Business
‘No boom-bust’: a dangerous economic cycle | The Express Tribune
External pressures are rising without growth dividend that once cushioned past busts
KARACHI:
Pakistan’s economy has long followed a familiar rhythm of boom and bust. Each cycle begins with an International Monetary Fund (IMF) stabilisation phase that focuses on fiscal tightening, inflation control, and temporary improvement in external balances. When stability returns, political leadership typically shifts toward growth, relying on domestic demand, cheap credit, and rising imports.
This expansion inevitably inflates the current account deficit (CAD), depletes reserves, and ends in another downturn. For decades, the pattern has repeated with almost mechanical predictability.
Today, however, Pakistan faces an even more unsettling variant of this cycle — one defined by rising external pressures without any real boom. The country is once again recording current account deterioration, but growth remains weak and uneven. The Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) recently estimated GDP growth for FY2025 at around 3.0%, yet this modest figure conceals stagnation in productive sectors and minimal job creation.
In essence, the deficit is widening not because of dynamic expansion, but because even minor import recovery is unmatched by export earnings. This imbalance — where economic pain persists without a growth dividend — marks a new, more fragile phase of stagnation.
Monetary easing has failed to spark revival. Although interest rates have been trimmed from record highs, private sector borrowing remains subdued. Commercial banks prefer risk-free lending to the government, leaving businesses starved of credit. Households, exhausted by years of inflation, lack purchasing power. Energy costs remain unpredictable, while political uncertainty discourages long-term investment. The result is an economy caught in paralysis: liquidity exists, but confidence and capacity are absent.
Underlying this stagnation is a chronic erosion of export competitiveness. In the 1990s, exports made up around 16% of GDP; by 2024, the figure had fallen to just 10%. Pakistan no longer earns enough foreign exchange to finance essential imports, leaving it vulnerable to external shocks and supply disruptions. Weak exports also translate into fewer industrial jobs and limited value addition, compounding social distress.
The World Bank’s latest “Pakistan Development Update” (April 2025) concludes that Pakistan’s growth model is unsustainable, noting that it “inflates import bills without expanding productive capacity” and fails to deliver inclusive benefits. The Bank cautions that while macroeconomic stabilisation has been achieved, “turning it into sustained and inclusive growth” requires deep structural reforms. This diagnosis aligns with the broader reality: Pakistan’s economy remains heavily consumption-driven and dependent on remittances, not on exports or productivity gains.
Excessive import dependence further worsens vulnerability. The economy relies on external supplies for food, fuel, and industrial inputs. The global energy price surge of 2022 — following the Ukraine conflict — exposed this weakness brutally, triggering inflation, a currency crisis, and fiscal strain. With minimal domestic buffers, even moderate global shocks can destabilise the entire economic framework.
Meanwhile, the state’s persistent fiscal weakness magnifies external fragility. Pakistan’s narrow tax base and poor compliance prevent adequate revenue generation, forcing the government to borrow domestically and abroad. These loans increasingly serve to service old debts rather than fund productive investments. As public debt mounts, fiscal space for development shrinks, and the economy drifts further into dependency on IMF lifelines. Each bailout defers crisis but deepens structural fragility, entrenching a cycle of temporary relief followed by renewed distress.
Investment – both domestic and foreign – remains chronically low. Pakistan’s investment-to-GDP ratio continues to trail behind regional peers, reflecting limited industrial capacity, policy inconsistency, and weak infrastructure. Even when credit is available, firms hesitate to expand amid political volatility and unpredictable regulation. Without capital formation, productivity stagnates, and exports remain uncompetitive.
The recent exodus of multinational companies (MNCs) illustrates this erosion of investor confidence. Several established global firms have either downsized or exited Pakistan altogether, citing supply-chain disruptions, currency volatility, and an unpredictable business environment. These departures — from consumer goods to energy sectors — are symptomatic of a deeper malaise. When experienced foreign investors see no future growth prospects, it signals that the local business climate has turned untenable. Beyond lost capital, such exits diminish technology transfer, managerial expertise, and export linkages, weakening the very foundations of economic resilience.
Political instability and inconsistent governance remain overarching impediments. Frequent power shifts, policy reversals, and weak institutional continuity have eroded credibility at home and abroad. Investors perceive high risk with little reward, while policymaking often prioritises short-term populism over structural reform. This environment deters innovation, discourages entrepreneurship, and ensures that even well-intentioned policies falter in implementation. Thus, Pakistan stands at a perilous juncture: the costs of external imbalance are resurfacing without the compensating benefits of growth. Unlike previous cycles that at least offered temporary prosperity before collapse, the current phase delivers austerity without expansion — a “no-boom bust.” The economy is tightening under debt and inflationary pressures before achieving any meaningful improvement in employment, income, or productivity.
THE WRITER IS A FINANCIAL MARKET ENTHUSIAST AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH PAKISTAN’S STOCKS, COMMODITIES AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
Business
Ask Dhirendra: “How do I decide how much to save and invest when my income is just about enough?” – The Times of India
“How do I decide how much to save and invest when my income is just about enough?”This is one of those questions that sounds technical, but is actually very emotional.On paper, it’s simple: income comes in, expenses go out, and whatever is left is “savings. In real life, income comes in, rent, EMIs, school fees, petrol, Swiggy, Zomato, sale on Myntra, birthday gifts, one sudden expense… and at the end of the month, you look at your balance and say, “I’ll start investing from next month. Pakka.”Next month looks surprisingly similar.So let’s start with an honest admission: for most people, the problem is not which fund to choose. It’s how much they can realistically save when it feels like the money is just about enough.At Value Research, whenever we look at this, we don’t begin with a number like “you must save 30%”. We start with a different idea: savings are not what is left after spending. Savings are what you decide first; spending adjusts after that if you flip this order, the maths – and your behaviour – changes completely.A good rule of thumb for many middle-class households is to allocate 20–30% of their take-home income to savings and investments. However, I also know that for many people today, 30% sounds like a bad joke. So instead of fighting over the “ideal” number, let’s work with two simpler questions:
- What can you save today without breaking your life?
- How can you make that number grow every year?
To answer the first question, you need to know where your money is actually going, not where you think it is going. For one or two months, track your expenses honestly – not for Instagram, for yourself. You don’t need an app; even a simple notebook or spreadsheet works.
Where does a typical salary go?
Once you see your own pie chart, three things usually stand out:
- Some expenses are non-negotiable (rent, basic food, fees).
- Some are negotiable but important (a modest phone, occasional eating out).
- Some are pure leakage (unused subscriptions, impulsive orders, “I don’t even remember what this was”).
Your first “investment” might simply be plugging two or three leaks. Even if that frees up only ₹2,000–₹3,000 a month, that is your starting SIP.Now let’s look at how “small” that really is.
From spare change to serious money
When we run these numbers at Value Research in our retirement and goal calculators, the results are always the same: the gap between zero and small is far bigger than the gap between small and perfect.But what if your income truly is at the survival stage? There are people for whom even ₹2,000 is a luxury some months. If that’s your reality, you have two parallel jobs. One is to create a tiny habit – even ₹500 or ₹1,000 a month into a recurring deposit or a conservative fund. The absolute amount is less important than the mental switch from “I’ll save if anything is left” to “I will save something, and then I will live on the rest.”The second job is to make sure that as your income grows, your lifestyle doesn’t expand at the same speed. This is where a lot of middle-class Indians quietly sabotage themselves. Every salary increase automatically becomes a better phone, nicer meals out, upgraded gadgets, and bigger car loans. The percentage saved stays the same, or sometimes even falls.A very powerful habit – one we often build into plans at Value Research – is the “step-up”. Each year, when your salary goes up, you increase your SIPs and savings before you upgrade anything else.
Step up your SIP before you step up your lifestyle
In many examples we’ve run, the step-up strategy leads to a dramatically higher corpus at the end, without you ever feeling an acute “sacrifice” in any single year. You just avoid letting every pay hike leak out into lifestyle.Now, how do you decide your own number?Here’s a simple approach:
- First, add up your genuine essentials: rent/EMI, groceries, utilities, fees, basic transport.
- Next, be realistic and add a modest amount for discretionary spending that you know you’ll do anyway – because you are human, not a robot.
- See what is left. From that leftover, commit to a percentage – even 10% of your take-home income – as a non-negotiable
saving and investing amount. Set up automatic transfers and SIPs for that right after your salary date.
If that number feels tight, start a little lower and promise yourself one thing: every time your income goes up, your savings rate will go up faster than your spending.At Value Research, when we build long-term plans, we don’t assume people will suddenly start saving 40% from next month. We assume they will start somewhere realistic, and then we design step-ups. The rigour is in the process, not in some magical starting number.One last point. Many people postpone investing because they are embarrassed by how small their starting amount looks. Please don’t underestimate the psychological power of seeing a small, growing pile that you started and maintained. It changes how you think about yourself: from “I can’t save” to “I am someone who always saves something.” That identity is worth more than one extra dinner out.So how much should you save and invest when your income feels just about enough? The honest answer is: start with whatever you can without lying to yourself, protect that amount like you protect your rent, and then make sure it rises every time your income increases. The “right” number is not what a formula says; it’s the number you will actually stick to for the next 20 years.The perfect percentage can wait. The first rupee cannot.If you have any queries for Dhirendra Kumar you can drop us an email at: toi.business@timesinternet.in(Dhirendra Kumar is Founder and CEO of Value Research)
Business
Amazon Layoffs: Job Cuts in Luxembourg May Force Indian, Other Non-EU Staff To Leave
Last Updated:
Amazon is cutting about 8.5% of its workforce in the tiny European nation, or roughly 370 employees out of a total headcount of 4,370.
While Amazon described the move as part of routine restructuring, the consequences could be severe for non-EU workers. (Photo Credit: X)
When Amazon announced plans earlier this week to cut 14,000 jobs globally, a significant share of the impact fell on its technology operations in Luxembourg, a move that could put Indian and other foreign employees in a particularly difficult position.
According to a Bloomberg report, the e-commerce giant is cutting about 8.5% of its workforce in the tiny European nation, or roughly 370 employees out of a total headcount of 4,370. This marks Amazon’s largest round of layoffs in Luxembourg in nearly two decades.
While the company described the move as part of routine restructuring, the consequences could be severe for non-EU workers. Luxembourg hosts Amazon employees from countries including India, the US, Australia, Egypt and Tunisia. Under local immigration rules, foreign workers who lose their jobs typically have three months to find new employment or leave the country.
“These are adjustments that reflect business needs and local strategies,” Amazon said in a memo to staff dated December 12, adding that the severance package “goes well beyond industry benchmarks”. The Luxembourg labour ministry did not respond to Bloomberg‘s request for comment.
Prash Chandrasekhar, a member of Amazon’s employee delegation in Luxembourg, told Bloomberg that some employees are almost certain to be forced to leave the country. “I am almost sure some employees will have to leave. It’s not easy to find a job in Luxembourg, for 370 people entering the job market at the same time,” he said. Chandrasekhar added that for professionals seeking roles in big technology firms, there are limited alternatives outside Amazon in the country.
Under European Union rules, companies must consult employee representatives, and in some cases the government, before carrying out mass layoffs. Following two weeks of negotiations, Amazon reportedly reduced the number of planned job cuts in Luxembourg from 470 to 370. A portion of affected employees are expected to receive formal termination notices in February, Chandrasekhar told the agency.
Beyond the immediate human impact, the layoffs may also create friction in Amazon’s long-standing relationship with Luxembourg, which has positioned itself as a tax-friendly hub for multinational companies. With a population of about 6,80,000, the country has benefited from hosting Amazon’s European operations since 2003, and the company remains its fifth-largest employer even after the cuts.
An Amazon employee, speaking anonymously to Bloomberg, said most of the job losses are expected among software developers as the company expands its use of artificial intelligence and trims roles created during the pandemic-era hiring boom.
Trade unions, including the General Luxembourg Workers’ Organization (OGBL), have accused the government of granting Amazon and other multinationals “outsized” tax benefits. Bloomberg reported that Amazon and several foreign firms operate holding structures in Luxembourg to channel European business, using accounting practices that were ruled legal by European courts in 2023 but allow companies to minimise tax liabilities.
Public records show that Amazon EU Sarl, the Luxembourg-based holding entity, reported €70.4 billion ($82.8 billion) in EU e-commerce sales last year, nearly matched by expenses including staff costs. As a result, taxable profits amounted to just €180 million.
Despite the layoffs, political ties remain publicly cordial. In November, Luxembourg Prime Minister Luc Frieden met Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy in Seattle, calling the company a “vital partner” in a LinkedIn post. Jassy responded, “Luxembourg’s been an important home for Amazon and our 4,000 teammates there. Appreciated the discussion and partnership.”
December 19, 2025, 12:27 IST
Read More
Business
TikTok owner signs join venture agreements to avoid US ban
Peter Hoskins,Business reporterand
Lily Jamali,North America technology correspondent
TikTok’s Chinese owner ByteDance has signed binding agreements with US and global investors for the majority of its business in America, TikTok’s boss told employees on Thursday.
Half of the joint venture will be owned by a group of investors, including Oracle, Silver Lake and the Emirati investment firm MGX, according to a memo sent by chief executive Shou Zi Chew.
The deal, which is set to close on 22 January, would end years of efforts by Washington to force ByteDance to sell its US operations over national security concerns.
It is in line with a deal unveiled in September, when US President Donald Trump delayed the enforcement of a law that would ban the app unless it was sold.
In the memo, TikTok said the deal will enable “over 170 million Americans to continue discovering a world of endless possibilities as part of a vital global community”.
Under the agreement, ByteDance will retain 19.9% of the business, while Oracle, Silver Lake and Abu Dhabi-based MGX will hold 15% each.
Another 30.1% will be held by affiliates of existing ByteDance investors, according to the memo.
The White House previously said that Oracle, which was co-founded by Trump supporter Larry Ellison, will license TikTok’s recommendation algorithm as part of the deal.
The deal comes after a series of delays.
In April 2024, during President Joe Biden’s administration, the US Congress passed a law to ban the app over national security concerns, unless it was sold.
The law was set to go into effect on 20 January 2025 but was pushed back multiple times by Trump, while his administration worked out a deal to transfer ownership.
Trump said in September that he had spoken on the phone to China’s President Xi Jinping, who he said had given the deal the go ahead.
The platform’s future remained unclear after the leaders met face to face in October.
The app’s fate was clouded by ongoing tensions between the two nations on trade and other matters.
“TikTok has become a bargaining chip in the wider US-China relationship,” said Alvin Graylin, a lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
“With recent softening tensions, Beijing’s sign off on the structure and algorithm licensing now looks less like capitulation and more like calibrated de-escalation, letting both capitals claim a win at home.”
NurPhoto via Getty ImagesThe White House referred the BBC to TikTok when contacted for comment.
Oracle and Silver Lake declined to comment. The BBC has contacted MGX for comment.
The deal drew critiques from Senate Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon, who said it wouldn’t do “a thing to protect the privacy of American user”.
Under the terms, TikTok’s recommendation algorithm is set to be retrained on American user data to ensure feeds are free from outside manipulation.
“It’s unclear that it will even put TikTok’s algorithm in safer hands,” said Sen Wyden.
He opposed the 2024 law, and was among the US lawmakers who lobbied to extend the TikTok deadline in January in a bid to give Congress more time to mitigate threats from China.
Some users also expressed caution at the prospect of new investors.
Small business owner Tiffany Cianci, who has more than 300,000 followers and nearly four million likes on the platform, said she hopes the incoming investors will maintain the same user experience for entrepreneurs like her.
“I hope small business owners are protected,” Ms Cianci said.
TikTok has said that more than seven million small businesses market their products and services on TikTok in the US.
“I reserve judgement on whether or not we have saved the app for those small business,” she added.
Ms Cianci said she chose TikTok for promotion because the platform offers profit-sharing on terms that are more favourable than what competitors like Meta offer.
Over the last year, Ms Cianci has been active in organising protests in Washington and on TikTok aimed at saving the app.
-
Business6 days agoHitting The ‘High Notes’ In Ties: Nepal Set To Lift Ban On Indian Bills Above ₹100
-
Politics1 week agoTrump launches gold card programme for expedited visas with a $1m price tag
-
Business1 week agoRivian turns to AI, autonomy to woo investors as EV sales stall
-
Fashion1 week agoTommy Hilfiger appoints Sergio Pérez as global menswear ambassador
-
Business1 week agoCoca-Cola taps COO Henrique Braun to replace James Quincey as CEO in 2026
-
Sports1 week agoPolice detain Michigan head football coach Sherrone Moore after firing, salacious details emerge: report
-
Tech1 week agoGoogle DeepMind partners with UK government to deliver AI | Computer Weekly
-
Sports1 week agoU.S. House passes bill to combat stadium drones
