moscow’s dependence on China’s financial system and provides a sanctions-resistant funding channel for pipelines and LNG logistics. It also advances Beijing’s strategic goal of renminbi internationalisation, embedding energy security within financial sovereignty.

Pipelines, panda bonds and LNG defiance illustrate that China is embedding energy security and financial sovereignty in closer alignment with Moscow, while India’s continued purchases show it is not acting alone. The market impact may not be immediate, but the political signal is hard to miss.

Li Yuxiao: Achieving the wind and solar power goals outlined in the SCO meetings will require a great deal of active collaboration across the entire industrial chain. This includes the manufacturing of wind and solar photovoltaic tech, and financing from Chinese investors.

Even as China’s domestic wind and solar capacity booms, Chinese investors still face serious obstacles to invest in wind and solar projects abroad. They will require stronger policy support for implementation and insurance.

In our work in Beijing, we have for years spoken to Chinese investors, enterprises and banks who express keen interest in wind and solar but are faced with a lack of effective financial mechanisms and limited risk coverage. Chinese investors looking at overseas wind and solar projects face limited financing structures, inflexible insurance guarantees, lengthy approval processes and a fragmented regulatory system not aligned with international technical standards. All this inhibits investments.

The 10+10 GW targets would involve the whole industry chain for wind and photovoltaic. The industrial strategy behind this agreement has of course received a lot of attention. But while much attention has gone to the strategic “offloading” function of such agreements for China’s clean-tech industries, this particular agreement’s inclusion of “technology transfer” and “experience exchange” stands out.

This is an area that will be of strategic interest for member countries. Indeed, the member countries’ response statements give greater emphasis to these elements. If effective technology transfer and experience exchange occurs between China and partners in the Global South, it could significantly support local-industry development from the ground up. Ultimately it could benefit regional energy structures and advance the energy transition both locally and globally.

Ruchita Shah: India’s participation in the SCO summit reflects a willingness to engage in energy co-operation, as China seeks to shape the forum into a platform for green-technology collaboration. For New Delhi, this engagement could indeed help streamline trade and knowledge sharing on green technologies. 

But it will remain cautious in order to protect its domestic supply-chain reforms. It will continue pursuing diversification to prevent falling into new dependencies. 

And it will emphasise ensuring that co-operation creates value within India through technology transfer, finance and joint research and development, rather than simply expanding import flows.

Chinese solar photovoltaic modules have been crucial in driving India’s installed solar capacity up to its current 120 GW. 

Meanwhile, domestic manufacturing of solar panels has expanded rapidly from 2.3 GW in 2014 to 100 GW by 2025. But India still depends on China both for solar cells, which are the building blocks of solar panels, and for battery components. Though a Production Linked Incentive scheme has been launched to support domestic battery-manufacturing capacity.

Meanwhile, India’s growing fossil-fuel imports need to be seen in the context of its broader energy transition. As the world’s fastest-growing major economy, it needs to balance rising development-driven energy demand with supply security. Oil demand will continue to rise in the medium term, even as electrification gathers pace. There is no official climate target linked to reducing oil consumption. Instead, India’s climate commitments focus on expanding renewable energy, reducing emissions intensity and reaching net zero by 2070. Higher oil imports today do not contradict its climate targets, as they are framed around reshaping the power mix and improving efficiency, largely by reducing reliance on coal.

India’s influence in energy and climate discussions extends beyond its reliance on imports. Renewables already make up half of its installed power capacity and it is targeting 365 GW of solar and 140 GW of wind by 2032. Electrification in transport, agriculture and domestic energy use is accelerating. At the same time, policies such as the Approved List of Models and Manufacturers and the Production Linked Incentive schemes for solar, batteries and green hydrogen are trying to localise supply chains and reduce import dependence.

Over the years, India has built a supportive policy environment for the energy transition. Competitive renewable auctions have consistently delivered some of the world’s lowest tariffs, helping shape international price benchmarks and procurement models in other emerging economies. India also co-founded and leads the International Solar Alliance, now joined by over 120 countries, highlighting its role in shaping global clean-energy governance. Its advocacy in multilateral forums emphasises equitable, sustainable transitions for emerging economies. The SCO’s 2025 declaration also recognised India’s global vision of “One Earth, One Family, One Future,” reaffirming its leadership in promoting inclusive and sustainable development.

Omais Abdur Rehman: This year’s SCO summit drew unprecedented attention due to shifting global dynamics.

The US has imposed heavy tariffs on China and India, and it is putting pressure on Russia to end the conflict in Ukraine, and pressure on India not to buy oil from Russia. SCO member states therefore began signalling interest in a parallel global system. China especially has felt the need for an alternative. This was also the first summit with both heads of state of India and Pakistan present since the recent military conflict between the countries.

India, frustrated by external interference, including Trump’s claims of mediation on Pakistan-India tensions, appeared to recalibrate its posture, hinting at openness to Chinese infrastructure support. China seized the moment, hosting the largest SCO summit to date, with 24 heads of state, and outlining expansive ambitions for the bloc beyond symbolic diplomacy.

Climate co-operation emerged as a key theme. China proposed a new SCO development bank, and pledged CNY 2 billion in grants and CNY 10 billion in loans. Russia backed the multilateral approach, reinforcing a shared stance against hegemonism. However, despite the urgency, especially with Pakistan and India facing severe climate disasters, the summit lacked concrete mechanisms for joint climate action or immediate relief.

For Pakistan, the summit signals a potential pivot. The approval of the SCO Development Strategy 2035 and of the proposed SCO development bank offers alternatives to International Monetary Fund and World Bank financing.

Aligning with SCO’s broader development goals, Chinese and Pakistani leaders emphasised opening up new opportunities under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) for industrial, agricultural, energy and digital co-operation. Pakistan’s prime minister officially announced the launch of CPEC 2.0. Further, the Second Pakistan-China B2B Investment Conference saw focus on not just electric vehicles, petrochemicals and iron and steel, but also health and agriculture.

Pakistan is likely to deepen its engagement with China to advance its energy transition through decreased reliance on fossil-fuel assets. It is time for China to move towards the phase-out and early retirement of coal in Pakistan as well as other countries. The SCO can help China to focus on these goals.

Amid the strained relationship between India and Pakistan, climate resilience presents a rare opportunity for collaboration. The present floods in both countries have yet again proven this is not an option but a necessity.

The continued India-Pakistan tensions, along with the failure to present a joint climate-action plan at the summit, remain critical challenges. But the SCO provided a platform for both countries to discuss possible transboundary collaboration.

This article was originally published on the Dialogue Earth website under a joint byline including Lin Zi and Shalinee Kumari. It has been reproduced on Geo.tv with permission.

Farahnaz Zahidi Moazzam is a Karachi-based journalist whose work focuses human-centric feature stories, environmental issues like solid-waste management, blue carbon, and water initiatives in South Asia.

Shalinee Kumari is an Indian journalist based in New Delhi who has keen interest in the intersection of climate with gender, caste, culture, politics and economy.

Lin Zi is a London-based journalist with over a decade of experience in climate change and environmental policy-related work.