During our conversation, Brown compared Praxis to Israel—minus a world war and a holocaust, of course. “There were these stateless people who were scattered,” he says, and they had “this idea of Judea and building a state and returning to the OG homeland.” (Srinivasan has been even more direct in the past, saying, “What I’m really calling for is something like tech Zionism.”)
Of course, the beauty of a network state is that it can embody “the West” without actually having to be there. In addition to the Vandenberg location, Praxis announced that its team would be traveling to Morocco, Japan, and the Dominican Republic, among other countries, to explore the possibility of establishing an SEZ. While Brown says he does not consider Morocco to be Western, Praxis is willing to work with countries that are willing to give it land. Like Ion, Brown promises an influx of companies and tech talent that “can radically benefit” those places, boosting property values and creating jobs for local residents. It is unclear if those Moroccan residents would be considered “citizens” in a Praxian SEZ. In the meantime, through an initiative called Praxis Development, the group plans to buy up residential properties where its members can live as a stepping stone toward “real territory, real assets, and real power.”
“This is a colonial project, aimed at tech empire,” says Gil Duran, a former political consultant and author of the independent newsletter The Nerd Reich. “It sounds like colonization 2.0. When you go to another person’s country and create your own country there, no matter your excuse, no matter your rationale.”
Or, as the Praxis X account posted on September 1, “Cyberpunk East India Company.”
The most evolved version of the SEZ strategy is Próspera, a charter community, backed by Pronomos Capital, on the island of Roatán in Honduras. It has an arbitration system, low taxes, and a code of rules. (Vitalia, Ion’s original project, considered setting up a permanent location within Próspera.)
Próspera’s leaders say they do not consider it a network state, that their goal is “city-scale development that advances human progress and prosperity—within Honduran sovereignty and law.” The Honduran government, then led by Juan Orlando Hernández Alvarado, granted the city its charter in 2017. But Hernández was arrested in 2022 for drug trafficking (he has since been convicted), and the new government repealed Próspera’s SEZ status, alleging that these types of zones violated the country’s sovereignty. Próspera then filed an $11 billion lawsuit against the Honduran government, alleging that the government had failed to “honor its guarantees of legal stability.” The case is ongoing.
Ion, for his part, says that he “would approach different things differently” in Viva City.
Back at Viva Frontier Tower, after the morning rave and a full day of sessions on health and longevity, Ion, now dressed in a T-shirt and jeans, leads a few dozen attendees on a tour of his pop-up fiefdom. While the AI-generated images on the group’s website portray a semitropical seaside paradise that looks like a cross between Monaco and Atlantis, in real life, the WeWork turned “vertical village” turned temporary network state is in various states of repair.
The recent exploitation of CVE-2026-21509 by Russia’s APT28 group, just days after Microsoft disclosed and patched it, isn’t merely another security incident to file away. It’s a flashing red warning indicator that the aggregation risk and our dependence on a default software platform is creating systemic risk in a world where spreadsheets and spyware are equally viable warfare tools.
APT28, also known as Fancy Bear, BlueDelta and Forest Blizzard, isn’t some shadowy newcomer. This unit of Russia’s GRU military intelligence has been wreaking havoc since at least 2007. They may have interfered in the 2016 US presidential election, compromised the World Anti-Doping Agency, targeted Nato, and they are credited with conducting countless operations against Ukrainian infrastructure. They’re sophisticated, relentless, and have a particular fondness for Microsoft’s ecosystem.
In recent years, they’ve exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange, Outlook, and now Office itself. Their tradecraft isn’t opportunistic – it’s industrial-scale cyber warfare executed with military precision.
Severe Office vulnerability
Only recently we witnessed their latest attack. The timeline gives rise for concern as Microsoft issued an out-of-band patch for a high-severity Office vulnerability on 26 January.
Three days later, malicious documents exploiting that exact flaw started circulating in Ukraine. Phishing lure files appear to have been crafted within 24 hours of Microsoft disclosing the software flaw, a single day after the patch dropped.
Think about that timeline – this is an adversary that was either tipped off, had advance access, or was already weaponising the vulnerability before the patch even existed.
This is an adversary that was either tipped off, had advance access, or was already weaponising the vulnerability before the patch even existed Bill McCluggage
CVE-2026-21509 is a security feature bypass – the kind of flaw that tricks users into opening crafted Office files that deliver MiniDoor malware, designed to harvest and exfiltrate victims’ emails, along with PixyNetLoader malware, designed to implant malicious software on compromised systems.
The problem is structural. IT professionals know that deploying patches isn’t instantaneous. They take time, albeit in some cases automated updates can be relatively quick. But in a conflict zone wrestling with bandwidth constraints, outdated systems, and limited access to enterprise-grade licensing, that vulnerability window becomes a chasm.
If Ukrainian organisations are running older Office builds because they lack resources for restrictive, subscription-based licensing, or can’t afford IT automation for patching, they’re sitting ducks. This is a strategic liability, and other nations need to understand the systemic risk they too face.
Microsoft’s patching cadence deserves further scrutiny, and this incident highlights that recognition delays matter, even outside of active conflict zones. When vulnerabilities are actively exploited before patches arrive or are installed, we’re no longer managing risk, we’re into documenting damage and incident recovery.
Delays in Microsoft patch deployment shouldn’t be inevitable – when your patch management depends on manual schedules, restricted bandwidth, or enterprise support you can’t access, that delay becomes a shooting gallery for groups like APT28.
Recent Azure outages, whether from cyber attacks or botched updates, have demonstrated how a single point of failure implanted in Redmond can cascade globally. When national governments, critical infrastructure, and essential services run on cloud platforms controlled by one company, we’re not just talking about vendor lock-in. We’re talking about digital colonialism disguised as convenience that introduces systemic risk.
Market concentration compounds this risk. When a single platform is effectively the default across governments and corporations globally, vulnerabilities don’t fail in isolation – they fester and spread.
Licensing models and interoperability barriers that discourage diversification entrench this monoculture. The result is aggregation risk on a geopolitical scale – its bugs are potential weapons in grey-zone conflicts where every user is a potential target, and every attachment could be a trap.
This isn’t just a cyber security challenge – it’s a market structure problem. Structural risks require structural remedies. Bodies like the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition have a clear role here, by ensuring that concentration in productivity and cloud services does not translate into national and global security vulnerabilities.
The ability to diversify and introduce real competition in secure cloud and productivity ecosystems is becoming a matter of digital sovereignty and defence resilience.
The way forward
So what’s the path forward? Microsoft must rethink vulnerability disclosure and patching for high-impact products introducing faster mitigation pathways and protective heuristics that can be deployed before formal patches are released.
Enterprises and governments need to invest in automated patch management and redundancy planning.
And regulators need to recognise that monoculture is inseparable from security risk.
The next frontier of cyber security policy isn’t just about defending networks – it’s about making markets safer by design.
Bill McCluggage was director of IT strategy and policy in the Cabinet Office and deputy government CIO from 2009 to 2012.
Employees at Salesforce are circulating an internal letter to chief executive Marc Benioff calling on him to denounce recent actions by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, prohibit the use of Salesforce software by immigration agents, and back federal legislation that would significantly reform the agency.
The letter specifically cites the “recent killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis” as catalysts, calling them the “devastating indictment of a system that has discarded human decency.” It’s unclear how many signatories the letter has received so far.
The letter, which has not been reported on previously, is being organized amid Salesforce’s annual leadership kickoff event this week in Las Vegas. During an appearance at the event earlier today, Benioff asked international employees to stand to thank them for attending. He then joked that ICE agents were in the building monitoring them, according to current and former Salesforce employees who spoke to WIRED.
Benioff’s remarks sparked immediate backlash among employees. “Lots of people are furious,” says one source, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. Another source tells WIRED that the internal pushback today was significantly more forceful than after Benioff made other controversial comments last fall supporting President Trump’s call to deploy the National Guard to San Francisco to address crime.
Salesforce did not immediately respond to a request for comment from WIRED. Business Insider and 404 Media previously reported on Benioff’s remarks and the reaction to them inside Salesforce.
“We are deeply troubled by leaked documentation revealing that Salesforce has pitched AI technology to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to help the agency ‘expeditiously’ hire 10,000 new agents and vet tip-line reports,” the letter reads. “Providing ‘Agentforce’ infrastructure to scale a mass deportation agenda that currently detains 66,000 people—73 percent of whom have no criminal record—represents a fundamental betrayal of our commitment to the ethical use of technology.”
The letter argues that Benioff’s voice “carries unique weight in Washington,” pointing to an episode last fall when Trump called off an ICE deployment in San Francisco after what appeared to be outreach from Bay Area tech leaders, including Benioff and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. It urges Benioff to use that influence as a “corporate statesman” to issue a public statement condemning what it calls ICE’s unconstitutional conduct and to commit Salesforce to clear “red lines” barring the use of its cloud and AI products for state violence.
Benioff has weighed in on both national and local political issues for years. He supported Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016 and later became one of the most high-profile backers of Proposition C, a failed San Francisco ballot measure that would have raised taxes to fund programs to address homelessness. In 2020, he donated to the primary campaigns of some Democratic presidential candidates, including Kamala Harris.
But since Trump returned to the White House in January, Benioff has signaled greater support for some Republican leaders. In one interview, he said he strives to stay nonpartisan because he also owns Time magazine. But he also joked that, while he declined to contribute to Trump’s inauguration fund directly, he had “donated” a photo of the president on the magazine’s cover, which named him its 2024 Person of the Year. “He can use the Time magazine cover for free,” Benioff said in the interview with Fortune.
Benioff also faced backlash from Salesforce employees last fall when he suggested the National Guard should be sent to San Francisco to tackle crime ahead of the company’s annual conference in the city. He later apologized for the remarks, explaining they stemmed from genuine concerns about safety. He later reversed his stance and joined Nvidia’s Huang in asking Trump to refrain from sending troops.
3D bioprinting, in which living tissues are printed with cells mixed into soft hydrogels, or “bio-inks,” is widely used in the field of bioengineering for modeling or replacing the tissues in our bodies. The print quality and reproducibility of tissues, however, can face challenges. One of the most significant challenges is created simply by gravity — cells naturally sink to the bottom of the bioink-extruding printer syringe because the cells are heavier than the hydrogel around them.
“This cell settling, which becomes worse during the long print sessions required to print large tissues, leads to clogged nozzles, uneven cell distribution, and inconsistencies between printed tissues,” explains Ritu Raman, the Eugene Bell Career Development Professor of Tissue Engineering and assistant professor of mechanical engineering at MIT. “Existing solutions, such as manually stirring bioinks before loading them into the printer, or using passive mixers, cannot maintain uniformity once printing begins.”
In a study published Feb. 2 in the journal Device, Raman’s team introduces a new approach that aims to solve this core limitation by actively preventing cell sedimentation within bioinks during printing, allowing for more reliable and biologically consistent 3D printed tissues.
“Precise control over the bioink’s physical and biological properties is essential for recreating the structure and function of native tissues,” says Ferdows Afghah, a postdoc in mechanical engineering at MIT and lead author of the study.
“If we can print tissues that more closely mimic those in our bodies, we can use them as models to understand more about human diseases, or to test the safety and efficacy of new therapeutic drugs,” adds Raman. Such models could help researchers move away from techniques like animal testing, which supports recent interest from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in developing faster, less expensive, and more informative new approaches to establish the safety and efficacy of new treatment paths.
“Eventually, we are working towards regenerative medicine applications such as replacing diseased or injured tissues in our bodies with 3D printed tissues that can help restore healthy function,” says Raman.
MagMix, a magnetically actuated mixer, is composed of two parts: a small magnetic propeller that fits inside the syringes used by bioprinters to deposit bioinks, layer by layer, into 3D tissues, and a permanent magnet attached to a motor that moves up and down near the syringe, controlling the movement of the propeller inside. Together, this compact system can be mounted onto any standard 3D bioprinter, keeping bioinks uniformly mixed during printing without changing the bioink formulation or interfering with the printer’s normal operation. To test the approach, the team used computer simulations to design the optimal mixing propeller geometry and speed and then validated its performance experimentally.
“Across multiple bioink types, MagMix prevented cell settling for more than 45 minutes of continuous printing, reducing clogging and preserving high cell viability,” says Raman. “Importantly, we showed that mixing speeds could be adjusted to balance effective homogenization for different bioinks while inducing minimal stress on the cells. As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrated that MagMix could be used to 3D print cells that could mature into muscle tissues over the course of several days.”
By maintaining uniform cell distribution throughout long or complex print jobs, MagMix enables the fabrication of high-quality tissues with more consistent biological function. Because the device is compact, low-cost, customizable, and easily integrated into existing 3D printers, it offers a broadly accessible solution for laboratories and industries working toward reproducible engineered tissues for applications in human health including disease modeling, drug screening, and regenerative medicine.
This work was supported, in part, by the Safety, Health, and Environmental Discovery Lab (SHED) at MIT, which provides infrastructure and interdisciplinary expertise to help translate biofabrication innovations from lab-scale demonstrations to scalable, reproducible applications.
“At the SHED, we focus on accelerating the translation of innovative methods into practical tools that researchers can reliably adopt,” says Tolga Durak, the SHED’s founding director. “MagMix is a strong example of how the right combination of technical infrastructure and interdisciplinary support can move biofabrication technologies toward scalable, real-world impact.”
The SHED’s involvement reflects a broader vision of strengthening technology pathways that enhance reproducibility and accessibility across engineering and the life sciences by providing equitable access to advanced equipment and fostering cross-disciplinary collaboration.
“As the field advances toward larger-scale and more standardized systems, integrated labs like SHED are essential for building sustainable capacity,” Durak adds. “Our goal is not only to enable discovery, but to ensure that new technologies can be reliably adopted and sustained over time.”
The team is also interested in non-medical applications of engineered tissues, such as using printed muscles to power safer and more efficient “biohybrid” robots.
Entertainment5 days ago
Tech1 week ago
Entertainment1 week ago
Fashion1 week ago
Tech1 week ago