Connect with us

Business

Stamp duty: Five ways abolishing the tax could change the housing market

Published

on

Stamp duty: Five ways abolishing the tax could change the housing market


Kevin PeacheyCost of living correspondent

Getty Images A row of terraced houses painted, left to right, yellow, blue, purple and pink, with fences and shrubs in front.Getty Images

The debate around stamp duty is intensifying. When Kemi Badenoch said a future Conservative government would abolish it on the purchase of main homes, it went down well at the Tory Party conference.

There has also been speculation that the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is considering replacing it.

Scrapping stamp duty would be popular among some home buyers, including first-time buyers. There’s been widespread support in the housing sector as well as among some independent economists.

Analysts say there would be some significant consequences of scrapping stamp duty for primary residences, affecting buyers, sellers and the wider UK economy.

1. House prices might rise

Whenever there has been a temporary easing of stamp duty, such as in the immediate aftermath of the Covid lockdowns, house prices have then risen.

It is more difficult to judge whether a permanent abolition would have the same long-term impact on prices as the short-term sweetener of a stamp duty holiday.

However, greater demand is likely to feed through to asking prices.

“If, and this is a big if, it is a simple tax giveaway, the likelihood is that the current stamp duty bill simply passes through into prices,” says Lucian Cook, head of residential research at Savills.

In turn, that could mean first-time buyers paying less in stamp duty, but having to find a bigger deposit.

“Given the way stamp duty works, this would be unevenly distributed across the country,” Mr Cook added.

The most obvious point here is that the government in Westminster can only control stamp duty in England and Northern Ireland. Scotland and Wales have their own land and transaction taxes overseen by the devolved administrations.

2. Tax cut for wealthy

A swathe of first-time buyers do not pay stamp duty. That’s because, in England and Northern Ireland, they are exempt when buying properties of up to £300,000.

“For them, the enormous challenge is raising a deposit,” says Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown.

Data from property portal Rightmove suggests that 40% of homes for sale in England are stamp duty free for first-time buyers.

While the vast majority of movers pay stamp duty, the rate increases at certain price thresholds.

So, the bigger the home, the bigger the benefit, if stamp duty was scrapped.

This will also mean a big regional difference in the impact of such a policy.

At the moment, 76% of properties on sale in the North East of England are free of stamp duty for first-time buyers, according to Rightmove’s figures. In London, it is only 11%.

Richard Donnell, from Zoopla, points out that 60% of all stamp duty is paid in southern England – so the majority of the benefit of abolition would be felt in the south.

3. Easier to find somewhere to move to

One of the great selling points of stamp duty abolition is the extra mobility it should provide for workers, buyers, sellers and downsizers, according to experts.

“Homeownership is the foundation of a fairer and more secure society – but stamp duty has denied that opportunity to too many for too long,” says Paula Higgins, chief executive of the Homeowners Alliance.

“Our research shows over 800,000 homeowners have shelved moving plans in the past two years, and stamp duty is a major barrier.”

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), an independent economic think tank, describes stamp duty as “one of the most econmically damaging taxes”. In its most recent analysis, it says particular winners will be those who want to move frequently, to more or less expensive homes.

It should, for example, clear an obstacle for older homeowners, who want to sell a family home but are discouraged by stamp duty. If they are more likely to move, then their homes become available to younger families and the whole market becomes more fluid.

However, others suggest the influence of stamp duty could be overblown.

“Take someone downsizing, from a £750,000 property to a £300,000 one. In England and Northern Ireland, they’d pay £5,000 in stamp duty. It’s a fraction of what they’re likely to pay in estate agency fees, and sits along a huge range of costs from conveyancing to removals,” Ms Coles from Hargreaves Lansdown says.

“It begs the question of whether removing the cost of the tax is a gamechanger.”

4. Potential tax rises elsewhere

Stamp duty raises a lot of money for the Treasury, so scrapping it would leave a gap in the public finances.

The IFS said that the direct cost of the Conservative policy might be around £10.5bn to £11bn in 2029-30, although the Tories’ own estimate is about £9bn.

Chart showing how much stamp duty was raised in England and Northern Ireland. It was £11.9bn in 2019, £11.6bn in 2020, £8.7bn in 2021, £14.1bn in 2022, £15.4bn in 2023, and £11.6bn in 2024.

The question for any administration tempted to scrap or reduce stamp duty is how else it finds the money.

The Conservatives say they will make savings elsewhere. They also say the policy will boost growth and the housing sector in general, and therefore bring in more tax receipts.

The other option is to raise other taxes. As some analysts have said, the main consideration is not what is scrapped, but what replaces it.

5. Impact on renters

The idea of scrapping stamp duty for primary residences will benefit homeowners but could end up meaning less choice for renters.

The IFS suggests it could discourage the purchase of rental properties by landlords, as they would still have to pay stamp duty.

The think tank says it would increase the more favourable tax treatment of owner-occupation relative to renting.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

At over Rs 3.1 lakh crore, road & railway ministries see record capex in April-September – The Times of India

Published

on

At over Rs 3.1 lakh crore, road & railway ministries see record capex in April-September – The Times of India


NEW DELHI: The road transport and railway ministries have achieved a record capital expenditure utilisation of 63% and 56.5%, respectively, during the first half of the current financial year. The combined capex of the two ministries by Sept end was over Rs 3.1 lakh crore, as against the budgetary allocation of Rs 5.2 lakh crore for FY26.The road and railway sectors account for over 50% of the capex allocation of Rs 11.2 lakh crore for all sectors for the current financial year. Officials in the road transport ministry said the utilisation of capex this year is the highest ever in its history and has exceeded the target set for the first six months. So far, the ministry has spent around Rs 1.7 lakh crore out of the total allocation of Rs 2.7 lakh crore. In the corresponding period last year, the capex stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crore. Sources said that with better utilisation of the allocated budget, there may be scope for increasing the allocation at a later stage when Budget Estimates are revised.In case of the railway ministry, the spending on account of capex by Sept end stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crore. The capex earmarked for the entire 2025-26 is Rs 2.5 lakh crore. Officials said the national transporter has spent Rs 22,286 crore on safety-related works in the past six months, out of the Rs 39,456 crore earmarked for FY26. This includes automatic train protection technology-KAVACH related works, track renewals, road over bridges, bridges and level crossings.Officials said the maximum expenditure has been incurred under the capacity augmentation head, which includes new lines, doubling, gauge conversion, electrification and metropolitan transport.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump tariffs: Swiss companies target alternative export markets

Published

on

Trump tariffs: Swiss companies target alternative export markets


Imogen FoulkesBern, Switzerland

AFP via Getty Images A gloomy looking Karin Keller-Sutter, with economy minister Guy Parmelin, leave the US Department of State after talks in August.AFP via Getty Images

So far President Karin Keller-Sutter has failed to reduce US tariffs on Swiss goods

President Trump’s tariffs have caused shock worldwide, with governments scrambling to find a deal to placate him. Some have managed: the UK got in first, with a sweet deal of just 10%, the European Union crept in behind with 15%.

Still more than they were paying before Mr Trump’s “liberation day”, but less than they had feared.

Spare a thought then for Switzerland, which has been hit with punitive tariffs of 39%, and has so far been unable to persuade the US president to relent. Switzerland is not in the EU, so it can’t benefit from the deal struck by Brussels.

But Switzerland is regularly ranked as the world’s most competitive and innovative economy. It is also one of the biggest investors in the US, creating, Swiss business leaders say, 400,000 jobs. That’s why they find the US strategy not only outrageous, but inexplicable.

“Thirty nine percent tariffs: I was just shocked,” says Jan Atteslander, director of international relations for the Swiss business federation Economiesuisse.

“This is unjustified, you can’t explain why they are so high.”

Getty Images Bars of Swiss chocolate on a shop shelf.Getty Images

Around 17% of Swiss exports go to the US

Since the tariffs (the highest in Europe and the fourth-highest worldwide) were announced on 1 August, the Swiss government has been desperately trying to renegotiate with Washington, to no avail. The US president, it seems, has moved on to other matters.

Around 17% of all Swiss exports go to the US, a market Switzerland cannot afford to lose overnight. Now that the tariffs have come into effect, the once muscular Swiss economy is suffering. Economic growth is shrinking, and job losses in key industries appear inevitable.

Switzerland’s most lucrative exports to the US are pharmaceuticals. Ironically, they are not affected by the 39% tariffs, but might be subject to the 100% tariff on imported medicines that Trump recently threatened. That would be another huge blow.

Another big Swiss exporter to the US is Switzerland’s world-leading medical technology industry.

“It’s precision mechanics, it has its roots in the watchmaking industry,” explains Adrian Hunn, who is managing director of Swiss Medtech, the trade body representing the industry.

MPS An MPS worker with short hair looks into a microscopeMPS

The US is an important market for precision instrument firms like MPS

The town of Biel, the historic home of Swiss watchmaking, and now the site of medical technology companies, demonstrates why there may be no winners, but only losers, from Washington’s tariff policy.

The company MPS (short for micro precision systems), produces medical instruments from aortic valve replacements to the tiniest of surgical drills, used in hip or knee replacements. Just the kind of things a wealthy country with an ageing, and increasingly overweight population – like the US – needs.

So precise is the production process, that even the machines used to produce the devices are made and specially calibrated locally.

“It’s a very integrated way of working,” explains MPS’s CEO Gilles Robert.

“Measuring equipment, milling tools, cutting liquids. That’s why we call it an ecosystem that we have here in Switzerland.”

Mr Robert’s proudest product is the engine for the world’s only medically-registered artificial heart.

Just 120 of them have been transplanted worldwide. “It’s a pump that will pulse in both sides, to create beating in both chambers, and allow people currently waiting for a transplant, people with terminal heart deficiencies, to keep on living.”

Technology like this is very different from the car industry, where, often, the brakes are made in one country, the windscreen wipers or door handles in another, and everything is assembled in a third.

That’s why Mr Robert is not convinced that Trump’s stated strategy of moving production to the US could work.

“It would be extremely challenging if not impossible to separate the components from the actual product assembly,” he says. “And I think those types of skills would be extremely hard to find in the US.”

MPS In a white lab coat, Gilles Robert speaks to a colleague who is holding an electrical device.MPS

It would be “extremely challenging” to move production to the US, says Gilles Robert

Trump has said the countries hit with tariffs will “eat them”. So can MPS absorb the 39%?

“They had the best price before the new tariffs came into effect,” says Mr Robert.

“We don’t have the leeway to give a discount to our customers, because the margins are already as low as they can be.”

Instead, says Adrian Hunn of SwissMedTech, “Medical devices will get more expensive for US patients.”

And he adds, probably for US taxpayers as well. “Costs for hospitals and healthcare systems in the US in many cases are funded by public reimbursement programmes, and this means taxpayers bear the burden.”

Perhaps even more worrying for patients, since some high precision medical devices are made only in Switzerland, is the possibility that Swiss companies will stop exporting to the US altogether.

“These are companies that have very good products,” says Jan Atteslander of Economiesuisse. “And they have told us, we just stopped delivering, sorry guys.”

Mr Atteslander and Mr Hunn agree with the Swiss government’s strategy of not retaliating to the US tariffs. Switzerland’s David, the thinking goes, cannot realistically take on America’s Goliath.

But the Swiss are actively chasing other markets. A trade deal with India – “the fastest growing economy on the planet, 1.4 billion potential consumers,” Mr Atteslander points out – came into force on 1 October.

An agreement with South American trade block Mercosur has also just been concluded, Switzerland’s longstanding trade deal with China is being upgraded, and free trade with the EU, the market for 50% of all Swiss export, remains intact.

So although the US tariffs are already damaging the Swiss economy, and some still cling to hope that Trump may change his mind, there is also a quiet confidence that Switzerland will, if it has to, weather this storm.

“To be a successful export nation, you have to have resilience in your DNA,” says Mr Atteslander.

The more long-term damage may be to the traditionally good business relations between the two countries. In Switzerland, there is a real feeling of hurt. The US wasn’t just an important market: the Swiss loved doing business there.

Many thought they had found entrepreneurial soulmates, more oriented to the free market than their more regulated partners in the EU. Now, both Adrian Hunn of SwissMedTech and Gilles Robert of MPS have abandoned that notion – for now at least.

“I lived six years in the US, so I was very close,” says Mr Hunn.

“I have a lot of friends there. So, this, it didn’t change my view of America, but it did change my view, you know, of how the current administration in the US is acting globally, and treating allies.”

“I studied a year in the US,” says Mr Robert.

“It had an impact on me, on my way of looking at the world. How you can take risks, be an entrepreneur, and be positive about the future.”

But, he adds hopefully: “Even though I’m sad about this situation, we will overcome, we’ll find solutions, and I’m sure in the end reason will prevail.”

More Technology of Business



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Taiwanese MediaTek open to get chips made in India – The Times of India

Published

on

Taiwanese MediaTek open to get chips made in India – The Times of India


NEW DELHI: Taiwanese chipmaker MediaTek – the world’s biggest chipset provider to smartphone brands apart from automotive and home product makers – has said that it is ready to get its chips manufactured in India once fab production begins here.MediaTek, which globally designs and contract-manufactures chips for companies such as Xiaomi, Samsung, Oppo and Vivo, believes that with the surge in electronics and automotive manufacturing in India and build-up of semiconductor facilities, it is time that the chip production begins here for global as well as local brands.“If consumption is in India and manufacturing is in India, that’s good for us. It (local manufacturing of chips) may also happen. It makes business sense, certainly it’s a good thing to do. Things can be done to Make in India,” MediaTek’s India MD Anku Jain told TOI here.Like Nvidia and Qualcomm, MediaTek operates as a fabless semiconductor company as it focuses on designing chips and software for devices such as smartphones, laptops, and automobiles, while outsourcing the actual chip fabrication to specialised foundries like TSMC. MediaTek supplies chips to companies in India as well as globally by getting them produced at TSMC, apart from outsourcing some of the work to Intel Foundry Services and GlobalFoundries. With a $10-billion-incentive package, India has been pushing for production of semiconductor chips in the country. There are around 10 big projects in the semiconductor space under development in India.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending