Business
Planning To Use Your EPF Money To Pay Off Debts? Here’s What It Could Cost You
For thousands of salaried individuals, a familiar dilemma emerges a few years after buying a home. On one hand lies the home loan statement, with its stubborn outstanding balance and monthly EMI. On the other sits the Employee Provident Fund (EPF) passbook, steadily growing with every contribution and annual interest credit. The question that naturally follows is simple but consequential: should you dip into your EPF savings to repay the home loan and become debt-free? (News18 Hindi)

At first glance, the idea appears appealing. Closing a home loan using EPF funds promises immediate relief from EMIs, emotional comfort and the satisfaction of owning a house outright. However, financial experts caution that what feels like a smart short-term move could quietly weaken long-term financial security. (News18 Hindi)

EPF is not just another savings account. It is a structured, compulsory retirement instrument designed to build wealth steadily over decades. Contributions made by employees and employers earn an annual interest of around 8.25%, compounded over time. Crucially, these returns are entirely tax-free, making EPF one of the most efficient long-term investment tools available to salaried individuals. (AI-Generated Image)

Home loans, in contrast, are structured liabilities that become easier to manage with time. As EMIs progress, the interest component gradually reduces while the principal repayment increases. Simultaneously, salaries typically rise with experience and inflation, reducing the relative burden of EMIs over the years. Under the old tax regime, borrowers also benefit from deductions on both principal and interest, though these benefits are absent under the new tax regime. (News18 Hindi)

The interest rate comparison often drives confusion. Home loan rates currently hover around 7-7.5%, slightly lower than EPF’s 8.25%. On the surface, the difference appears marginal. But the real distinction lies in taxation. For someone in the highest tax slab, an 8.25% tax-free EPF return is equivalent to earning nearly 11% from a taxable investment. Few instruments offer that level of safety and assured, post-tax returns. (News18 Hindi)

Consider a commonly cited scenario. A borrower has a home loan outstanding of Rs 20 lakh with ten years remaining, and an EPF balance of Rs 20 lakh earning 8.25% interest. If the entire EPF amount is withdrawn to close the loan, the borrower saves roughly Rs 9 lakh in interest payments over the remaining tenure. However, this comes at the cost of completely exhausting the retirement corpus. Rebuilding such a fund later, especially as expenses rise with age, can be challenging. (News18 Hindi)

If the EPF is left untouched instead, the same Rs 20 lakh can grow to more than Rs 44 lakh over 10 years, entirely tax-free. Even after accounting for the interest paid on the home loan, the individual ends up with a significantly stronger financial cushion for retirement. In essence, the compounding power of EPF outweighs the interest saved on early loan closure in most situations. (News18 Hindi)

There are, however, limited circumstances where using EPF for loan repayment may make sense. Individuals who are nearing retirement, have surplus EPF savings well beyond their projected needs, or face severe cash flow stress may consider partial or full withdrawal. Even then, experts recommend caution and detailed financial planning before taking such a step. (News18 Hindi)
Business
India-US trade deal back in focus: Indian delegation to visit Washington next week for talks – The Times of India
India-US trade deal update: Months after India and the US announced an interim trade agreement that reduces tariffs on India to 18%, an official Indian delegation is set to travel to Washington next week for discussions with US authorities, a government source said on Wednesday.According to a PTI source, the visit is scheduled for next week. The agreement had originally been expected to be signed in March, but developments in the Donald Trump tariff regime following a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States have changed the circumstances.
In this light, the talks between trade representatives of India and the United States are seen as particularly significant. Officials had earlier indicated that the deal would be concluded only after clarity emerges on the revised tariff structure in the United States.In February, the two countries had announced that they had finalised the framework for the first phase of their bilateral trade pact. As part of this understanding, the US had agreed to bring down tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent.However, the tariff environment in the US shifted after the court struck down sweeping reciprocal tariffs introduced by President Donald Trump. Subsequently, the US administration imposed a uniform 10 per cent tariff on imports from all countries for a period of 150 days starting February 24.Amid these changes, a planned meeting between the chief negotiators from both sides was deferred last month. The two countries had been scheduled to meet in February to finalise the legal text of the agreement.At the time the framework was agreed, India enjoyed a relative advantage over competing nations. That edge has since narrowed, as all US trading partners are now subject to the same 10 per cent tariff.The upcoming talks will also be crucial in the context of two ongoing investigations initiated by the Office of the United States Trade Representative under Section 301.On March 12, the USTR launched a probe covering around 60 economies, including India and China. The investigation aims to assess whether policies or practices related to the enforcement of bans on goods produced using forced labour are unreasonable or discriminatory, or whether they restrict US trade.A day earlier, on March 11, the USTR had initiated another Section 301 investigation focusing on the policies and industrial practices of 16 economies, including India and China.
Business
Lidl and Iceland ads banned under new ‘less healthy’ food rules
Ads for supermarkets Lidl and Iceland have become the first to be banned under new rules governing “less healthy” food and drink.
The rules, which came into effect at the beginning of the year, are part of Government efforts to tackle childhood obesity by preventing ads for food and drink that is high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) appearing on television between 5.30am and 9pm, and online at any time.
The new ban applies to products that fall within 13 categories considered to play the most significant role in childhood obesity, including soft drinks, chocolates and sweets, pizzas and ice creams, but also breakfast cereals and porridges, sweetened bread products, and main meals and sandwiches.
Products that fall into these categories are than also assessed as to whether they are “less healthy” based on a scoring tool that considers their nutrient levels and whether products are high in saturated fat, salt or sugar.
Only products that meet both of the two criteria are included in the restrictions.
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said an Instagram post for Lidl Northern Ireland by influencer Emma Kearney featured the grocer’s cheese pretzel, which was not categorised as HFSS and therefore did not fall within the restrictions, and its Pain Suisse product, which was classified as both HFSS and a sweetened bread product and was therefore banned under the new rules.
Lidl said the ad had been removed and they had liaised with their marketing agency to ensure that all future ads complied with the new rules.
In a separate case, Iceland confirmed that two ads included a tub of Swizzles Sweet Treats, a packet of Chupa Chups Laces, a bag of Chooee Disco Stix and a bag of Haribo Elf Surprises, which were all classified as HFSS.
They also provided nutrient profile information from their supplier which confirmed that Pringles Sour Cream & Onion crisps, also included in the ads, were not an HFSS product.
Iceland’s Luxury Aberdeen Angus Beef Roasting Joint, Vegetable Spring Rolls, Sticky Chicken Skewers and Lurpak Spreadable Butter, which were also included in the ads, did not fall within the new restrictions.

The ASA did not uphold a complaint against an Instagram post by influencer John Fisher – known to many as Big John – which featured him promoting menu items at a new German Doner Kebab outlet because the specific items shown in the ad were not classified as less healthy foods.
The watchdog also cleared a TV ad for On The Beach promoting free airport lounge access which featured a boy approaching a buffet and taking a chocolate ring doughnut.
The ASA said viewers would see the ad as showing an example of what was available in the lounge rather than for the doughnut itself, meaning it did not break the rules.
ASA chief executive Guy Parker said: “As the ad regulator, our role is to remain impartial and independent, making sure our new LHF rules, which reflect the law, are applied fairly and consistently.
“These initial rulings are an important step in building a clearer picture of how the rules are applied in reality.
“We’ll be continuing to play our role in administering and enforcing them, including by using tech-assisted proactive monitoring.”
An Iceland spokesman said: “The products highlighted were part of a bigger range in the specific display ad and were featured due to a technical fault with a data feed from a third-party supplier.
“As the ASA has pointed out, these initial rulings are helping to build a clearer picture of how the new rules are applied, following the initial confusion and debate around the regulations.”
Business
Crisis grants launched for struggling Bradford families
At a meeting of the local authority’s executive on Tuesday, MacBeath said the scheme aimed to move beyond emergency aid by helping families become more financially “resilient”, offering advice on managing money, accessing benefits, reducing debt and finding work.
-
Fashion1 week agoIndia’s exports face reset as EU links trade to carbon metrics: EY
-
Entertainment1 week agoQueen Elizabeth II emotional message for Archie, Lilibet sparks speculation
-
Entertainment1 week agoLamar Odom shocking response to Khloé Kardashian account of his overdose
-
Tech7 days agoAs the Strait of Hormuz Reopens, Global Shipping Will Take Months to Recover
-
Tech7 days agoAzure customers up in arms over ‘full’ UK South region | Computer Weekly
-
Fashion1 week agoCII submits 20-pt agenda to Indian govt to back firms hit by Iran war
-
Tech6 days agoThis AI Button Wearable From Ex-Apple Engineers Looks Like an iPod Shuffle
-
Tech1 week agoA Single Strike Won’t Shut Off the Gulf’s Desalination System
