Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have found themselves once again at the center of breakup rumours.

Following reports of eyewitnesses claiming that the former Suits star appeared to be “overwhelmed” and “fighting back tears” during visit to a Montecito bookstore, the speculations have emerged about couple’s marriage.

As reported by Radar Online, the sources claim that Harry and Meghan are facing disagreements over their children’s privacy.

The tensions came after Meghan posted video on Instagram briefly showing Archie and Lilibet, but she deleted the post later.

“One of the many reasons they left the U.K. was because they didn’t want to be chased by paparazzi,” an insider shared.

Adding, “They wanted to lead a very private life. It is hypocritical of her to want a private life, then you’re posting pictures of the kids on social media.”

The source also added, “Harry is upset about it because, obviously, he grew up in the spotlight. He knows what it’s like.”

Moreover, Meghan has also returned to acting, recently filming a cameo for upcoming comedy Close Personal Friends.

The insider shared, “Acting could be her attempt to gain independence in case they pull the trigger on their marriage. It could be her saying, ‘I need to go back to my roots. I need to go back to my own kind of thing.’ It’s her backup plan in case she exits.”

However, the sources also commented on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s marriage, saying that the Duchess of Sussex would “fight hard” for half of the money incase of the split.

“Everything that they’ve earned post-royal life, and I think she would be the first one to say it, is because of her. She’s the one with all the contacts. She’s the one with the Hollywood connections.”

“She may go for half his money, and maybe more, because she would say, ‘Everything we got is because of me,'” the source stated.

Yet, a close friend told the outlet that the royal couple have remained united. “They’ve learned to function within the chaos. Constant drama and chaos, and mayhem seem to be all that is tying them together at the moment,” they added.

• Proxy war remains a modern warfare tool: Khawaja Asif.
• He says May conflict raised immediate war concerns.
• Asif says US intervention prevented further escalation.
  

ISLAMABAD: Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has warned that the risk of another war with India persists, emphasising that proxy conflicts remain an ongoing threat decades after they began.

“The proxy war has never truly ended; it has intensified in recent years,” said Defence Minister Asif during a talk show on a private television channel.

He explained that the proxy war started in the 1980s and has become a tool of modern warfare. Lahore and Rawalpindi have recently experienced explosions linked to these tensions, he said.

Asif added that the immediate threat of war was high following the May conflict, stating: “After the May engagement, the possibility of another war existed, and that risk has not disappeared.”

Highlighting Pakistan’s defensive successes, he said the United States certified Pakistan’s victory and intervened to prevent further escalation.

In May, the Pakistan Air Force shot down seven Indian aircraft, including Rafales, and destroyed an S-400 defence system.

He concluded by reaffirming that despite these measures, the danger of conflict with India remains a serious concern for Pakistan’s security establishment.

The four-day war between the two nuclear-armed nations was triggered by India’s unlawful missile strikes inside Pakistan, which resulted in the martyrdom of several civilians and security personnel.

Pakistan, in addition to downing multiple Indian fighter jets, then launched a retaliatory strike, targeting over 20 Indian military sites across multiple regions.

The hostilities ended on May 10 after the two countries agreed to a US-brokered ceasefire agreement.

Months after the conflict, a report submitted to the United States Congress acknowledged Pakistan’s military success over India.

The report, submitted by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, noted that Pakistan deployed advanced Chinese weaponry during the conflict to enhance its military edge over India.

The report mentioned the successful use of China’s modern weapons systems in active combat for the first time, including the HQ-9 air-defence system, PL-15 air-to-air missiles, and J-10C fighter aircraft.

Sarah Ferguson, the former wife of Prince Andrew Mountbatten, is struggling with a fresh crisis that has taken away not only her title but also tarnished her image, which currently seems irreparable. 

But it’s not the first time she has found herself in a situation like this. The woman is a true fighter and has emerged stronger after weathering even tougher storms when it comes to her personal life. 

The Duchess of York was famously photographed topless with a man in August 1992 while holidaying in the South of France. And it happened when she was still married to Prince Andrew. 

Sarah Ferguson was reduced to tears when she found royal family members looking at newspapers carrying her explicit photos with John Bryan, who was then known as her financial adviser, veteran journalist James Whitaker wrote in his 1993 book “Diana Vs Charles.” 

“The couple were kissing and cuddling by the poolside and, with the Queen’s grandchildren, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, playing nearby, John Bryan was lying on top of the Duchess.” 

He wrote, “The morning of publications, every member of the family at Balmoral was to be found poring over half a dozen copies of the Daily Record, the Scottish version of the Mirror, at breakfast.” 

“They were clearly taking some delight in the duchess’s impending discomfiture. Suddenly Fergie herself entered the dining room. I was told. 

“There was a mad scramble to turn the pages over, everybody pretended to be reading some other story. But the duchess knew. She was very close to tears, poor thing. She just hadn’t known the photographs would be as explicit as they were.” Five days later, Fergie left Balmoral for the last time as a member of the royal family.”