Business
Setback for expatriates? Delhi HC upholds mandatory EPFO membership; what this means for foreign staff – The Times of India
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday ruled that expatriates working in Indian companies must become members of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) and contribute to the fund regardless of their income levels.The court upheld amendments to the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, as well as the Centre’s 2008 and 2010 notifications that mandate international workers to contribute to the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF).Under the ruling, international workers will be allowed to withdraw their full EPF balance only after retiring at or after the age of 58, or in cases of permanent and total incapacity. This is seen as a setback for expatriates who generally work in India for shorter periods of two to five years, reported ET. Indian workers, by comparison, are required to contribute if they earn below Rs 15,000 per month. Legal experts noted that many foreign employees have already left India, meaning employers will now have to bear their share of contributions.A division bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela held that the distinction between foreign and Indian employees was justified. The court accepted the government’s position that international workers form a separate group because they contribute only during their limited time in India, unlike domestic employees who contribute throughout their service.“The classification made was reasonable and it also has an object sought to be achieved that the purpose of mandating an employee to be a member of 1952 scheme was to provide social security,” the court said, as quoted by ET.The court also upheld EPFO communications directing SpiceJet and LG Electronics India to deposit provident fund and related dues for their international staff. It dismissed SpiceJet’s challenge to summons issued in 2012 requiring it to produce records for determining liabilities, and similarly rejected objections raised by LG Electronics.The Delhi High Court’s ruling aligns with a previous judgment of the Bombay High Court, while the Karnataka High Court has ruled to the contrary. Due to the conflicting views, the matter is expected to reach the Supreme Court for final interpretation. Both companies are assessing the implications and are likely to move to the Supreme Court, according to legal sources.Atul Sharma, counsel for SpiceJet, said, “The entire basis of amendment to the scheme is implementation to certain treaties with countries who have similar provision for social security. And under the Constitution of India, this amendment could not be implemented as treaties have not been ratified by Parliament.” He said the issue requires further consideration.The companies had argued that the classification between foreign and Indian employees was discriminatory.
Business
NSE board approves IPO via OFS route – The Times of India
Mumbai: The board of the National Stock Exchange (NSE), the biggest stock exchange in India in terms of turnover and number of trades, on Friday gave its nod for the exchange to go for its long-awaited public offering. The NSE IPO will be an offer-for-sale. Currently, LIC, with a 10% stake in the bourse, is the largest shareholder, followed by the SBI group that holds 7.6% in the exchange. The exchange also set up a five-member panel consisting of its board members that will facilitate the IPO process. The members are Tablesh Pandey, Srinivas Injeti, Mamata Biswal, Abhilasha Kumari, G Sivakumar and Ashishkumar Chauhan.
Business
Hundreds of Google workers demand firm cuts ties with ICE
More than 900 Google employees signed a letter opposing company links to federal immigration actions.
Source link
Business
Stellantis CEO says automaker is stronger together as stock plummets amid $26 billion charge
Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa speaks during an event in Turin, Italy, Nov. 25, 2025.
Daniele Mascolo | Reuters
DETROIT — Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa on Friday said the automaker plans to move forward as one company amid speculation that it would be better off selling brands or splitting up after disappointing results.
“Stellantis is a very strong global company that is very proud to have very deep regional groups,” Filosa, an Italian native, told reporters during a media call. “It makes all of sense to stay together. We want to stay together for many years to come.”
His comments come hours after the company announced 22 billion euros ($26 billion) in charges from a business restructuring that includes pulling back on electrification plans and reintroducing V8 engines to U.S. models.
Filosa described the actions as an “important strategic reset of our business model, with the only intention to put our customer preferences back at the center of what we do globally and in each regions.” He said the “mission is to grow” after notable declines in market share in recent years.
Stellantis’ stock plunged more than 25% in trading in Milan and was down 23% on Wall Street.
Filosa on Friday did not specifically rule out the possibility of regionally refocusing or shrinking the company’s vast portfolio of 14 auto brands that includes U.S. brands Jeep, Ram and Chrysler, as well as Italian nameplates Fiat and Alfa Romeo, which have not performed well domestically.
Stellantis-listed shared in Milan and New York
“We want to really manage our brands in the sense to provide to them the products and the technology that our customers, that are now at the center of our strategic reset, will tell us that they want and they need,” he said. “This is our core mission.”
Filosa said additional information about the company’s plans moving forward will come at a May 21 investor day.
Friday’s announcement comes days after Stellantis executives met with the company’s U.S. franchised dealers at their annual National Automobile Dealers Association conference with a message that the automaker planned to grow sales across its U.S. lineup of brands, according to two dealers who attended the meeting.
$26 billion in charges
The majority of Friday’s announced charges — 14.7 billion euros — are related to realigning product plans with consumer preferences and new emission regulations in the U.S.
Other charges include 2.1 billion euros in resizing the company’s EV supply chain, 4.1 billion euros in warranty costs and 1.3 billion euros in restructuring European operations.
The automaker also canceled its dividend for 2026 and issued a 5 billion euro nonconvertible hybrid bond.
2026 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
Jeep
The charges related to EVs follow General Motors and Ford Motor announcing billions of dollars in similar expenses due to pullbacks in plans for all-electric vehicles.
Shares of Ford and GM were not as impacted as much as Stellantis, which also issued lower-than-expected guidance amid years of strategic problems with the company.
Stellantis said it anticipates a net loss for 2025. For 2026, the auto giant is targeting a mid-single-digit percentage increase in net revenue and a low-single-digit rise in its adjusted operating income margin.
“While charges were expected, the amount comes in above F ($19.5B) and GM ($7.6B). Expect shares to trade meaningfully lower today as a result. We continue to believe STLAM is a show-me-story. In the US, the company has lost substantial market share given high pricing and a perceived lack of product investment,” RBC Capital Markets analyst Tom Narayan said in a Friday investor note.
Past mistakes
Filosa on Friday called out mistakes by former company leaders more than he has since he succeeded Carlos Tavares as CEO in June.
Tavares, who was ousted in December 2024 amid disagreements with the Stellantis board, in a book last year reportedly said that the group’s French, Italian and U.S. operations might have to be split amid pressure from its main stakeholders.
It’s been just over five years since Stellantis was created through a $52 billion combination of Italian American automaker Fiat Chrysler and France-based Groupe PSA on Jan. 16, 2021.

The merger formed the fourth-largest automaker by volume, but the company has run into significant problems in recent years amid its investments in all-electric vehicles, focus on profits over market share and cost-cutting efforts to the detriment of products.
Stellantis’ global sales under Tavares fell 12.3% from 6.5 million in 2021 — the year the company was formed — to 5.7 million in 2024. That included a roughly 27% collapse in the U.S. in that period to 1.3 million vehicles sold. The automaker dropped from fourth in U.S. sales to sixth, declining from an 11.6% market share to 8% during that time frame.
Stellantis’ global market share has fallen from 8.1% in 2020 to an estimated 6.1% last year, according to S&P Global Mobility.
Correction: Global market share for Stellantis has fallen from 8.1% in 2020 to an estimated 6.1% last year, according to S&P Global Mobility. An earlier version mischaracterized the percentage.
-
Business1 week agoPSX witnesses 6,000-point on Middle East tensions | The Express Tribune
-
Tech5 days agoHow to Watch the 2026 Winter Olympics
-
Business5 days agoPost-Budget Session: Bulls Push Sensex Up By Over 900 Points, Nifty Reclaims 25,000
-
Tech1 week agoRight-Wing Gun Enthusiasts and Extremists Are Working Overtime to Justify Alex Pretti’s Killing
-
Fashion5 days agoCanada could lift GDP 7% by easing internal trade barriers
-
Fashion1 week agoItaly’s Brunello Cucinelli debuts Callimacus AI e-commerce experience
-
Tech6 days agoI Tested 10 Popular Date-Night Boxes With My Hinge Dates
-
Business5 days agoInvestors suffer a big blow, Bitcoin price suddenly drops – SUCH TV
